[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 1.11 MB, 1078x830, butter based.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19252249 No.19252249 [Reply] [Original]

This is a reminder that butter-basting doesn't actually do anything.

>> No.19252256

>>19252249
Prove it

>> No.19252259

Works on my machine.

>> No.19252261

What do you mean it doesn't. The butter stays on the steak. It's butter-covered steak. You taste some butter along with the steak. There's butter, on the steak, underneath the butter, on the plate. It's not a marinade, it's butter on a steak

>> No.19252321

the heat of the butter cooks the steak

>> No.19252507

then why does the steak have a butter taste?

>> No.19252535

>>19252507
Because you put butter in it. The same effect could be accomplished by just putting butter on after you take it out of the pan. You're just doing it to look like a fancy widdle chef bitchboi even though that's not even how steakhouses make steaks.

>> No.19252558

>>19252535
You're right. The steak and butter are completely unaffected by each other. It's simply denying science to suggest cooking a meat in a fatty liquid could have such an effect.

>> No.19252592

>>19252535
>Accuses other of being pretentious
>Cares what steakhouses do

>> No.19252735

>>19252558
I bet you took the vaxx too, retard

>> No.19252745

>>19252735
I did, and I'm perfectly fine. Thought I was supposed to have a heart attack by now, chud.

>> No.19252749 [DELETED] 

simply butter is useless yes , but basting with rosemary thym, or wtvr fresh herb no.

>> No.19252767

Butter basting is about aromatics being carried in the butter, and maybe developing a tad the crust.
Try with more herbs next time.

>> No.19252772

>>19252249
But mastru-basting does.
Try it some time.

>> No.19252790

Confirmed for shit cook. Go back to making tendies you faggot

>> No.19252799

>>19252321
You have to lift up the pan to spoon the butter which means you are removing the pan from the heat.

>> No.19252803

>>19252535
Lol what a retard

>> No.19253185

>>19252535
>raw ingredients will have the same flavor and effect as cooked ingredients. No way it changes the flavor or helps with browning.

Right anon, brown butter, garlic butter, aromatics, those are all just made up pretentious things. Why even cook the steak when you can just lick a cow and get the same effect?

>> No.19253195

>>19253185
Just to clarify my comment, I don't even like butter basting my steaks. I might throw a bit in the pan to make a little pan sauce or cook veggies in the pan while the steak rests, but to claim it does nothing is just retarded.

>> No.19253199

The heat of the steak cooks the butter

>> No.19253216

>>19253199
if you made a compound butter and put it on the steak right as it came off the heat, maybe you could get a similar effect, but there's no way the steak will actually brown the butter and impart similar heat as the cast iron pan.

Again I don't even like the style, but it is different than just putting butter on steak. Would you say brown butter tastes the same as regular melted butter?

>> No.19253217

>>19252261
That's the same as pouring melted butter on your already cooked steak. The act of cooking your steak with butter in the hot pan doesn't do anything different except maybe burn and waste your butter.

>>19252767
Making aromatic-infused butter can be done without basting the steak as it cooks.
>maybe developing a tad the crust.
wrong.

>> No.19253218
File: 1.84 MB, 4000x2252, 20230125_160726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19253218

Steaks always photograph so well, bros

>> No.19253219

>>19252535
But now you have steak flavored butter to use when you roast vegetables.

>> No.19253230

>>19253218
Why is this a square

>> No.19253235

>>19253217
make a pan sauce with the bitter while the steak rests you stupid shit

>> No.19253242

>>19253230
it's hip to be square

>> No.19253247

>>19253217
Lol you can't just say wrong and act like your correct. Butter has milk solids and proteins that will definitely effect the crust of the steak and can be browned. Why can't you just say you don't like the method instead of incorrectly claiming it does nothing?

>> No.19253254

>>19253247
>your
Oh no, I've fallen victim to one of the classic blunders.

>> No.19253265
File: 2.97 MB, 4032x3024, 4316BA34-8AA3-4B8B-A014-4941AADDE45E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19253265

>>19253218
This is now a regular steak thread. Post steaks.

Surf n turf with prime NY, shrimp n grits.

>> No.19253292

>>19252799
Do you think the pan will just go cold during the basting? Do you think, in general?

>> No.19253293

>>19252321
I butter my fork first, then fork the steak. I will also put a little butter on my tongue first, then put the steak bite in the mouth. Which leads me to the sponsor of my post, Hello Fresh. Look, Hello Fresh is just simple. They send you all the ingredients to make healthy meals, with zero guessing or waste. Use the promo code Rageusa to save 10% off your first order. Now back to the butter. So while basting your steak doesn't work, my wife and I have been using a baster to inject her with African sperm. Since my little swimmers are white, and planet earth doesn't need any more people who look like, well, me, we are working towards a better future, by hopefully having our first of many black children. And no, I won't have them do any household chores, that's for me to do. This isn't some opportunity for me to own mulatto slaves.

