/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.14259140]

And your dessert sir. Enjoy.

[Anonymous No.14259144]

[Anonymous No.14259149]

>>14259140
>it's not ice cream
>it's actually poopoo

[Anonymous No.14259150]

The terrorists were right. This has to end.

[Anonymous No.14259183]

Can i get a fuckin bowl around here?

[Anonymous No.14259538]

>>14259140
Why is this guy bringing it out?

[Anonymous No.14260175]

>>14259183
Here you are sir. Let me know if there's anything else you need.

[Anonymous No.14261768]

>>14259140
Why do people eat this shit up?

[Anonymous No.14261788]

>>14261768
post-modern pseudo-intellectual one-upmanship

[Anonymous No.14261791]

>>14259140
Nothing wrong with it. The dissonance is the objective, of course.

[Anonymous No.14261801]

>>14259140

BONE APPLE TEETH

[Anonymous No.14261807]

This is a German thing isn't it.

[Anonymous No.14261815]

>>14261768

They price stuff like this for rich people because only rich people will waste their money on this stupid shit.

[Anonymous No.14261823]

>>14261768
I fucking hate modern "art", and I especially hate "artsy" food.. It's literally just throwing shit from the kitchen onto a plate, it looks messy and ugly, it seems hard to actually eat, and worst of all it's fucking $285 dollars.

[Anonymous No.14261838]

>>14261823
Here's your deconstructed grilled cheese, sir. That'll be 39.99 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14261847]

>>14259150
They don't eat pork so they're hardly an authority on cuisine.

[Anonymous No.14261857]

>>14261847

[Anonymous No.14261867]

>>14261857
Hormones aren't a bad thing to ingest through meat. Stress only makes meat less tender in the long term.
That being said I think bleeding is probably a better slaughtering method, despite the cruelty concerns.

[Anonymous No.14261916]

>>14259150
>The terrorists were right. This has to end.
But Israel did 911, and the USS Liberty. Bin Laden never even claimed credit for 911, the CIA and Mossad are just taking advantage of the fact that you don't speak Arabic. When they raised his compound they found conspiracy theory books about who really did 911, because he had nothing to do with it. America took Afghanistan because it is on the other side of Iran which allows America to do two things, have military bases that surround Iran and also block potential oil pipelines from the middle East to China. Preventing China from becoming a superpower.

[Anonymous No.14261950]

>>14261823
>hating modern art
I guess i shouldn't be surprised that a site like 4chan is home to small minded philistines like yourself that get angry at things they don't understand

[Anonymous No.14261961]

>>14261950
Stop pretending like there's anything to modern art beyond money laundering and replacing beauty with ugliness.

[Anonymous No.14261980]

>>14261961
Not him but there's always been shit art. Using modern art as a catch all term for every single thing that's produced today makes you seem like a retard. There's plenty of interesting things being created today, and not everything is pseudo avant garde interpretive bullshit. You just see the dumb shit online because it's easier to shitpost about.

[Anonymous No.14261992]

>>14259140
Delete that shit right now.

[Anonymous No.14261995]

>>14261980
I wasn't the spongebob poster, but it's not just modern art. And the whole
>there's always been bad stuff, it's always been like this
is just annoying nonjudgmentalist lunacy because it's completely false. They didn't have museums dedicated to ugliness, laziness, and undermining culture in the past.

[Anonymous No.14261996]

>>14261992
Delete it yourself, grab a spoon.

[Anonymous No.14262018]

>>14261996
Lol, you win this round.

[Anonymous No.14262037]

>>14261961
The poster in that pic comes off as a huge pseud.

[Anonymous No.14262038]

>>14261995
The bricks have an evil energy to them

[Anonymous No.14262041]

>>14261995
>They didn't have museums dedicated to ugliness, laziness, and undermining culture in the past.
No one is saying they did, and I'm certainly not saying I like this garbage. All I'm saying is that it's retarded to dismiss all art made in the modern age just because some museums fill themselves with pretentious garbage.

[Anonymous No.14262046]

>>14262037
What does pic related symbolize to you? Is it worth $4.4 million?

[Anonymous No.14262052]

>>14261995
What the fuck is somebody adverse to ugliness doing on this website of all places? Holy shit you're a dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.14262068]

>>14262052
Maybe I'm here to escape the ugly world outside.

