[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 18 KB, 335x281, 8576467634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776142 No.3776142[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>mfw the nearest chik-fil-a is so packed they are directing traffic today

>> No.3776149

Yep, alienate the gays so you can pack your restaurant with hate-filled bigots.

Yum, yum, fried oppression sammich. How about a hateshake to wash it down?

>> No.3776154

>>3776149

>Yum, yum, fried oppression sammich. How about a hateshake to wash it down?

Dumbest shit I read all day. Congrats on making me reply.

>> No.3776156

>>3776149
>Owner says he's for traditional Christian Values, including marriage
>OMG I'M GAY, HELLO, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO ME, I HATE YOUR STORE BECAUSE I LOVE THE COCK, YOUR OPINION IS DUMB, HATE CHICKEN

>> No.3776158

Wait, what's happening at Chik-fil-a?

>> No.3776164

>>3776158
THIS man. The only time Ive read or heard about this shit is on this crappy ass site

from what i gathered its gays vs the church and chic fil a is a christian based owned company. gays are boycotting it and anti gays are supporting

>> No.3776165

>>3776149
>annoying PDA's to try to win over conservatives

yeah, whatever. I don't even care about what gays do, but I think they're hurting their cause more than helping it here. oh the hilarity .

>> No.3776166

>>3776156
>People are boycotting CFA because the owners is basically donating to and supporting an anti-civil rights movements
>Dumbass think it's all about some old coot's opinion and I WANNA BE GAY IN PUBLIC SPECIAL TREATMENT HURR

Shut up.

>> No.3776169

>>3776158
Customer appreciation day. So all the free speech/anti-gay marriage proponents are flooding the place. A few here in North Carolina have 2-3 hour waits for lunch.

>> No.3776172

>>3776158

They are officially kicking off heterosexual dining, by agreeing to only serve female chickens so their male customers, so they don't have to put cocks in their mouth.

>> No.3776173

ITT: buttmad liberals upset because the majority of Americans disregard your deviant lack of morality.

>> No.3776177
File: 171 KB, 428x510, maybethedingoateyourbaby.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776177

>>3776172

>> No.3776181

>>3776173
0/10

>> No.3776185

guys im from germany and see threads about chik fil a quite often, what is so special about it?

>> No.3776186

>>3776166
Yeah, CFA money supports anti-gay marriage groups, so sure, stop supporting them.

Yeah, Apple money supports child slavery in China, but nah, we gotta get that new iPhone, baby.

>> No.3776190

>>3776181
Nobody wants fucking queer marriage because it's a way of legitimizing a degenerate, disgusting lifestyle.

>> No.3776195

>>3776185
Owner of CFA stated his views against gay marriage. Shitstorm enues

>> No.3776198

>>3776190

except....maybe....the fags, right.

>> No.3776200

Say what you will about gay marriage, but I do admire Chick-Fil-A's courage to voice their opinions.

In this day and age, their views are controversial, but as a company, I admire that they have the balls to go through with it, and not backpedaling like most other companies do when they say the slightest thing.

If Montel Williams can tolerate a white supremacist, a couple of faggots shouldn't have any trouble leaving Chick-Fil-A alone.

>> No.3776201

>>3776198
America is a Christian nation.
Deal with it.

>> No.3776202

>>3776186
First of all, I don't have any apple products.

Second, I'm sure you know that for a fact and aren't pulling it out of your (probably cum-filled) arse.

>> No.3776204

http://nashua.patch.com/articles/nashua-chick-fil-a-to-sponsor-nh-pride-fest

>> No.3776205

>support anti gay ideals by consuming. consuming shit tier food.
I hate my country more and more every passing day. I also dislike gays.

>> No.3776207

>>3776190
I can get married to a random whore while dressed as Elvis Presley, and somehow that marriage is more valid than two dudes who really love each other.

>> No.3776209

>>3776205
CFA is awesome, you pinko commie faggot

>> No.3776213

>>3776204
>"So we went up to him ready to talk, to stand our ground. Shockingly enough, he was the owner, Anthony Piccola. He sat down with us – and also with his gay marketing director – and he ordered us all lunch. Then he said, 'Are are you looking for sponsors for this thing?'" Manseau said.

>gay marketing director
This is a real job title?

>> No.3776214

>>3776209
Im not saying I think the food is bad, its just bad for you.

>> No.3776222

>>3776213
A marketing director who is also gay.

>> No.3776223

>>3776207
But you can have a random child with that random whore and that makes it a whole different, er, ballgame.

>> No.3776232

>>3776213

yep, pretty much...also sounds like you'd be perfect for the job...well at least the first part.

>> No.3776233

>>3776214
so... you never eat at any chain restaurants then?

>> No.3776234

>>3776223
Okay, so straight marriage is valid because of child-rearing potential.

I guess sterile and disabled people should be banned from marriage too.

>> No.3776237

>>3776232
>sounds like you'd be perfect for the job...well at least the first part.
It's like I'm in the sixth grade all over again!

>> No.3776239
File: 263 KB, 598x644, montae.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776239

With Oreos supporting gay rights and Chick-fil-a supporting traditional marriage, what would be the best marketing strategy for a business? Market your store as supporting gay rights (at the risk of alienating homophobes and traditionalists, but gaining the support of the very vocal liberals and homosexuals) or coming out as supporting the 'traditional family?'

Let's face it, the CEOs of these places probably don't give a shit either way, but there's probably more money to be made from hopping onto the rainbow bandwagon, surely?

>> No.3776242

>>3776234

excellent idea, now we're really getting some where on the issues.

>> No.3776244

>>3776239
I'm gonna eat a chicken sandwich stuffed with Oreos.

NO ONE WILL KNOW WHOSE SIDE I'M ON.

>> No.3776250

Who knows, maybe a ton of people in high places in many companies are anti-gay or anti whatever. I don't care as long as they keep it out of whatever they do. But when the owner of a company has a need to express that opinion to all of his customers for no reason other than to make the business centered around his opinions then I have a problem because it would attract those people. Now I don't go around with a sign above my head telling everyone what I am and what I'm not but I would still feel uncomfortable even going to the hate filled place now. Good thing there is none around me.

>> No.3776253

>>3776202
That Asian child slave shit was all over the news cycle last year and part of this year.

You even watch the news?

>> No.3776255

>>3776233
I do occationally. Maybe a few times every three months or so. I make it a point to eat at local places when I eat out. The sanitation might not be perfect, but this has never been a problem for me as I dont really keep my own place spotless. The cooking methods at these local places are closer to what I would do in my own house and they dont use ingredients that are more chemical than natural.

>> No.3776265

>>3776250
Pretty much this. I couldn't give two shits about the issue, frankly. But I doubt I'll be eating at CFA anymore (I only did rarely anyway, because the closest one is a good 6 miles from my house, why bother unless I happen to be over there), for the same reason: I don't want my mealtimes marred by hate. Gee, let's make what precious little down time we have even worse by making your MEALS about politics and hate speech. Fuck that shit, and fuck everyone who plays into it.

>> No.3776281
File: 61 KB, 189x200, 1342641859961.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776281

Why is this even a topic to talk about?

>> No.3776332

It doesn't fucking involve hating gays. The President simply said he supports the traditional family unit as set forth in the Bible.
If you're gay, you're gay. Big fucking deal, don't expect everyone to support it. He never said he hates all gays and they should be thrown in jail.
It's slightly ironic how all of these faggots are so butt hurt.

>> No.3776334
File: 6 KB, 160x120, 91-10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776334

>mfw no trans fats at chik-fil-a

hell yeah, so hard to find trans fats free chicken

>> No.3776338
File: 45 KB, 193x167, 1294885247247.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776338

>mfw i waited fucking 2 hours in line at cfa to get 3 chicken sandwiches with cheese
I dont even care about all this gay shit, keep your politics out of my chicken

>> No.3776344

>>3776239
Most of the people who support Chik-fil-a will be dead soon, most of the others wont

>> No.3776346

I can't stand seeing people going to Chik-fil-a just as a political statement, like Sarah Palin just did. She's pretty much posting that picture to taunt people

>> No.3776348

>>3776346
So people should let a vocal minority of deviants dictate how the country be run without saying anything at all?

>> No.3776349

>>3776186
so are these groups specifically groups about being anti-gay, or groups that are christian and happen to be against gay marriage? kind of different things...and I don't care enough to look it up.

>> No.3776351

>>3776348
If you're going to be a dick about it, then yes

>> No.3776354

>>3776334
I'm so sorry you feel this way...

>> No.3776355

>>3776349
They're Christian organizations which align themselves with Christian Morals. AKA they don't support gay marriage, automatically making them anti-gay hate mongers in the eyes of every faggy liberal butthurt fuck face.

