[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 157 KB, 653x760, dwadawdawdawdawdq23er1234123412341234312.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6296510 No.6296510[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

ok then

>> No.6296518

>>6296510
lol liberal moonbats

>> No.6296522

>>6296510
next they'll tell me wheat is bad for me..

wait.
is it?
what?

>> No.6296561

>>6296510
>By Kiera Butler

Written by a woman. Instantly disregarded.

>> No.6296576

>>6296510
Yea I'm going to need sauce on this because there is no way this isn't from the onion.

>> No.6296580

>>6296561
She writes like a mental patient too

>> No.6296583

>racist

What?

>> No.6296612

>>6296510
The whole article seems like bullshit and logic-leaps, but I'm open to the idea that there may be more metabolically efficient meal plans then the traditional "Three Square Meals"

>> No.6296637

>Not eating breakfast, dinner, tea

>> No.6296648

>>6296510
>eating three meals a day is racist
no, it's racist to assume that anyone who can't afford or doesn't eat three meals a day is a minority

>> No.6296658

>>6296510
I don't know anything else about that article or it's author, but I generally agree that you don't NEED to eat three meals a day. If you're not actually hungry you don't need to eat.

Now, obviously, there are exceptions. If someone isn't normally hungry for breakfast when they get up, but know they're going to be hungry before they have a chance to eat lunch, eating something is fine; but if you just don't get hungry till about "lunch time" there is nothing wrong with skipping breakfast.

>> No.6296663

>>6296583
If it takes explaining, you will never get it shitlord.

>> No.6296666

According to an essay by Mother Jones Senior Editor Kiera Butler, eating three meals a day is “anti-science, racist, and might actually be making you sick.”

Butler’s astounding proclamation that three square meals is “racist” is supported by her interview with Historian Abigail Carroll, who wrote the book Three Squares: The Invention of the American Meal:

When European settlers got to America, they also imported their meal habits: a light meal—maybe cold mush and radishes—in the morning, a heavier, cooked one midday, and a third meal similar to the first one later in the day.

They observed that the eating schedule of the native tribes was less rigid—the volume and timing of their eating varied with the seasons. Sometimes, when food was scarce, they fasted.

The Europeans took this as “evidence that natives were uncivilized,” Carroll explained to me in an email. “Civilized people ate properly and boundaried their eating, thus differentiating themselves from the animal kingdom, where grazing is the norm.”
Butler goes on to urge her readers to abandon the racist, European invention by forgoing the three meals-a-day tradition.

As Katherine Timpf at National Review sums it up:

So, basically — if you organize your eating around breakfast, lunch and dinner, you are perpetuating the racist belief that Native Americans are savage animals.

Shame on you!

>> No.6296668

>>6296510
>eat when you're not hungry
>it's bad for you
oh okay

>> No.6296675
File: 70 KB, 620x827, v2-pg-36-mein-kampf-ap[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6296675

>>6296666
>Katherine Timpf

>Kate Timpf

she's good

>> No.6296684

>Why Retarded Clickbait Articles Are Fucking Worthless and People Who Post them Are Faggots
>by OP and his retarded friend

>> No.6296695

>>6296666
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/264659-mother-jones-three-meals-day-racist-european-construct/

It even has a clickbait photo of minorities eating pancakes

>> No.6296827

>>6296510

>Racist

What the fuck?

>> No.6296871
File: 28 KB, 261x223, 1416922072435.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6296871

This reminds me of that one article (It might've been on Kotaku) about how growing facial hair is racist and oppressive, and they closed the comments because everyone was calling him out on how fucking retarded it was.

Thank god all the social justice crazies only exist on the internet and in Europe

>> No.6296905

>>6296510

>racist

every time

>> No.6297002

>>6296871
>only exist on the internet and in Europe
Lol sure. And in droves at every university and college.

>> No.6297132

>>6296666
This is the stupidest shit I have ever seen or heard of.

I feel dumber for having read it, and I want the thirty seconds it took to read, re-read, and horrifyingly comprehend it back.

>> No.6297142

>>6296871
>This reminds me of that one article (It might've been on Kotaku) about how growing facial hair is racist and oppressive

Hey, I read Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon too

>> No.6297148

> They observed that the eating schedule of the native tribes was less rigid—the volume and timing of their eating varied with the seasons. Sometimes, when food was scarce, they fasted. The Europeans took this as "evidence that natives were uncivilized," Carroll explained to me in an email. "Civilized people ate properly and boundaried their eating, thus differentiating themselves from the animal kingdom, where grazing is the norm.

Is this bitch seriously saying that starvation based on food scarcity is superior to regular meals just because brown people did it?

>> No.6297150

>>6297132
Welcome to liberalism

>> No.6297156

>>6296510
Is that from the Onion?

>> No.6297158

>>6296666
>Mother Jones

Stopped reading

>> No.6297159

>>6296666
What if I am native american and eat three meals a day? Am I racist against myself?

>> No.6297163
File: 534 KB, 598x512, 1425073963078.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6297163

>racist

Just how?

>> No.6297166

>>6297159
You're a traitor to your race. You are an Uncle Tonto.

>> No.6297170

>a bunch of morons with no medical expertise tell other morons that eating 3 meals a day, one morning, one mid day, one at night, is correct
>a bunch of moron drones follow suit
>centuries later with technology and medicine at an all time high
>suddenly might be possible that there's a better way
>NO LET'S DISREGARD IT BECAUSE THIS IS HOW THE 1800S DID IT

Morons. I'm not even saying this article is right, or that the author isn't a moron. But all of the people just jumping at the idea to dismiss it just because >muh habits, are dumb as shit.

>> No.6297184

>>6297170
no, the better way isn't to pray for a berry bush like native tribes