/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.12387131]

>served chili at a friends house
>there's beans in it
>throw it in the garbage

Seriously why can't texas style be the norm?

[Anonymous No.12387144]

>>12387131
>I won't eat my friend's cooking because it has an ingredient in it I don't wish to be associated with this dish that doesn't even hurt the flavor
How do you even have friends you fucking spastic?

[Anonymous No.12387159]

>>12387131
>I made up a story that never actually happened except in my head because I'm a low functioning autist.
You're like that guy at the party that sits in the corner judging everyone, but in reality everyone is judging you.

[Anonymous No.12387162]

If it doesn't have beans in it, its not chili.

[Anonymous No.12387166]

>>12387159
Why can't we judge each other? What's wrong with that? Why must it be one or the other?

[Anonymous No.12387169]

>>12387159
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.12387199]

>>12387159

[Anonymous No.12387231]

Chili without beans is just spicy spaghetti sauce anon

[Anonymous No.12387242]

>>12387131
The earliest newspaper reviews in Texas about the Chili Queens mention beans in the chilies...

[Anonymous No.12387251]

Because poor people can't afford all meat with no filler material to stretch it out. Nobody likes beans, but they put them so you get more meals out of it.

[Anonymous No.12387259]

>>12387251
>nobody likes beans
This is the most delusional thing I've seen today.

[Anonymous No.12387261]

>>12387251
>Nobody likes beans
I do, you faggot.

[Anonymous No.12387280]

>>12387251
>Nobody likes beans
Stop

[Anonymous No.12387295]

>>12387251
>nobody likes beans

[Anonymous No.12387337]

>>12387131
I normally don't like all these retarded rules different regions have about food (e.g. no pineapple on pizza or no ketchup on hot dogs). But this might be the one good exception. Beans are shitty waste of space chili fillers.

[Anonymous No.12387368]

>>12387199
Grandma found the Blackberry Brandy and is now playing 'Grab the sausage' with her favorite grandson. A proud Texas tradition dating back to when it was a Republic.

[Anonymous No.12387372]

>no beans

Then it wasn't chili, fren

[Anonymous No.12387383]

>>12387159

[Anonymous No.12387407]

>>12387372
>no beans
>Then it wasn't chili, fren

[Anonymous No.12387412]

>>12387131
I put beans in my chili because I actually do hard physical labor everyday unlike your faggot ass.

[Anonymous No.12387420]

>>12387407
CASI Rules
-All chili must taste exactly the same
-You will be judged on the size of your bribe alone

[Anonymous No.12387428]

>>12387131
Why the fuck don't people want beans in their chilli? The beans absorb the flavour and become little texture capsules, so good

[Anonymous No.12387431]

>>12387251
primitive

[Anonymous No.12387446]

>>12387412
>I put beans in my chili because I actually do hard physical labor everyday
Typical chili with beans has something like one calorie and change per ounce more than typical traditional chili without beans. You don't get a significant calorie advantage by replacing some of the meat with beans.

[Anonymous No.12387456]

>>12387251
>Because poor people can't afford all meat with no filler material to stretch it out. Nobody likes beans, but they put them so you get more meals out of it.
He's right you know. Beans are fine for amateur hour homestyle chili, but keep filler out of the real stuff.

[Anonymous No.12387515]

Not a single one of you trailerpark inbreds have ever left your 1200 pop towns, let alone gone to Mexico for true chile. Why are you even arguing about how do you prefer to eat your canned dog food?

[Anonymous No.12387518]

>>12387162
It's actually the opposite.

[Anonymous No.12387579]

>>12387515
Holy yikes

[Anonymous No.12387629]

>>12387131
>t.

[Anonymous No.12387850]

>>12387131
>texas style
There's no such thing. It's simply chili, if you put beans in it then you've got bean soup not chili.

[Anonymous No.12387872]

>>12387850
If you put beans in you've got a good chili instead of a shit and boring one. That's the only difference.

[Anonymous No.12387889]

>>12387872
>Non-meat filler is exciting
Nope.

[Anonymous No.12388079]

>>12387131
Texan here and I put ranch style beans in my chili. Chili is just spaghetti sauce without beans.
Fight me irl fagets

[Anonymous No.12388084]

>>12387889
>I want to eat nothing but meat slop
Beans add a wide range of textures and taste to the dish and end up having more protein anyways.
Meat in chili is for the fat content, not because its meat. You throw shit cuts and offal into chili, god fucking help you if you don't cut it with something.

[Anonymous No.12388106]

>>12387131
No one cares autist.
Beans make chili better.