>> No.3776356

I saw someone on Twitter point out that Chik-fil-a's biggest partner is Coke, who are one of the top pro-gay rights organizations.

So in the end going there is just kinda supporting both sides

>> No.3776360

>>3776349
Some of them are also the type of organizations which run camps where they attempt to "cure" people of homosexuality

>> No.3776364

>>3776356
Yeah but the portion of the price that goes toward the cost to produce the drink is only like ten cents, like 98% of the price is profit to CFA.

>> No.3776366

This is how my favorite fast food chain is going to die? Really?

>> No.3776369

>>3776366
Oh no it will have a newfound popularity. It will just become more popular with the kind of people you wouldn't want it to be popular with

>> No.3776370

>>3776338
Why the FUCK would anyone wait that long at any fast food place, for anything?? There is no fast food on earth that's worth a two hour wait.

>> No.3776372

>>3776364

>98% of a food item counting as profit

wat

>> No.3776387

>>3776372
You realize that drinks at fast food places are sold at something like 300-500% their worth

>> No.3776391
File: 110 KB, 960x960, 111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776391

I'll just leave this here....

>> No.3776400

>>3776387

>selling price is only triple to quintuple the cost
>not counting machinery, overhead, and operating expenses, just pure cost of syrup
>somehow winds up with 98% profit margin

I think you should be more angry at your maths teacher than Chick-Fil-A.

>> No.3776408
File: 44 KB, 351x440, fucking 5star post.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776408

>>3776172

>> No.3776411

>>3776149
i make sure to go once a week to support anti gay movement and i advise the rest of america to follow

>> No.3776413

>>3776400
The machinery is generic, and the overhead and operating expenses will be associated with CFA, not Coke.

Yeah, I fucked up counting 98% of it as profit, but that doesn't mean that the portion of the price that represents the money transferred to Coke isn't still miniscule in comparison to the portion that goes to cover CFA's costs and profit.

>> No.3776417

>mfw it's financially beneficial to trivialize political issues by slapping support for or against them on commercial products
I can't wait to see "pro life" ho-hos, or maybe some "keep guns in the battlefield" pizza rolls.

>> No.3776427

>>3776413

>being associated with Chick-Fil-A means that expenses magically turn into revenues

I know that all Amerifats aren't this stupid. They can't be.

>> No.3776436

>>3776411
Why even do this? If you care enough just donate directly to the anti-gay groups. It's not like a huge percentage you spend will support the groups

>> No.3776446

>>3776417
This.
Goddamn, people are so stupid.

>> No.3776447

one of my friends on facebook is boycotting CFA. he's one of those internet activists that think they've done something by posting about it on facebook. I'm pretty sure there isn't a CFA withing 50 miles of our town.

So tell me, everyone. What does something the president of the company said, have to do with local CFA's? Does it mean CFA only hires people against gays? hurr durr, I'm not going to eat in one of those hate filled places. Unless you roll in there dressed as a rainbow giving 3 guys handies while rollerskating, no one is going to know you're gay. This shit is fucking retarded. Double standards. Double standards everywhere.

>> No.3776455

>>3776447
I think it's stupid to make a huge issue out of it. I don't like the fact that they support those kinds of groups, and I choose not to eat there. But I don't care if other people do. It's just a personal preference.

>> No.3776461

Fuck, I don't care about any of the bullshit either way. But, there's no better time to eat one of those delicious chicken sammichs when everyone is telling you not to. Just imagine the taste of their hot, crispy chicken melting inside of your mouth with each and every amazing bite.

feels so wrong but it's so good, and I want one more than anything.

>> No.3776470

>>3776427
>missing the fucking point
Sorry I have to simplify this shit for eurodumbs.

The poster at >>3776356 said that shopping at CFA will also support Coke, since CFA sells Coke. Coke syrup is dirt-fucking-cheap and represents a tiny portion of the retail cost. Therefore, any "support" that goes to Coke by shopping at CFA is far smaller than the "support" that goes to CFA.

>> No.3776490

>>3776470

>thinking I'm a eurofag

Please. I understood your so-called point just fine. My issue is with your blatant disregard for logic, facts, and common sense.

>keep being mad as all fuck over nothing, you dumb bint

>> No.3776498

>>3776455

you should probably stop buying things altogether then, seeing how the profit goes to things such as unfair/child labor.

In fact, stop eating, too. All those poor cows, chickens, fish, pigs, etc.

if CFA's president never said anything about this, you'd go on blindly with the program, eating their chicken, drinking their drinks. You only care about something once it's been brought out into the light to make it seem like you're a better, more tolerant and caring person than people like me who think, "Who gives a fuck what they use my money for? I'm hungry, and don't give a fuck what people choose to do in their private lives."

I'm so sick of people thinking they're making a difference by essentially doing nothing. Your inaction is a pathetic attempt to appear involved and up to date on current affairs.

"You are neither hot, not cold. So, because you are lukewarm, I will spew you from my mouth."

>> No.3776509

>>3776490
Until you actually tell me what logic, facts, and common sense I'm apparently disregarding, or address a single one of my assertions with facts to the contrary, I have no choice to conclude that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Please shut up and let the adults talk.

>> No.3776525
File: 139 KB, 784x587, chickfila-ashland-kentucky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776525

Dropped by to post this pic. It's Chick-Fil-A, today.
>don't drink the faggots' tears, you might get AIDS

>> No.3776532

>>3776525
>kentucky
What do you know, the shittiest states have shitty opinions.

>> No.3776533

>>3776525
Why is everyone going today?

>> No.3776534
File: 88 KB, 735x720, hitler is amused.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776534

>>3776525

>> No.3776537

>>3776498
So you think that by you "not giving a fuck" and eating there anyway that you're somehow ethically superior? All that proves is that you are selfish. I believe you, sir, would be the lukewarm spit.

>> No.3776541

>>3776455

in fact, stop making money too. all that money goes to taxes, which line the pockets of corrupt officials. but that's okay, because they're not against gay marriage. but wait a minute, maybe they are! seriously, why do you people care what they use the profits for? why do you think not eating at a CFA is going to do anything? even more importantly, why do you people think that since the president of CFA, whose opinion has nothing to do with the opinions of the local owners and managers and employees of CFA's, is against gay marriage, that they're suddenly going to become havens for intolerant gay bashers with an affinity for fried chicken?

>> No.3776543

>>3776509

>fucks up basic maths
>gets defensive and butthurt when called out

Pretty sure you're in no position to call yourself an adult.

>> No.3776546

>>3776533
It's "Appreciation Day". Basically, after all that backlash toward CFA for the anti-gay comments their CEO made, Mike Huckabee basically said "everyone who supports the CEO's comments, go to CFA on August 1".

All those people flocking to CFA are people who support the anti-gay comments.

>> No.3776553

>>3776543
What "basic maths" did I fuck up?

As far as I know, the only money that Coke gets from CFA is however much Coke charges CFA for the syrup, and that money is the only money that could be reasonably called "support". Of the money you pay for a Coke product, only a couple percent of it is actually necessary to cover the cost of the syrup.

It doesn't fucking matter what happens to the rest of the cost, and it doesn't fucking matter what Coke does with the money they charge, because that's irrelevant to the point.

>> No.3776557

>the us constitution gives americans the right to vote
>black people cant vote
>they protest this as civil rights

>gays cant marry
>claim marriage is a right
>protest as civil rights

>I have a right to drive a car even though Im blind
>every american has the right to get a job, force this company to hire me
>I have the right to live in a house, the government should buy this house for me
etc

>> No.3776559

>>3776537

I don't give a fuck about gays. awesome. if it works for you, do it. but to boycott a restaurant for having a different opinion than yours is the most childish thing an adult can do. what happened to tolerance? or is that just a one way street? we have to be tolerant of gays, blacks, illegal immigrants from mexico trying to forge a new life. but being tolerant of someone against gays, blacks, etc.? OH FUCK NO. NOT IN MY AMERICA.

seriously, keep thinking your inaction is helping. continue thinking you're ethically superior because you choose not to eat at a restaurant.

>> No.3776568

>>3776546

or maybe, and I'm just speculating, they're going to get chicken. maybe they're going to be appreciated, and receive some sort of coupon good for x amount off a meal.

if popeyes, whose profits go towards maintaining chickens in cages just big enough for their bodies, had a CAD, by your logic, anyone that went to popeyes that day supports the unethical treatment of chickens.