>> No.19253306

>>19253247
>milk solids and proteins that will definitely effect the steak
wrong.
first of all, milk solids includes the milk proteins. you said "milk solids and proteins" as if they aren't inclusive.
and the "effect" (correct grammar is "affect") you think it has on the steak isn't true. that's the milk solids that are browning by themselves independent of the steak and those milk solids have no effect (notice the difference between affect and effect) on the steak's crust formation. you don't understand the cause and effect relationship or what browning actually means.

>> No.19253475

>>19253265
this is a horrible combination of textures for otherwise good foods

>> No.19253580

>>19252249
it covers the meat in butter. that's all it needs to do.

>> No.19253587
File: 156 KB, 1080x1367, jf48kue3hzf71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19253587

This is a reminder that frying chicken in oil does nothing. The same effects could be accomplished by dousing seared chicken in oil after it's done cooking

>> No.19254651

>>19252535
That's because steakhouses are optimized for efficiently cooking good steaks, not cooking one or two excellent steaks.

>> No.19254667

op is right. the fat from butter and steak dont mix since fat isnt water soluble, especially when heat is applied. the fat bounces off eachother and any marbling from the steak stops the butter from penetrating.
butter basting is a meme past searing.

>> No.19254751
File: 122 KB, 500x555, Tired Buddha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19254751

>>19253587
>TO DRUGS TO YES SAY PZZA SAY NO
Ahh yes.

>> No.19255316

>>19253580
Then pour melted butter on the already-cooked steak. Butter basting is a stupid thing to do if having a piece of steak covered in butter is all that you want.

>>19253587
False equivalence.

>>19254667
It's not so much that as it is that meat simply expels fat and water from its tissue as it cooks; it doesn't absorb fat like butter-basting idiots believe happens.

>> No.19255387

I hate this board. How does a cooking board draw so many cooklets with bad and wrong opinions? It's incredible, really..

>> No.19255463

>>19255316
>Chicken proteins act totally different from beef proteins under high heat!
lol
lmao

>> No.19255545

>>19255463
Oh you're just a troll pretending to be retarded. I thought you were actually retarded kek.

>> No.19255560

>>19252249
does it feel bad to act all smug about technical details while knowing that you will remain a subpar cook?

>> No.19255563

>>19252249
You pour some of the steak/rosemar/garlic infused butter over the steak and use it as a "dipping sauce".

>> No.19255574

>>19255560
It doesn't do anything and it may even lower the quality of the sear
If you want it to taste like butter, melt some butter in a sauce cup and dip your steak in melted butter

>> No.19255601
File: 24 KB, 450x337, 1301957317101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19255601

>>19253185
>Why even cook the steak when you can just lick a cow and get the same effect?

>> No.19255624 [DELETED] 

>>19255574
>and it may even lower the quality of the sear
This is so fucking true, and it should be obvious to anyone who's not a retard which is what makes it baffling when you see "pros" do it.

First off when they butter-baste they slightly lift the steak end of the pan off the heat so it's getting less heat.

Second, the butter is cold or room-temperature when it first goes into the pan so that's taking more heat out of the pan.
And third, butter is 20% water, so that's weakening the sear even further.
Fourth, the butter can easily burn as if often does in most of the videos where you see chefs doing it kek.

It makes no fucking sense how butter-basting became a thing that people swear by if it only takes five seconds of thinking to realize how stupid it is.

Just make a fucking sauce with butter and your herbs and seasonings, or just pour melted butter on the steak when serving it.

>> No.19255626 [DELETED] 

>>19255624 (continued)
or just cook the steak in clarified butter. butter-basting is stupid from every possible angle

>> No.19255632

>>19255574
>and it may even lower the quality of the sear
This is so fucking true, and it should be obvious to anyone who's not a retard which is what makes it baffling when you see "pros" do it.

First off when they butter-baste they slightly lift the steak end of the pan off the heat so it's getting less heat.
Second, the butter is cold or room-temperature when it first goes into the pan so that's taking more heat out of the pan.
And third, butter is 20% water, so that's weakening the sear even further.
Fourth, the butter can easily burn, as it often does in most of the videos where you see chefs doing it kek.

It makes no fucking sense how butter-basting became a thing that people swear by if it only takes five seconds of thinking to realize how stupid it is.