[Anonymous No.14262069]

>>14262046
it represents this

[Anonymous No.14262077]

>>14262046
What does an unfinished sculpture of a dragon symbolize to you?

[Anonymous No.14262115]

>>14262077
Nothing. But it required more craftsmanship, effort, and thought than a 140 character tweet despite them not being able to finish. If they did complete it, it probably looks pretty cool, especially if they added a nice wood stain.

[Anonymous No.14262139]

> big slop o shit

[Anonymous No.14262175]

>>14262046
I like it, especially the way it's lit. Reminds me of this image that Mug anon posted a couple years ago.

[Anonymous No.14262203]

>>14262115
>But it required more craftsmanship, effort, and thought
Thought is debatable.

So its just a cool looking piece of art? Is that it? What does it say about the modern man or society or how we think? The sculpture next to the dragon and that bed sculpture say far more about us as human beings then that dragon sculpture. People today dont seem to realize that art today is more about trying to capture whats in the interior rather then whats on the exterior.

[Anonymous No.14262211]

>>14262069
Don't you dare.
This is a true work of art immortalized within the interwebs. Untainted by profit or convention.

[Anonymous No.14262214]

>>14262203
>20 questions for something that took effort and isn't visually offensive
>defensive and offensive for post modern shit
I'm not playing this game with you, faggot.

[Anonymous No.14262224]

>>14262214
You dont understand art yet you think you can comment on it. Stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

[Anonymous No.14262228]

>>14262175
>Dali
>Jim Beam
>best girl
This picture shows so much class I had to do a double take.

[Anonymous No.14262231]

>>14262228
I hope mug anon is still around. I miss his threads. That picture I posted is unequivocally the greatest image ever posted on the internet. It's actually a modern art masterpiece.

[Anonymous No.14262234]

>>14262214
Nothing wrong with putting a giant fertility idol in your back yard.

[Anonymous No.14262241]

>>14262224
>You just don't understand art
>You're not allowed to comment on it
>Stop disagreeing with me

[Anonymous No.14262244]

>>14261768
Is annoying af to hear Grant Achatz speak. I could hear the subtitles in his voice

[Anonymous No.14262249]

>>14262241
You can disagree with me, but youre itterly dismissive of modern art and dont actually care about having a conversation. Your mind is already set and nothing i say will change your view on the matter so go fuck yourself.

[Anonymous No.14262251]

>>14262241
Art is a secret club and you can't get in.

[Anonymous No.14262267]

>>14262068
Try Reddit. We intensify ths ugliness of the world here, not hide from it.

[Anonymous No.14262280]

>>14262249
>jumping at the chance to defend degenerate vulgar shit that has no place in decent society
>barraging questions like Ben Shapiro instead of making any point
>projecting faggotry and stubbornness
>pretending to want any discussion
You're so disingenuous. >>>/lgbt/

>>14262251
At least someone is being honest here.

[Anonymous No.14262295]

>>14262280
Why is modern art degenerate and vulgar?
Why is classical art beautiful and ideal?

[Anonymous No.14262296]

>>14262249
>>14262267
Here's your deconstructed Caesar salad, sir. That'll be $100 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14262300]

>>14261768
That will be 600$ plus tip sir

[Anonymous No.14262318]

>>14261961
Ah ah I was thinking about that pic, really represents the current mindset of the shitters who roam this website who would rather have a cringy wood carved dragon tail than this exquisite autoerotic art in their living room.
I remember some shitlords on /pol/ who were circle jerking in threads spammed with neo classical buildings from fucking Azerbaijan that looked like a ghetto disney land, painted in the saddest colors ever. Or the polish idiots creaming on pompier paintings of winged hussars and blonde women dancing in wheat fields.

[Anonymous No.14262333]

>>14262214
Oh nooo a vagiiiina reeeeeeee.
People used to shit and fuck every where in Versailles give me a break

[Anonymous No.14262336]

>>14262295
>Why is modern art degenerate and vulgar?
Was a "sculpture" of a guy sucking himself off, an unmade bed with vodka bottles and condoms strewn about, and these abominations >>14262214 all on display really not enough to answer that for you? Do I need to explain to you how a guy sucking himself off is degenerate and vulgar? The absolute state of public schools.
>Why is classical art beautiful and ideal?
How about the fact that it isn't a literal can of shit? It tries to uplift man instead of bringing man down to the gutters. Why should art reflect the ugliness of the world in sick and twisted displays that only alienate people like a flies feeding on a rotting cow's head or a stack of bricks in the middle of a room or even a light turning on and off?