[Anonymous No.12388122]

>>12387889
Enjoy your colon cancer and dead planet

[Anonymous No.12388142]

>>12387889
as much as I like beans, and do put them in my chili, i would never call it chili. i'd call it meat tomato pepper stew i put beans in.

[Anonymous No.12388145]

>>12387131
They poor and need to pad it out with filler.

[Anonymous No.12388148]

>>12388122

[Anonymous No.12388208]

Tomato doesn't belong in chili and it isn't chili if it doesn't have suet in it

[Anonymous No.12388378]

>>12387579
kys pls

[Anonymous No.12388487]

>>12387251
I like beans. Am I nobody'

[Anonymous No.12388494]

>>12387446
You get to do more farts though

[Anonymous No.12388551]

I have come to realize that it's not just beans, it's tomato and lack of actual chili peppers too. most people who talk about chili have never had real chili in their lives. it's like someone talking about gumbo who doesn't even know how to make a roux.

[Anonymous No.12388729]

>>12387169
Aww did we strike a nerve sweaty?

[Anonymous No.12389013]

>>12387131
>not liking a healthy and delicious protein
K you indubitable lardass

[Anonymous No.12389024]

Chili without beans only makes sense if you're putting it on something. By itself its just tomato stewed beef, what the fuck thats not a meal.

[Anonymous No.12389202]

>>12389024
>tomato stewed beef
not chili

[Anonymous No.12389483]

>>12388084
>tastes
If you can taste the minuscule flavors any kind of bean would add them you've got some outrageously bland chili
>textures
Beans are pebbles of mush. You've already got the thick liquid/sauce of chili itself, you've got soft onions and peppers, and you've got tender beef often more than one cut. Why do you need a mushy texture to go with the rest of the soft textures? What does mush add to a dish that is already loaded with thick soft textures?

I'm not against beans in Chili by any means but you're deluded if you believe this garbage. There's no flavor or texture that beans add that actually improve the dish at all. It's simply the least offensive addon you can add beyond the usual tomato, onion, peppers, and beef.

[Anonymous No.12389490]

>>12387131
>at friends house

Lying within the first 4 words you type isn't a good look my man.

[Anonymous No.12389522]

>>12389483
You can't even taste beans? Forget arguing about chili, you need to see a doctor. Your tongue is completely fucked up.

[Anonymous No.12389548]

>>12387131
>>12389024
Chili con carne is called that for a reason.

True chili is just beans

[Anonymous No.12389955]

>>12389013
You get protein from meat too you retard.

[Anonymous No.12389958]

>>12389522
No, beans are called filler for a reason. See:
>>12387407
>>12387456

[Anonymous No.12389987]

>>12387251
>i don't like thing therefore nobody likes thing

[Anonymous No.12390022]

>>12387251
Enjoy your basic bitch meat in spicy onion water.

[Anonymous No.12390032]

>>12389548
>Chili con carne is called that for a reason.
It's called that because "chili" refers to the peppers in that phrase you monogoloid.

[Anonymous No.12390034]

>>12390022
>basic
zoomers pls leave

[Anonymous No.12390036]

>>12387131
autism
also weak LARP bait
remember to sage anons

[Anonymous No.12390062]

>>12387131
You don't have friends anon.

[Anonymous No.12390581]

>>12389522
Jesus I didnt realize how fucking terrible chili was in other regions. Yes, if you can taste the beans in your chili then your chili is absolutely awful. Being able to taste beans means you're not even close to the right amount of spices and chilis. You're simmering a 'stew' with a metric fuckton of spices for hours - anything with a mild flavor will be overpowered.

[Anonymous No.12390609]

>not putting beans in chili
Everyone I have ever met in my entire life puts beans in their chili. This whole "debate" is a Reddit meme with only one true, actual correct side. Beans belong in chili. Weirdos.

[Anonymous No.12390617]

>>12390581
>>12389483
It's for the textures and the flavors it adds *into the the rest of the chili*
nobody is tasting an individual bean just like nobody is getting a good taste of that $0.70/lb ground beef you tossed in, it's about what it adds to the dish as a whole

[Anonymous No.12390621]

>tfw texan
>tfw love beans in my chili
stay mad nobeanfags

[Anonymous No.12390648]

>>12390617
you might as well claim that you can taste the flavor of rice in jambalaya

[Anonymous No.12390654]

>>12390617
>ground beef
why don't you just admit that you've never made chili in your life?

[Anonymous No.12390661]

>>12387251
I like fiber anon. How’re your poops

[Anonymous No.12390673]

>>12390648
Make jambalaya with plain white rice vs good mixed brown right and tell me you don't immediately taste the difference.

>>12390654
Most people will use ground beef, unless you're really going out of your way to make uncle bills world famous chili.

