Old Food Brand Logos

[Anonymous No.20336513]

.

[Anonymous No.20336515]

[Anonymous No.20336518]

>>20336513
'73-'79 is perfect. They use that logo on the Taco Doritos which btw are the best flavor.

[Anonymous No.20336522]

>>20336513
73-79 was peak

[Anonymous No.20336525]

>>20336513
Why is the 73 logo still used but only on the taco flavoured Doritos (which are the best ones)?
>>20336515
First two look like he wants to play a game. Saw-lookin-ass motherfuckers.

[Anonymous No.20336526]

[Anonymous No.20336529]

>>20336525
>>20336518
BROS

[Anonymous No.20336535]

[Anonymous No.20336542]

[Anonymous No.20336558]

this variant of the mcdonalds logo though

[Anonymous No.20336589]

>>20336513
Where's the updated tranny logo

[Anonymous No.20336835]

>>20336535
is this the only one here where the most recent logo isn't the worst one?

[Anonymous No.20336874]

>>20336513
For me, it's brads drink

[Anonymous No.20336942]

>>20336515
>Starts balding at 35
many such cases

[Anonymous No.20337246]

scheumorphic design > minimalist design

[Anonymous No.20337294]

>>20337246
>scheumorphic
idkwtf that means and it gets red squiggles under it when typed out

[Anonymous No.20337318]

>>20336535
29-45 looks somehow modern, it was ahead of its time

[Anonymous No.20337335]

dewy

[Anonymous No.20337364]

>>20336513
>doritos existed in 1964
wtf, never knew this

[Anonymous No.20337562]

>>20336942
Good catch!
I'm gonna point this out to people.

[Anonymous No.20337894]

>>20336515
You can see Mr. Pringles health decline over the years of eating his own product.

[Anonymous No.20337908]

>>20336515
retarded woman designer thought his hair was eyebrows. Why is everything so shit now a days?

[Anonymous No.20337923]

>>20336515
it used to be a chip that was mr pringle's, now the chips are called pringles
sad

[Anonymous No.20337930]

>>20337364
Time existed way before the early 2000's you mop topped fuck.

[Anonymous No.20337931]

>>20337930
proof?

[Anonymous No.20338025]

>>20336513
73-79
>>20336515
2009+
>>20336526
anything 1970-2009, these didnt change that much
>>20336535
2017+, rare to find one thats new
>>20336542
95-98
>>20337335
80-91. Funky. I also don't hate the 2009+ sharp dew look honestly, they leaned into the Gamer aesthetic for sure though

[Anonymous No.20338312]

>>20337930
Suck my big uncut dick, I am not an americuck so I don't have a PhD in your slop. I've only heard of Doritos around 2000.

[Anonymous No.20338315]

>>20338312
I would suck it but uncut dicks are ugly and contain smegma. Gross.

[Anonymous No.20338354]

>>20338315
>he doesn't like the cheese
You don't belong on /ck/

[Anonymous No.20338372]

>>20338354
I don't mind the cheese. I just don't like the ugly foreigners attached to the cheese.

[An Ode... No.20338407]

>>20337246
>scheumorphic
>>20337294
>Skeuomorphic. Adj.-A skeuomorph (also spelled skiamorph, ) is a derivative object that retains ornamental design cues (attributes) from structures that were necessary in the original.
A little slack here, that anon is an art student who never reads.

[Anonymous No.20338467]

>>20338312
NGL, you sound pretty fucking GAY asking other guys to suck on your dick.

[Anonymous No.20338517]

>>20336513
Peaked in the 70s for sure
>>20336515
96-02
>>20336526
91-94
>>20336535
All shit
>>20336542
Rare case of the current being the best
>>20336558
Good
>>20336874
Fuck Brad
>>20337335
Peaked in the 70s

[Anonymous No.20338520]

[Anonymous No.20338521]

>>20337246
Learn to spell but also one single design philosophy for branding is retarded, you pick the style that suits the product. This is why marketing fags are so fucking stupid, they don't know how to do anything other than chase whatever the current trend is instead of using their fucking brains and thinking about context and what would work best for a given situation.

[Anonymous No.20338525]

>>20338520
99-10 is peak comfy

[Anonymous No.20338582]

>>20337908
He had eyebrows from 1986 to 2002, retard. The eyebrows make his face more expressive since they simplified the art, nobody is dumb enough to mix up the hair with the eyebrows besides you

[Anonymous No.20338588]

>>20338582
He had eyebrows on his face and also hair

Now he has eyebrows above his head where his hair used to be in the era he didn't have eyebrows.

[Anonymous No.20338667]

>>20338520
What the fuck did one of the logos only ast a year for

[Anonymous No.20338875]

>>20338372
Now this is based

[Anonymous No.20338882]

>>20338520
74-99 mogs and im glad they noticed this and brought it back

[Anonymous No.20338890]

>>20336518
The best flavor was actually salsa. I haven't had them in 20 years but the flavor is still vivid in my mind. Look how they massacred my boy.

[Anonymous No.20339526]

[Anonymous No.20339565]

I can't decide if the modern minimalist garbage or the edgy 2000s "squish it, skew it, and turn it all around" design concept is worst.

