/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.13179061]

Why doesnt he invite micheal twitty anymore?

[Anonymous No.13179066]

>>13179061
stuff goes missing whenever he gets invited

[Anonymous No.13179225]

I got Twitty's book he wrote about soul black food, and slavery. It's very interesting and has a few recipes in it as well that still work today

[Anonymous No.13179227]

How exactly did the black dude come to convert to Judaism? They never explain that part.

[Anonymous No.13179230]

>>13179061
>you will never eat his barbeque

[Anonymous No.13179234]

Isn’t that the left wing nationalist who threatened President Trump’s life

[Anonymous No.13179256]

I let james know that he is a faggot, and well, you gotta get right with god if you're going to reach townsend's audience

[Anonymous No.13179259]

>>13179256
There's no need for homophobic slurs here.

[Anonymous No.13179261]

>>13179061
Orange Fool

[Anonymous No.13179268]

>>13179261
Seriously though. It was like a year after a very controversial election.

He was doing a joint-show with that woman at Mt. Vernon and it was probably her idea but out of all the recipes you could have picked he went with a very obviously political jab at Trump. Ok it was her idea, but at least admit you realize she was trying to make it political and apologize.

[Anonymous No.13179273]

>>13179268
Tangerine Buffoon

[Anonymous No.13179277]

>>13179061
IM FRUSTRATED.

[Anonymous No.13179279]

>>13179273
I mean the reason the issue has persisted is because he refuses to admit he had some idea that the woman was politically motivated in choosing that recipe before he released it.

[Anonymous No.13179283]

>>13179061
imagine alienating over half your audience with 1 video

[Anonymous No.13179284]

>>13179268
It's funny as a cannuck I watched that video but didn't pick up on the Trump jab. I like him even better now.

[Anonymous No.13179286]

>>13179283
By that logic his video with the dairy lady was alienating gay men watching his videos.

>>13179284
Not really helping the image of Canadians as dumb...

[Anonymous No.13179290]

>>13179259
I understand your hesitation but I was just calling a spade a spade

[Anonymous No.13179316]

>>13179286
>Not really helping the image of Canadians as dumb...

It's more that I'm not so obsessed with Trump that I'm looking for references to him in everything. Still, this has upped my respect for Jon a whole lot and if it chased retard Trump fans off his channel even better.

I do really hope he has Twitty back more, that whole series is excellent.

[Anonymous No.13179329]

>>13179316
That’s gonna be a hard “based” from me

[Anonymous No.13179332]

>>13179316
I mean orange fool is pretty obvious.

It was a series of episodes about historic American presidents and he picks orange fool a year after an election where calling Trump orange is one of the most common jabs. There's no way he didn't know. He just plays it off because likely irl he is extremely conservative and doesn't want to draw attention to that.

[Anonymous No.13179366]

>>13179061
He had financial difficulties and had to sell his slave.

[Anonymous No.13179383]

>>13179332
Ohh yeah now that I see the joke it's great. But I both don't think I'd watched them in order so I wasn't paying attention to the series and I've heard of the dish before so it went over my head at the time. Pretty funny now though for sure.

[Anonymous No.13179390]

Why are Trump voters so sensitive?

[Anonymous No.13179402]

>>13179268
No. It was a direct attack on PRESIDENT Trump. We mustn’t take this kind of rebellion lightly.

[Anonymous No.13179403]

>>13179279
Shut the fuck up tranny faggot

[Anonymous No.13179408]

>>13179390
Because they've lived in a white-snowflake bubble for so long and can't at all handle being challenged or told they're wrong (even when they're objectively wrong).

[Anonymous No.13179416]

>>13179403
I'm gay.

Transgender people are homophobic and I don't support them.

Either way, no need for slurs.

[Anonymous No.13179417]

>>13179390
There’s a distinct difference between being “triggered” and responding to criticism. Only liberals get upset; we just get serious.

[Anonymous No.13179420]

>>13179390
This
I don't care for American politics but both sides are fucking pathetic. If anyone says anything remotely bad who they support they flip out. Both sides need to grow up and not be so thin skinned.

[Anonymous No.13179433]

>>13179420
Naw. Only liberals do that. They are sensitive snowflakes.

[Anonymous No.13179436]

>>13179433
>OH NO NOT HAVING TO BAKE A WEDDING CAKE FOR GAY PEOPLE AHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.13179440]

>>13179417
Mub liberals muh liberals
Shut the fuck up you annoying cunt. The entire world doesn't revolve around american politics. This is a cooking board if wish to talk politics fuck off the pol. Same goes for hillary supporters. Your both retarded and annoying and need to fuck off.

