>you're proposing murdering millions of people
for the greater good. and calling them people is really borderline. also, it's not murder, if it's war. in war it's just killing.
> for arbitrary factors
umm, not arbitrary at all. they're stupid, they're selfish, they're a blight on the earth, they are holding everyone back, they're rude, they're abusive. we'd be better off without them. there is nothing less arbitrary than that.
>Do you have literally no empathy?
i have empathy for the people close and closer to me, not people who are unlike me. to love someone, you have to hate someone else. that's literally how it works.
>Why would you want to murder strangers for the way they were born?
for the way they were born.
>Two, literally all these are true about killing racists, and they would atually deserve it.
wrong, racists comprise a vast amount of very important and valuable people. and racism isn't wrong. it's not a crime or bad. it's good and normal. it's healthy.
> how do you decide who qualifies for you wet-dream genocide?
it's not hard. if it's not white, nightey night!
> black people have contributed tonnes of shit to science, technology, and culture.
they've detracted from all of these. complete fucking negative impact.
>why not base it on achievement, rather than skin colour?
first of all results would be almost the same second of all it's not skin color, it's race.
>I'm not sure you know what a fact is.
one fact is that if you let niggers handle your food, you're stupid. they're going to do a bad job, they're unsanitary, they're hateful little shits that will tamper with your food because they have no work ethic, and they're disease-ridden. you can not argue with the undeniable fact, the absolute incontrovertible reality that it'd be better to have white people handling your food. you can't get around that without delusion.