/CK/hopped /CK/hallenge Round 2

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12569014]

You faggots let the last one die while I was at work. I thought you wanted this?

Many coo/ck/s - five rounds - but only one chance to win.
The challenge? Create an unforgettable meal from the mystery items hidden in these baskets before time runs out.
Who will win the prize - and who will be Chopped?

This is the official announcement thread for the next /ck/ challenge - Round 2: Hors D'Oeuvres/Appetizer

FIVE ROUNDS - ONE WINNER
>X Round 1 | 6/15-6/22 | Breakfast X
>*** Round 2 | 6/29-7/6 | Hors D'Oeurves (Appetizer) ***
>Round 3 | 7/13-7/20 | Entree (Lunch)
>Round 4 | 7/27-8/3 | Main Course (Dinner)
>Round 5 | 8/10-8/17 | Dessert

SCORES THUS FAR
>1st Place: 24 pts - Hula Doll, Sake Bottle
>3rd Place: 22 pts - Tiny Level
>4th Place: 21 pts - JPP Figure, Gold Fly (me), Small Crystal
>7th Place: 19 pts - Green Pick

SCORING HOW-TO
Out of a possible 25 Points:
__/5 for Challenge Theme
>a rating regarding Use of Basket Ingredients and Meeting Round Theme
__/5 for Originality
>a rating regarding Uniqueness and Creativity
__/5 for Technique
>a rating regarding Level of Skill used
__/5 for Appeal
>a rating regarding Taste (assumed) and Cohesiveness
__/5 for Plating
>a rating regarding Visual Appeal

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12569015]

SUBMISSION
>Anyone who makes a challenge submission must vote. If you do not contribute to voting in the voting round, your submissions will be disqualified.
>All submissions must be accompanied by a timestamp and token/totem. Any submissions without timestamp and token/totem can not be considered.
>At least two photos are required for each submission: One high-quality photo of your final dish with timestamp and totem, and at least one photo documenting your process or ingredients used.
>All four mystery basket ingredients should be fully incorporated in your submission. Omissions or "garnish" use may result in loss of points.
>Verticals are not required but encouraged, and can only help your score. Verticals documenting your process can give insight to judges regarding your Technique and Originality. I can help you make a vertical if you cannot (fucking phoneposters).
>The cutoff time for submissions will be 11:59 PM EST on the final day of the challenge week.

BASKET INGREDIENTS
>You may make reasonable substitutions for inaccessible exotic ingredients to be scored by the audience and fellow contestants.
>Basket ingredients are randomly chosen from four lists: Meat, Produce, Grocery, and Wildcard.
>Basket ingredients should be fully incorporated in your final dish.

VOTING
>CONTESTANTS MUST VOTE. Any contestant who does not vote will be disqualified for this and future rounds. It's important that we play together.
>Audience members are welcome to vote as well.
>Contestants should post their scores with timestamp, totem, or tripcode to verify.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12569021]

Roll 1 - #60 - pork (ground)

Roll 2 - #27 - chives

Roll 3 - #62 - canned: capers

Roll 4 - #89 - frozen - ice cream (vanilla)

You have ground pork, chives, capers, and vanilla ice cream for the Hors D'Oeurves/Appetizer round.
The clock started a while ago but for all intents and purposes it can start now.

[Anonymous No.12569028]

>>12569014
Those scores don't make any sense.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12569039]

>>12569028
I think they were fucked up because not many people voted. That's why, moving forward, all contestants must vote or face disqualification.

I think some people submitted really stupid reasons for their scores, and some people didn't vote at all on purpose, hoping to skew the scores.
The first round is over now. Four rounds remain unless this thread dies again..

[Anonymous No.12569266]

>>12569039
>i think they were fucked up because not many people voted
Nah, I think you just fucked up the totals. Either that or I forgot how to do 3rd grade math. Explain how you got 21 for yourself? I figure you at 19.