[Anonymous No.14262350]

>>14262336
Wake up sheeple

[Anonymous No.14262353]

>>14262333
Here's your deconstructed burger, sir. That'll be $49.50 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14262360]

>>14262353
I don't tip

[Anonymous No.14262363]

>>14261995
Oh shit I saw that exact piece at the Tate Modern when I was in high school. The worst one was a piece that was literally a blank canvas. Nothing else at all.
Gilbert and George was hilarious though.

[Anonymous No.14262371]

>>14262336
You didnt read my question at all you retard. I said, why is modern art degenerate? Whats the cause and reasoning for it?

>How about the fact that it isn't a literal can of shit? It tries to uplift man instead of bringing man down to the gutters. Why should art reflect the ugliness of the world in sick and twisted displays that only alienate people like a flies feeding on a rotting cow's head or a stack of bricks in the middle of a room or even a light turning on and off?

Why should it uplift man? Why is art not allowed to portray people as they really are?

[Anonymous No.14262398]

>>14262360
this is a man with big balls right here

[Anonymous No.14262399]

>>14262371
There's no point man he just cherrypicks stuff intended to shock without any reference to context or anything. Manzoni's shit was a response to the art market and Hirst takes clearly from Rembrandt or Caravage or the long lasting tradition in art of depicting shit, piss, cum and putrefaction.

[Anonymous No.14262404]

>>14262398
I just live in a civilized country where staff has a decent pay and don't rely on whoring for tips

[Anonymous No.14262419]

>>14262404
Ah booo small balls then.

[Anonymous No.14262454]

This seems like typical talmudic fecal obsession. I'm pretty sure if you look into the establishment, you'll find plenty of cohencidences

[Anonymous No.14262488]

>>14261916
based non-brainwashedposter

[Anonymous No.14262496]

>>14262371
>literally needs to be told why a sculpture of a guy sucking himself off is degenerate
Let me guess, #notallmodernart again? The thing about reprobates is that they don't want art (or anything, for that matter) to uplift man. They don't want anyone to be the best they can be, to excel above and beyond. No, they just want everyone brought down to their level.

Apparently "portraying people as they really are" is flies feeding on a rotting head, a bejeweled skull, a light turning on/off, a giant inflatable green butt-plug, or a blank canvas as another anon mentioned. You gonna give me some froufrou malarkey about it being an expression of their laziness/perversion, the art industry's corruption, and a symbol of money laundering? Why should some pervert's degeneracy be on display?

>>14262399
>#notallmodernart
Yet nobody has posted anything to the contrary. That you compare Manzoni to Rembrandt/Caravage is an insult to the latter and shows you know less about art than a chimpanzee (if there isn't already an experiment/study on that, it sure wouldn't be hard to attract a chimp to a beautiful painting over a can of shit or a rotting cow head). No doubt the other anon won't badger you about that asinine comparison though.

[Anonymous No.14262542]

>>14262496
>literally needs to be told why a sculpture of a guy sucking himself off is degenerate
Missed me again.

>That you compare Manzoni to Rembrandt/Caravage
He didnt compare Manzoni to those two.

Youve misread several posts by now. Are you okay anon?

[Anonymous No.14262546]

>>14262496
What's degenerate about sucking yourself off? What is it "degenerating" from? "Degenerate" is derived of a verb. So expand on that.

[Anonymous No.14262552]

>/ck/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.14262578]

>>14262542
>state argument, provide supporting examples, explain how they support argument
>"Missed me again."
Keep proving me right, sodomite.
>He didnt compare Manzoni to those two.
You're right, but Hirst is just another perverted reprobate too. It really makes no difference.
>Youve misread several posts by now.
Really haven't, you're just being a disingenuous reprobate faggot. >>>/lgbt/

>>14262546
>please be my English teacher
Instead of just adding to the 41%, try being successful at something in your life for once.

[Anonymous No.14262599]

>>14262578
>Keep proving me right, sodomite.
Youre retarded. Youve never answered the question. I asked you why is modern art degenerate and vulgar and for some reason youre fixated on the one sculpture instead of modern art in general.