[Anonymous No.13179442]

>>13179433
>both sides are shit
>nuh uh just liberals because they whine all the time unlike me who isn't currently moaning

[Anonymous No.13179443]

>>13179417
t. conservative snowflake

[Anonymous No.13179444]

>>13179416
>Transgenders are homophobic
They aren't but go off.

[Anonymous No.13179446]

>>13179444
They literally are. Straight trans people are self hating closeted gays.

Gay trans people are straight people who get off on dating gay people.

[Anonymous No.13179447]

>>13179417
>/pol/ocks
>we just get serious
lmao ok

[Anonymous No.13179449]

>>13179420
I mean both sides are shit, but considering that the economic left literally doesn't have a representative party here kind of justifies their anger.
>>>>Inb4 democrats are leftist

[Anonymous No.13179451]

>>13179446
Occams razor seems applicable here

[Anonymous No.13179454]

>>13179449

[Anonymous No.13179457]

>>13179446
Lots of misgendering happening in this post

[Anonymous No.13179458]

>>13179446
Ok, boomer.

[Anonymous No.13179462]

>>13179457
There's no such thing as misgendering. Your bones mark you as a member of your natal sex.

Implying that someone who appears to be a gay man is actually a woman is implying that person is straight, which is homophobic.

[Anonymous No.13179464]

of course the /pol/ thread gets hundreds of replies again...
you are pathetic

[Anonymous No.13179470]

>>13179462
Ok boomer

[Anonymous No.13179474]

>cooking board
>/pol/cucks finds a way to talk about trump and trannies
Mental illness.

[Anonymous No.13179476]

>>13179454
What is the labor party?
Greater worker representation is only seen tyrannical to those that have all the power.

[Anonymous No.13179559]

>>13179440
>>13179447
>muh /pol/ boogyman
Predictable.

[Anonymous No.13179595]

Orange Fool Recipe:

Ingredients
1 orange fool
3 tablespoons orange fool
3 tablespoons unsalted orange fool
1 large orange fool
1/2 cup well-chilled orange fool
Preparation
With a orange fool remove 2 orange fools from orange (each about 3 by 1/2 orange fool) and mince.
Squeeze enough orange fool from orange to measure 1/2 cup and in a small heavy orange fool simmer orange fool until reduced to 1/4 cup.
Remove orange fool from heat and add orange fool and orange fool to orange fool, whisking until orange fool is melted. Whisk in orange fool until combined well and cook orange fool over moderately low heat, whisking, until thick enough to hold marks of orange fool and first bubble appears on orange fool, 3 to 5 orange fools.
Remove orange fool from heat and add zest to orange fool, whisking. Pour orange fool into a bowl set in a larger orange fool of ice and cold water and stir until orange fool.
In another bowl beat orange fool until it just holds stiff orange fools and fold into orange fools gently but thoroughly.
Spoon orange fool into 2 chilled goblets.

[Anonymous No.13179603]

Why didn’t he ever make a BROWN FOOL?
Pic fucking related

[Anonymous No.13179608]

>>13179230
He spoke at my university anon, and I DID eat his barbecue

[Anonymous No.13179617]

>>13179234
>left wing nationalist
Huh?

[Anonymous No.13179634]

>>13179603
Two reasons: There was no historical dessert called "brown fool" and he wasn't a fool.

[Anonymous No.13179642]

BECAUSE HE'S A NIGGER

[Anonymous No.13179645]

>>13179603
More like brown STOOL. Because he’s a piece of shit.
>>13179634
Cu ck.

[Anonymous No.13179659]

>>13179617
He’s against Trump. Fuck him.

[Anonymous No.13179672]

>>13179659
This just in: Trumptards know nothing about politics but the American liberal-conservative spectrum, and they're even misguided when it comes to that

[Anonymous No.13179686]

>>13179454
I was an anarchist too, before I realized I may actually want my political views to happen someday and that most people are disagreeable morons who aren't smart enough to participate in a government-free society. Take the tankiepill, anon

[Anonymous No.13179695]

>>13179390
Because the whole rest of the world makes fun of them on a daily basis.

[Anonymous No.13179698]

>>13179617
Huh?

[Anonymous No.13179710]

>>13179436
Its against their religious beliefs and it's their business they can choose their clientele

[Anonymous No.13179713]

>>13179698
Huh?

[Anonymous No.13179728]

>>13179710
>they can choose their clientele

no they can't

they are open to the public

what do you think public means?