[Anonymous No.12569515]

>>12569266
seriously i thought green picks dish was better than figures & chairmans

[Anonymous No.12569876]

>how everyone scored

Anime Figure:
Green Pick – 20
Sake – 24
Chairman Fly – 23
Tiny Level – 22
Hula Doll – 24
Small Crystal – 23

Sake:
Green Pick – 17
Chairman Fly – 19
Tiny Level – 21
Anime Figure – 21
Hula Doll – 24
Small Crystal – 21

Chairman Faggot:
Green Pick – 19
Sake – 23
Tiny Level – 23
Anime Figure – 21
Hula Doll – 23
Small Crystal – 20

Hula Doll:
Green Pick – 12
Sake – 18
Chairman Fly – 16
Tiny Level – 14
Anime Figure – 13
Small Crystal – 13

Tiny Level:
Green Pick – 15
Sake – 21
Chairman Fly – 18
Anime Figure – 18
Hula Doll – 24
Small Crystal – 16

[Anonymous No.12569879]

>>12569876
>each contestant's average score calculated

Green Pick: 20 + 17 + 19 + 12 + 15 = 83 / 5 = 16.6
Sake: 24 + 23 + 18 + 21 = 86 / 4 = 21.5
Chairman Fly: 23 + 19 + 16 + 18 = 76 / 4 = 19
Tiny Level: 22 + 21 + 23 + 14 = 80 / 4 = 20
Anime Figure: 21 + 21 + 13 + 18 = 73 / 4 = 18.25
Hula Doll: 24 + 24 + 23 + 24 = 95 / 4 = 23.75
Small Crystal: 23 + 21 + 20 + 13 + 16 = 93 / 5 = 18.6

[Anonymous No.12569889]

>>12569879
>final score totals and first round ranking

Hula Doll: 23.75
Sake: 21.5
Tiny Level: 20
Chairman Fly: 19
Small Crystal: 18.6
Anime Figure: 18.25
Green Pick: 16.6

I literally have no idea where OP Faggot got his numbers from.

[Anonymous No.12570212]

This is a gay af desu.

[Anonymous No.12571196]

You made this shit too dumb and elitist, nobody gives a fuck, good job.

[ChairmanFaggotfly !36n/pdF2i. No.12571201]

I legitimately didn't even open the old thread after I posted the new one because it had been so lackluster. The thread went straight to page 10 after every time I bumped it.

I'd be totally remiss in my unpaid job for letting those really crappy scores from Tiki count. If you're going to be an irredeemable faggot I would just ask you not to enter anymore.
>Does not play well with others

Anyone with opinions on when to disqualify troll voting?

[ChairmanFaggotfly !36n/pdF2i. No.12571221]

>>12571196
>too elitist
Run your own slop o' shit challenge if you like.

[Anonymous No.12571284]

Just make a discord to jerk each other off in and let this bullshit die already

[Anonymous No.12571362]

>any contestant who does not vote will be disqualified for this and future rounds
>any contestant whose votes i don't agree with will not be counted, even if literally every contestant scored them in first place
I was about to run out to the grocery store, but I'm not even sure if I should bother at this point. Is anyone else going to continue for fun in spite of the OP?

[ChairmanFaggotfly !36n/pdF2i. No.12571364]

>>12571284
I would have if anyone would have participated in a /ck/ discord, but they don't.
I'd do anything to have a real community of people who like to cook to discuss & cook together, who aren't insufferable niggers like rebbit.
But all I got is you fags. We'll make it work.

[Anonymous No.12571413]

>>12571364
You already killed this shit you dumb faggot, cope harder.

[Anonymous No.12571483]

>>12571362
Yeah I still want to cook.

[Anonymous No.12571492]

Fuck the voting, I want to make creative foods.
I'm wondering if the vanilla icecream could be melted into a sauce, or if keeping it frozen would be sticking to the theme more closely?

[Anonymous No.12571510]

>>12571483
Cool. I don't really care about the scores or the bullshit; I just find these challenges fun. I actually like how outrageous and random this is.

>>12571492
I'm absolutely planning on melting the ice cream into a sauce. If someone keeps it frozen and makes it work I'll honestly be mesmerized.

[ChairmanFaggotfly !36n/pdF2i. No.12571696]

>>12571492
If you don't melt it you won't have transformed it, so melting is the way to go.
On real Chopped, contestants have melted ice cream to use as a base in other ice cream or cream pate. I went back and looked through the episodes with ice cream for ideas.

>>12571510
I don't care about being scored, but I do want to maintain the integrity of the voting practice. In my view, the scores submitted by (not tiki) were clearly malicious, and I don't think we have to accept it, no matter how often he posts in these threads pretending to be more than one person.
But I'd like other opinions.

[Anonymous No.12571710]

>>12571696
I thought that the split scoring system was supposed to lessen the impact of troll scoring anyway. Once all of the contestants are scoring then we should have enough legitimate scores that troll scores will be less significant.