PEOPLE JUST WANT FOOD FOR A SLIGHTLY CHEAPER PRICE.

inb4 strawman argument

>> No.3776569

>>3776532
>waaaaaaaaaaaaaah

>> No.3776571

>>3776553

>abloobloobloo babby can't learn from its own mistakes

>> No.3776572

>dont agree that the christian notion of marriage that somehow became part of united states law should be changed to include gays instead of being scrapped alltogether in exchange for civil unions for everyone

>get called a bigoted homophobe

christ, I use to be a liberal you know. Fuck these guys.

>> No.3776573

>>3776546

But is there like... a discount on sandwiches?

>> No.3776577

>>3776571
>>3776553
>>3776543
>>3776509
>>3776490
>>3776470
>>3776427
>>3776413
>>3776400
>>3776387
>>3776372
>>3776364

lmao

>> No.3776578
File: 182 KB, 400x533, wendys-chick-fil-a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776578

Here's something you don't see every day. This was in North Carolina, on several franchise outlets.

Not a shoop.

>> No.3776579

>>3776571
>baww baww baww i cant think of a reason why he's wrong so ill just call him a baby

If you give me evidence that I'm wrong, I'll admit I'm wrong. But you have to make the first step. I'm not going to take it on faith that you're right just because you say so.

Tell me why I'm wrong. Tell me what facts I'm neglecting. Tell me why my reasoning is flawed.

But if you can't, shut the fuck up.

>> No.3776584

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2012/08/01/americans_turn_out_in_droves_to_support_chickfila

Right after this one posted, without looking at the post, a gay threw a tantrum and said nobody eat at Chick-fil-A and 2 of them closed already, and the report is false. I just LOL'D

>> No.3776586

>>3776579

>waahhhh waahhhh do it for me it's too hard waaaahhh

No wonder your country is in the shitter with an attitude like that, son.

>> No.3776588
File: 25 KB, 314x295, 1326842233194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776588

Disregard the homo issue, this company will probably use its money to support more shitty petition driven initiatives (in California specifically).

Do you feel cool and edgy going there today?
Give me a fucking break.

Fuck this Southern Baptist run company. Fucking protestants.

>> No.3776590

>>3776578

It's from the fast food sign generator site. They've done it with McDonald's as well.

No Wendy's or McDonald's franchise owner is as stupid as the CEO of Chick-Fil-A and wants to throw away business to express their political views, no matter what they are.

>> No.3776591
File: 127 KB, 290x320, 1342964767008.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776591

the liberal butthurt in this thread is delicious.

Its almost as if they only talk to other people who share their viewpoints so when they have to defend their ideas they get flustered and start calling everyone homophobes.

>> No.3776594

>>3776591

Nonsensical talking points.

>> No.3776601

>>3776591

Troll. Yes, I know you'll try to claim you aren't.

>> No.3776602

Not to mention at least two liberal Majors tried to banned Chick-Fil-A in their cities. That's why many people who usually don't care with gay married issues also go out and eat there.

>> No.3776603

it's okay for oreo's to support gays, but it's not okay for CFA to be against them. stupid...fucking...people.

I'll dress as a giant penis, and you have to tolerate me, because I'm a special and unique snowflake. But the second I have to tolerate your opinion of me looking like a faggot, all rules are thrown out the window.

more and more I'm beginning to see that the majority of earth's population should be wiped out. did I say majority? fuck it, make it the entirety.

idontwantoliveonthisplanetanymore.jpg

>> No.3776606

>>3776603
>more and more I'm beginning to see that the majority of earth's population should be wiped out. did I say majority? fuck it, make it the entirety.
Edgy teenager alert.

>> No.3776607

>>3776588

do you feel cool and edgy by not going there?

give me all your breaks

>> No.3776611

>>3776578

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/chickfila.asp

Most businesses are steering clear of the issue.

>> No.3776614

>>3776606

I wouldn't mind if all wannabe edgy teenagers were wiped out. Would make 4chan almost tolerable.

>> No.3776618

>>3776606


because it's totally cool and edgy to think that humanity as a whole is worthless and should be wiped out.

who's that kid? he looks so cool.

oh, that's Tom. he thinks humans are worthless and should be exterminated.

I'll brb, I'm going to ask him to the prom.

>> No.3776622

>>3776614

>thinking 4chan would be better off without the wannabe edgy teenagers

^get a load of this edgy motherfucker^

>> No.3776627
File: 33 KB, 161x180, 1343012988300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776627

Friend of mine is arguing that because the owner of Chic-Fil-A donates to Anti gay organizations that he doesn't care if he was Christian or not he'd still shit on him. What do I even say to something that stupid? This conversation started as a man voicing his opinion and not being a bitch and backing away from it now it's everyone jumpin his dick over this bullshit.

>> No.3776635
File: 195 KB, 791x621, die-cis-scum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776635

all these moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain, die cis scum

>> No.3776640
File: 47 KB, 470x470, sxe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776640

Did someone say Straight edge?!

>> No.3776642

>>3776627
keeping marriage laws the way they are is not "anti-gay"

having cops raid gay bars and beating them up is anti-gay.

>> No.3776646

>>3776635

WTF...is this some kinda of low rent eruotrap?

>> No.3776654

So which companies are pro gay marriage which are conservatives?
I know Starbuck and Oreo are for gay marriage, Chick-Fil-A is against. Are there more?

>> No.3776656

>>3776646
head on over to /pol/ sometime where you'll find that this is a picture of your average cultural enrichment enforcement officer whose job it is to check your privilege.

>> No.3776661

>>3776627

People in the public eye with unpopular opinions get unfriendly attention.

The right of a guy to have an opinion doesn't trump everyone else's right to think that opinion is totally bogus and call them out on it.

>> No.3776664

If you wanted to support anti-gay whatever, wouldn't it be more sensible to just donate to those charities, rather than give your money to chick-fil-a and have a tiny portion go to those charities?
But it isn't about getting shit done, it's about party affiliation. I swear, political issues are becoming like sports teams.

>> No.3776665

>>3776661
but we're talking about opinions that could become legislation

>> No.3776668

>>3776664
>political issues are becoming like sports teams

They've already become spectator sports.

>> No.3776670

>>3776664
well, charities dont do much to help any cause. This is to combat the boycott of chick-fil-a and help them recover the tiny bit of revenue they lost.

>> No.3776671
File: 22 KB, 565x377, Rogerwaters%20may1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776671

Are there any queers in the theater tonight?

>> No.3776672

>>3776590
Nope. That's an actual photograph of a Wendy's in North Carolina, telling people that they support Chick-Fil-A.

Not generated. Not a shoop. The story is reported by the L.A. Times:
http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-chickfila-appreciation-protest-20120801,0,279
3918.story
And the photo is on BusinessInsider.com:
http://www.businessinsider.com/a-bunch-of-wendys-restaurants-put-up-signs-that-say-we-stand-with-chi
ck-fil-a-2012-8

>> No.3776678

Meanwhile, in Martinsburg, WV, gay activists called in a bomb threat to try to stop the flood of support for Chick-Fil-A:
http://www.herald-mail.com/breakingnews/hm-chickfila-in-martinsburg-evacuated-due-to-reported-bomb-t
hreat-20120801,0,5868126.story
I guess if you can't win the hearts and minds of the public, hey, what the hell, call in a bomb threat.

>> No.3776680

>>3776665

Well theoretically that's what we're in a democracy for but since it rarely seems to work that's why the boycott exists.

I don't have any problems with the protest and in fact I mostly agree with it, except for that I imagine a lot of them are just "fair-weather activists" who are jumping on the bandwagon cause it's an easy way to make themselves feel important. The reaction is somewhat disproportionate.

>> No.3776684

>>3776671

get em a bucket of chicken and then get em up against the wall!

>> No.3776686
File: 23 KB, 136x148, fuming.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776686

>>3776635
How many transgender people are there in the general population? 2 percent? 1 percent? Yet I've seen so much anger towards the rest of the general population who don't happened to know the exact politically correct term for them or misuse personal nouns. What do they expect? How can such a small number of people have such a presence on the internet and not understand that most people don't generally have much (if any) contact with them.

I'm all for equal rights and the right to change your gender (and be accepted as that gender) and while I agree people should have the courtesy for them, it's delusional to think that all people everywhere should know these PC terms and not get confused (especially the older generation). It verges on arrogance sometimes.

>'cis gender is a privilege'
Yeah? Well so is living in a country that allows your whining.

>> No.3776693

>>3776678

>Implying people are going to care if you're outside protesting by kissing members of the same sex

>implying I won't go "yeah, whatever" and get some chick'n

watch it be a bunch of fat dykes and fags playing tonsil hockey and being butthurt because nobody cares

>> No.3776697
File: 121 KB, 362x356, arton814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776697

that one looks Jewish

>> No.3776700

>>3776672

Troll.

