Art or sustenance?

[Anonymous No.17146700]

So are the Pellegrino Brothers right /ck/ is food art or is it sustenance or is it both? And if it's both how artsy can it get before it would be inappropriate and shunned as bad? Pic related is what they prepare in their restaurant.

[Anonymous No.17146723]

>>17146700
Is left the busted up asshole from the chef?

[Anonymous No.17146772]

What a stupid question, why does it need to only be one or the other? Stupid faggot-fucking tweens put zero thought into the questions they ask. Eat shit you stupid retard.

[Anonymous No.17146919]

>>17146772
Neat and the second question reading comprehension anon?

[Anonymous No.17146950]

>>17146700
Why does the right one look like something from a bukkake movie?

[Anonymous No.17146964]

>>17146700
that's a plaster cast of his anus, innit

[Anonymous No.17146976]

>>17146700
food isn't art, but scamming people with food is ;^)

[Anonymous No.17146989]

>>17146700
Honestly would rather eat shitty lidl tier teddies than have to lick lemon foam out of a cast of some blokes gob.

[Anonymous No.17147048]

>>17146989
>webm
*God Bless the USA starts playing*

[Anonymous No.17147398]

>>17146700
I’d rather suck it off a mold of the chef’s cock.

[Anonymous No.17147556]

>>17146700
didn't we just have this thread? how long can you beat this dead horse?

also, /ck/ is a lousy repository for shit you saw on instagram

[Anonymous No.17147752]

What's the thing on the left supposed to be?

[Anonymous No.17147768]

>is food sustenance

come the fuck on

[Anonymous No.17148825]

>>17146700
I like fine dining. Try to explain it to my friends. Then a story like this comes out and destroys all that work.

[Anonymous No.17148833]

>>17146700
if you cant figure out how sustenance can and should be art, you should fast and rub your face with dirt until you are enlightened or return to dirt entirely

[Anonymous No.17148870]

>>17148825
This. Always hear the bit about "why would anyone pay so much for such a tiny dish?". No one gets that a) you're served a bunch of dishes and you're there for hours, and b) it's about the experience, and the imagery is part of the experience. People eat with their eyes first, and the great chefs execute stellar presentation. If you just want to stuff your face and be back home, all in an hour, then just go to Applebee's, but everyone should be able to cobble together the money to go out for a real fancy dinner every once in a while. Besides, you're paying like $200-$300 for a lot of meticulously crafted good food, it's really not that expensive.
I'm a little biased because I'm the sous chef at a place that's trying to get its second Michelin star, but I take the wife out to nice restaurants for special occasions, always a lovely experience, drinking wine and eating tasty stuff and nerding out about how it's made, going all night long.

[Anonymous No.17148878]

>>17146700
if you want your food to be art you can go ahead.
Meanwhile I'll put my food on a plate and eat it

[Anonymous No.17148904]

>>17148870
thats not a bias, you have a special interest and you don't even realize it lol

[Anonymous No.17148951]

>>17148870
>200 dollars for a single meal isnt that expensive
you are wealthy, that makes you different. a majority of people are not wealthy. i could spend 200 dollars for a roundtrip across the entire united states and have more of an experience. and yeah i know im not your friend but theoretically if you asked me to eat there i would feel a need to pay my part so would decline because i have to work for my money and food is not that important

[Anonymous No.17149085]

>>17146700
Is visible things art or is it objects?

[Anonymous No.17150009]

>>17148951
>you are wealthy, that makes you different.
Not op but it's not about wealth. It's about priorities. The same people that will mock a person for spending $600 on fine dining will spend $2000 seeing their favorite basketball team. One you could have seen on TV for free.

[Anonymous No.17151163]

>>17146700
Art or sustenance?0snpg