Beans in Things That Beans Shouldn't Be in

[Anonymous No.13300404]

Any other examples?

[Anonymous No.13300408]

>>13300404
human bean

[Anonymous No.13300417]

>>13300404
bong here, i genuinely cant think of anything else apart from a cheese toastie that you could eat beans with?

[Anonymous No.13300418]

>>13300404
non funny British comedies

[Anonymous No.13300468]

>>13300417
Bongs are always wrongs

[Anonymous No.13300472]

chili

[Anonymous No.13300488]

>>13300472
But beans DO belong in chili.

[Anonymous No.13301355]

[Anonymous No.13301359]

coffee is beans
chocolate is beans
tofu is beans
peas is beans
thoughts is beans

[Anonymous No.13301376]

>>13301355
Feijoada doesn't have beans? I thought it was a literal slave food? Trying to stretch the meal the best they could.

[Anonymous No.13301383]

>>13300417
I can't think of a single thing you would eat baked beans with. I can't understand how a human can stomach those mushy, ketchup-flavoured n-words.

[Anonymous No.13301400]

>>13301359
beans is beans

[Anonymous No.13301753]

>>13300472
"chili" without beans is called pasta sauce.

[Anonymous No.13301988]

>>13300404
Chili.

[Anonymous No.13301997]

>>13300488
Incorrect. Beans were added by poor people to replace meat they didn't have. True chili only has cuts of meat in it.

[Anonymous No.13302010]

>>13301383
Pulled pork and brisket come to mind.

[Anonymous No.13302037]

>>13300404
Movie theaters

[Anonymous No.13302408]

>>13300404
Beans and pasta.... Gorgeous.

[Anonymous No.13302442]

>>13301753
Good God I'm glad I've never tried your "chili". You just pour beans in pasta sauce? That's fucking gross.

[Anonymous No.13302893]

>>13300404

You have to post an example first.

[Anonymous No.13304542]

>>13300404
Black beans would be good. The look of those beans just doesn't seem right. What's the flavor of the sauce they're in?

[Anonymous No.13304544]

>>13301383
Burgers of course. I could eat boston baked beans alone though tbqh.

[Anonymous No.13304550]

pancakes with bean paste (dorayaki)
ice cream with bean paste
just look up stuff made from adzuki beans

[Anonymous No.13304864]

[Anonymous No.13304872]

You should not add beans to shrimp scampi

[Anonymous No.13304907]

>>13304864
>bean pizza
How the fuck did I never think of this before.

[Anonymous No.13304964]

>>13301997
pureed beans are a pretty fantastic thickener though

[Anonymous No.13305148]

>>13300404
>pic unrelated

[Anonymous No.13305158]

>>13301383
This. I fucking hate those overly sweet overcooked shitty beans. I don’t get why would people buy this shit. It’s expensive and disgusting.

[Anonymous No.13305332]

[Anonymous No.13305335]

[Anonymous No.13305338]

[Anonymous No.13305340]

[Anonymous No.13305343]

[Anonymous No.13305345]

[Anonymous No.13305347]

[Anonymous No.13305350]

[Anonymous No.13305351]

>>13305158
>refried beans
>expensive, and disgusting
You have a child's pallet, and allowance.

[Anonymous No.13305354]

[Anonymous No.13305356]

[Anonymous No.13305359]

[Anonymous No.13305362]

[Anonymous No.13305363]

[Anonymous No.13305365]

[Anonymous No.13305367]

[Anonymous No.13305373]

[Anonymous No.13305374]

[Anonymous No.13305377]

[Anonymous No.13305380]

[Anonymous No.13305382]

[Anonymous No.13305383]

[Anonymous No.13305387]

[Anonymous No.13305389]

[Anonymous No.13305390]

[Anonymous No.13305392]

[Anonymous No.13305395]

[Anonymous No.13305398]

[Anonymous No.13305400]

[Anonymous No.13305403]

[Anonymous No.13306085]

>>13304864
These were really good, wish they'd bring them back.

[Anonymous No.13306284]

> ewwwww totally gross dude! you can't eat baked beans for breakfast!

[Anonymous No.13306402]

>>13301359
Beaners is beans.

[Anonymous No.13306434]

>>13301359
that's beans!

[Anonymous No.13306452]

>>13300404
Fuck off anti beaner. See you on the GF

[Anonymous No.13306458]

>>13304864
I'm gonna make a baked bean and cheese pizza tonight.

[Anonymous No.13306620]

>>13300404
asian weirdos put beans in their pastries and ice cream

[Anonymous No.13306751]

>>13301997
Literally no one cares. It tastes fucking good and that's all that matters to anyone who's sane and doesn't have their goddamn head up their asshole.