No such pic appears in the links.

>> No.3776705

>>3776686


other than your long and unnecessary rambling about how tolerant and edgy you are....I still don't get it....WTF is CIS

>> No.3776707

>>3776700
Liar. It's on the BusinessInsider link, as stated.

>> No.3776719

>>3776705
Instead of whining like a bitch and criticizing my post, why didn't you just google it?
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender
WOW, LOOK AT THAT! THERE'S MY CISGENDER PRIVILEGE AT WORK AGAIN

>> No.3776720

>>3776705
not trans

>> No.3776723

>>3776686
I understand and agree with what you're saying here (and, yes, at the risk of getting shit for it, I'm trans and avoid the "community" because I'm relatively lax about my own pronouns, which rustles tons of jimmies).

But the fact is that it's a largely misunderstood issue. If someone completely understood and supported you and happened to use the wrong term, it's not an issue at all. But most people, even the gays, don't consider it a legitimate condition. That's where the problem is, and it's where the pronoun issue comes in. Refusing to call someone by their preferred name or pronoun is often indicative of their attitude toward you.

>> No.3776735

>>3776719

see...there you go being all douchy to people, why can't you just answer the stupid question like a normal person without flying off the handle and rambling about some totally unrelated stuff....DUDE...calm down.

>> No.3776738

>>3776723
That's fair enough. To be honest I'm judging it on what I've seen on various blogs, facebook and tumblr, so it's probably the worst sample of transgendered people anyone could take. I guess being in the niche doesn't stop it from being any less of an issue at all.

>I fucking hate tumblr

>> No.3776742

>>3776723

I demand trap confirmation right NAO.

>> No.3776746

>>3776735
Sorry if I flew off unnecessarily, but it's irritating to write a load of shit just to get it dismissed as edgy garbage, then asked something that's easily found with a quick search.

>> No.3776756
File: 203 KB, 1024x686, i17420120501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776756

>>3776738
lmao, those are the worst possible places to take samples of *anybody*. Teenagers who have just discovered the internet is good for attention whoring, adults who should know better, all that...

>>3776742
Not exactly food & cooking ... ;) But for the record, I suppose I'm what you would call a reverse trap.

>> No.3776762
File: 63 KB, 640x480, 1259910842286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776762

This is the most faggoty ass shit I've ever seen.
All this is doing is pot-stirring and making big bucks for CFA.
Not to mention that chicken is the shit tier of the meat industry and has the worst practices. I might (and that's a very small might) be slightly more interested if it was "support a steakhouse" day or "support your favorite local restaurant day" or something like that.
tl;dr FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS
You can all go suck a turd.

>> No.3776765

I won't eat there, but I didn't eat there in the first place. Regardless, they're a private enterprise, so they should be able to do what they want in regards to human rights. They can support non-equal marriage, and if they want they should totally be able to bar people they don't like from their restaurants. They could have little signs to show it. Like a unicorn in a red circle with a slash through it for "no gay people" and the same thing with a picture of Stevie Wonder for "no black people" and a little drawing of a man in a rice hat for "no asians". Or maybe just like a red circle without a slash with a picture of a sensible family sedan in it for "whites only".

>> No.3776779

>>3776642keeping marriage laws the way they are is not "anti-gay"

Was keeping segregation laws the way they were not anti-black?

>> No.3776793

>>3776765
They're not trying to bar homosexuals from their restaurants. Stupid strawman argument is stupid.

>> No.3776798

If I were black, I'd be happy to give money to restaurants that donate to the KKK.

It only makes sense. Why mix food and politics?

>> No.3776799

>>3776793
It's a joke, not an argument.

>> No.3776834

>>3776799
YOU DON'T GET IT!!!!!!!!!!1

>> No.3776835

>B-BUT MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH
>implying being a company run by people with unpopular opinions entitles that company to customers and money
>implying boycotts encroach on freedom of speech

>> No.3776847
File: 49 KB, 730x624, 1343514927327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776847

I'm actually surprised at some of the responses itt, more-so what sounds like honest hate for the gay community.

Regardless of my own views, any business owner who openly discusses a hate for another group of people is, in lack of better terms, gross.

I know a lot of kids here like to be edgy and hating gays is somewhat acceptable, but on a large scale, hating any group just for their bred association (i.e. sexuality/race) is just plain regressive.

Merchants should and always be impartial.

Religious or not, a chicken salesman shouldn't ever be publically speaking out like this. Its intolerant and overall bad business.

>HURR DURR RIGHTS
My 2c on this is simply if you can do something being a straight white male, you should be able to do it as any other classification of person.

>> No.3776858

>>3776762
That's what's so wonderful about it all.

>1. Get butthurt about restaurant owner's politics
>2. Drama queens scream for boycott
>3. ???
>4. PROFIT!!!

Oops! Chick-Fil-A wasn't the one that was supposed to profit, was it?

>hurr durr stupid homos should call for moar boycotts

>> No.3776860

>>3776847
Pretty much this.

My father is a business owner and definitely is a proponent of, "the customer is ALWAYS right"... even when they are wrong. It could piss his staff off at times, but he knows who pays the bills.

>> No.3776863

>>3776858

maybe it was a really clever ploy by the gays to make all the people who hate them fat and unhealthy from eating fried chicken sammies, so they just die.

>> No.3776864

>>3776858
If people go out of their way to show support for a business owner that goes on about how he doesn't like a group of American citizens for their (perfectly legal) beliefs, that is pretty sad.

Just saying. No wonder you guys are always shooting each other, hate paying taxes, have a corrupt government, and are at each others throats all the time - you pretend you love America but you hate Americans.

>> No.3776868

>>3776860
Most of the homos screaming about CFA were never customers to begin with.

>> No.3776871

>>3776868
How do you know their demographics?

>> No.3776873

>>3776871

fags frequently forgo foraging fried food, faggot

>> No.3776878

>>3776873
Not only do you sound like an idiot, but you are making gay people sound a lot better than the average Americlap fatfuck.

>> No.3776883
File: 90 KB, 278x284, 1310950042093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776883

>mfw Chik-Fil-A hires LGBT employees

>> No.3776901

>>3776878
They really are though.

>> No.3776911

>>3776864
>If people go out of their way to show support for a business owner that goes on about how he doesn't like a group of American citizens for their (perfectly legal) beliefs, that is pretty sad.

>Just saying. No wonder you guys are always shooting each other, hate paying taxes, have a corrupt government, and are at each others throats all the time - you pretend you love America but you hate Americans.

This.

>> No.3776913

>>3776693
You obviously don't know the kind of tea party people that do shit like Chik-Fil-A appreciation day
I think I might go just so I can watch the yelling matches.

>> No.3776921

>Work at Chik-Fil-A
>People keep telling me good job for stopping the queers
>I'm gay
I'm actually avoiding my boyfriend because he won't stop laughing at me

>> No.3776928

>>3776921

srs'ly why don't you just quit...they so obviously hate you there.

>> No.3776930

>>3776928
My manager is pretty cool and I like money...

>> No.3776934

>>3776930
capitalist american pig

>> No.3776941

>>3776930
Are you at least looking for a new job?

>> No.3776948

>>3776941
Actually I have a new job lined up in about a month
Unpaid internship

>> No.3776951

>>3776948
That's slavery, not a job.

>> No.3776959

>>3776921
>People keep telling me good job for stopping the queers
Hahaha America.

>> No.3776965
File: 69 KB, 447x453, 1343665035666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3776965

Man America get your fucking act together. You used to be the greatest country on the planet & now you're squabbling over chicken?
God fucking dammit your circling the drain quickly

>> No.3776972

my problem isn't with the CEO or president or whatever of CFA saying he supports traditional marriage. Everyone knows it's a christian company with christian ideals. My problem is the fact that they declared it "Come to CFA if you're a bigot" day. If people support him they can go any day they wanted except sunday and get their chicken. They started this shitstorm on purpose and turned every CFA into an anti-gay rally, which is not what fast food restaurants are for.

>> No.3776981

>>3776972
Oh really? Tell us, oh wise one, what ARE fast food restaurants for, seeing how you're an expert and all? I'm sure you've run quite a few franchises in your day? You don't know what you're talking about. Don't make me laugh.

>> No.3776986

>>3776200
Actually most people are opposed to same sex marriage. The only majority group for it is under 21 years old. Its 70% for the teenage group actually. But every group after 21 is always in the against gay marriage category. The oldest category is somewhere around 90% are against it.

So overall most the population is against it which is why even the most liberal states such as California don't pass gay marriage laws.

I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm straight white male so I care not for what people do when it doesn't effect me. Apathy is the best route.

>> No.3776987

>>3776965
>your

And you're already down the drain.

