/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.12281310]

Would you heat proteins from the left?
Why?

[Anonymous No.12281313]

>>12281310
Yes because I don't give a shit

[Anonymous No.12281340]

>>12281310
It's generally okay to eat from the left, but I'd prefer meat from the right as I think the quality is higher and the animals are able to live more comfortable lives. They exist to be my dinner but that doesn't mean I want them treated like objects.

[Anonymous No.12281349]

>>12281310
To kill bacteria and make it safe to eat.

[Anonymous No.12281362]

I used to think free range was a meme until I accidentally bought free range eggs. The colour was better when cracking them and they tasted much more vibrant. I only buy free-range now and I encourage anybody who cares about the quality of their food and is not financially struggling to do the same. You really don't know what you're missing.

[Anonymous No.12281367]

>>12281349
Not sure what you're saying is making any sense

[Anonymous No.12281373]

>>12281367
Why not? That's the entire origin of cooking.

[Anonymous No.12281383]

>>12281310
>thinking you can feed 7 billion people on the right
If you start putting yourself in the animals position the the left is terrible, BUT animals aren't humans. They don't think like humans, they don't feel thing like humans, they're sole purpose is to be used as food by us. Thinking animals are just like humans is the same mentality that gave rise to furries.

[Anonymous No.12281389]

>>12281349
>>12281373
I figured some snarky ass would bring this up so I didn't have to.

[Anonymous No.12281392]

>>12281349
>implying raw meat is not safe

[Anonymous No.12281401]

Extensive farming is much more ecologically damaging, so if you‘re advocating for abolishment of industrial farming practices you should know that you are implicitly advocating for vast dietary changes in meat consumption.

[Anonymous No.12281407]

>>12281383
>jews arent humans because I say so
>Thinking they're humans leads to furries
Great argument.

[Anonymous No.12281426]

>>12281383
>thinking you can feed 7 billion people on the right
you actually can

[Anonymous No.12281428]

>>12281426
So you have a terraforming machine? Nice

[Anonymous No.12281431]

>>12281383
yeah about those 7 billion people, we can most definitely cut down on the amount of people in africa, the middle east, india and asia.

[Anonymous No.12281433]

>>12281310
left, because it's probably a lot cheaper and tastes comparable to the right.

[Anonymous No.12281434]

>>12281428
where are you bringing that up from anyway

[Anonymous No.12281437]

>>12281434
Huh? Do you speak human?

[Anonymous No.12281443]

>>12281310
>PROTEIN

[Anonymous No.12281451]

You shouldn't do either. I can't believe people still aren't vegan in CURRENT YEAR.

[Anonymous No.12281462]

Luckily they make lab meat soon so everyone can go on carnivore diet and get rid of the toxic plants in their diet.

[Anonymous No.12281474]

>>12281340
>>12281362
Ditto on this, fuck Tyson.

[Anonymous No.12281484]

>>12281383
>this is the myth the megacorporations want you to believe
You can. The intensive farming is solely for the farmers convenience. If the animals are confined shoulder to shoulder in warehouses it's much easier. Those warehouses are usually located isolated acerages which are plenty large enough to handle the same quantity of animals as the warehouses, but it requires more effort. Hence, why extensive farming products cost more to produce

Also the 7 billion people aren't eating meat every meal like the 340 million amerilard glutton bloodlusting carnists.

[Anonymous No.12281496]

>>12281484
>Also the 7 billion people aren't eating meat every meal like the 340 million amerilard glutton bloodlusting carnists
You're right. They're eating dirt.

https://youtu.be/s3337cj4sJQ
https://youtu.be/O60ACtH3LfM

[Anonymous No.12281532]

>>12281407
>Jews=Animals
I mean if you say so

[Anonymous No.12281574]

>>12281310
i would eat both, but i would prefer the one that tastes better, if there is a difference. if there is no difference in taste, give me the cheaper one. animals were put here for me to eat

[Anonymous No.12281590]

>>12281310
I would, and do probably, but dont feel great about it.

Id be happy to pay a extra couple bucks per pound for right

[Anonymous No.12281616]

>>12281310
>yes
>because i don't eat raw pork or poultry

[Anonymous No.12281619]

>>12281362
Oh honey. If only you knew how the industry defined 'free-range'. Believe me, there isn't a lick of difference between caged eggs, cage free, and free range eggs. In every single situation, the birds are all packed together with little room to move around. Free range and cage free are simply memes so the industry can charge you more. But, go ahead, you buy your overpriced eggs if it makes you feel better.

[Anonymous No.12281715]

>>12281619
Well it depends, if you're from a third world country like the US with no food standards then you're correct.

[Anonymous No.12281917]

>>12281619
>>12281715
There are differences. Conventional in cages (90% of US production) they barely have room to stand but cannot stretch wings or turn around. Cage free they can move around freely, jump on perches, take dust baths, etc. Free range is the same but have access to the outdoors although they may never choose to go out.

