Why does Adam Ragusea trigger /ck/ so much?

[Anonymous No.13572084]

[Anonymous No.13572085]

>>>/trash/

[Anonymous No.13572088]

>>13572084
he dabbed on spicefags and they're bitter about it

[Anonymous No.13572097]

>>13572085
No U

[Anonymous No.13572101]

He's the embodiment of slave morality. You can tell that behind his cringey little "you do you!" shit and starting his plebbit comments with "friend, ...", there's real contempt hiding. He speaks this way because he's terrified of confrontation and has no idea how to handle disagreement. It's quite evident that he genuinely thinks he's the shit, but he's just too much of a coward and a mental weakling to face any critique head-on and honourably. That's why he hedges with these weasely little phrases, why he pre-empts all possible criticism with a pre-written and pinned FAQ, and why he saw the need to make that bizarre and incoherent video on why he refuses to use metric conversions.

So it doesn't surprise me that he's prone to the occasional outburst of impotent anger in his comments section from time to time -- he clearly has an ego and a measure of masculine rage, but has never learnt what to do with them, and has spent his life being afraid of any kind of self-affirmation. Why, for example, did he overreact with such vitriol to this relatively benign comment about ceramic stoves? Why does he get so upset over a very gentle quip about the narration? Because that's the kind of language in which Adam would himself codify his criticism. He interprets the slightest of gibes as full-frontal attacks because that's the way he'd make a criticism. Simple, honest and straightforward language is not for him; he lacks the courage to be direct.

As other anons have said, all of this has probably been reinforced/cemented by his having been a professor, where he's been able to go mostly unchallenged in his little fiefdom for years. Now he's suddenly exposed to the internet, where everyone is way harsher, and more importantly, don't need to please him to pass a class. I guess he's struggling to adapt a bit.

[Anonymous No.13572102]

>>13572088
Will they ever recover?

[Anonymous No.13572105]

>>13572101
cool pasta

[Anonymous No.13572110]

>>13572101
That's an al dente pasta

[Anonymous No.13572997]

>>13572084
He keeps making threads about himself

[Anonymous No.13573041]

>>13572084
he isn't a /pol/tard. that's pretty much it.

[Anonymous No.13573138]

>>13572101
this

[Anonymous No.13573355]

>>13573041
Why does he trigger /pol/?

[Anonymous No.13574053]

>>13572084
He's far too based for the brainlets of /ck/ to comprehend, especially >>13572101

[Anonymous No.13574164]

>>13573041
>>13573355
Absolutely this. This entire site has been absolutely saturated with Reddit tourists ever since the previous election. Due to the circumstances of the influx, said tourists accumulated in /pol/ and from there distributed through the rest of the website thinking they know our culture well enough to start posting immediately despite the fact that they have spent literally 0 time lurking. That, combined with the fact that they are Redditors at heart and thus exhibit many characteristics of the average redditor (normalfaggotry, being overly vocal and opinionated, spamming forced memes until they become part of natural conversation, herd mentality, general drone-like behavior) causes them to all of a sudden rise up against things like Ragusea all the time. He does or says one questionable thing (usually at least somewhat political in nature, as the tourists came here for political reasons and are more sensitive to such things) that goes against their opinions and they just explode all of a sudden. Due to their inherent vocalness, one may mistake just this group of tourists hating something for the entire board hating it. Though at this point it is not unlikely that they are in fact the majority after all.

[Anonymous No.13574681]

>>13572084
i've never heard of this faggot. who is he?