>>13398562
>>13398734
There's already an opposite of "ironic". It's "sincere", "honest", or "candid", depending on the kind of irony in question. Considering you have absolutely no clue what irony actually is (since, in this case, the idea you meant to negate was your possible sarcastic sentiment, given that sentiment != irony), none of us can reasonably have an idea what you actually meant. The best I can do is make assumptions based on the fact that basically no one actually knows how to use English correctly, let alone accurately or clearly.