[Anonymous No.12281920]

>>12281340
If those animals had the ability to lock you and your family up like that they would

[Anonymous No.12281931]

>>12281619
post proof or you are a dumb contrarian sperg who probably falls for pro-vegan bait threads on the reg

[Anonymous No.12281942]

>>12281920
So sink down to their level?

[Anonymous No.12281951]

>>12281920
great hypothetical champ

[Anonymous No.12281956]

>>12281920
>them thur chigguns n cows ar plottin agenst us i tell ya whut
based paranoid redneck posting

[Anonymous No.12281964]

daily reminder that "animal activists" are entirely militant vegan marxists who want nothing less than the criminalization of eating meat

[Anonymous No.12281999]

>>12281964
t. confirmed paranoid schizophrenic

[Anonymous No.12282000]

>>12281619
I just looked it up and you appear to be correct but only about livestock in the USA. My country's standards are much more specific and do conform to what the average person would assume to mean "free range", which explains why I do get better quality when buying them but you get the same old sickly pale goo.

But go ahead, you buy your low-quality garbage eggs if it makes you feel better, but it doesn't matter because you don't have a choice anyway.

[Anonymous No.12282040]

>>12281310
Because nothing matters but me the unique one. Ethics are nothing but a spook.

[Anonymous No.12282076]

>>12281313
>whitewomanshitroodypoo.jpg

FPBP

[Anonymous No.12282079]

>>12281917

182x273

Convincing picture proof attached.

[Anonymous No.12282154]

>>12281310
not too big on this whole English thing, are ya, laddie?

[Anonymous No.12282256]

>>12281310
There aren't two options, factory farming embodies the culmination of technological advancements necessary to sustain a population of 8 billion+ people.
Prayer for genocide, pandemic, worldwide famine, or global thermonuclear war is a more sound environmental action plan than consuming post-millennial "fair life" products and ingredients designed to make you think you're making a difference by spending $10 on celery.
>used to work at Target
>women comes through express lane with some produce
>ring up two apples and four apricots
>apricots are $1 each
>$4 for 4 tiny fucking apricots
>"Wow, that's kind of pricey for apricots"
Yeah, it is.
>...
>"Well, they are organic™ "
>tfw don't even say anything

[Anonymous No.12282294]

There's nothing any one person can do to foreclose to possibility of environmental ruin.

[Anonymous No.12282306]

>>12281310
You’re trying to force the government to bail out every farm in existence because you don’t think the animals are treated properly. If you have a shit about their conditions, you wouldn’t let them be slaughtered so you could eat them. They’re all animals purposely made for us to eat, who gives a fuck if cow #4127779 is happy?

[Anonymous No.12282315]

>>12281383
Stop eating meat every day and farm vegetables and fruits in massive skyscrapers using hydroponics to save space and water, then it’s easily possible. Even easier if we get net-gain fusion reactors in the nearish future.

[Anonymous No.12282366]

>>12281431
So you’re advocating that the cows lives are more important and contribute more than the humans lives. Interesting take on that, PETA

[Anonymous No.12282393]

>>12281715
You’re out of your mind if you don’t think the us has some of the most rules and regulations. Take a look at the fda website sometime.

[Anonymous No.12282403]

>>12281310
the one on the right looks objectively more delicious.

[Anonymous No.12282449]

>>12281407
this but unironically

[Anonymous No.12282522]

>>12281310

Honestly, as someone that has rescued horses from free ranges in Alberta where the horses are raised without attention and then funneled into auction to be sold for meat, there's no difference. Their quality of life isn't necessarily better just because they're in huge fields.

If you really want to make any kind of a difference, go directly to a farmer who raises cattle and has a butcher on hand.

[Anonymous No.12282555]

>>12282315
>justbuildmyfantasyworld.jpg

[Anonymous No.12282732]

>>12281917
oh buddy, do you think the color of eggs has anything to do with how they are raised? it's the color of the chicken that determines the color of the egg

[Anonymous No.12282917]

>>12281310
I only ever buy free ranged.

[Anonymous No.12282938]

>>12282256
>necessary
>westerners are literally dying from eating nothing but meat and simple carbs

[Anonymous No.12283256]

>>12281917
Sorry I didn't realize you were on dial up and couldn't upload images.

[Anonymous No.12283326]

>>12282294
at least my conscience will be clear

[Anonymous No.12283347]

>supplies millions on the left
>supplies only thousands right
This is optimal scenarios too. In the end not everyone can eat meat if you want everything to be ethical

[Anonymous No.12283454]

>>12282366
Its not that the cows are more important so much as we should stop funding and supporting countries that can't sustain themselves and their unstoppable birthrates.

[Anonymous No.12283464]

>>12283454
Anyone who knows even a little bit about economics understands that HDI and lower birthrates go hand in hand, and that the purpose of international development programs is to REDUCE birthrates. Cutting aid to failed or near-failed states is pretty much the best way to guarantee that everyone with a working uterus will revert to popping out a baby every 9 months until she dies of AIDS.