>> No.3776994

What are all you Christians doing on 4chan anyway? You're not welcome here. Fuck, this site has gone downhill since it became mainstream

>> No.3776995

>>3776986
You are incorrect, sir.

http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm
http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx

>> No.3776998

>>3776994
>there were no Christians on my super secret club le 4chan until it became mainstream

lel

>> No.3777000

>>3776981
that was my first post in the thread bro, no need to get your jimmies rustled.
a fast food restaurant is supposed to get you quick mediocre food that is very consistent every time you go.
you get a big mac because it's a big mac and every other mcdonalds will make the exact same big mac.
I shouldn't have to wait 3 hours to get the fast food of my choice because there's a huge clusterfuck of bigots rallying and eating all the chicken. I should be able to go in and get my food within 10 minutes without a crowd of people clapping because they hate gays.

I drove by our local CFA twice and the line of cars was out into the street. It was almost as bad as some years ago when people were lined up at gas stations for 3 hours because everyone was worried about a shortage.

>> No.3777004

>>3776998
You know nothing about me you impudent child. Fuck off and take your shitposting back to reddit.

>> No.3777008

>>3776972
>My problem is the fact that they declared it "Come to CFA if you're a bigot" day.
>bigot

That's funny because if that would've been literally, you and your fellow leftists would've been invited as well. So called liberals are usually the most bigoted and intolerant people they are as they go absolutely berserk if someone doesn't agree 100% with their politics.

>a person who is intolerant of any ideas other than his or her own, esp on religion, politics, or race

Which makes you fucking bigots yourself. Oh shit, eh? Your favourite insult and you just learned that it doesn't just mean "people on the right who I don't like". How does it feel to be a bigot, you bigot?

>> No.3777010

>>3776994
Are you retarded?

>> No.3777011

>>3776994
You don't have to be a Christian to hate fags.

>> No.3777017

>>3777011
I guess not, but if other people's happiness affects you in any way you're VERY insecure and probably autistic.

>> No.3777018

>>3776995
Ok so of people that actually vote its a majority that doesn't want gay marriage legalized. You know since it constantly gets knocked down in most states.

Majority says it is for legalizing. When they actually vote they vote against it. Weird how that works.

>> No.3777024

>>3777008So called liberals are usually the most bigoted and intolerant people they are as they go absolutely berserk if someone doesn't agree 100% with their politics.

[citation needed]

>>3777018
Voting isn't precisely about popular opinion or sheer numbers.

>> No.3777025

>>3777008
Gonna cry more because you aren't given a cart blanche to be an intolerant bigot piece of shit?

>> No.3777028

>>3777008
Don't act like you know me, bro. I'm not even a leftist. I'd say I'm apathetic in pretty much every issue. I don't care what anyone thinks because it's their business. And I don't want anything to do with their business so they should get it out of my face.

What I care about is what a big obnoxious shitstorm this whole thing is. what if I wanted chick-fil-a today without waiting 2-3 hours.

>> No.3777030

>>3777000
>If you don't share my opinion or if you like chik-fil-a you are a bigot
Haha I'm for gay rights and this shit is dumb as fuck. People can oppose your opinion and not be bigots and closed minded.

>> No.3777035

>>3777004
>thinks 4chan is is secret clubhouse
>has been here a whole month

No need to be angry, kid.

You are a fucking faggot. Calm down and stop shitposting. You need to use an inside voice when speaking to adults.

>> No.3777033

>>3776994
and the atheist were so friendly towards faggots and furries amirite?

On the other hand, many people buy there because of two liberal politicians call to ban Chick-Fil-A. People in power trying to silence civilian's political stance is a total no-no in America whether you're a Christian or not.

>> No.3777038

>>3776166
Your "civil rights" translates to tyranny of the weak. The government is forcing employers to hire fags, dykes, women and minorities. You can't just hire the most qualified people, you have to adhere to some retarded percentages. That's some draconian, dictatorial shit right there to begin with but then, as if that wasn't bad enough, if those people do a shitty job or fuck up they can't even fire them without being sued for every penny they have.

Welcome to Fascist Leftist American Union, comrade!

>> No.3777037

>>3777030
I don't understand why you Republicunts can't understand this. Rational people will NEVER tolerate your views because your views are not valid. Hating people without reason is not a worldview and it sure as shit shouldn't be respected.

>> No.3777043
File: 57 KB, 401x245, chickfilgay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777043

Oh great, now I'm a religious bigot just for eating there today

>> No.3777045

>>3777038
[citation needed]

>> No.3777047

>>3777030
I'd say they are if they believe in hating a group of people so much they have to go out and tell everyone in the world.

I don't care who they hate as long as they don't shove it in my face. Who doesn't hate anyone?

>> No.3777050

>>3777037

What about people who are against gay lifestyle from utilitarian approach, that gays lifestyle does not bring greatest welfare to greatest amount of people without bringing religion into it?

>> No.3777054

>>3777017

Nope, I'm having fun hating faggots. I just need to think about how many of those sick fucks die thanks to AIDS and I'm have a big smile on my face.

>> No.3777055

>>3777035
I will not calm down. Gonna do something about it Republicunt? I'd knock your fucking teeth out. You have no argument here. There is NO reason why other people's happiness affects your own. Do i need to repeat it again so your tiny conservative brain can understand this? Don't tell me about how America is a christian nation. It isn't. Read the treaty of Tripoli. America is a FREE nation, this means that your rights aren't dictated by a few bigots like yourself that are so insecure they take up causes that they really have nothing to say about. Do you understand me you snot-nosed little shit?

>> No.3777056

>>3777050
wait... what? I almost get what you say but it isn't exactly clear.

>> No.3777058

>>3777045
What, you've never heard of Affirmative Action And anti-discrimination laws?

>> No.3777060

>>3777037
But hating people has been what humans have done all their existence. It literally is ingrained into our very culture. Hatred of others has lead us to where we are today.

Also there is nothing illegal about hating another person as long as you don't bother their rights as a person. If you don't have the rights you believe you deserve then you fight for more. Like every other civil movement in history. Modern civil rights are such a crock not because of any of their stances but because they feel like people should just give them what they want with no struggle.

Civil movements have always had sacrifice and struggle in them. Just because you don't have enough devotion to a cause to suffer with it doesn't make others bigots.

>> No.3777066

>>3777054

How badass.

>> No.3777068

>>3777054
so edgy

>> No.3777072

>>3777050
What are you talking about? Are you willing to elaborate for the sake of your troll?

>>3777058
I still need a citation. What laws are you talking about? Please pull them up and post them here because until you do we're discussing nebulous, abstract concepts at best.

>> No.3777074

>>3777060
hatred of others is what's holding humans back. We'd probably being exploring deep space by now if people cared less about the things others are doing that don't affect them in any way.

>> No.3777075

>>3777056

Well, I heard once an atheist sociologist said that he's for social conservatism (including opposition on gay marriage). I assume he must have been persuaded from utilitarian approach on this, since he says that the trend does point to decrease in family values that contribute greatly to society as a whole. Seems like calculated reasoning against gay marriage, so if someone use that kind of argument to back his point of view, do you still think that it's not legit?

>> No.3777081

>>3777055
>>I'd knock your fucking teeth out.
More like, you'd flounce around whining in dramaqueenese.

>> No.3777083

>>3777060
>But hating people has been what humans have done all their existence. It literally is ingrained into our very culture. Hatred of others has lead us to where we are today.
Typical Americlap subhuman nonsense. Have you actually paused and thought what a fucking imbecile you act like? Do you read your posts before posting, or are these just streams of your utterly crass consciousness?

>> No.3777090

>>3777081
Give me your contact information, and we'll see what happens. Man up.

>> No.3777085

>>3777075
I think denying people rights is bad for society. Who is this quack you're referencing?

>> No.3777091

>>3777085
Noam Chomsky

>> No.3777092

I actually wanted some chick-fil-a today
and then I go and it's so packed they can't even close the doors.

I just wanted some chicken, fuck all this shit. If they're gonna start throwing rallies every time I decide I actually want to go there they can count me out. Bojangles is better anyways.

>> No.3777096

>>3777055

Wait, you think you have history on your side? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, how fucking dumb can you be? Being gay used to be a crime and considered a mental illness, you fucking faggot.

Why don't you go and try to force churches to marry you a little bit more?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9327150/Gay-rights-campaigner-I-wish-we-could-have-been-mar
ried-in-church.html

THERE, FAGGOT! How's that for bigotry you gay piece of shit? Fucking faggots are trying to force churches to marry them. You people truly do belong in jail and mental institutions.