Just make a fucking sauce with butter and your herbs and seasonings, or just pour melted butter on the steak when serving it.
or just cook the steak in clarified butter. butter-basting is stupid from every possible angle

>> No.19255666

>not using the happy customer ingredient
using lots of butter is a business decision, not a cooking decision

>> No.19255673

>>19252249
The cram of my ass cooks the steak

>> No.19255674

>>19255666
Explain then why the butter must be added to the searing hot pan and used to baste the steak as it cooks instead of just pouring melted butter on an already-cooked steak.

>> No.19255719

Since you're not specifically taking about steak, I'd offer that this method is most useful for fish. For meat, I guess the leaner the product the more possibility for this to be helpful.

>> No.19255753

>>19255632
I kinda want to try frying a steak in Flavacol-infused grease
With Flavacol mashed potatoes
And maybe a salad with Flavacol vinaigrette

>> No.19256014

>>19255719
meat does not absorb fat when it cooks. how retarded do people have to be to believe this bullshit?

>> No.19256017

>>19252249
This is a bait thread, right? Nobody who's cooked a steak in a pan without and then with butter basting could possibly be this dumb.

>> No.19256020

>>19256014
I know, right?
Deep frying meats is totally pointless
Boiling it then covering it in oil does the same thing

>> No.19256021

>>19256017
What do you mean? Are you a supporter of butter basting? If so then why?

>> No.19256026

>>19256020
...Oh, so really are retarded. You don't know how deep-frying works, do you? As in, when you deep fry, do you seriously just drop a plain piece of meat not covered in anything into oil?

>> No.19256223

>>19253217
Why wouldn't cooking in a thicker layer of butter develop the crust? You're increasing the contact area between the hot butter and the meat, which should dry out the juices as they escape the meat instead of letting them build up on the pan.

>> No.19256407

>>19256223
Because butter contains water which slows down crust formation because the presence of water prevents the maillard reaction because the temperature cannot get high enough in the presence of water.

What you really want to do is use oil or clarified butter which are both pure fat and contain no water.

>> No.19256415

>>19253292
It will begin to lose heat since it is no longer in contact with the source of the heat.

>> No.19256426

>>19256407
I baste with high smoke point oil because burning your butter's solids and filling the kitchen with smoke is dumb, but if you're throwing butter into a hot pan with high thermal mass the moisture is going to evaporate in a couple of seconds.

>> No.19256437

>>19256426
in the process of the moisture evaporating, the eat of the pan and steak will drop as if you've deglazed the pan with a bit of water, not to mention the fact that the butter you're throwing into the pan is either room temperature or cold.

And even if your pan is insanely hot enough to vaporize the moisture that fast and recover the heat that quickly, that means your butter will quickly start to burn.

But regardless of the heat or potentially burning the butter, the question remains: for what purpose are you putting butter in the hot pain with the steak for basting that isn't accomplished simply by pouring melted butter on top of the cooked steak or just making a steak sauce with the butter and seasonings?

>> No.19256439

>>19256437
*heat of the pan.

>> No.19256477

>>19256437
I also think butter is the wrong oil for the job, but basting with e.g. refined peanut oil means you're constantly spooning hot oil over the top of the steak, which evaporates any juice that's pooling on top and keeps the steak at a more even temperature, as well as depositing any solids suspended in the oil (from herbs or from the steak itself) on top of the steak.

>> No.19257564

>>19253293
I'm actually reading this in his voice kek

>> No.19257626

The best steak I've ever had was a NY strip that I butter basted with garlic, fresh thyme, and parsley. I thought the herb thing was a meme till I tried it. Took a lot of practice tho

>> No.19257633

>>19255674
If you've ever done it, you'd know that the butter in a cast iron particularly isn't just melted butter. It foams and browns to a certain extent, especially as it repeatedly drenches the steak. Mixes with the rendered marbling, outside sear, and aromatics. It transforms the butter from a simple fat to a complex pseudo-sauce that tastes great when poured over the steak as it's resting.
Really, try it sometime.

>> No.19257639

>>19256426
If your butter is burning, you need to do three things: drop the heat after you're done searing, add way more butter than you're using, and constantly tilt the pan so the butter pools. If it's too thinly distributed or too hot, it'll burn and taste like shit

>> No.19257698

>>19253185
WHY I SEASON MY KNIFE, NOT MY CUTTING BOARD

>> No.19257719

>>19252249
the steak of the butter cooks the heat

>> No.19257733

>>19252249
Butter basting is stupid, but I do use ghee or butter to cook my steak. No basting though.