>Really haven't
You really have. And you seem so familiar with /lgbt/ so maybe you should go back.

[Anonymous No.14262610]

>>14262578
You literally can't even defend your own use of a word.

[Anonymous No.14262648]

>>14262046
Looks like my former roommates room, just missing his dildo

[Anonymous No.14262659]

>>14262599
>state argument, provide multiple supporting examples, explain how they support argument
>NOOOOOOOO YOU DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION
>YOU'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT ONE SCULPTUUUUREEEEEEE
Keep lying, irredeemable reprobate.

>>14262610
I didn't know "degenerate" was your "trigger word", Sally. I'm sure you consider pic related progress though, so I can see why you wouldn't understand the word "degenerate". I do find it mildly amusing that you think you found some 'gotcha' though.

>>14262648
I think there was a dildo in there somewhere. Or maybe it just wasn't "progressive" enough for that.

[Anonymous No.14262681]

>>14262552
Here's your deconstructed shepherd's pie, sir. That'll be $75.00 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14262700]

>>14262659
>Degenerate

>1.having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.
"a degenerate form of a higher civilization"

>2. lacking some property, order, or distinctness of structure previously or usually present.

>3. an immoral or corrupt person.

>4. decline or deteriorate physically, mentally, or morally.
"the quality of life had degenerated"

I ask you for a simple explanation of how sucking yourself off is related to any of these qualities.

You can't, because it's not. I'm tired of faggots like you misusing words all the time. There is no "gotcha", I'm calling you a fucking retard, because you're a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.14262706]

>>14262139
Here's your deconstructed ice cream, sir. That'll be $59.99 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14262714]

>>14261791
Yes there is — it's a moronic objective.

[Anonymous No.14262715]

>>14262681
>without tip
You got that right.

[Anonymous No.14262721]

>>14262700
>a sexually immoral abominable act isn't "having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline", "lacking some property, order, or distinctness of structure previously or usually present", an act of "an immoral or corrupt person", or "decline or deteriorate physically, mentally, or morally"
wew lad

[Anonymous No.14262727]

>>14261768
with enough confidence you can make the richest of idiots spend money.

it's soulless

[Anonymous No.14262738]

>>14262700
>autofellatio isn't degenerate
the funniest thing about your post, is that you probably typed all of that with a dead-serious look on your face.

[Anonymous No.14262750]

>>14262721
Define how sucking yourself off is a "sexually immoral abominable act".

Define how having the physical fortitude to do so, the mental faculty to be comfortable enough in your own body to suck your own dick, how any of this relates to morality beyond some faggot overly concerned with what some guy does with his own dick in his own free time, and most importantly define WHAT it is degenerating from.

You can't do so, because your tiny brain and fat, flabby inflexible body can't picture a new world of stimulus. So you choose to misuse the English language and lash out in anger when your retardation is called into question.

[Anonymous No.14262775]

>>14262659
>state argument, provide multiple supporting examples, explain how they support argument
Thats ideal if you did that, except you didnt.
You never stated how and why modern art moved away from platonic ideals and beauty.
You never stated why modern art adopted ugliness beyond your shallow reasoning.

Modern art aims to depict truths in the world, not some unrealistic ideal. And its form must match its content.

So no, you didnt answer the question. And the more you post the more obvious you know fucking nothing about art. Youre a pseud in the truest sense of the word. Im not gonna waste my time with you. Ive said my piece. Call me a degenerate all you want. You barely even know what it means without resorting to a dictionary. Youre a fucking joke, dude. Go back to the shithole of /pol/ where you no doubt reside.

[Anonymous No.14262787]

>>14262738
You're free to attempt to explain how it's degenerate too.

I've already outlined the definition of the word. Go ahead and tell me how it fits.

[Anonymous No.14262826]

Imagine crying about degeneracy on fucking 4chan of all places

[Anonymous No.14262847]

>>14262750
>sucking yourself off isn't immoral, faggot!
Are you in the closet or something? Why are you trying to defend gay shit while simultaneously calling others faggots? Do you suck yourself off every night? I hope you're not eating it. You know that stuff's meant for biological reproduction and not sustenance, right? While I'm on the subject of biology, did you know that your anus is meant for defecation and not penetration? You might want to look into gay bowel syndrome before it's too late.
>how any of this relates to morality beyond some faggot overly concerned with what some guy does with his own dick in his own free time
I really don't care that you suck yourself off and likely eat your own semen every day. I'm just stating the plain and simple, self-evident truth that it's degenerate. You shouldn't try declaring that it's normal or healthy or anything, because it's not. It's an abomination. Do you need to look up the definition of that word too? I can wait.