>> No.3777101

>>3777074
That's not how it works at all. Technology advances faster in times of war then it does in times of peace. It is impossible for all of mankind to unite. Just because Utopian government is the best type does not mean it is possible. People have different wants in life. No one system can work for everyone.

>> No.3777103

>>3777037
Dumass, opposing the redefinition of marriage, a 6,000 year old institution is not hating anyone. I love my faggot friends even if i think their shit is a little twisted.

You on the other hand obviously hate Christians since you want to limit their ability to worship their faith.
I seem to remember the Nazis started out with the intolerance much like today's American Liberals.

>> No.3777112

>>3777096
Churches can do whatever the fuck they want. When did I EVER say that I was for forcing people to do anything? All I said was that it's wrong to deny people rights.

>> No.3777115

>>3777103
>can't spell dumbass

>> No.3777114

>>3777085

No you dolt, denying people "rights" is society. It literally is. Society is a set of rules, things you aren't allowed to do.

Without denying people "rights" there is no society, only complete anarchy.

>> No.3777118

>>3777096
Pre 16th century being gay wasn't really that big of a deal. In some cultures you didn't tell people about it but honestly the main reason gays are looked down on now a days is because of Yuropoors hating Romans so they needed to find multiple reasons to demonize them. Gays being one of them

>> No.3777119

>>3777103
Christians can practice their faith as they please, but when that "faith" enters the public forum, it becomes my business. When did I EVER say that christians shouldn't practice their faith?

>> No.3777120

This thread is making me dizzy.
Goddammit America, just let your bloody fags marry. You'll have a lot more peace and quiet.

Sincerely,
England

>> No.3777121

>>3777090
I'll meet you at the Chick-Fil-A at 717 E Butterfield Road, Lombard, IL at 11am on Friday. Bring flowers, faggot.

>> No.3777123

>>3777112

A gay man has all of the same rights that I do.
He has the right to marry a woman, just like I did.

>Not sure I would recommend it though

>> No.3777124

>>3777085
Nobody denies anyone's here, gays can function as a family if they want to, they can have sex and fall in love, they can have jobs, etc. There's just seems to be no reason for the government to have any deal with this. So gay people can pay less tax and receive more benefit, but would there be real contribution to society? In some society, you're even penalize to be a family that the government deemed that it won't benefit them, for example in China you'd be penalize with taxes if you have children, in some other countries they do the exact opposite, they would pay you to marry and have children.

>> No.3777126

>>3777120
No, then they'll just whine incessantly about something else. They're perpetually anally impacted.

>> No.3777127

>>3777114
So denying people the right to a civil union is good? You seem to have missed the point/ are deliberately acting like you don't get it

>> No.3777131

>>3776981
>>3776981
...Fast food restraunts are for serving fast food.

Wow, that was so hard. What erudite logic it took to arrive at that profound conclusion...

>> No.3777132

This all should be up to whoever marries people. The government having a hand in a normally religious/spiritual event makes no sense. The fact that married people get treated different by the government is retarded.

>> No.3777133

>>3777112

Who are you to decide what constitutes a "right"?

>> No.3777134

>>3777121
Nah, fuck you. Not gonna go all the way to IL to kick some fatty's ass.

>> No.3777136

>>3777126

If you put a band-aid on the wound, it'll still hurt. But it'll hurt LESS.
Thick-headed bastard.

>> No.3777137

>>3777103
>I seem to remember the Nazis started out with the intolerance much like today's American Liberals.
Daft cunt. Kill yourself.

>> No.3777138

>>3777118
[citation needed]

>> No.3777145

>>3777103Dumass, opposing the redefinition of marriage, a 6,000 year old institution is not hating anyone

Marriage actually predates Abrahamic religion and existed in societies with no contact with Abrahamic religion. Furthermore, same sex marriage has existed for thousands of years and used to be performed by the Catholic Church prior to about 1200.

Furthermore, not everyone is demanding that churches should have to support gay marriage. Equal marriage is about gaining equal recognition before law. Personally, I don't care who churches choose to marry, but their sociopolitical views should not have any bearing on a person's right to be married before the law.

>>3777124
Homosexuals work and pay taxes. They contribute to society. Denying them any rights is segregation. I don't fucking care what China's stance is.

>>3777132
Marriage exists in many permutations, including as a legal ceremony. It's possible to have a secular marriage, you have your license signed by a judge and hold whatever ceremony (or no ceremony) you please.

>>3777138
I'm not him, but hey, here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_homosexuality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome

>> No.3777147

>>3777103
>a 6,000 year old institution
That's a funny way to refer to a <200 year-old intsitution.
Silly republicunts and their delusions adherence to made-up traditions.

>> No.3777153

>>3777137
Too be fair Hitler got elected under much better circumstances then most our modern presidents do. The people actually like him where as nobody tends to like who gets elected here they just go with their political parties. So yea American presidents literally are worse then Hitler in that sense. Hitler also did a lot for the German people another reason American presidents are worse then Hitler.

>> No.3777158

>>3777147
delusional*

>silly liberals and their habit of changing their sentence midway through but forgetting to modify their words accordingly =P

>> No.3777164

>>3777120
and then, what? Getting sued left and right by their activists? No thanks, I'm used to hearing people whining all the time.

>> No.3777165

>>3777153
>Too be fair Hitler got elected under much better circumstances then most our modern presidents do.
lolwat
Go read a history of Hitler, because you don't know what the FUCK you're talking about.

He was a popular and moving demagogue, yes, but he wasn't elected under favorable national circumstances.

>Hitler also did a lot for the German people another reason American presidents are worse then Hitler.
Got me there.
And most of our presidents wouldn't be that far from Hitler on the moral spectrum if it weren't for their concerns about public image.

>> No.3777167
File: 360 KB, 320x240, 2418471_o.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777167

>President of CFA expresses antiquated views and spends his money on groups that promote antiquated views
>public decides this man represents the company as a whole--every employee and every patron must share the same views and agenda

ISHYGDDT

>> No.3777169

>>3777120
and then, what? Getting sued left and right by their activists? You must remember that this is USA we're talking about where people sue McDonald because she spilled coffee to herself, and win.

>> No.3777175

>>3777167
By eating there part of your purchase goes towards funding "family" lobbying groups which oppose things like planned parenthood, abortion, and gay rights.

>> No.3777179

>>3777167

It's called voting with your dollar, something Americans can't fathom.

>> No.3777184

Hey gays,

Just FYI, the Chick-Fil-A in Fort Wayne, Indiana had such a successful day that they ran out of chicken about an hour and a half ago.

I'm sure the owner and execs thank you for your anti-support!

>> No.3777196

>>3776142

Unless you investigate every single company whose products you consume and shun any who have shady affairs, you're no better than a CFA customer. (If you do do that, you probably shouldn't be here, since most ISPs support SOPA, you freedom-hater) You can't just cherrypick companies and turn a blind eye to others. Kinda like Bible quotes.

>> No.3777197

>>3777145

So does the Japanese man who marry Nene Anegasaki from Nintendo DS, last time I checked he's not getting the incentives from Japanese government. Are they being unreasonable (along with others who marries their printed pillow)? Is the guy denied any rights? Why should a government promote and give privilege to any institutions that does not benefit the society, quite the contrary it lower life expectation and health standard of said society? You might say that it's unfair, but what is your base of fairness? What if others said FUCK YOUR RIGHTS, what objective stance you can hold on to to say, "No, you are wrong. My right is real and not just my opinion."

>> No.3777200

http://www.owldolatrous.com/?p=288

- In 75 countries in the world, being gay is illegal. In many, the penalty is life in prison. These are countries we can’t openly visit. In 9 countries, being gay is punishable by death. In many others, violence against gays is tacitly accepted by the authorities. These are countries where we would be killed. Killed.

- Two organizations that work very hard to maintain this status quo and roll back any protections that we may have are the Family Research Council and the Marriage & Family Foundation. For example, the Family Research council leadership has officially stated that same-gender-loving behavior should be criminalized in this country. They draw their pay, in part, from the donations of companies like Chick-Fil-A. Both groups have also done “missionary” work abroad that served to strengthen and promote criminalization of same-sex relations.

- Chick-Fil-A has given roughly $5M to these organizations to support their work.

- Chick-Fil-A’s money comes from the profits they make when you purchase their products.

>> No.3777202

>>3777197
You're rambling.

>> No.3777203

>>3777184

>blaming the gays for the actions of Conservative and/or Fundamentalist Christians

I don't even understand why anyone on 4chan identifies with those sorts of Christians. Fuck knows they'd hate you.

>> No.3777204

>>3777196
>boycotts are awful tyranny
>you're a hypocrite if you exist

Americunt logic.