[Anonymous No.12571744]

>>12571696
>I'd like other opinions
Here's a hot take. You've had a hate boner for tiki since the last challenge that you just can't rub out, even though tiki isn't even participating in this competition. Yeah, she scores lower than other anons, but there's a thought out explanation given for every score, unlike Anime Figure who just gave 20+ scores across the board with zero criticism, but somehow that's not a problem. Looking back she gave you the second highest score in the first round, so I don't even know what you're complaining about. I care more about the feedback from other anons than I do about the actual numbers, and sure as fuck don't want the person running the competition deciding who gets to compete just because of some random butthurt. I'd like the challenge to keep going even if only a few anons care about it, but let us know now if you're going to keep running it or if we're wasting out time.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12572193]

>>12571744
I wasn't part of the last challenge, nice try.
I do plan on keeping it going. I'm going to update the scoreboard now that I've gotten home from work.
Phoneposting is not funposting.

>>12571710
No one else even voted, so the idea was useless.

[Anonymous No.12572375]

Fuck niggers

[Anonymous No.12572621]

>>12571364
>I'd do anything to have a real community of people who like to cook to discuss & cook together
Calls anyone who has a problem with the contest format a cooklet and poorfag. Takes criticisms personally. Didn’t bother to participate in the last contest when everyone was cooking and more people were voting and discussing b/c he had a problem with the “inclusivity” or some shit. Wants to take this dead competition and automatically eliminate people who don’t participate enough to kill the competition even faster.
Yeah, bs. You just want everyone to stroke your cock for poorly copying the last competition which, while bad, was still better than yours.
Thanks for helping “save” the board w/ this circlejerking shit show that was ruined by your pretentious personality.

Seriously, anyone can see voting was the point of failure for these completions; should have just had a separate panel of judges. Could’ve been your mom and dad upstairs and no one would’ve cared

[Anonymous No.12572985]

>>12572375
Be sure to vote, dum dum frog man.

[Anonymous No.12573012]

>>12569021
>vanilla ice cream for the Hors D'Oeurves
how fucking funny

[Anonymous No.12573065]

>>12571744
>thought and explanation
>pretending she’s not just a drippy cunt on her period
>pretending Tiki is capable of thinking
Nice try, whiteknight.

[Anonymous No.12573072]

Sorry chairman, but as long as Tiki participates I’m out. I really wanted to join this competition. But fuck Tiki. Her scores, like you said, are malicious, like they were last competition, and they’re going to drag down everyone she feels intimidated by again, like some kind of jesters revenge from the grave last round. If people are going to sit here and attempt to defend someone who cooks with frozen chicken nuggets, I’m cool on this whole ordeal. Besides, without Bell, I feel like there’s truly no competition anymore. Good luck in the future, maybe keep her toxic ass out next time.

[Anonymous No.12573086]

>>12573012
Yeah, every time I see these challenges I think, "what a fucking stupid combination of ingredients", and then 2 minutes later I have a 90% thought out dish in my head which my autism compels me to make a reality.
>>12573072
You either voted her into first place last round and are now asking her to be disqualified, or you didn't vote at all. Either way it just seems like you're trying to kill this challenge. Five (5) fucking people voted last round. Nobody is putting up prizes and nobody really seems to be taking it seriously aside from the contestants. There's literally nothing at stake.

[Anonymous No.12573092]

>>12573086
I didn’t participate at all you dense fuck. I warned the last competition that this would happen. Shut the fuck up Tiki. You braindead basic chicken nugget bitch.

[Anonymous No.12573129]

>>12573072
>>12573092
>i didn't participate last time
>i wanted to participate this time (now that we're already in the second round) but fucking tiki!
>i-if i did participate i'd surely win since bell would have been my only real competition (if i actually participated)
All you've done is bitch and whine and troll. You've contributed nothing. Bell literally made pic related in response to you. The irony is palpable.

[Anonymous No.12573346]

>>12573092
>STILL can't appreciate a good tendie.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12573830]

>>12572621
You're too buttblasted, kiddo. You're thinking way too far into this and generally passing "critical" all the way to "pointlessly fucking rude" when it comes to saying anything.

You're nothing but completely unpleasant, spamming the thread, and acting holier-than-thou while also being a vitriolic little brat.
Yes, I would like if you did not participate anymore. No, I am not bothered that you think I'm pretentious, because I think you're shit. :)

>>12573072
No one's defending them except themselves. I'd welcome second- and third-round joiners. If the last round looked like fun to participate in, you should do this, because the basket and the theme are really fun and versatile.
I'm not going to let any malicious scores factor in. I was clear on that from the beginning.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12573851]

After accounting for Tiny Level's votes, which I failed to see the first time, and after accounting for the fact that a majority seem to agree the votes submitted by Hula Doll were maliciously lowballed, the Round 1 scores are as such:

>1st - 24 pts - Hula Doll
>2nd - 23 pts - Sake Bottle
>3rd - 22 pts - Tiny Level
>4th - 20 pts - Gold Fly; Anime Figure; Small Crystal
>7th - 18 pts - Green Pick

[Anonymous No.12574747]

>>12573012
It's like no one here has ever seen Chopped.