It wasn't that long ago that the world was sane enough to recognize homosexuality as a mental disorder. Nowadays though, that's all gone so far out the window that little boys are told they can become girls and vice versa. They're told to hate their own bodies and that they should take toxic cross-sex hormones and mutilate their healthy body (including breast implants/removal or chopping off their dicks/making a flesh bag with forearm skin). I sure hope you're not going down that path, but I wouldn't be surprised if you were. After all, "morality's relative" and "we're all just animals" and "if it feels good, do it!" is what's taught in public schools these days.

>>14262775
tl;dr fag, your retarded lies are boring and your level of intellectual dishonesty just makes any discussion a waste of time if you're not at least going to be entertaining like the other gay retard. No doubt you'll cry for me to leave or be censored next.

[Anonymous No.14262930]

>>14262847
I have never sucked myself off and have no inclination to do so. I'm stating a very simple thing here, and time and time again you prove to be unable to address it in any meaningful way, because time and time again you demonstrate that you're a retarded faggot.

You continually make the claim, "sucking yourself off is degenerate", and when pressed on HOW it is degenerate, even when provided with the definitions for easy reference, you reflexively get triggered and dig yourself further into a hole, as now you not only have been unable to define how the word degenerate is applicable to sucking yourself off, but now you've claimed an act involving literally one person and one person only, is somehow homosexual, and preemptively have tried to strawman that "morality is relative", when it literally is. Your definition of what may be right and wrong can and likely is vastly different than gigantic swaths of the population.

With each post you prove yourself to be more and more of a fool. Keep it coming.

I can call you a faggot because I can easily explain that faggot has evolved colloquially on the internet as a common slang to address people who act in a manner such as the one you're acting in, ergo, you are a faggot.

You could have stated that the act is degenerate in a similar way, and that you're using it in a slang form for "thing I don't like", but you decided to double down when I posted the dictionary definition, and now you've been intellectually cornered, leaving your only further course of action to be to backpedal from here on out.

Funny you lament public schools, yet display a level of literacy lower than an average inner city nog middle school dropout.

[Anonymous No.14262931]

>>14262826
Imagine paying $29.99 for a deconstructed apple. Please don't forget to tip, sir.

[Anonymous No.14262947]

>>14262930
>I flawless demand logical arguments from you explaining every last facet and detail of your post down to definitions of words and how they apply
>no, why should I have any reading comprehension skills to understand common English words on my own
>what do you mean hurling insults isn't a valid logical argument?
And now I'm bored of you too. Enjoy your own cock in your mouth, I guess.

[Anonymous No.14262953]

>>14262947
Thank you for conceding defeat, you retarded faggot.

[Anonymous No.14262955]

>>14262953
>literally my pic related

[Anonymous No.14262962]

>>14262955
not an argument

[Anonymous No.14262967]

>>14262244
HAHAHA

[Anonymous No.14262978]

>>14262962

[Anonymous No.14262985]

>>14262978
see >>14262962

[Anonymous No.14262999]

>>14262985

[Anonymous No.14263004]

>>14262999
the text of >>14262962 still applies.

[Anonymous No.14263092]

>>14262546
>What's degenerate about sucking yourself off?

[Anonymous No.14263097]

>>14263092
You can read through the thread and see what you're in for or you can try to explain it yourself anon.

[Anonymous No.14263099]

>>14263092
Here's your deconstructed beer, Mr. Clarkson. That'll be $34.95 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14263102]

>>14263099
why do you have these so readily available

[Anonymous No.14263108]

>>14263102
not anon but he prolly just googled beer ingredients or hops and wheat.

[Anonymous No.14263253]

>>14262546
I'll expand my cock in your mom's pussy you braindead quintuple nigger. Kill yourself and all your artist friends.

[Anonymous No.14263342]

>>14262931
I don't give a fuck about your gay argument about things the retarded 1% buy. I just find it hilarious that of all the places someone could go on the internet to bitch about "degenerates" they'd pick 4chan.