[Anonymous No.13179738]

>>13179728
Yes they can. Restaurants refuse service to people all the time. The company I work for just turned down a client. You never have to service the customer. It's a privately owned company and the owner can choose how he wants to run it and who he wants to serve

[Anonymous No.13179748]

>>13179659
Most people in the country are, why is this a surprise?
Even more so after his cock ups over the past 2 and a half years.

[Anonymous No.13179755]

>>13179738
Restaurants cannot decline to seat Black people on account of them being Black.

Privately owned is not what matters. What matters is it being a public accommodation, i.e. open to the general public.

If they are discriminating against customers who misbehave, that's one thing, but turning down customers for membership in a protected class is unlawful.

[Anonymous No.13179761]

>>13179738
You can turn people away, but it can't be BECAUSE of a specific protected class. Like you can't turn away all black people or all gay people. You can decide to turn away a specific black person or gay person for reasons other than their race or sexual orientation

[Anonymous No.13179763]

>>13179748
Um, I assume John Townsend himself is politically conservative which is why he found the whole thing so embarrassing because he doesn't want his personal beliefs discovered.

[Anonymous No.13179770]

>>13179761
Which they did. They dont support gay marriage. They have nothing against gays, they just believe marriage is between a man and a woman and a sacred religious tradition. If I remember right they offered to bake them a cake, just not a wedding cake

[Anonymous No.13179775]

>>13179061
He's afraid

[Anonymous No.13179776]

>>13179755
They didnt turn them down due to being gay. They turned them down because they dont support gay marriage

[Anonymous No.13179786]

>>13179776
How do you justify this sort of ridiculous verbal gymnastics?

If they were not gay, they would not have been refused service.

Straight people wouldn't come in and somehow specifically request a gay wedding cake.

[Anonymous No.13179795]

>>13179763
It's just Jon. But anyways, I would think genuine conservatives would be the ones most enraged by Trump at this point. He's not really either financially or socially really a conservative in any way. Heck,for years he called himself a Democrat he just hijacked the GoP by siding on a few issues like guns and immigration.

Any real conservative, especially a religious one as has been hinted at a few times through his videos would be appalled by Trump.

[Anonymous No.13179803]

>>13179786
Because were a country based on religious freedom and if they're religion doesnt support gay marriage they shouldnt be forced to take part in one

[Anonymous No.13179804]

>>13179795
So like one giant no true scotsman fallacy then?

[Anonymous No.13179812]

>>13179786
Also it's not verbal gymnastics. Like I said in >>13179770, I believe they offered to bake them a cake, just not a wedding cake

[Anonymous No.13179831]

>>13179803
We don't live in a theocracy.

Mormons can't have polygamous marriage despite their religious beliefs.

>take part in one

baking a wedding cake is not exactly personally taking part in the wedding

nobody thinks a baker has personally endorsed the wedding they made a cake for

if you can't do your job, find another job

>>13179812
No, they refused to make a custom cake and told him he could buy one off the shelf.

His main business was custom wedding cakes so they were not making an unusual request. He is just hiding his personal dislike for gay people behind a religious shield.

There's a reason he doesn't sell wedding cakes at all anymore.

[Anonymous No.13179838]

>>13179804
A little bit but minus the fallacy. In theory a conservative should be a person who supports conservative values. No true Scotsman only works to a degree. Someone who claims to be a baseball fan but has never watched or enjoyed baseball is just a liar. Pointing out they're lying isn't the no true Scotsman fallacy, it's just illustrating the lie.

Claiming to be morally and religiously conservative and then supporting someone who brags about sexual assault simply shows that you are not what you claim. Calling that out isn't the same as no true Scotsman.

[Anonymous No.13179842]

>>13179838
There are plenty of religious conservatives who love Trump and I'm fairly sure John Townsend is among them.

[Anonymous No.13179858]

>>13179831
Polygamy isnt illegal in the eyes of the federal government, only the state. He did his job fine. He did it so well that a gay couple sued him for not serving them. Also your name is on the cake. If a company caters a kkk rally do you think that wont reflect back on them?
He doesnt sell wedding cakes because he was sued for not wanting to be part of something he doesnt personally support

[Anonymous No.13179864]

>>13179290

Kek I get it

[Anonymous No.13179867]

>>13179858
There literally had been a Supreme Court case though ruling that religious freedom does not enable people to have polygamous marriage.

The law banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in Colorado is a state couple.

They didn't sue him, they filed a complaint with the state board.

>your name is on the cake

wat

No, he doesn't sell gay wedding cakes so he can be a hostile bully towards gay people because he's a decrepit old man with nothing else to live for but one-upping people from minority groups with angsty bullshit.