[Anonymous No.12575017]

>>12573129
Wah Tiki. You think you’re special and not even the chairman likes you. Cry more, hole.

[Anonymous No.12575033]

>>12573129
Since you’re pretentious enough to make a fucking meme about yourself, I went ahead and fixed it. Thank me later.

[Anonymous No.12575294]

Fuck kikes

[Level !5cC6YqDnIQ No.12576488]

I don't mind harsh scores as long they aren't obviously consistently targeting someone in particular. I enjoy participating and coming up with creative ways to use ingredients that I wouldn't normally think of for a regular meal. I'm glad that the contest is still going even if it's not very popular.

[Tiny Level !5cC6YqDnIQ No.12576493]

>>12576488
Oops messed up my tripcode.

[Anonymous No.12577679]

>>12576488
I think it's kind of bullshit that OP is both running the competition and competing in it, and then willy nilly deciding who's votes count. That said, literally nobody but a handful of contestants are even voting, so the scores really don't mean much. It would be nice if there was even a little interest from the "community", but it's still fun just to participate and try new things. Also, bump.

[Anonymous No.12577754]

>>12577679
let this gay ass shit die faggot

[Anonymous No.12578079]

>>12577679
Tiki was notorious for previously making bad dishes and rating high-tier dishes from people like Bell very poorly. She’s confirmed to be Hula and yet again is rating nice dishes very poorly. She was right to rate the lower-tier ones the way she did, but she had a jealousy issue and likes to rate the top-rated dishes lower to boost her own score. That’s why I fee more secure with Chairman making the calls. He’s not doing it in cold blood, there is a pattern to this particular person and if they don’t want to rate fairly they can drop out.

[Anonymous No.12578099]

Ice cream is going to make all the results disgusting. I hope the arguing doesn't shut this thing down before I get to see these revolting abominations.

[Anonymous No.12578106]

this whole competition is obviously a long-game troll at this point

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12578822]

>>12576488
>>12576493
Thanks. I like it too, and I'm having a lot of fun with it.

>>12577679
I think it's kind of bullshit that you keep spamming my threads being rude when I already talked to you about this.
I would not bother running this if I didn't get to compete and I think most people would feel the same. What possible benefit could anyone glean from impartially running a competition for strangers to have fun with, while not getting to do anything fun? You ask too much.
I don't care about winning or scoring, I just want to prove myself. If you don't like it, don't compete.

>>12578079
I'm trying to make it fair. If I wasn't, I'd have let those crappy scores from Hula in, because they were just fine for me and bad for everyone else. I didn't decide alone, either; multiple people posted saying the scores were unfair and malicious, so in that spirit, I decided to discount them.

>>12578099
Only disgusting if the cook can't turn it out.

[Anonymous No.12578999]

>>12578822
>I think it's kind of bullshit that you keep spamming my threads being rude when I already talked to you about this.
thinks all the criticism he gets come from a single person. you asked for input and opinions from the community, anons pointed out you seem defensive, weird you compete and host, some of your ideas may be flawed, etc. and that makes us all vitriolic brats
afaik, all previous hosts refrained from participating. if it was so much trouble maybe you shouldn't have hosted. you could also have just participated under a different trip

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12579067]

>>12578999
No, you're the same person that is always bitching, as evidenced by the fact that you've quoted the exact phrases I've written to you in the past while you were bitching about the exact same thing.
The only great host this challenge ever had was Borneo, who we didn't deserve and the likes of which we'll never get back, so don't waste your breath bitching about that.

I don't see any problem with my participation. All the host does is post the threads and keep the rules which I sought help in writing, posted at the beginning, and have not deviated from. I'm not the judge, the arbiter, or the gatekeeper.
I'm trying to keep things level and fair to all contestants, and to incorporate constructive input; but your incessant bitching is not constructive input.

[Anonymous No.12579095]

>>12579067
>The only great host this challenge ever had was Borneo
Yikes. You actually only just got here in 2016, didn't you?

[Anonymous No.12579243]

>>12579095
What other "great" hosts do you think you remember?