[Anonymous No.14263366]

>>14263253
not an argument

[Anonymous No.14263558]

>>14259140
It's no wonder that restaurant's completely empty

[Anonymous No.14263575]

>>14263558
Here's your deconstructed omelette, sir. That'll be $100.03 without tip.

[Anonymous No.14263577]

>>14261768
>its this fucking guy again
Does every meal at his restaurant involve chefs coming out if the kitchen to throw shit on the table in front of you

[Anonymous No.14263580]

>>14263577
Here's your deconstructed roast chicken, sir. That'll be $295.50 without tip

[Anonymous No.14263603]

>>14263580
>no potato seeds
>no carrot seeds
>no onion bulb
>no stick of butter
I'm not paying for this shit, maybe you should learn to cook

[Anonymous No.14263626]

>>14259140
this is the most coastie thing I have ever seen

[Anonymous No.14263648]

>>14261768

Welcome to FUCK YOU!
>Throws your dinner at you
That'll be $800. gratuity has already been added

[Anonymous No.14263659]

>>14262046
Some fucking debt-ridden fart-sniffer woke up in this exact filth and, after a bong rip and some coffee, had just one moment of clarity when they thought they'd just put their own living conditions on display as an example of just how badly someone in the first world can waste their life.
Honestly, if the "artist" didn't live in that squalor, I might be impressed. Not $4.4M impressed, but they've certainly captured A feeling in there.

[Anonymous No.14263666]

>>14262360

You're gonna tip, Mr. Pink.

[Anonymous No.14263685]

>>14263603
>I'm not paying for this shit, maybe you should learn to cook

[Anonymous No.14263689]

>>14262363
I always dislike seeing this one piece of modern art at the High Museum of Art that is just a big piece of thick felt. The person who sold the artist the bolt of felt should receive the recognition. The artist did nothing but purchase a big bolt of felt.

[Anonymous No.14263708]

>>14263689
link?

[Anonymous No.14263777]

>>14261768
Money Laundering businesses.

[Anonymous No.14263817]

>>14263366
Shut up molyneux

[Anonymous No.14265107]

>>14262249
Yeah but posting his correct views makes me happy and retards like you mad so I'd rather he keep posting. Kill yourself worthless so called artfag. You're retarded and everyone sees your shit and think's so. Nigger.

[Anonymous No.14265795]

Why are people ITT so mad at modern art when they finance furry erotic games and shemale onlyfans with their neetbux?

[Anonymous No.14265837]

>>14262496
Hirst is a good artist but you may be not sensible to the questions of life, death and sex...
Tell me who are good modern artists then

[Anonymous No.14265856]

>>14262599

>people selling literal stripes of paint on canvas or piles of trash for millions of dollars to launder money
>art community systematically chases off great artists who don't huff their farts or have right wing views
>even in Hollywood, being good at your craft and not a pseud gets you shit on ie. Toby Maguire, Edward Norton, etc
>it's okay though that self-sucking sculpture was just a poor example

Yup, this is the typical liberal art student BS that made me reconsider life in the theatre. The fact that this all needs to be so painstakingly explained to you is just a testament to the naivety and grossly feminine sentimentality of people like you.

[Anonymous No.14265866]

>>14261961
I enjoy how every time this gets posted people shit on the dragon autist, and yet it still gets posted.

[Anonymous No.14265868]

>>14265856
>great artists
Like?

[Anonymous No.14265870]

>>14265856
I bet you think postmodernism is bad instead of being really interesting

[Anonymous No.14265871]

>>14261768
those panels did not come off the ceiling

[Anonymous No.14265872]

>>14265866
Who's the original poster? More of his cringe?

[Anonymous No.14265876]

>>14265856

Ps, for anybody that thinks autofellatio guy is bad, that's nothing. It's actually a fairly competent sculpture. Look up "The Voice of Fire" or "Interior Semiotics" and get ready to see some truly degenerate shit.

[Anonymous No.14265889]

>>14265868

>initial reception of Samuel Beckett: characters being booed off stage & told to commit suicide, plays abandoned during intermission, scathing reviews in Europe & America of a "pretentious French intellectual"
>modern reception of Samuel Beckett: ripped off of more than Shakespeare & you literally cannot attend any formal dramatic education without worshipping the ground the man walked upon

Shall I go on?

