/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.20823923]

Prisoners received three meals per day. In the morning, they received only half a liter of “coffee,” or rather boiled water with a grain-based coffee substitute added, or “tea”—a herbal brew. These beverages were usually unsweetened. The noon meal consisted of about a liter of soup, the main ingredients of which were potatoes, rutabaga, and small amounts of groats, rye flour, and Avo food extract. The soup was unappetizing, and newly arrived prisoners were often unable to eat it, or could do so only in disgust. Supper consisted of about 300 grams of black bread, served with about 25 grams of sausage, or margarine, or a tablespoon of marmalade or cheese. The bread served in the evening was supposed to cover the needs of the following morning as well, although the famished prisoners usually consumed the whole portion at once. The low nutritional value of these meals should be noted.

[Anonymous No.20823927]

>>20823923
The soup sounds pretty decent for death-camp food

[Anonymous No.20823929]

>>20823923
What is the point of prisons? What is the point of feeding these people for free? Why not make them do construction works or something? Have them be useful at least.

[Anonymous No.20823931]

Sounds comfy. Who doesn't like bread and soup?

[Anonymous No.20823933]

>>20823929
>Why not make them do construction works or something?
What prison do you think OP is talking about exactly?

[Anonymous No.20823940]

My grandmother lived in Rome as an Italian civilian during the Nazi occupation. She said that the rations were half a liter of thin soup and half a loaf of bread (so something like half a demibaguette) per person per day. Her mother would give her her ration every other day so she would have enough to eat. She said her neighbors resorted to black market meat that she insisted was human since there were no animals left but plenty of corpses. She said it had a very distinct sweet smell and shrunk when it was cooked.
People forget that war time are hard.

[Anonymous No.20823942]

>>20823940
>People forget that war time are hard
No they don't

[Anonymous No.20823943]

>>20823933
Im talking about prisons in general

[Anonymous No.20823947]

>>20823943
So you replied to a specific post in a specific thread but just decided to talk about different shit without indicating that? What an annoying faggot. Go to a different board if you want to start your own conversation about "prisons in general".

[Anonymous No.20823951]

>>20823947
Nah ill do whatever i want. You can keep seething and frothing at the mouth i guess.

[Anonymous No.20823954]

>>20823942
They do. Look at all the internet tough guys talking about wars in other parts of the world or a new civil war without realizing they'd be the people struggling to survive.

[Anonymous No.20823955]

>>20823954
>Look at all the internet tough guys talking about wars in other parts of the world
Where? Which ones?

[Anonymous No.20823961]

>>20823951
>be retarded
>hey man you're being retarded
>SHUT UP I'LL DO WHATEVER I WANT YOU'RE MAD STOP BEING MAD
Whatever you say retard

[Anonymous No.20823966]

>>20823961
Keep replying to me monkey i love thr (you)s

[Anonymous No.20823968]

>>20823955
Literally the first thread on /pol/. Or look at any comment section on any article about any war. Americans are complacent.

[Anonymous No.20823988]

>>20823968
I don't see any posts in that thread indicating that the poster has forgotten that war times are hard. Can you point to one post in particular that indicates that? /pol/ seems like a particular bad source of evidence for your claim, since it's full of edgelords making jokes just for the sake of being inflammatory, but if you really think that some people in that thread legitimately believe that war times aren't difficult for the people involved, it should be pretty easy for you to specifically point it out instead of just making vague gestures and claims.

[Anonymous No.20823997]

>>20823988
I made a general statement about what I've observed. I'm not going to write you a referenced thesis. We're on 4chan, maybe reddit suits you better?

[Anonymous No.20824000]

>>20823997
>I made a general statement about what I've observed
Your statement is obviously wrong and you can't provide a single one of your "observations." Die mad.

[Anonymous No.20824009]

>>20824000