[Anonymous No.20339590]

>>20336513
2000-'05
>>20336515
late 90s
>>20336526
'90s
>>20336535
'88-'01
>>20336542
'98 is fucking SOVL
>>20337335
'69-'96 is more appealing to me
>>20338520
'99 goddamn
>>20339526
present is fine

90's were pretty great

[Anonymous No.20339592]

[Anonymous No.20339596]

[Anonymous No.20339600]

[Anonymous No.20339605]

>>20338520
Those all look like total dog shit except '74-'99. Glad they quit fucking around and brought it back.

[Anonymous No.20339613]

[Anonymous No.20339857]

>>20338025
>>20338517
>>20339590
Faggots.

[Anonymous No.20340230]

>>20339526
1928-1929 for me but otherwise I like the newest 2
>>20339592
I like the old one here but I understand its pretty much unusable as a modern logo. Overall this hasn't changed much at all but I guess 69 or current are the best, just spare me the shitto cgi
>>20339596
2008-2016 for this one, who knows what the fuck they're doing with these gay square letters. The old ones look like a pharmaceutical product and the 97-2008 are fairly Rough and y2k edgy aesthetic which was the meme of its time and is stupid now.
>>20339600
1989-1995 easily. Again we have tried to 3d-ify the ball, which look retarded.
>>20339613
Current girl is an improvement (could be hornier and more of an anime burger princess, that's just me though) but otherwise the older ones are better across the board. If "fast food" is going to be like $30 we need to retvrn to Old Fashioned and as far as I'm concerned the 69-71 versions with that sharp cowboy font are the best.
>>20339857
Doesn't really supply an argument or any kind of substantive content, presumes sexuality based solely on the posters engaging in the premise of the thread. If we're going to just use random insults like this then definitely racial slurs would be an improvement, this kind of stuff doesn't have any impact otherwise.

[Anonymous No.20340239]

>>20338025
>>20338517
>>20339590
>>20340230
>contributes nothing
Mass repliers need to be tied to a horse and dragged.

[Anonymous No.20340260]

[Anonymous No.20340263]

[Anonymous No.20340275]

A common thing between all of these is that once the brand is old enough to be recognized, any and all description is take away.

[Anonymous No.20340351]

>>20340239
I'm going to continue posting what I think of the logos and you can't stop me. What is the point of the thread otherwise? Image spam with zero engagement?
>Quaker oats
Current one is actually the best IMO, part of the brand here is being Old Fashioned so trying to get too modern with it makes it looks stupider plus we gotta have the old guy. 1972 looks like the kind of logoslop we'd get today, somebody was ahead of their time on that one
>>20340260
51-62 for sure but most of these suck. pepsi has a fucked up history from the start, like wtf is up with the 1898-1903 design? schizo tier, cool but borderline unreadable
>>20340263
89-95 is best but I'd give second place to the current one. I just like the lemon and limes. Maybe if the dot on the i was yellow still like it was in the 19-22 one. That would also evoke the original 61-64 variant.

[Anonymous No.20340357]

>>20336515
>Pringle's
Til

[Anonymous No.20340362]

>>20340357
Also kill every lawyer

[Anonymous No.20340378]

>>20340239
>seething over nothing
lel

[Anonymous No.20340674]

>>20340378
Way to confirm that you are, in fact, nothing.

[Anonymous No.20340878]

>>20337318
Maybe because the current one is in the same front and is clearly derived from that one.

[Anonymous No.20340942]

>>20336513
>2000-2005
pure sovl, appeals to the gamer in me. everything before just looks like a generic tortilla chip brand.
>>20336515
96-09 are all good
>>20336526
04-09 is flawless
>>20336535
boring
>>20336542
they nailed it with the current logo. don't fix what ain't broken.
>>20337335
>MTN
so fucking stupid. i'm liking 69-80 and 96-98
>>20338520
glad they returned to the old standard. 2014-2019 is so bad wtf.
>>20339526
1972-present is a good balance. 29-32 is very official looking though. like if it was a legal document instead of some whimsical chocolate product.
>>20339592
1964 all day. pure sovl.
>>20339596
these are all terrible
>>20339600
87-89 is money
>>20339613
new wendy sucks and so does the font. i'm surpised they kept such a classic look for so long. i like the declaration of "old fashioned hamburgers".
>>20340239
bland and soulless, like oatmeal
>>20340260
fuck it, i'm going BRAD'S DRINK
>>20340263
original logos looking very christmasy. i'm going 74-89, very comfy.

[Anonymous No.20340978]

[Anonymous No.20340980]

[Anonymous No.20340983]

[Anonymous No.20341004]

[Anonymous No.20341009]

[Anonymous No.20341010]

I find it really fascinating that food branding and Logos didn't really seem to hit their stride until the Late 60s-Late 70s.
It seems like it wasn't until that time that icons really became "iconic". Most of the iterations over the years look to either emulate that era, or ultimately revert to it after deviating too much.

I'm curious what the connection is behind it all.
It can't be just a coincidence, it seems like they all came from the same person or school of thought. Does Warhol have something to do with it?

[Anonymous No.20341022]

[Anonymous No.20341027]

wow the new kraft mac and cheese is bad

[Anonymous No.20341748]

>>20340978
Every one of these sucks ass but I'm going with 1947-1960
>>20340980
Also never been good, but in light of that the best one is the current iteration
>>20340983
1985. I like 1972 the best but I appreciate the need for a non-text logo and this purple shit is stupid. What part of tacos are fucking purple?
>>20341004
Mostly trash but I like 83-99
>>20341009
80-98 obvious mog
>>20341022
All pointless as far as it goes but I like the current one best