/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.14309422]

White chocolate is delicious.
Don't let the mainstream lie to you.

[Anonymous No.14309487]

It's ok but regular chocolate has more earthiness which makes it superior.

[Anonymous No.14309493]

It's okay but it's too rich to be eaten like chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14309499]

>>14309493
I agree. It's good but it needs to be taken in smaller doses.

[Anonymous No.14309510]

>>14309422
white chocolate isn't even real chocolate

[Anonymous No.14309519]

>>14309422
White chocolate is way too sweet for me

[Anonymous No.14309521]

White chocolate is delicious and it's my favorite

[Anonymous No.14309523]

>>14309510
No chocolate is real chocolate

[Anonymous No.14309546]

>>14309422

>white """"""chocolate""""""

[Anonymous No.14309559]

It tastes like vomit.

[Anonymous No.14309560]

>>14309546
>reddit spacing AND a "not real chocolate" fag
Leave immediately

[Anonymous No.14309561]

White chocolate is cheese plus cocoa butter.

[Anonymous No.14309564]

chocolate is chocolate I love chocolate I hate chocolate white chocolate is too sweet white chocolate is my favorite white chocolate is nasty white chocolate is for fatties white chocolate is good for you white chocolate is expensive white chocolate isn't chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14309570]

>>14309560
It's not actually chocolate though, it's not made from chocolate solids.

[Anonymous No.14309575]

>>14309559
>>14309519
You're okay as long as your reason for not eating it is just "I don't like it"

[Anonymous No.14309596]

It's not chocolate lol. It;s just a sweet fat mass.

[Anonymous No.14309605]

>>14309510
>>14309546
>>14309570
>>14309596

[Anonymous No.14309614]

>>14309422
It IS delicious

[Anonymous No.14309646]

It's Refined Bleached Deodorized Palm Kernel oil+sugar

[Anonymous No.14310071]

>>14309422
Nobody says it tastes bad. Autists just like screaming that it isn't real chocolate, similar to if someone brings up the topic of boneless wings.

[Anonymous No.14310117]

>>14309493
>It's okay but it's too rich to be eaten like chocolate.
What are you talking about you pseud? Do you eat regular chocolate like it's a main course.and reserve white chocolate for a dessert? Does it make you feel that good to use "rich" in a culinary sentence that you had to force some bullshit distinction in use that nobody has ever practiced in reality?

[Anonymous No.14310122]

>>14310071
I love white chocolate. but boneless wings are just chicken nuggets.

[Anonymous No.14310123]

>>14309422
It's just fat and sugar, so it'll taste okay in small doses. It can end up tasting a bit bland compared to regular chocolate though since that has some bitterness to balance things out.

[Anonymous No.14310127]

>>14309422
let me guess, this is gonna show up on social media in a week or so being racist

[Anonymous No.14310138]

NIGGERS

[Anonymous No.14310144]

>>14310122
I'm not saying that's wrong. I'm saying it's autistic to point that out. Says nothing about how much you enjoy it that it isn't literally the name it goes by.

[Anonymous No.14310154]

>>14310144
white chocolate is for all extents a substitute for chocolate and tastes similar so the name makes sense.

boneless wings have literally nothing in common with wings other than being from chicken. its a silly name that only exists to sell more of them because they can pretend its "wings" and not "nuggets"

[Anonymous No.14310185]

>>14309646
There might be some vanilla

[Anonymous No.14310188]

>>14310154
>and tastes similar
No it doesn't, unless you're only considering the sweetness. Even the texture isn't the same though.

[Anonymous No.14310249]

>>14310154
>boneless wings have literally nothing in common with wings other than being from chicken.
>white chocolate has literally nothing in common with chocolate other than being from cocoa beans.
Also being meat from the same animal isn't some minor similarity you retard. Not even like you're talking about chicken liver vs. wings. It's just chicken meat without wings involved so it can be boneless without falling apart.

[Anonymous No.14310373]

>>14310249
>thighs are the same as drumsticks

[Anonymous No.14310381]

>>14310373
They're not identical. They're just extremely similar, come from the same animal, and serve the same culinary and dietary purposes. That's the point.

[Anonymous No.14310395]

>>14310381
nigga what?
ribeyes and drumsticks serve the same culinary and dietary purposes as slabs of meat you eat for protein.

you'd never swap out thigh meat with leg meat. its totally different meat.

but you can swap out normal chocolate for white chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14310409]

>>14310395
>you'd never
And yet everyone does, which is why we're having this conversation in the first place.

[Anonymous No.14310435]

>>14310395
>you'd never swap out thigh meat with leg meat. its totally different meat.
>but you can swap out normal chocolate for white chocolate.
Are you having a stroke? Or just doing subtle nonsense trolling?