[Anonymous No.12390707]

>>12389955
and you’re too dense to get that someone hating beans is a man child tastelet who only likes macdonalds meat and can’t eat healthy. Jesus you’re retarded as fuck.

[Anonymous No.12390722]

"Chili" without beans is not chili, its meat sauce. Texas is an unbelievable fucking embarrassment to American cuisine.

[Anonymous No.12390794]

>>12390673
>brown rice jambalaya
>Most people will use ground beef
how can one person be so wrong about everything?

[Anonymous No.12390816]

>>12387159
More like
>I posted a story that never actually happened but which is guaranteed to get (you)s despite the fact that we have seen this shit a thousand times already
I personally wish death upon every /ck/ shitposter, I really do.

[Anonymous No.12390923]

>>12390617
Again, beans are not adding any kind of flavor that will impact chili, they are solely there because they add a protein that does not impact the flavor and much like ground beef is able to soak up the flavors from simmering. That's all well and good! But you could easily omit them in favor of some kind of steak / roast cut, or even use pork shoulder for a tender stringy addition. Any of which would add a juicy tender texture that can actually improve flavors thanks to the natural fat content. You would choose beans here if you want to save money and the fact that what else would you put here? Corn, peas, potatoes? Beans are logically the best addition in such a case. But pretending you cant have a superior product by replacing them with other cuts of beef or meat is ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.12390986]

>>12390816
>I personally wish death upon every /ck/ shitposter, I really do.
Hmm, this statement seems a little out of place. Let me look a little closer...Aha!

[Anonymous No.12391015]

>meatcuck in 2019

[Anonymous No.12391022]

>>12390923
>beans have no flavor
wrong
>replace beans with meat
I'm saying supplement meat with beans you mong
I'm not out making a case against having meat in chili, but almost all the meat in chili is fucking shit cuts anyways, you don't eat a stew for the individual ingredients. Beans DO have taste and DO impart that into the chili, just like meat does. Perhaps not as pronounced if you've saturated your palate with giant blobs of fat every day, but it's there.

[Anonymous No.12391029]

Corn and beans and peas all belong in chili

[Anonymous No.12391262]

I'm not the kind of purist who would freak out and refuse to eat it if someone offered me chili with beans in it. But I find it incredibly weird how in love with beans almost everyone in this thread is. They're just beans. They really don't add much of anything. And the idea actual traditional chili is somehow incomplete without beans is ridiculous. The meat in chili already covers anything beans would be bringing into the equation with the exception of indigestible fiber.

[Anonymous No.12391318]

>>12391022
You definitely could have some chili-esque bowl with beans where you're able to taste the beans in it. But that's not a good sign if your chili's so weak your filler ingredients are still noticeable. That's part of why there's this no beans in chili rule in the first place. It's either not doing anything to the flavor and just taking up space or it is doing something to the flavor in a way that's indicative of a weak chili.

[Anonymous No.12391701]

>>12387131
is that krillin?

[Anonymous No.12391904]

>>12390654
proper Texas chili is just cubed steak in pepper puree sauce...thats it, nothing else. If you start adding onions and tomato you've already bastardized it so don't act like you're superior for being "authentic"

[Anonymous No.12391912]

>>12391318
Or it's good chili whose flavor is boosted by the beans, because beans have flavor, and if you taste ANYTHING in chili that is not a powerful flavor on its own you have weak chili.

[Anonymous No.12391920]

>>12391022
I did not say beans have no flavor and would appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. I said that beans are too mild of a flavor to impact the end result of a good chili recipe. You should be using a full bodied spice blend involving cumin, oregano, garlic, onion powder, and smoked paprika to start off with. On top of that you have your dried chili mix which is usually atleast two types of dried chilis either powdered or made into a paste. Then you have fresh peppers such as jalapenos, poblanos, serranos, etc. You then have your veg flavors such as onions and tomatos (crushed and sometimes tomato paste). Finally you have adjunct ingredients such as coffee, beer, and/or unsweetened cocoa powder. All of this combined will overpower anything the beans people commonly add to chili by a long shot. Trying to act like only people with messed up palates cant taste the additional bean flavor only so highlights inexperience with the dish. It's one thing to prefer beans in chili because you like the texture and feel they absorb the flavor of the chili well - it's another to act like they are actually imparting a flavor of any kind of significance in the face of that many potent spices and ingredients.

[Anonymous No.12391929]

>>12387131
>hates beans so much he throws them away
Stop being a child, they're good for you.

[Anonymous No.12392017]

>>12390794
He's not wrong, most people will use ground beef because it's cheap, easy and probably what they would have grown up with. I'm not saying that it's right (I myself use chuck roast because ground beef is hamburger helper shit tier), but it's what I'd expect from the average person.