[Anonymous No.13179871]

>>13179867
state law*

[Anonymous No.13179875]

>>13179842
I know the call themselves that. I am saying they're hypocrites. I worked in a church for 14 years though so it's npt at all shocking, but that is my point. The "religious and moral conservatives" who support Trump are just bigotted hypocrites who support him in spite of religion, not because of it.

Jesus would be absolutely disgusted by the way Trump act and treats people and anyone calling themselves Christian who claims otherwise is a charlatan.

[Anonymous No.13179887]

>>13179875
Religious people in general are hypocrites.

Jesus never existed so what "he" thinks is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.13179902]

>>13179867
You can give it a google search. It's under the state not the federal government that deems polygamy illegal.
If your company provides a service to someone, whatever that person represents reflects on your company. Also the supreme court ruled in the guys favor anyway since like I said, he has the right to do what he did based on religion freedom. You can not like him all you want, but he does have the right to do what he did and believe what he wants

[Anonymous No.13179912]

>>13179887
And Trump highlights their hypocrisy.

[Anonymous No.13179914]

>>13179902
I don't understand why the fact that polygamy isn't federally banned is relevant. It is a state law that bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in this instance that the baker violated.

>If your company provides a service to someone, whatever that person represents reflects on your company

Implying that gay people reflect poorly on others just by existing and being involved with the public sphere is regressive homophobia.

Go back to the 18th century.

>he has the right to do what he did based on religion freedom

not where it conflicts with state law.

he is not in any way doing anything religious by being hostile to gay people in his publicly accessibly business.

He is operating a secular bakery open to the public, not a church.

[Anonymous No.13179915]

>>13179672
>>13179659
>>13179234
What the actual fuck are you on about, you utter twat?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIi1bjl_iqE

[Anonymous No.13179916]

>>13179672
*Sorry, didn't mean to reply to you.

[Anonymous No.13179940]

>>13179914
Because you brought up mormons and I said polygamy isnt banned under federal law because thatd be the feds infringing on religious beliefs.
He might think that way, so he doesnt want his name associated with gay marriage. He doesnt support it so he doesnt want to take part in it. Why is that so upsetting to you? Its anyone's right to not take part in something they dont want to. Especially if you believe it violates your personal beliefs.
But the supreme court ruled otherwise saying the state commission didnt employ religious neutrality in the case so you're wrong. If he just said he hates queers for no reason itd be a different story. Itd be like asking a muslim to slaughter a pig for you and getting upset when he refuses to do so

[Anonymous No.13179945]

>>13179061
Because it was a single series, you phoneposting faggot?
So fucking sick of these stupid fucking threads anywhere I go, that insinuates falsehoods to get the mongrels on this shitty website excited.
>>13179066

[Anonymous No.13179955]

>>13179940
It wouldn't be infringing upon religious beliefs. The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that laws that incidentally infringe upon religious beliefs but that further a compelling government interest are constitutional.

You clearly have no actual knowledge of the history of these sorts of cases.

He just wants a license to be hostile towards gay customers and the courts blew him the fuck out of the water for the most part.

You can cry all you like online, in reality he no longer sells custom wedding cakes at all, and he said that was a majority of his business before.

A law that happens to ban polygamy is not designed to infringe upon religion, it is designed to infringe upon the act of marrying more than one person, regardless of secular or religious context.

If I don't want to take part in Black people, that doesn't give me a right to refuse them service either.

Stop being a bigot and deal with the modern reality that people different from you exist.

>But the supreme court ruled otherwise saying the state commission didnt employ religious neutrality

which is not the same thing as saying he had a license to discriminate

>If he just said he hates queers for no reason itd be a different story

no it wouldn't

in either case he wouldn't be allowed to sell wedding cakes just to straight couples and in fact he isn't and doesn't anymore because the brave gay couple complained

>Itd be like asking a muslim to slaughter a pig for you and getting upset when he refuses to do so

custom wedding cakes were his main business and they wanted a custom wedding cake, they were not asking for anything unusual

you people are so fucking whiney and yet call everyone else snowflakes all because you can't treat gay people like second class citizens and be openly hostile to them in public business settings as if that's really asking so much

[Anonymous No.13179965]

>>13179786
The fags wanted a giant penis cake! Gayness doesn’t even enter into it; they didn’t want to erect an erect cock. They would have refused service if it were a pair of tits, too.

[Anonymous No.13179966]

>>13179454

[Anonymous No.13179969]

>>13179965
They never got to the point of discussing what would be on the cake.