[Anonymous No.14310439]

>>14310409
And that's why they're wrong when they do it.
If you ordered a sirloin and got a flank, you'd be pissed.

[Anonymous No.14310455]

too sweet

[Anonymous No.14310469]

>>14310395
>you'd never swap out thigh meat with leg meat. its totally different meat.

[Anonymous No.14310499]

>>14310439
If I ordered chocolate and was served white chocolate I’d be pissed too.

[Anonymous No.14310504]

>>14310117
Fucking retard, you are. You can just eat chocolate with tea or whatever as it is. White chocolate is too fatty or rich to be eaten by itself or in the same quantities you'd eat dark/milk chocolate in.

[Anonymous No.14310510]

>>14310127
That'd be hilarious wouldn't it

[Anonymous No.14310527]

>>14310504
You eat neither in large quantities.
>tea
How does hot water with a leaf change anything?

[Anonymous No.14310554]

>>14309493
didnt stop me eating a whole pack of white chocolate over a day anyways
felt like shit though, never did it again

[Anonymous No.14310587]

It's easier to find decent dark chocolate than it's to find decent white chocolate, white chocolate tends to be too sugary.

[Anonymous No.14310921]

>>14309422
Pairs well w cranberrys in muffins/brioche/cookies

[Anonymous No.14310993]

>>14310504
>in the same quantities you'd eat dark/milk chocolate in.
enlighten me, fatty. What quantities are dark/milk chocolate meant to be eaten in?

[Anonymous No.14311015]

>>14309422
How is it even chocolate?

[Anonymous No.14311065]

>>14311015
It's not, those are keyboard parts

[Anonymous No.14311163]

So how the industry came to consider substitute fat chocolate a "compound" but white chocolate a valid chocolate product? shit makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.14311168]

>>14309422
white chocolate is not chocolate, but it's still bretty gud in small doses. Milk chocolate, on the other hand, is plain trash. Only dark chocolate is worth anything

[Anonymous No.14311176]

"It's not chocolate" fags are nearly as obnoxious as the "it's not cheese" fags.

[Anonymous No.14311186]

>>14310527
ngl tea and chocolate sounds like a good pairing.

[Anonymous No.14311196]

>>14310510
.

[Anonymous No.14311204]

>>14310993
A bar, maybe less of milk/dark. You'd eat maybe one or two pieces of white chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14311242]

>>14309422
Too sweet on its own.

I like white chocolate macadamia nut cookies and those cookies and cream Hershey's bars, though.

[Anonymous No.14311684]

>>14311204
"Pieces?" As in you break off one or two little squares and eat then individually, amounting to 1/12 of an already normal sized chocolate bar? But only if it's white chocolate and not milk chocolate?
Milk chocolate and white chocolate have the same amount of sugar, the same number of calories, and the same amount of fat, so stop being a pretentious cunt making some big deal out of the most minor of differences possible.
>inb4 "it's not just the sugar that makes it so sweet tasting!"
There is literally nothing in it that makes sweet flavor happen other than sugar. Stevia's not added in on top of sugar.

[Anonymous No.14311706]

>>14311684
shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.14311707]

>>14309493
>too rich
>>14309499
>it needs to be taken in smaller doses.
>>14309519
>White chocolate is way too sweet for me
>>14309596
>It;s just a sweet fat mass.
>>14310123
>It's just fat and sugar, so it'll taste okay in small doses.
>>14310455
>too sweet
>>14311242
>Too sweet on its own.
All these anons repeating the "white chocolate is too sweet" bullshit seemed strange to me at first especially given how we're all posting on the public internet where you can pull up a search engine and learn in two seconds that regular chocolate and white chocolate are nearly identical in sugar content and therefore sweetness. But now that I think about it this is also the board most swayed by food and beverage advertising, so there's probably a greater gullibility / suggestibility level here, on average.

[Anonymous No.14311770]

>>14311707
even if they contain the same amount of sugar, the cocoa content makes the final taste different. Take a two spoons of sugar and mix it in to cups of water separately. Now add quinine to one cup

[Anonymous No.14311780]

>>14311770
So you can't eat white chocolate because it's too sweet but if someone sticks a bitter flavoring on top of it then you'll be fine? If that's your only problem why not just eat it alongside coffee?

[Anonymous No.14311838]

>>14311780
You're overthinking it, anon.

[Anonymous No.14311850]

>>14311780
yes? do you know how taste works you fucking idiot
>drink it with coffee
fuck off

[Anonymous No.14311896]

White chocolate is okay but I do not consider interchangeable with real chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14311903]

does white chocolate or pineapple on pizza get more hate?