[Anonymous No.13306803]

[Anonymous No.13306874]

>>13300472
Based. Beans are disgusting and serve no purpose in chili apart from cheap filler

[Anonymous No.13306919]

this thread makes me very uncomfortable

[Anonymous No.13306949]

>>13300404
The only country that actually makes good beans is mexico, why do white people fuck it up soo badly

[Anonymous No.13307071]

>>13306949
All other countries in the world fuck up beans and are white?

[Anonymous No.13307107]

humans shouldn't be eating beans in the first place

[Anonymous No.13307180]

>>13306949
Red beans with smoked sausage and white beans with smoked ham hocks can compete with mex pinto beans cooked in lard and hold their own.

[Anonymous No.13308383]

>>13300417
jacket potato

[Anonymous No.13308452]

I'm not even English but that stuff looks like a nice hardy breakfast I'd have on a lazy Sunday if I had nothing to do. I find if I eat too much in one sitting I feel lazy and lethargic for a while

[Anonymous No.13308461]

>>13300488
Beans are by definition a filler ingredient in chili. They're used to stretch smaller amounts of meat across larger numbers of bowls. If you can afford meat stop putting beans in it.

[Anonymous No.13308468]

>>13308461
>Beans are by definition a filler ingredient in chili
By what definition?

Meat isn't even part of the dish, it is added optionally.

[Anonymous No.13308477]

>>13306751
Beans don't taste like anything if you made your chili right. The entire point of chili is you make it fucking strong. If you can still taste your crappy bean juice through the chili then you did chili wrong as a separate problem before even addressing how you added beans when you shouldn't. Any way you look at it beans are bad performance in chili.

[Anonymous No.13308484]

>>13308468
>Meat isn't even part of chili con carne

[Anonymous No.13308491]

>>13308484
>con carne
Note how that means "with meat"
Chili is therefor without meat by default.

[Anonymous No.13308492]

>>13308468
Southerners who claim they invented chili feel they can tell others how to make it. I grew up with beans in chili and I like the texture. My dad was never a great cook but he makes a killer chili and beef stews

[Anonymous No.13308498]

>>13308468
>Meat isn't even part of the dish, it is added optionally.
Yikes.
>By what definition?
You can have your shitty bean monstrosity in an amateur hour homestyle cook-off for slow children. Just keep it away from people with fully developed nervous systems and tongues.

[Anonymous No.13308502]

>>13308491
No, that's not how it works, idiot. When you say chili what you mean is chili con carne.

[Anonymous No.13308508]

>>13308502
Don't tell me what I mean, faggot.
When I mean chili con carne I will damned well say chili con carne.

[Anonymous No.13308511]

>>13308508
Literal chili is just referring to the pepper. You mean chili con carne and are too dumb to realize it.

[Anonymous No.13308524]

>>13308511
Literal grilled cheese is cooked on a barbecue but I know damned well you cook it in a pan.

[Anonymous No.13308536]

>>13308524
Pretending meat is optional in actual chili is retarded and you should feel bad. Vegetarian chili is an imitation of actual chili, not some equally valid alternative.

[Anonymous No.13308541]

>>13308536
It is neither an alternative nor an imitation, it is the base dish to which can be added according to preference.

[Anonymous No.13308556]

>>13308468
>>13308491
>>13308508
>>13308524
>>13308541

[Anonymous No.13308570]

>>13308541
There is no support for that bullshit you're claiming. There is zero question chili (which is, once again, really chili con carne but it gets referred to as just chili in the US as a shorthand) was a chili pepper and meat dish when it was created. Vegetarian chili wasn't even a common idea until as late as the 1960s. You're getting confused by words here because you're historically illiterate and have no context.

[Anonymous No.13308591]

>>13308570
Stop replying to bait. Nobody's that stupid. He's just pretending.

[Anonymous No.13308943]

someone post the bean boy

[Anonymous No.13308951]

>>13301997
show me a credible source that can confirm what you're saying, or go suck a cock faggot

[Anonymous No.13308973]

>>13300472
don't forget the raisins!

[Anonymous No.13309014]

>>13308951
Beans are definitely a poverty food used to stand in for meat.
>During the last days of meat rationing in 1945-1946, the term Trumanburger was coined. This dish, named after President Harry Truman, consisted of a patty of mashed baked beans! [8: 12]
http://digital.lib.ucdavis.edu/projects/food/panl8ukno.html
Specific to beans in the context of chili, here are two sources (CASI and ICS) telling you beans are filler ingredients:
https://www.casichili.net/guide-1st-time-cook.html
>CASI has a whole book dedicated to rules for a CASI event; but most of these are administrative rules for the CASI officials and event promoters. There are a few basic rules that a cook must remember:
>Do not use fillers in your chili; such as beans, macaroni, rice, hominy, or other similar ingredients.
>>13308498
>Any non-meat fillers are not allowed, including beans.