>> No.3777205
File: 24 KB, 390x240, khaaaaan.....jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777205

CAN EVERYONE JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP. THIS THREAD IS LIKE WHITE NOISE BEING BLARED OVER A ROOM OF SCREAMING CHILDREN.

SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP

thank you! :)

>> No.3777210

>>3777203
>Share an opinion with a group
>Means you must like that group.
Wut?

>> No.3777213

>>3777179

It's called getting something to eat. When I'm hungry, I'm not craving political agenda, I'm craving chicken.

I'm paying for a chicken sandwich. What they do with the money I give them is their choice, and rather than throw a temper tantrum over an imaginary black-or-white scenario, I'm going to respect their decision.

They're just throwing their money away, anyway. Eventually marriage equality will become federal law.

>> No.3777218
File: 58 KB, 500x448, libtardation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777218

"it's only free speech when we do it, ban hate speech!"

~ liberals everywhere

>> No.3777220

>>3777213

gj dodging responsibility for your actions

>> No.3777221

Is it my right to use hard drugs like heroine? Some would say no, because it might change me and statistic says that I'll prone to be a criminal if I use it. But if it's within my right, then they should catch me only after I commit said crime. Could I sue the state because they deny me right to be happy?

tl;dr What is right? Why should someone in strong position should care about rights of others?

>> No.3777223

>>3777145

LOL

a lot of that was actually pederasty, older men fucking young boys. Come on, tell me all about how pedophilia is a human right and should be made legal. lol, you fucking nutter.

>> No.3777227

>>3776142

Using your superior third-world logic, explain to me while it's okay to bash CFA supporters for being homophobic bigots while, say, enjoying a tall latte from Starbucks (who themselves have a history of gay discrimination), or tweeting on an iPhone (Apple has had problems with exploitative labor).

>> No.3777228

>>3777213
Trouble is, a bit of that money comes to be donated to organisations that perform electroshock therapy on gays, and organisations that support the harassment, imprisonment, and even execution of gays in ultra-backwards countries like Uganda.

If that's all in good conscience, though, you're probably a cock.

>> No.3777230

>>3777218
Asking for “mutual tolerance” on this like running up to a bully beating a kid to death on the playground and scolding them both for not getting along. I’m not trying to dissolve the CFA president’s marriage or make his sex illegal. I’m not trying to make him a second-class citizen, or get him killed.

All your life, you’re told to stand up to bullies, but when WE do it, we’re told WE are the ones being intolerant?

>> No.3777231
File: 73 KB, 360x460, 1000x500px-LL-3f14fb89_jimmies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777231

10/10

>> No.3777234

>>3777221
>Some would say no, because it might change me and statistic says that I'll prone to be a criminal if I use it
[sightation needed]

>>3777223
>Come on, tell me all about how pedophilia is a human right and should be made legal. lol, you fucking nutter.
Childhood sexuality is a natural and irrepressible aspect of human biology and it should not be criminalized.

...Close enough?

>> No.3777237

>>3777203
'184 here. I hate Christians when they are assholes. I hate faggots when they are assholes. Today it was hard to pick which side to hate more, but the faggots are the ones being drama queens, so fuck them harder.

>> No.3777240
File: 49 KB, 500x497, 72 Taco Child.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777240

Freedom of Speech, it's a wonderful thing. Oh how the tolerant (liberals) have become so intolerant

>> No.3777241

>>3777230
...That's some pretty sound logic, actually. Kudos.

>> No.3777243

>>3777202

No, it's relevant. He paid taxes, he said he's married, but Japan said "NO!" but everyone said it's fair. After-all why would a government give tax cut so a man can marry his nintendo DS. That's what I asked you, you just said it's because gays pay taxes, but the Japanese guy also pay taxes.

You're talking like it's gays' right to get benefit from government, it was nobody's right. Your basic right is not being denied, so what's your basis to ask more?

>> No.3777244

>>3777218
I don't think anyone ever said that the CFA CEO wasn't allowed to voice his opinion.

>>3777223
This is a slippery slope. A 14 year old occupies a different position in Ancient Greek society than he does in modern Western society. Regardless, I never endorsed, or even implied an endorsement of, pederasty. I think it's pretty savage, based entirely around the exploitation of power.

>> No.3777246

>>3777221
Well done, great argument in favor of fascism.

>> No.3777248

>>3776142

I guess you're a cock, too, because I guarantee that either now or in the past, you've also given money to companies who in turn spend it on deplorable things. If you own an iPhone, you support sweatshop labor. If you bought a Droid, you support invasion of privacy. If you paid your taxes between 2000 and 2008, you funded unjust wars.

Unless your hands are totally clean--and they aren't--who are you to bash someone for the same 'crime' you've committed? Just because it's trending on Twitter right now doesn't give you the right to put on holier-than-thou airs. Don't bother, because it's inescapable.

>> No.3777249

>>3777243
You're still rambling. A homosexual is a person. A video game character is not. It's not relevant at all.

>> No.3777258
File: 68 KB, 800x600, 800px-Masami_Akita_5267969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777258

>>3777248
What are you talking about? Just because it's difficult to the point of impossible to live without lending indirect support to something heinous, no attempt should be made to limit your complicit involvement with the suffering of others?

I do my best to limit my negative impact on the world. I don't care if I can't reduce it to zero.

>> No.3777264

>>3777234
Just change that to any reason you want, what makes you think I should be denied my right to pursue my happiness by using heroine?

>> No.3777265

>>3777264
I don't feel that you should be denied the freedom to use heroin.

>> No.3777267

>>3777249
I don't really want to associate myself with the moron you're arguing with, but I have to jump in to point out that this issue isn't always going to be so clear-cut.
Defining what is and what isn't human is going to become very difficult and divisive as artificial intelligence, robotics (maybe), biocomputing, and bioengineering advance.

Hopefully we as a society will be intellectually mature enough at that point that we won't be arguing about souls and god's will, but there will definitely be tension and debate anyways.

>> No.3777269

>>3777230
So they're bullies because they have a different opinion than you...

STOP OPPRESSING ME WITH YOUR DIFFERENT OPINION YOU BIGOT!

>> No.3777270

>>3777264
I think you should be allowed to use heroin. I also don't think that using heroin makes you more likely to be a criminal (unless because the act of using heroin itself is a criminal one, but that's a bullshit line of circular reasoning.)
So... yeah. Not sure what the problem is?

>> No.3777274
File: 32 KB, 599x447, 1301957201252.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777274

The "Kiss Mor Chiks" thing that the homosexuals are going to pull on Friday is easily classifiable as public indecency/disturbing the peace/etc. A company of any statute does not have to put up with behavior that clearly interrupts the flow or management of their business if said people aren't even going to be customers, so technically that would also be trespassing if the intent is disruption and making a scene.

Your sexual orientation is irrelevant to the legality of such a law, but of course it will be twisted by the media and activists to be some anti-gay witchhunt too. How about this? Leave everyone alone. The CEO of Chick-Fil-A is as entitled to believe marriage is between a man and a woman as you are to believe it's between anyone.

That doesn't give you the right to intimidate and threaten said companys' customers, disrupt their business and take away peoples' first amendment rights because they don't conform to YOUR view. You preach tolerance and acceptance of others and their opinions? Practice it too, no matter how much their view differs from yours.

ITT: people that can't handle the fact there are others with differing views in the world whom they'll never change the minds of.

>> No.3777275

>>3777267
I used the term "person" for a reason.

>> No.3777276

>>3776142

>I don't care if I can't reduce it to zero.

So why are you getting high and mighty on others who apparently feel the same way?

>> No.3777279

>>3777249

It is, what makes you think your rights to marry another man is comes before the Japanese guy to marry a video game character? The state recognize neither, but they recognize heterosexual marriage because it benefit them. Homosexual marriage or marrying a vidya game char are not beneficial, why would any nation support them? That's why I ask you, you keep saying "rights", other could just come and say "nope"; What's makes your view objectively better, then?

>> No.3777281

>>3777249
But how can you claim his love is any less valid then the Homosexuals? Unless only your version of love is right and all others are wrong.

>> No.3777284

>>3777279
I don't know where you got the impression that civil rights had anything to do with net social benefit, or that it was a net social harm.

>>3777281Unless only your version of love is right and all others are wrong.

Is this not your implicit argument when you deny homosexuals the right to marry?

>> No.3777285

>>3777275
And I'm saying that declaring that digital information in a video game as being "not a person" won't always be so simple.

>> No.3777287

>>3777274

/thread

Why are all of you still posting?

>> No.3777288

>>3777270

Well actually my question is if you read the post was what is right? I just use heroine as an example. I also know a person that say any kind of tax actually denied him his right. On the other hand is it not the right of society to impose their power on him? Or stronger group of people to weaker group?