I can't remember a /ck/ challenge being better than it was under her. Best participation rates and best dishes submitted, plus comparatively little bitching/trying to ruin everything with a wet blanket attitude.

[Anonymous No.12579264]

>>12579243
Hearts always used to run it. Bubble ran it once after Hearts left. I love Borneo, but the challenge she hosted was pretty shitty.

[Tiny Level !5cC6YqDnIQ No.12579616]

>>12578822
>I would not bother running this if I didn't get to compete and I think most people would feel the same.
I do agree with this. So far I have not felt unhappy about the way it's been run. I do take my entries seriously but am not highly concerned about scoring as it's about the enjoyment of it for me, and I am neutral about the use or non-use of Hula Doll's scores. As I said before, I definitely do not mind harsh scores and understand that different people many have extremely different opinions that I do not agree with. But that will come with any contest, especially a cooking contest that cannot actually be tasted.

[Anonymous No.12580404]

>>12573851
>a majority seem to agree the votes submitted by Hula Doll were maliciously lowballed
Did I somehow miss that poll? As far as I can see only one contestant and a random anon weighed in on it, and Tiny Level didn't seem to mind that the scores had a lower average as long as they weren't targeting anyone in particular.
>>12579067
>no, you're the same person that is always bitching
Maybe it's only me and one or two other people giving feedback and, in your words, "being rude", but it's still more than one person. I don't know how you can insist it's one person "trolling" the thread and then just flat out claim that there was some kind of consensus on whether or not to throw out a contestant's scores when you and someone posting anonymously were the only ones to complain.

[Anonymous No.12580426]

>>12579067
if i were the person you claimed, why would i bother bumping your thread?
your assumption that all the criticism comes from a single person only further validates those criticizing you

[idiot No.12580437]

>>12580426
wow fail screenshot on my part

[Anonymous No.12580465]

>>12580404
to be fair to him tho, there are some toxic responses and i think he'd be better off ignoring them but the me v world mentality seems apparent imo

[Anonymous No.12580494]

>>12580437
I did make the post at the top of that screenshot, and half the posts complaining about OP being in the competition, and only the contestants voting, were probably from me. I think Tiki/Hula Doll legitimately has some form of autism, but I still scored them highest last round. I also don't think that their scores were malicious; my main complaint has always been that people competing in the challenge (or running it) shouldn't be judging it, because they have an obvious interest. I don't have any ideas on how to get non-contestants to vote, and generally think OP is running a pretty fun challenge. Maybe if you're going to require contestants to vote they should also vote for themselves and then we can all decide whether or not someone's scores are unfairly biased.
>>12580465
>i think he'd be better off ignoring them but the me v world mentality seems apparent imo
I entirely agree. I also think he should have just used a different name/trip to compete as someone else suggested.

[Anonymous No.12580540]

>>12580494
i thought OP was going to have a separate panel of judges based on the brainstorming thread and think that would've been better. it seemed most unbiased and it would've avoided most controversy at the very least
i am/was with tiny, idc about harsh review. i probably prefer them in the spirit of improving but i was harsh judge in the last competition

[Anonymous No.12581874]

Bump

[Anonymous No.12582498]

Time to cook soon lads

[Anonymous No.12583598]

>>12582498
I've prepped some things and am planning on getting my entry in tonight. Looking forward to what everyone else came up with.

[ChairmanFaggot !36n/pdF2i. No.12583936]

>>12580540
There is no one to do the panel of judges thing; we barely have contestants. I've just arranged it however I could so that even if only five or six people participate, which is what's happened, we don't have to stop playing. We're all judging, all competing, and all helping to set the rules.

I think we all agreed that the actual winning aspect isn't the most important, just the fun of competing, but out of principle I just don't want to play along with someone like Tiki/Hula that has to be a giant cock at every turn. There's no sense in it.

>>12580404
>poll
There wasn't a poll - I just asked people in the thread at the time and only Hula defended them while a handful of other people agreed with me or remarked about them being unfairly low. 3 to 1 is still a majority vote, even if participation sucks.

>>12580494
>>12580426
I'm sorry to both of you for lumping you together and being a dick. I just want this to succeed.

>>12582498
>>12583598
I have all my ingredients but I got invited to a last-minute family shindig for America day in a couple hours. I won't be able to do my entry till tomorrow.
I'm really excited to try to tame this ice cream.

[Anonymous No.12584118]

>>12583936
You're doing fine Chairman, fuck those fags. Happy best country day.