[Anonymous No.13309406]

>>13304864
Ok if you liked the roof of your mouth fucked up and burnt. The beans became superheated for some reason.

[Anonymous No.13309441]

>>13309014
That's literally just the rules for chili competitions. I'd like add that those same rules also bar your from marinading you meat and require you to cook over a propane stove.

[Anonymous No.13309452]

>>13300468
Nigger

[Anonymous No.13309472]

>>13309014
So then there is no difference between chili and chili con carne?

[Anonymous No.13309473]

>>13308477
who the fuck cares what other people eat?

[Anonymous No.13309691]

>>13305338
this nigga drinkin beans

[Anonymous No.13311427]

>>13309472
Chili is what Americans call chili con carne.

[Anonymous No.13311438]

>>13309472
>>13311427
Which is to say no, there is no difference. It was never the case that you had a base dish called chili and then chili con carne was a variation on that with meat added. That's completely wrong. Chili on its own before chili con carne was invented in Texas (and yes, it was invented there and not in Mexico believe it or not) was a word for a kind of pepper. Not a word for a kind of dish.

[Anonymous No.13311446]

There is no such thing as something that can't be improved with beans.

https://youtu.be/3CsJpOdl6h8

[Anonymous No.13311514]

>>13311446
>>13311446
Just start saving a little more of your paycheck, anon. I'm sure you'll be able to afford meat in no time.

[Anonymous No.13311527]

>>13311514
At what point did I ever imply I would be utilizing beans instead of meat and not beans as an improvement on top of meat?

[Anonymous No.13311546]

>>13311527
You don't have to say it. It's just a fact.

[Anonymous No.13311600]

>>13311446
>Here's your improved burger, bro.

[Anonymous No.13311830]

>>13302442
No, he's wrong. Chili without beans is a beef stew variant.

But seriously, modern chili is a garbage pot. You toss in your leftover meat and produce at the end of the week that you know will be bad in a few days, and let it all simmer for hours, with some classic seasoning. Arbol chili pepper, cayenne, salt, cumin, pepper, a dash of cinnamon to round it out, and wa la.

[Anonymous No.13311838]

>>13311830
>Chili without beans is a beef stew variant.
Chili without beans is just actual chili. The bean crap was later on in history and was a mistake.

[Anonymous No.13311853]

>>13311838
It's called chili con carne not chili con beanse
The meat is obviously the later addition.

[Anonymous No.13311859]

>>13311853
No, holy shit you guys really let yourselves get tripped up bad with the linguistic shit here. See:
>>13311438
>It was never the case that you had a base dish called chili and then chili con carne was a variation on that with meat added. That's completely wrong. Chili on its own before chili con carne was invented in Texas (and yes, it was invented there and not in Mexico believe it or not) was a word for a kind of pepper. Not a word for a kind of dish.

[Anonymous No.13311872]

>>13311853
Basically the problem is people in the US started abbreviating chili con carne to just chili in everyday speech later on and it causes confusion for people like you in America in modern times because you imagine the dish is chili and chili con carne was an add-on deal when everywhere else in the world and earlier on in US history chili was just the pepper.

[Anonymous No.13311879]

>>13311872
>america america america america
We get it dude you're jealous

[Anonymous No.13311881]

>>13311879
I'm American.

[Anonymous No.13311888]

>>13311881
Then act like it.

[Anonymous No.13311896]

>>13311888
I would love to not have to explain chili to you but you keep on not understanding it.

[Anonymous No.13311906]

>>13311888
>act like it
What should I do, shit my pants in Walmart?

[Anonymous No.13311919]

>>13308477
black beans add fiber and phytonutrients. i also put spinach in my chili

[Anonymous No.13311922]

>>13305359
I winced

[Anonymous No.13311929]

>>13311919
>fiber
Such a retarded meme.

[Anonymous No.13311942]

>>13311919
>black beans add fiber
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435786/
>Whilst it is often stated in physiology textbooks that bulking agents improve peristalsis, there is no proof of this in practice nor experimentally. Regardless of the food ingested, small intestinal and right mid colonic contents are fluid and all ingestible dietary fiber is suspended therein. Dietary fiber, therefore, cannot act as solid boluses for the initiation of peristalsis. In fact, dietary fiber had been shown to retard peristalsis and hold up gaseous expulsion in human experiments[22].
>Dietary fiber is also associated with increased bloatedness and abdominal discomfort[22]. Insoluble fiber was reported to worsen the clinical outcome of abdominal pain and constipation[18-20]. In our recent study, patients who followed a diet with no or less dietary fiber intake showed a significant improvement, not just in their constipation, but also in their bloatedness. Patients who completely stopped consuming dietary fiber no longer suffered from abdominal bloatedness and pain. These symptoms are caused by the fermentation of dietary fiber by colonic bacteria, which produces hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane[23]. Gases that are trapped by peristaltic colon exert pressure on the walls, causing the abdominal pain experienced by patients.
>In conclusion, contrary to popularly held beliefs, reducing or stopping dietary fiber intake improves constipation and its associated symptoms.