>> No.19257859

>>19255674
The only 2 reasons to add cold butter to a hot pan are: you want to make a sauce and you want to prevent the hot butter in the pan from burning. In which case you're a shit cook.

You baste your meat with fuming hot butter, of course. The aim is to prevent the juices from leaving the meat. Hot butter does that, it sends the juices back down. Cold or lukewarm butter doesn't do anything. It melts and mingles with the meat's juices and that's it. Gives you dry meat and poor sauce as a result.

>> No.19258071

>>19253217
If the butter didn't turn black, it isn't burnt

>> No.19258264

>>19257859
>The aim is to prevent the juices from leaving the meat. Hot butter does that, it sends the juices back down
Please tell me you’re not this hopelessly retarded. If you believe this then what other insane moronic things must you think in general?

As expected, people who believe in butter basting are drooling bucktooth dipshits.

>> No.19259600

>>19258071
They simply edit out any footage where the butter is visibly black.

>> No.19259612

>>19253306
>and the "effect" (correct grammar is "affect")
1. that's vocabulary, not grammar. you fucking fool.
2. "effect" is still acceptable in context. the butter [effects/creates/constitutes] the crust.

>> No.19259616

>>19252321
kek came here to post this

>> No.19259642

>>19252249
You are a certified nigger. I'm going to assume the reason you can't taste the difference is that all the Lawrey's Seasoned Salt you put on everything has completely fried your tastebuds.

>> No.19259650

>>19252249
I’m going to boy-baste your asscheeks with my cum

>> No.19259669

>>19252799
fine then. Melt some butter in a pan, then lift it up from the burner and sip a spoon of butter if it won't burn your mouth.

>> No.19260346

>>19257633
yes, brown butter and aromatic-infused butter are good.

basting your steak with it as it cooks doesn't do anything

>> No.19260396
File: 1.66 MB, 3922x3021, IMG_3330.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19260396

I have a cast iron skillet since 2018 and I’ve never been able to achieve steaks like the ones posted here, with a thick and consistent crust.
Mine has always blonde spots, although it tastes good.

>> No.19260463

i've never buttered my steaks. for cuts like NY strip even the fat cap is too much for me, i have throw away like 75% of it, or more recently feed it to my room mate's cat. i can't imagine how fatty a steak with butter based would feel like.

>> No.19260512

>>19260463
do you not let the fat render?

>> No.19260532

>>19252249
just had "aged" beef steaks, really thick ones
absolutely disgusting is all aged beef this disgusting? I can't even

>> No.19260534

>>19260463
>feeding a cat raw fat
Don't do that.

>> No.19260538
File: 90 KB, 1000x750, 1682922670459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19260538

after butterflying a chicken breast you better be butter basting it in the pan as it's frying too

>> No.19260667

>>19260346
>basting your steak with it as it cooks doesn't do anything
Try collecting water that's run over your seared streak and see if no flavor has seeped into the water.

>> No.19260708

>>19252745
>he took only one
ngmi

>> No.19260723

>>19260708
2 moar wix

>> No.19260726

>>19260667
The fond and its flavor is collected from deglazing, yes. You do not need to baste your steak in fat to gather the fond.

>> No.19262092

I think butter basting is overrated.
A lot of youtubers use a whole fucking stick of butter and baste the steak for way too long, and then 99% of the butter is left in the pan and wasted and burnt. Especially when cooked with tons of olive oil or some oil too, just way too oily.

For me, the best method is to render some beef fat, just cook the steak in it's own fat, and then if you want butter, add butter, garlic, and whatever else you want to the pan while the steak is resting. Then, you can have a garlic butter with steak fat as a topping if you'd like. Also, it's much easier to keep the butter lightly browned instead of burnt to shit

>> No.19262196

>>19260512

of course i do, my body just can't handle that much fat. i also cna't even finish a wholr NY strip unless i'm starved, usually a 6 in. piece will last me 2 meals.

>> No.19262215

>>19262196
How small are you?
also you can get ny strips/steaks with less fat, although that's the flavor

>> No.19262232

>>19252249
>coating food in butter doesn't do anything
what

>> No.19262776

>>19262215
>he unironically thinks the "fat is flavor" saying is to be taken literally as "all the flavor from a steak is from the fat and without it, there is no flavor."

>> No.19262782

>>19256415
Have you considered using a gas stove?

>> No.19263129

>>19262776
That's not what I said dingus

>> No.19263357

>>19252249
I don't really see the point when beef fat tastes really good

>> No.19263362

you are wrong because I A B tested a butter basted and non butter basted steak and they tasted different

>> No.19263679

>>19255316
why would i melt the butter separately when ive got a hot pan right there?