[Anonymous No.14311970]

>>14311707
By "regular" chocolate, you mean milk chocolate? Yeah, I don't like that either because it's a big mouthful of fatty sugar. Only dark chocolate is good. I want more chocolate, less sugar. In your mind, why is milk chocolate "regular" chocolate? Has you mind been trained to believe this is the default format of sweet chocolate by advertisement?

[Anonymous No.14312274]

>>14310554
but you didn't rule out the possibility that you will do it again

[Anonymous No.14312316]

>>14309422
I really like White Chocolate Peppermint Cocoa in the winter. The peppermint counterbalances the sweetness, they warm you up, and make a good contrast to rich holiday food.

[Anonymous No.14312331]

>>14309422
It is delicious. The problem most people have is that it isn't chocolate/as good as real chocolate. If it was named something other than white chocolate it would be more highly regarded.

[Anonymous No.14312551]

>>14309523
Holy fucking shit you people are insufferable. Yes, we all know this. If you don't eat something because "name" you are a child.

> eggplant isn't eggs
> headcheese isn't cheese
> Rocky Mountain oysters isnt oysters
> black pudding isn't pudding or dessert
> Eskimo ice cream isn't ice cream
> mountain chicken isn't chicken
> white chocolate isn't chocolate (but guess what, it's main ingredient is coco butter, from the coco plant, that we use to make chocolate with)
Fucking retard, go back to middle school.

[Anonymous No.14312578]

>>14309422
It's way too sweet.

[Anonymous No.14312851]

>>14311780
>I don't know how flavours work together and genuinely think that eating sugar is the same as eating sugar balanced out by other flavours

[Anonymous No.14312927]

>>14311707
>regular chocolate and white chocolate are nearly identical in sugar content and therefore sweetness
Perceived sweetness is not determined by sugar content alone. Ketchup consists of about 25% sugar—more than twice as much as the average softdrink—but no one in their right mind will claim that ketchup tastes sweeter than ginger ale.

[Anonymous No.14312933]

>>14309422
Everything white is superior.

[Anonymous No.14313001]

>>14309422
This, best tasting chocolate (I don't care if it's not "real" chocolate, there's no other name for it)

[Anonymous No.14313181]

>>14311186
it depends heavily on the tea but it can be a premium experience

[Anonymous No.14314114]

>>14311707
Not quite correct, the bitter flavor elements in regular chocolate acts as a contrast to the sweetness and makes it easier to eat in quantity.

[Anonymous No.14314747]

>>14309422
Came to post the opinion: dark chocolate>cookies & cream>milk chocolate>white chocolate

[Anonymous No.14314863]

>>14312927
>Ketchup consists of about 25% sugar
>but no one in their right mind will claim that ketchup tastes sweeter than ginger ale
You don't drink a bottle of ketchup you retard. The amount most use is less than 1/4 of 1 ounce, compared to a single serve bottled soda at 20 oz. That's over 80 times as much of the latter taken in vs the former in one sitting. There's your obvious difference.

[Anonymous No.14314923]

>>14311970
>By "regular" chocolate, you mean milk chocolate?
>In your mind, why is milk chocolate "regular" chocolate?
>Has you mind been trained to believe this is the default format of sweet chocolate by advertisement?
Stop being a contrarian idiot. It's common knowledge chocolate not otherwise specified means milk chocolate. And if you want something more objective proving that look at sales. Milk chocolate has always outsold dark chocolate, by far, every year. You need to ask specifically for dark chocolate or else no one will give you that kind, which is the exact definition for "default" RE: regular milk chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14314935]

>>14309422
White chocolate and ricotta icing is based.

[Anonymous No.14315229]

>>14309422
it's just fucking sugar and oil, like what even the hell ?!

[Anonymous No.14315567]

Its fine but low quality white chocolate is common and is so fucking disgusting

[Anonymous No.14315918]

>>14309422
dark = white >>>>> milk

dark chocolate (70%) is rich but flavorful, deep but light at the same time.
white chocolate (without milk) is rich but bright, very sweet but not lingering.

milk chocolate is heavy, saccharine, cloying, and feels like it coats your entire mouth. Milk chocolate is the worst.


pic tangentially related I guess

[Anonymous No.14315926]

It's ok to be white chocolate.

[Anonymous No.14315941]

>>14310144
>>14310188
>>14310249
>>14310381
>>14310395
>>14310469
white chocolate is at least partially chocolate, because it's the same as other chocolates (minus the cacao powder solids)

boneless wings are not wings because they are literally not wings.

Boneless wings actually substitute better for wings,
than white chocolate substitutes for dark chocolate.

That's because the equivalent to "chocolate" isn't "wings", but rather "chicken" or "white meat poultry"