But sure, please tell the UN that you figured out the REAL problem which is actually foreign aid.

[Anonymous No.12283485]

>>12281917
Same image, but for non-ants.

[Anonymous No.12283500]

>>12283485
>brown doesn't mean anything
Are wh*te people really this blind?

[Anonymous No.12283502]

>>12281310
Yes. Animals don't have feelings.

[Anonymous No.12283514]

>>12283500
The color of the egg depends on the kind of chicken which lays it.
>t. raises chickens for eggs

[Anonymous No.12283526]

>>12283514
So you agree that color is real, then?

[Anonymous No.12283573]

>tfw I have risen above dumb meatcucks

[Anonymous No.12283600]

>>12283347
This is hiding the countless square kilometers of farmland being used to raise basic feed crops to sustain the left. Integrated farming that takes advantage of simple shit people used to do like crop rotation and multi-cropping can curb stomp the output of the current industrialized yield.
You would have to stop being a lazy faggot and eat a bit less meat, and a bit more vegetables in their actual season, however. Do you think you can be a big boy and do that, anon?

[Anonymous No.12283776]

>>12283485
>Spend lives in area the size of a MacBook
Because that is the ultimate metric of determining area, who still uses square meters?
They really know the audience they are speaking to here, brilliant.

[Anonymous No.12283883]

>>12281431
If literally every single person in India and China just died, the world would be a better place. Nothing angers me more than the idea that 1.4 billion Chinese cockroaches think that eating the penis of a rhino, or the heart of a Manta Ray, will cure their impotence

[Anonymous No.12283893]

>>12281383
>Caring about feeding africans

[Anonymous No.12284020]

>>12281383
>thinking you can feed 7 billion people on the right

>Thinking it's our job (as whites) to feed 7 billion people.

The productive class of Europe, the us and especially Australia can feed itself on the right. If our Jewish masters force us to feed all non-whites in the world, for free, it can't be done. (Free range grass feeding)

[Anonymous No.12284027]

>>12281999
Spotted the vegan. Satanist confirmed also.

[Anonymous No.12284820]

>>12281920
Wisdom of a Flyover man

[Anonymous No.12284849]

>>12281619
you type like a faggot

[Anonymous No.12285195]

>>12281310
Yes because all of us already do.

[Anonymous No.12285225]

>>12281310
Factory farming is better for the environment, and I care slightly more about that then I do about how happy cows are

[Anonymous No.12285238]

>>12281920
but they don't, so imma lick the bones of my cheap-ass cruelty chicken clean

[Anonymous No.12285252]

>>12281362
i used to scoff at an eight dollar carton of eggs but now I buy farm eggs too man. nice orange yolks, dense whites and leathery shells. i still keep the six-month-old cold stored bleach eggs on deck for baking though. i keep them shits frozen.

[Anonymous No.12285406]

>>12281443
I dont get this board, honestly
1 anon likes thing
>NO U WRONG I RIGHT
>NONONO IS ACSUALLY DIS OTHER TING
>YOU GUYS SUCK GO BACK
i browsed pretty much every significant board and only this one and /sci/ are so inconsistant, fucking decide what your memes mean you spergs.

[Anonymous No.12285429]

The right is ideal but if that's the only way to get steak then demand+land restrictions are going to make meat cost like four hundred dollars per pound

[Anonymous No.12285432]

>>12285406
>memes are weak in the two boards most immediately applicable to reality
huh

[Anonymous No.12285474]

>>12285195
>I just tug the line, and do what others do! As long as others do it, I'm fine being culpable with mass torture.

[Anonymous No.12285489]

>>12285432
Not weak just people seem to disagree with each other so much, probably 1 out of 1000 people will agree with you, simple things like "hey how do you cook your meat?"
" ah yeah i like to sou vid it"
"WHAT YOU ZOOMER WHO DOES THAT HAHA SO MUCH S OI"

[Anonymous No.12285568]

>>12281362
>t. Mr. Placebo

[Anonymous No.12285571]

>>12281431
>we can
You'd like to. But you really can't.

[Anonymous No.12285585]

>>12281920
But they don't

[Anonymous No.12285587]

>>12282393
It doesn't

[Anonymous No.12285601]

>>12281920
>If those animals had the ability to lock you and your family up like that they would
If those animals had that ability, they would prove to be intelligent, and therfore taboo to enslave and to eat.

[Anonymous No.12286426]

>>12285587
It does it's part of the reason like 2 people die a year from E.coli but we don't have the farming culture that Europe has so we don't have everything as free as they do.

[Anonymous No.12286525]

>>12285406
>>12285489
Lol fuck off retard soycuck

[Anonymous No.12286701]

>>12281619
There's about 5 sq ft of difference
If it bothers you just build a coop and get some ladies of your own.