[Anonymous No.14265932]

>>14265889
are you pro or anti beckett

[Anonymous No.14265962]

>>14265889
What's your point?
Critics disliked Blade Runner when it came out, thought Elvis was a dangerous provocateur and generally panned the innovative works of Melville, Joyce or Orwell.
When it comes to art the impressionists were frowned upon and Victor Hugo's played caused literal fights in the audience.
Also >muh right wing artists are persecuted, Mel Gibson deserves everything that's happening to him

[Anonymous No.14265997]

>>14262203
That's a terrible take. Why do I have to see it and be disgusted by it? Why is the quality so fucking shit? I see people who take 2 hours to make sand castles or sand mermaids that look beautiful.
The low quality sculpture shows the artist has no talent, no thought process and this shit ruins art galleries.
Sure, I think to myself that the fact this made does say a lot about society but I already am disgusted about society and how this shit is normalised. Being reminded that this disgust in society exists isn't good or enjoyable.
However, if it was high quality it would be porn and porn belongs on age restricted websites. Art like that belongs in the trash.
Also depending on how you look at it, the dragon tree can mean a lot more to someone, just like how reading a novel can mean more to someone than reading philosophy.

[Anonymous No.14266008]

>>14265997
Hey buddy you're a few hours late for this trolling position, don't rev up your moralfag folder we have everything we need here, better luck next time champ.

[Anonymous No.14266022]

>>14266008
imagine smiling thinking you were typing out a witty response and it just ending up to be a reddit seethe post

[Anonymous No.14266027]

>>14266022
Ahah who's frothing at a paper mache sculpture really

[Anonymous No.14266044]

>>14265997
The time argument is a loose one you don't get rewarded for spending 2hrs to take a shit, it's shit regardless of how much time it took you to drop it. Might be even worse, spending days to carve a shitty fantasy dragon only impresses vaping neckbeards

[Anonymous No.14266113]

>>14266044
I don't really care for the dragon. Honestly I don't enjoy dragons and fantasy. But 100%, people are much more likely to appreciate that.
The difference is, anyone can slap clay together and recreate the art on the left. But there are very few who could or could be bothered to recreate a tree dragon or whatever it is. Also, given a minute to think about it, I could honestly think of something much more deeper than someone sucking his own dick, which is what makes the art work so repulsive. It's like someone put that there as a silly little joke because they don't really give a shit about the course they are enrolled in. It's like something I would have done in art class in high school, as I didn't r ally give a shit about art, I'd just draw dicks in my art folder, and the fact that the person was doing this at uni probably means that all the art had to be finished and displayed to pass the unit. I had plenty of friends who did and arts degree for a year or two to get the hang of uni before they decided what they actually wanted to do with their life. In Australia it's a pretty common thing and even my mum tried to convince me to do an arts degree instead of having a year off. Not sure how that differentiates in the US. But yeah, I do agree with your argument about time - times spent does not equate to quality. But the way I see it, say you give two people 2 days to create a dress. One dress is perfectly seamed, fits nicely, stitching is of great quality whereas the other one has loose thread, there are fold lines in the dress but it still fits right. You could argue that the dress, that is poorly created, is better than the first because 'you don't need to have skill to be a seamstress.' But in reality, the first one is technically better. The rules can be bent, and that's what creates new fashion trends. But people will prefer to wear the dress that isn't...shit. Some trends change rules for the better whereas some are extremely retarded.

[Anonymous No.14266119]

>>14266113
In other words - there isn't enough information in the image to judge it properly. So I can understand why some people hate on the tree guy and some people don't

>>14266027
Damn, you got me. Guess you win this one

[Anonymous No.14266141]

>>14266113
>anyone can slap clay together and recreate the art on the left
no
> I could honestly think of something much more deeper than someone sucking his own dick
But you don't, same argument as "my 4-yo could do this"
>One dress is perfectly seamed, fits nicely, stitching is of great quality whereas the other one has loose thread, there are fold lines in the dress but it still fits right
Reminder that the dragon tail is unfinished and doesn't even look that good

[Anonymous No.14266142]

>>14263689
I remember seeing an "art piece" at a local art gallery that was literally a bunch of standing fans grouped together in a plot.
>Army of Fans lul

[Anonymous No.14266150]

>>14266141
I appreciate the effort anon.