>> No.3777290

>>3777274

In addition, these demonstrations affect the 'wrong' target. Not every CFA employee inherently believes the same things Cathy does. You're just giving a bunch of grief to people who might actually agree with you.

I know, I know, they work for Cathy so they're the enemy. The next time your country's leader makes a poor decision, remember: you're the enemy for paying his taxes.

>> No.3777292

>>3777285
That's not relevant either. A character in a DS game is decidedly not a person. There's no way to reliably predict what a semi-organic or non-organic mind will act like, or even if they will have any erotic or romantic prediliction, so there's no point in extrapolating this argument to that extent, except as thought exercise. And my mind already hurts from the shit I've had to read in this post.

>>3777288
You're conflating "right" with "ability".

>> No.3777303

>>3777274

It's not okay to contest someone who's actively attempting to deny you something you want, believe you deserve and which has no impact on the liberty of himself or anyone else?

>> No.3777306

>>3777270
>I also don't think that using heroin makes you more likely to be a criminal

AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHQHQHQHQ

OH MY FUICKIGN GOD

>> No.3777309

>>3777284

Then anyone should get tax cut, and increased benefit (just claim I marry my cricket, etc)? But then it beats the original purpose of having marriage law, which is to support the institution of family that benefit the whole society. Gay marriage need to give much more than, "gay pay taxes too", which you haven't show, people could argue that gays have more health problems, lifestyle problems, lower life and health expectancy, not the best environment to raise children, etc.

>> No.3777310

>>3777306
What, all drug users are criminals and can't lead normal lives? What about all the non-alcoholics out there? Or prescription pill addicts that don't always succumb to theft/murder to maintain their supply?

>durrrr D.A.R.E. fag

>> No.3777313
File: 323 KB, 764x1024, f6dd6bfe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777313

McKinney, TX Chick-Fil-A. Looks like nobody went there, er, I mean looks like they had record levels of business too.

>> No.3777314

>>3777309Then anyone should get tax cut, and increased benefit (just claim I marry my cricket, etc)?

I neither stated nor implied this.

>But then it beats the original purpose of having marriage law, which is to support the institution of family that benefit the whole society.

Is this the original purpose of having laws regarding marriage? Are you sure? What about marriages that produce no children? Should married heterosexuals be obligated to procreate? What about heterosexuals who cannot procreate? Who are too old to procreate?

>people could argue that gays have more health problems, lifestyle problems, lower life and health expectancy, not the best environment to raise children, etc.

Yes, they could argue that. What's your point? Are you implying that these are factual statements? If that's the case, then I would like to hear your reasoning and see some evidence. Simply stating them doesn't get us anywhere.

>> No.3777316

>>3777309
>gays aren't as healthy as non-gays
Citation needed. You can't just say "hurrr AIDS" because lots of non-gays have AIDS.

And there are plenty of children that need adoption - gays could help out with that. Oh no, because all gays are pedophiles right?

How about fat people allowing to get married and raise fat kids and be a burden on society?

>> No.3777325

>>3777316

Why can't single men adopt children, then?

Oh, right. They aren't faggots so nobody cares about them.

Fuck you.

>> No.3777328

>>3777309

Not the other guy but I think those arguments would have more merit if marriage as an insitution wasn't already so fucked up with things like no-fault divorce and custody laws. If we can accept things like single parenthood and 24-hour marriages as common then as far as I'm concerned legal marriage is effectively meaningless and you may as well give it to anyone who wants it.

>> No.3777331

>>3777292

Yes, that's my question. Why would someone with an ability can't just go out and say "It's my right! You can't deny that!". What objective justification you could give to him that "No, it is/is not your right."

>> No.3777335

>>3777325
He never said that single men shouldn't be able to adopt children. At any rate, half of what you said was right. They aren't homosexuals. That doesn't mean that "no one cares about them", but it does mean that they aren't relevant to a discussion about homosexuals and their rights.

>>3777331
You have the ability to commit murder. You do not have the right to commit murder. It's completely arbitrary. What's your point?

>> No.3777350

I seriously can't believe people in the U.S. still get uppity about homosexuality.

It is confounding.

>> No.3777352

>>3777314

Dunno about America, but here if they don't raise children, they don't get tax cut+benefit. You might mixed up my post with others, I'm the one that asking, you aren't denied any basic rights by the government, then what are you protesting? Tax cuts? I'm not saying gays cannot have sex, love another person or live with each other.

Source?
"In our paper, we demonstrated that in a major Canadian centre, life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 21 years less than for all men."
Just google it. If I'm not mistaken, it's the average life expectancy in low/no HIV gay community. CMIIW

>> No.3777358

>>3777335

He's asking what's the essential criteria for a right to be considered a right is. If I were to go out and kill someone on what basis is that my right/not my right.

Why is marriage for gays a right and marriage for a man and a fictional character is not? The two ideas are founded on the same basic notion of "right to happiness" but if one is acceptable because it's between two real people and the other not acceptable because it's only a single real person then there must be some additional reasoning for its status as a right.

>> No.3777369

>>3777335

It's arbitrary perhaps because you live in a western country based mostly on Greek and Judeo Christian morality. 2 months ago, here in my country, there was just a conflict between a tribe of head hunters vs Islam fundamentalists. One kill for Allah, one need heads to be honourable member of the tribe. They both claim it's their right and tradition. Do you believe in objective morality? If yes, what is the objective base for right is in your opinion? It's my question since my first post, and actually I'm asking both sides here.

>> No.3777394

>>3777358
Here's a fucking idea: privatize marriage. I don't see any reason why any government should be banning people from doing this or that in their private life, nor why any government should require this or that with regard to someone's private life. This should not be a rights issue.

And I say this not as a Paulfag, I say this as a communist.

>> No.3777395

>>3777369
>head hunters
You lying sack of shit, fuck off.

>> No.3777397

>>3777352

I wonder how much hate crimes play into that statistic.

>> No.3777412

Google ngayau. I live in Indonesia, there are thousand tribes with different customs and languages here; those tribes are from Borneo island. I shit you not, it's the 2nd time they fought with fundies in Borneo. The last time there's no bloodbath but the first conflict, 600 heads were rolled. There were pic of a kid laughing and dancing grabbing a head, a decade ago it was famous. Lemme see if I can still get the picture.

>> No.3777416
File: 18 KB, 340x250, moran.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3777416

Wait, wait...doesn't CFA serve OREO MILKSHAKES?

ABANDON STORE! ABANDON STORE!
WE'S BEEN HOODHINKED BY DEM DIRTY HUMMYSEXUAMULLS!

>> No.3777419

>>3777352you aren't denied any basic rights by the government,

The right to marry, which is what this whole argument has been about.

>Just google it

From the same essay you quoted, which can be found here: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/6/1499.full

"In contrast, if we were to repeat this analysis today the life expectancy of gay and bisexual men would be greatly improved. Deaths from HIV infection have declined dramatically in this population since 1996. As we have previously reported there has been a threefold decrease in mortality in Vancouver as well as in other parts of British Columbia."

We call this "cherry picking" in many American intellectual circles, it is often frowned upon.

>>3777358
Because I decided so. It's arbitrary, as are many things that are not precisely a matter of fact or nonfact.

>>3777369 Do you believe in objective morality?

To an extent. Murder is wrong as it denies the victim the right to life. I feel comfortable labeling both cultures you've described as savage in regards to their respect for human rights, and I feel comfortable demarcating that human rights supersedes their cultural values. They do not have the right to murder.

>>3777397
The statistic is going to be misleading on its own, as homosexuals as an aggregate group have higher rates of drug usage and a higher rate of AIDS infection. There's no reason to believe that the life expectancy of a healthy homosexual is any different from a heterosexual.

>> No.3777426

>>3777303

It's his belief, just as what you believe is your belief. It's only an hot button issue because it was suddenly brought to your attention and you clearly have nothing better to do with your life than agonize over it and participate in protests and rallies.

Don't like it? Don't eat at his establishment. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't give you the right to villify their company and it's employees, intimidate it's customers and disrupt their business. It is NOT within your right to silence those whom you disagree with.

>> No.3777430

>>3777419To an extent.

Let me rephrase this. I suppose it's not "objective morality" because it's still my opinion. Regardless, if I were a lawmaker, they would not be granted an exemption. If I were a law enforcement officer, I would arrest them. If I were a judge, I would sentence them.

>> No.3777457

>>3777397

Can't remember a good source of that but according to this website (bias, I know, but they provide links to seemingly legitimate researches and website) is almost none, since very liberal countries and those against gay marriage they found almost no increase in gay/lesbian health and well-being