Bear in mind that most people also use something like pic related because they can't cook for shit.

[Anonymous No.12392028]

>>12391920
>I said that beans are too mild of a flavor to impact the end result of a good chili recipe
And I'm saying that's false.
The fact they are so absorbent is huge part of the flavor they impart, you get little nuggets of soaked spices instead of over-spiced water, and it also reduces the sharp impact those spices have allowing other ingredients to come through.
The fact you're saying this shit tells me you've never bothered trying beans because you think it's for poorfags or something, because holy shit the taste is changed IMMEASURABLY by adding just a can of pinto. Changing absolutely nothing else, make two batches of chili, one with beans one without. I fucking dare you to tell me they taste the same.

[Anonymous No.12392039]

>>12391904
so you admit that you never made chili in your life

[Anonymous No.12392136]

>>12392028
I've made chili with my uncle since I was 7. We've tried our recipe every which way practically adding anything we could just to experiment as local cookoffs dont require competition specific ingredients normally. And yes, pinto beans did not significantly change the flavor profile, and was outright inferior in flavor profile to an additional cut of meat. Pinto though was better than other beans in our chili (others had a tendency to actually mellow our recipe). I say these things because I've actually done them. I'm not part of the bean hating club, I just dont use them because the results of using another cut of meat is just superior.

[Anonymous No.12392162]

>>12392028
>I fucking dare you to tell me they taste the same.
They taste the same.

[Anonymous No.12392178]

>>12391929
His friend was the one who turned perfectly fine chili into trash by adding beans. All OP did was send the trash to its home.

[Anonymous No.12392754]

>>12387131
>friends
Come up with something better next time.

[Anonymous No.12393097]

>>12392136
Your uncle sounds like quite the guy. Still close are you?

[Anonymous No.12393259]

>>12390654
I have you most likely haven't

[Anonymous No.12393302]

>>12391920
A lot of that shit doesn't belong in chili

[Anonymous No.12393656]

>>12393259
I use the recipe from that starting strength /fit/ meme guy

[Anonymous No.12393967]

>>12387383

[Anonymous No.12394019]

>>12387131
Do you also not eat bananas cus your afraid the other kids will laugh at you?

[Anonymous No.12394081]

>>12393967
What was the purpose of this? To test if you could modify the image data to post the exact same thing? Because you can.

[Anonymous No.12394100]

All you fuckers getting up in arms about beans and not the true pleb chili filler ingredient.

Diced celery and carrots.

[Anonymous No.12394243]

>>12394100
actually it's tomato. everything bad about bad chili recipes starts with too much tomato.

[Anonymous No.12394256]

>>12394243
Oh yeah that's right, I forgot that the severe autists make something resembling Indian "pepper water". Not sure why you'd want to imitate the dot people, but go ahead.

[Anonymous No.12394504]

>>12394081
>What was the purpose of this? To test if you could modify the image data to post the exact same thing?
It says "bean heal" instead of "burn heal" your retard. There were only six words you had to read, how did you miss that?

[Anonymous No.12394511]

>>12394100
All of those are filler. You're not going to validate the existence of beans by bringing up other shit filler examples.

[Anonymous No.12394964]

>>12392039
you didn't like my recipe? also i was describing cookoff chili which is the real chili for all authenticfags jockeying to be the realest.

[Anonymous No.12394973]

>>12387407
Are they scared that additional ingredients might make meat and tomato soup taste better? Why bother having a competition about a recipe that is not inherently superior?

[Anonymous No.12395529]

>>12387131
Texas sucks

[Anonymous No.12395776]

Chili without beans is just spicy bolognese, fuck off Kuckichi.

[Anonymous No.12395790]

>>12394973
>has no idea what chili is

>>12395776
>has no idea what chili or bolognese is

[Anonymous No.12396111]

>>12394973
>Are they scared that additional ingredients might make meat and tomato soup taste better?
No, they just don't want to deal with amateurs who use filler ingredients.

[Anonymous No.12396149]

>>12387131
>all this seething poverty COPE
Poorcucks can’t handle the fact that people with taste don’t like packing peanuts in their chili.

[Anonymous No.12396156]

>>12388487
Being anonymous you are both nobody and everybody.

[Anonymous No.12397012]

>>12387131
Living in Ohio makes the whole chili debate a bit weirder

[Anonymous No.12397016]

>>12387242
>Yankee news man
They pulled the wool over that faggot's eyes.

[Anonymous No.12397107]

>>12387251
bitch ill take a beany shit in your mouth so big youll call me Mr. Bean