[Anonymous No.14266192]

>>14266150
Apply yourself ffs

[Anonymous No.14266208]

>>14261768
Grant Achatz annoys me so much. Of all the pretentious chefs out there today he strikes me as THE most pretentious

[Anonymous No.14266343]

Why is it that only smallbrains hate contemporary art and architecture? I associate it with having a small dick.

t. globalist capitalist

[Anonymous No.14266377]

>>14266343
And I associate liking post modern art and architecture with having a big nose.

[Anonymous No.14266390]

>>14266377
Ashkenazi Jews have 1 STD dev higher average IQ than whites. Literally all it is to our success. People like you are like nogs complaining about whites. Those watercolor paintings you adore and pointillist pieces were just as cutting edge in their time. It's just a lack of education and a fawning over what TV says is art when you were a kid, a period you never grew out of

[Anonymous No.14266402]

>>14266390
Are you including hispanic whites and other mongrel that only fit the loosest definition of white in that classification? Because if you look at the IQs of European whites and compare them to the IQ of the fake jews you might be surprised. Now scram, schlomo. Your dirty tricks don't work here.

[Anonymous No.14266411]

>>14266402
Nonhispanic white American average is 104, Ashkenazi is 114. 1.7% of the population and 40% of Nobel science prize laureates. You are inferior, Mitch. Check out The Bell Curve by Murray. Intelligence, which is genetic, is linked directly to income in a free market. You're poor for a reason.

[Anonymous No.14266416]

>>14266390
>>14266411
>making me post it

[Anonymous No.14266437]

>>14266416
This. There is nothing special about jews, other than their rampant nepotism and shitty business practices.

[Anonymous No.14266442]

>>14266416
This image is completely false and completely unsourced. It is extremely well documented that Jewish American students outscore their white inferiors on every standardized exam. Whoever made this is trying to create distrust in free markets and create a socialistic system

[Anonymous No.14266455]

>>14262353
wtf I thought this song was a joke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQWo0YSdKGQ

[Anonymous No.14266459]

>>14266442
Israel has an average IQ of 94. That much is true. If Ashkenazi Jews truly are so much smarter than everyone else then that number should be higher. I think you're lying, and posting exam scores to prove intelligence is further proof of that.

[Anonymous No.14266467]

>>14266459
Israel is only 30% Ashkenazi. The other groups, who are much poorer, score far lower on IQ tests. Exams link very well to IQ scores, see: GRE

[Anonymous No.14266477]

>>14266442
Your retarded.

[Anonymous No.14266482]

>>14266477
Nah, he's just got shekels on the mind almost all the time.

[Anonymous No.14266488]

>>14266459
You forget about all the arab jews and other scattered despora that moved back. Its like claim all white american are smart but ignoring all the irish, scottish, and italians mixed in.

[Anonymous No.14266497]

>>14266477
I got a 35 on my ACT, went to one of the best universities in the world, and make more money than you. What is it you do? Flip burgers and blame other, more intelligent groups, for your lack of discipline while skirting against the hard cap of your intelligence opening a package of bread buns?

[Anonymous No.14266507]

>>14266497
lol

[Anonymous No.14266520]

>>14266497
>its afraid

[Anonymous No.14266530]

>fine discussion on art devolves in race baiting, shit flinging, infographic tossing, phoney stats spewing.
T-thanks /pol/turds

[Anonymous No.14266762]

>>14266530
Don't bring up political topics if you don't want anyone to respond, retard. Now go cry for hiro to delete /pol/ again.

[Anonymous No.14266942]

>>14266762
Pol is reddit users who want to spout nigger freely tho

[Anonymous No.14266945]

>>14266762
I'm not her (>>14266530) I'm >>14266497

Also I've been here before /pol/ and /new/'s deletion

[Anonymous No.14267140]

>>14261768
Because its food

[Anonymous No.14267427]

>>14262727
>with enough confidence you can make the richest of idiots spend money.
It's literally just money laundering.

[Anonymous No.14267432]

>>14266762
/thread

[Anonymous No.14267453]

>>14261950
Fuck off faggot

[Anonymous No.14267562]

>>14262546
I deeply, deeply despise this poster.

Like more than any other anon I've seen in months, this is the fucking one I hate.

[Anonymous No.14267631]

>>14262295
art is only sold for laundering money nowadays so all these high profile artists doing low effort shit get most of their money from criminals.