[Anonymous No.13311943]

I don't know what the fuck is y'all problem with beans. Excellent source of protein, fiber, and in most cases potassium.

What's the problem is?

[Anonymous No.13311958]

>>13311929
>>13311942
>Epidemiological and clinical studies demonstrate that intake of dietary fiber and whole grain is inversely related to obesity, type two diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257631/

its also why fruit is significantly less insulinogenic than soda, and fiber keeps you full longer. even just the quality/ease of shits you take with less wiping is a repeatable, tangible benefit

[Anonymous No.13311963]

>>13311942
i dont have idiopathic constipation, so this is irrelevant to me and anyone else with similar lack of idiopathic constipation

[Anonymous No.13311965]

>>13311943
It's a filler ingredient used to jew people out of meat.
It's a weak flavor and a huge warning sign in chili because it means the person who added it either didn't make the chili nearly strong enough because you can taste beans still through it or else they did make it strong enough but added in beans anyway just to waste space.
It's also not a better source of nutrition than just using meat would be.

[Anonymous No.13311972]

>>13301400
thats a potato, though

[Anonymous No.13311973]

>>13311958
Yeah, fiber is good for people with weight problems EXACTLY because it's a waste of space that hinders the intake of calories. That's a pretty bad reason to be a fan of it.

[Anonymous No.13311978]

>>13311963
Fiber doesn't help with what people assume it does is the point. People actually improve with GI problems by reducing fiber.

[Anonymous No.13311985]

>>13311973
>hinders the intake of calories
it slows it, which is beneficial for sustained nutrient delivery, but ive seen no evidence that it blocks absorption of any calories

>>13311978
people with GI problems are weak. black beans are a powerhouse of nutrition, and the fiber therein is a benefit to those without GI problems, even if not the main one

[Anonymous No.13311994]

>>13311943

You know how most people would be disappointed if they were expecting a real burger and got baked beans on a bun instead? Same thing, but for chili.

[Anonymous No.13311995]

>>13311985
and to add to this, your body doesnt have a storage mechanism for excess protein, and it can only build so much tissue out of protein in a given timeframe. youll make better use of your macronutrients by having them absorbed more slowly over time, i.e. accompanied by fiber

[Anonymous No.13312075]

>>13311972
Found the underage.

[Anonymous No.13312084]

>>13312075
i got the reference. thats beans is a potato, though

[Anonymous No.13312164]

Beans belong in everything

[Anonymous No.13312729]

>>13312164
Fuck off, Pedro.

[Anonymous No.13312766]

>>13304864
Godly

[Anonymous No.13312814]

>>13309406
I pack my walls with beans and cheese. Good R value. Really holds the heat in.

[Anonymous No.13312975]

>>13311859
Texas was Mexican before gringos stole it. And yes they had chile con carne which sickly gringos adopted. Grow up and learn history, stormer.

[Anonymous No.13312983]

>>13301376
propaganda have reached far from brazil
its actually have it origins in portugal and italy, fagiolata. And their meat variant of the old greek fasolada
The only thing they did in brazil was to use black beans. and the custom to the side dishes forofa and kale.

[Anonymous No.13312992]

tutu de feijão

[Anonymous No.13313011]

>>13302037
underrated desu

[Anonymous No.13313028]

>>13312975
Earliest known chili recipe is 1850. Texas wasn't part of Mexico in 1850.
>stormer
?
I'm not insulting Mexico. Contemporary Mexicans on the record themselves have repeatedly insisted they have nothing to do with it:
>The only thing certain about the origins of chili is that it did not originate in Mexico.
>Charles Ramsdell, a writer from San Antonio in an article called San Antonio: An Historical and Pictorial Guide, wrote:
>"Chili, as we know it in the U.S., cannot be found in Mexico today except in a few spots which cater to tourists. If chili had come from Mexico, it would still be there. For Mexicans, especially those of Indian ancestry, do not change their culinary customs from one generation, or even from one century, to another."
>If there is any doubt about what the Mexicans think about chili, the Diccionario de Mejicanismos, published in 1959, defines chili con carne as (roughly translated):
>"detestable food passing itself off as Mexican, sold in the U.S. from Texas to New York."