/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.4810617]

Daily reminder the term "healthy" is subjective, stop being stupid, /ck/.

[Anonymous No.4810638]

I'm guessing your fat then

"Healthy" is a pretty objective term

[Anonymous No.4810643]

>>4810638
>your
>Ad hominem

I bet you think calories, carbs and fat are bad.

[Anonymous No.4810646]

>>4810643

Quite the opposite. But what I do think, is that you're obese

[Anonymous No.4810647]

fuck off retard

[Anonymous No.4810648]

>>4810638
>"Healthy" is a pretty objective term

...it really isn't. Some things like bleach are objectively unhealthy but nobody's talking about that.

[Anonymous No.4810658]

>>4810646
Not even close.

>>4810647
Quality post.

[Anonymous No.4810664]

How could healthiness be subjective?

[Anonymous No.4810667]

>>4810664
Not everybody has the same dietary restrictions. Fatties have corrupted the word into meaning "low fat/calorie/whatever"

[Anonymous No.4810671]

>>4810667
>Fatties have corrupted the word into meaning "low fat/calorie/whatever"

If you like; meanwhile people who aren't cretins realise that healthy means to be in a good state of health. No single food is healthy in the same way that no single food is particularly unhealthy. The key is balance in one's diet and moderation.

[Anonymous No.4810687]

Daily reminder that /a/ commonly gets bored of their own board and likes to shit post in other boards because they're lonely and think they are better than you.

[Anonymous No.4810691]

>>4810667

So why does that make healthiness subjective? Because there's varying degrees of health?

[Anonymous No.4810694]

>>4810671
>No single food is healthy in the same way that no single food is particularly unhealthy. The key is balance in one's diet and moderation.

OP here... That's pretty much what I was saying.

>>4810687
>I DON'T LIKE THREAD MUST BE /a/ SHITPOSTING

(fuck /a/)

[Anonymous No.4810706]

>>4810667

You're a fucking retard. You just proved it IS objective, because you're claiming that there is food that's healthy and that fat people are wrong in saying that those foods are unhealthy or that unhealthy foods are healthy. Other people being wrong about something doesn't make it subjective, it means they're incorrect about something objective

[Anonymous No.4810711]

>>4810617
What is your weight?

What is your height?

We'll decide if you're healthy or not.

[Anonymous No.4810724]

>>4810694
Then... What's the point in this thread?

Ohhhhhhhhhh shitposting. Cool. I'm drunk, what's your excuse?

[Anonymous No.4810751]

>>4810706
..."healthy" refers to the specific person.

>>4810711
This is irrelevant, I could easily lie.

[Anonymous No.4810793]

>>4810751
>This is irrelevant, I could easily lie.
>implying height/weight isn't an objective and accurate method of determining obesity
>avoiding the question

fatty detected

[Anonymous No.4810821]

>>4810694
>posts stupid cartoon picture
>claims they aren't from /a/

[Anonymous No.4810901]

>>4810793
>using BMI to test if someone is "healty"
>>>/fit/ would like a word with you

[Anonymous No.4810915]

subjective!=relative

a "healthy"/"unhealthy" dichotomy is fucking stupid, but it's just as dumb to think that eating bacon cheeseburgers and twinkies every day without any excercise isn't going to slowly and painfully kill you.

[Anonymous No.4810951]

>>4810751
>"healthy" refers to the specific person.

...And? I want to know specifically what you are trying to say here. Not all cars work exactly the same, but there is a big difference between a car working or not.

One persons healthy is anothers unhealthy, I will give you that. But if someone is unhealthy, that doesn't mean they are healthy just because they still fall into someones elses standard of healthy. If someone is unhealthy, they will have symptoms. Note that not all symptoms are obvious or life threatening.

[Anonymous No.4810989]

Should have been a daily reminder that no adjective can ever be objective because for such word to hold meaning it would have to be compared to other.
Fucking retard

[Anonymous No.4811035]

>>4810989
>no adjective can ever be objective

"Raped" is a pretty objective adjective.

[Anonymous No.4811041]

>>4811035

on /ck/ it means "a retarded man looked at me at the supermarket once"

[Anonymous No.4811053]

>>4810617
I would also like to add:

no one knows another persons activity level/energy needs, therefore "OMG YOU JUST ATE A MEAL FOR 3 PEOPLE" and "YOU MUST BE 300 LBS. TO EAT THAAAAT MUUUUUCH" commenters need not show their faces.

[Anonymous No.4811063]

>>4811035
No because it holds no meaning alone, it depends on the word "rape". For something to be objective it has to hold meaning by itself, and only nouns and verbs can do that (some even say only nouns can do that)

[Anonymous No.4811069]

>fat acceptance

[Anonymous No.4811072]

>>4810617
No, it isn't. That is why there are doctors who give physicals.

[Anonymous No.4811075]

>>4811053
fatty spotted

>wasting my 60 seconds on this troll thread

[Anonymous No.4811076]

>>4811035
>>4811063
>objective
>meaning alone

Pick one. In fact, pick none. Meaning as you two are arguing over isn't what people usually make of it, but fun chasing your analytic-synthetic distinction endlessly in circles if it gives you pleasure.

[Anonymous No.4811084]

>>4811076
>analytic-synthetic distinction

What the flying fuck?

I want you to define this string of words right now.

[Anonymous No.4811087]

>>4811075
It actually is really annoying when people derail a thread to criticize someone's portions/act intensely shocked and horrified at them.

[Anonymous No.4811094]

This is now a fat people thread.

[Anonymous No.4811097]

>>4811084
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analytic-synthetic/

[Anonymous No.4811110]

>>4811097

Laymans terms please, not something you pulled off google. How does it apply to the current conversation, why bother labeling the conversation as such.

An intellectual such as yourself should be able to give me the run down.