[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 3.24 MB, 4032x3024, 20250120_073620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21124277 No.21124277 [Reply] [Original]

Thoughts on aerosolized duck fat?

>> No.21124279

>>21124277
i don't see the point

>> No.21124281

>>21124277
i don't understand aerosolized anything desu. Except feembraps of course, were this possible.

>> No.21124308
File: 25 KB, 480x360, cHNFGTGStk94fDLmEJpB-oloibsLSL-af1m80clO23s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21124308

>>21124277
isn't duck fat solid at room temperature (aka not a oil)?
what's next, aerosolized butter? spray tallow?
unless it's just duck flavored vegetable oil or something like that.

>> No.21124349

Check the ingredients, since it's probably mostly oil like >>21124308 said
If it's well and truly just fat of the honk then it's worth trying once.

>> No.21124354

>>21124277
>$7.34 for fucking bacon grease

>> No.21124355
File: 80 KB, 640x853, duck-fat-spray-exists-v0-oi9wkd0vd6yb1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21124355

>ingredients: duck fat
>total fat 0
>calories 0
what the fuck is this sorcery?

>> No.21124372

>>21124355
>1/4 second spray
just a spritz goyim

>> No.21124374

>>21124355
0.25g of duck fat is in fact 0 on everything. But you're not spraying 0.25g of duck fat, it's gonna be upwards of 4-5g will have a decent amount. If my calorimeter didn't break last month I'd go find the same can and give you an accurate measure for a longer spray.

>> No.21124385

>>21124374
0.25 grams of fat is a ridiculously small portion, but it's still 2.25 calories, not 0.
that's a pretty misleading label to say the least

>> No.21124392

>>21124385
if the calories are less than like 5 per serving they're legally allowed to say it's 0 calories. pretty sure all cooking oil sprays say 0 calories because the serving size is 1 molecule

>> No.21124396

>>21124355
>.25g serving
This just means they don't have to write what's actually in it, doesn't it?
also
>trans fat
nasty shit, op

>> No.21124407

>>21124392
it's still bullshit, that's why they chose a serving size of an ant's booger.
How many people will read the label and think "hey, it's calorie free, I can use it as much as I want!"

>> No.21124410

>>21124355
same reason why tictacs are 0 sugar despite being all sugar

>> No.21124417

>>21124374
>0.25g of duck fat is in fact 0 on everything.
No it isn't. The fat and calories are simply below the threshold required for reporting due to the small serving size.
>>21124407
It's those people's own fault for thinking something labelled "duck fat" has 0 fat and 0 calories.

>> No.21124435

>>21124355
>servings per container 792

>> No.21124438

>>21124281
what's feembrap? is it like pam?

>> No.21124440
File: 203 KB, 1512x958, IMG_6698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21124440

>>21124277
>>21124279
>>21124281
>>21124308
>>21124349
>>21124354
>>21124355
>>21124372
>>21124374
Did somebody say Fat Duck?

>> No.21124441

>>21124435
You're supposed to use it like an inhaler

>> No.21124472
File: 73 KB, 1311x1300, 51TUzsChGIL._AC_SL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21124472

>>21124435
1 grams of oil is slightly more than 1 ml.
that means the suggested serving size is 1/4 of this syringe

>> No.21124509

>>21124355
That's why you need the European labels which show ingredients by gram per 100 g. No rounding, no fraud.

>> No.21124601

>>21124277
It's really good at soothing my niece's budding breasts.

>> No.21124635

>>21124601
Your adult nephew will never be a woman.