>> No.19263722

>>19263679
but what use is basting the steak in the butter as it cooks?

>> No.19265154

>>19263722
It helps you to apply heat to both sides of the steak after getting a good sear, allowing the inside to cook more quickly without worrying about overcooking the outside.
The aromatics you add to the butter like garlic, rosemary, and thyme infuse into the butter and penetrate the steak much better than if you added them dry.
The butter adds some mild additional richness on its own, especially as it browns in the pan.

>> No.19265250

>>19252249
why would you make a thread where you pretend to be retarded. i dont get it, you know this isnt true.
what do you gain from this?

>> No.19265395

>>19265154
>It helps you to apply heat to both sides of the steak after getting a good sear
None of this has anything to do with butter or basting. You can accomplish this simply by turning down the heat after you got your sear and flipping frequently.
>allowing the inside to cook more quickly
You have no idea what you’re talking about.

>The aromatics you add to the butter like garlic, rosemary, and thyme infuse into the butter
Yes but that isn’t butter basting.
>and penetrate the steak much better than if you added them dry.
Nothing penetrates the steak. You’re just spouting myths now.

>The butter adds some mild additional richness on its own
The question was about butter basting, not butter on its own.
>especially as it browns in the pan.
Yeah and then burns in the pan.

Just make a brown butter sauce with the aromatics.

>> No.19266071

>>19265395
You are genuinely fucking retarded and full of shit. All of his points were valid and you either tried to play a spergy semantics game or else just made shit up that completely contradicts centuries of cooking knowledge.

Let me guess, you season your cutting board, not your steak?

>> No.19266114

>>19266071
Lol, being this mad about being told you’re wrong.
>contradicts centuries of cooking knowledge.
Lmao, no.

>Let me guess, you season your cutting board, not your steak?
You’ve lost track of what you’re saying because Fagusea believes in butter basting too.

>> No.19267707

Cooks do this because it looks good on camera. and because they think meat absorbs butter, which is totally unscientific and not the way meat works lol.

>> No.19267776
File: 80 KB, 801x687, retarded spiderman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19267776

>>19253587
>SAY PIZZA TO DRUGS SAY NO TO YES

>> No.19267780

>>19266114
whi gives a shit what some B grade youtube nobody does or thinks

>> No.19267908

>>19263362
/thread

>> No.19268768
File: 397 KB, 1019x1561, Anxiety steak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19268768

>>19253218
>Steaks always photograph so well

>> No.19269643

>>19268768
What is it with Brits and beans? Usually they have beans because they can’t afford meat but this brit has a fuckin steak right there so what’s wrong with him?

>> No.19269902

>>19268768
that looks sad af,imagine expending so much money on something you're not good at

>> No.19270107

>>19260708
I had the 4. Where's my heart attack at faggot? You fucking promised me.

>> No.19270109

>>19269643
there are no beans in that picture

>> No.19270890

>>19252249
I tried butter basting calzones today and it was really good

>> No.19271444

>>19270109
My bad. I was viewing the picture on my phone with low brightness and didn't bother zooming into what I assumed was beans because most sad food photos are British ones featuring beans.

>> No.19271837

>>19252249
>he uses butter instead of 50$ a kilo artisanal ghee
Ngmi
Jokes aside i can see an Amazon page for 1kilo can of ghee for 25$ straight from India. It says it's water buffalo ghee though and not cow ghee. Good deal?

>> No.19272883

>>19252321
At that temperature, cooking your steak in butter is like cooking it in concrete

>> No.19273903

>>19271837
Ghee is never a good deal. You're always better off making your own from regular butter. Ghee is like 5x the price of butter.

>> No.19273942

>>19255387
This is every board about anything and taste is subjective but when it comes to nutritional facts and the process of cooking it's simple straightforward science, so it's easy to tell when people talk shit.

>> No.19274019

>>19273942
What's the science of butter-basting then?

>> No.19275142

>>19252249
it keeps the top from drying out

>> No.19275709

>>19252745
>>19270107
2 more weeks

>> No.19277205

>>19255632
I like cooking steak, and I get different kinds of steak. Sometimes i go for the grass-fed, prime, dry-aged steak, and sometimes I go for the cheap stuff on sale.

if I cook a thin steak, like less than 3/4 inch thick, you sear hard on both sides, and it's pretty much done.

If I cook a thick steak, like 1.5-2in thick, i sear hard first, then turn down the head and cook gently. Fat carries heat well, and by basting, you can cook both sides gently at the same time, after getting that perfect sear.

>> No.19277800

>>19270107
>actually took the boosters
imagine being proud of this and having access to the same internet feeds as everyone else. then bragging about it lol.