/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.13619037]

in all honesty what is wrong with soy? is it as bad for you as people say? I kinda want to try it

[Anonymous No.13619040]

>>13619037
soy has lots of s trojan

[Anonymous No.13619042]

>>13619037
There's nothing wrong with soy, but protein shakes are kind of gay.

[Anonymous No.13619050]

>>13619042
those aren't necessarily protein shakes, but rather, they are a meal in a bottle

[Anonymous No.13619055]

>>13619037
nothing wrong with soy, but soylent was created so you wouldnt waste time eating and could make your employer more money which is cringeworthy

[Anonymous No.13619060]

>>13619037
it tastes yucky

[Anonymous No.13619076]

>>13619050
I know what they are. It's just really annoying how "soy" has become a buzzword (but kudos to the mods for actually doing literally anything since moot left and not filtering it here). Soy is great and versatile, but the people who unironically call people onions are usually doing meal prep and counting their protons, which is the most soy-cringe thing imaginable.

[Anonymous No.13619082]

>>13619076
It's pretty hard to count protons, Anon.

[Anonymous No.13619093]

Yes

[Anonymous No.13619096]

>>13619082
Monkeys find it hard to count in general.

[Anonymous No.13619107]

>>13619096
Don't be mean to monkeys, they're better than /fit/izens.

[Anonymous No.13619113]

>>13619076
I just need to lose weight and I'm thinking of ordering a bunch of these to last me about a month so I do not have to eat food

[Anonymous No.13619114]

>>13619107
Says the limp-wrist Nancy...

[Anonymous No.13619121]

>>13619113
They won’t make you lose weight. Being hungry will make you lose weight. You can drink those and still be hungry, or you can eat a light meal and still be hungry. The difference is only one method of weight loss will reduce the size of your tits. Not really, but it’s a fucking waste of time. You need to learn how to eat properly. Drinking some shakes and losing weight will only cause you to gain it back because you didn’t learn about proper nutrition and portion sizes.

[Anonymous No.13619122]

Soynut butter on triscuit crackers is the bomb. Damn I hate being allergic to soy.

[Anonymous No.13619123]

>>13619114
I think you're lost in the ocean of piss.

[Anonymous No.13619126]

>>13619121
good point anon

[Anonymous No.13619238]

/thread

[Anonymous No.13619240]

>>13619037
If you're a woman, there shouldn't be any problems.

[Anonymous No.13619245]

Soy is fine, using it as a replacement for meat is bad.

[Anonymous No.13619269]

What are the shits like on a full soylent diet? Is it basically just diarrhea?

[Anonymous No.13619334]

>>13619076
Yeah all those weightlifters are so cringe, your fat ass is definitely not cringe at all

[Anonymous No.13619336]

It's not so bad for you that you can't "try it".

I recommend their strawberry or mint chocolate chip

[Anonymous No.13619358]

>>13619037
The truth is that it has less to do with the product and more to do with who it is popular with.

[Anonymous No.13619361]

Have ya'll been to the fine website called reddit? There's plenty of other things you'd like there too, like Star Wars and bug chasing. Hey, did you know Orange Man bad?

[Anonymous No.13619378]

>>13619361
I’m so glad that isn’t Regis. Not that I play hs or watch hs youtubers. My friend is glad. That’s what I meant...

[Anonymous No.13619382]

>>13619037

The amino profile is a bit weird, and can cause issues if that's your ONLY source of protein. But if you also eat meat like a normal human being you'll be OK.

[Anonymous No.13619435]

>>13619037
"Something something feminizing something something not understanding how estrogen works"
- idiots who villainize soy and call people soy boys unironically

[Anonymous No.13619472]

>>13619037
The soylent fanbase attracts mind blowingly stupid people for some reason.

[Anonymous No.13619489]

>>13619269
pls resbond

[Anonymous No.13619796]

>>13619050
>they are a meal in a bottle
Daily reminder that Soylent is not legal for sale in Canada because it fails to meet the nutritional requirements to be marketed as a "meal replacement". Suddenly all the Soylent fans cried out about how "the Canadian food industry is biased", despite their product significantly missing the mark of "20% of an adult's daily nutrition".
Nothing inherently wrong with soy itself, though. It can be a part of a balanced diet.

[Anonymous No.13619800]

>>13619037
Nothing, really. But Soylent is basically Ensure for morons who think it's a good idea to live off of a liquid diet.

[Anonymous No.13619808]

>>13619269
I'm no professional, but I'd imagine they'd be much less frequent and not very big.

[Anonymous No.13619837]

>>13619269
>>13619808
>"Although there is no dietary reference intake for insoluble or soluble fiber, many experts recommend a total dietary fiber intake of 25 to 30 grams per day with about one-fourth — 6 to 8 grams per day — coming from soluble fiber."
>Fiber in Soylent Drink, Total Fiber: 2.85 g, Insoluble Fiber: 2.15 g
Assuming you take their "20%" claim at face value (which is a lie), and drink five per day, you'd consume 2.9 times five grammes of fibre, for an underwhelming 14.5g per day. Your stools would probably be rather loose or liquid, though:
>Total dietary fiber intake should be 25 to 30 grams a day from food, not supplements. Currently, dietary fiber intakes among adults in the United States average about 15 grams a day. That's about half the recommended amount.
You'd probably have the same kind of loose shits if you don't consume enough fibre in the first place. Also, if you have existing bowel motility issues, a all-fluid diet may exacerbate them.

[Anonymous No.13619869]

>>13619037
It is very bad for you but if you have it occasionally you'll be fine assuming you're healthy

[Anonymous No.13619909]

>>13619037

yet another Soylent shill appears

[Anonymous No.13619935]

>>13619909
>anyone talking about brand-name products is a shill

[Anonymous No.13620699]

>>13619037
It's the reason I donr have a gf