[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking

View post   
File: 616 KB, 1500x844, fried-fish-103018840_horiz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213220 No.12213220 [Reply] [Original]

Assuming equal amounts, what has more calories: fried chicken or fried fish?

>> No.12213234

Yes.

>> No.12213241

No.

>> No.12213243

>>12213234
No

>> No.12213248

>>12213243
..but, maybe?

>> No.12213258

>>12213220
It’s exactly the same you fucking retard.

>> No.12213259

>>12213248
Eh, possibly.

>> No.12213266

>>12213258
But chicken is heavier

>> No.12213273

>>12213220
Do you mean equal weights or equal volume?

>> No.12213274

>>12213266
If you drop a ton of fried chicken, and a ton of fried fish, from the same height; which one hits the ground first?

>> No.12213277

>>12213273
It doesn't matter a pound of fried chicken and a pound of fried fish would weigh the same

>> No.12213282

>>12213274
Yes.

>> No.12213286

>>12213277
Lol no. You get way more fish per pound so it would be heavier.

>> No.12213290
File: 268 KB, 1280x738, heavier-than-feathers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213290

>>12213277

>> No.12213295

this shit is apples and oranges.
Fried chicken is wheat flour breading and fried fish is cornflour breading.

>> No.12213305

>>12213220
equal amounts of calories?

>> No.12213308

>>12213220
Assuming you use skinless, trimmed chicken breast, fish has more

>> No.12213317
File: 299 KB, 1268x556, 1553885544724.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213317

>>12213277
OP didn't say pounds, he said equal 'amounts', which could also be talking about volume.

>> No.12213336

>>12213220
Fish is probably lower in calories, but it depends on what kind of fish, what cut of chicken, if the skin is left on, etc.

>> No.12213340

>>12213317
>Jokers to the right, clowns to the left of me
What jester made this?

>> No.12213346

>>12213274
Your mom.

>> No.12213347

>>12213274
Chicken, less wind resistance

>> No.12213354

>>12213347
But a fish's body is naturally more aerodynamic, especially if we're talking about a flying fish.

>> No.12213588

>>12213354
What if it's just fried wings?

>> No.12213599

>>12213588
Wouldn't wings stay in the air longer? Birds use them to fly right?

>> No.12213629

>>12213599
Sure, but are we talking about a whole flying fish, or just the fins?

>> No.12213979
File: 52 KB, 600x300, fish_flying-fish_600x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213979

>>12213599
>>12213629
I think he's talking about a literal flying fish
As in, these shits

>> No.12214085

>>12213979
Assuming equal amounts, what has more calories: fried chicken wings or fried fish wings?

>> No.12214131
File: 124 KB, 598x742, fort.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12214131

>>12213220
>what has more calories
Here you go OP

>> No.12214220

>>12213220
wat fish?

>> No.12214243

>>12213979
>>12213629
>>12213599
>>12213588
Fried fish wings are lighter and would probably get blown around by the breeze, chicken wings are denser and would plummet to the ground easily

>> No.12214248

>>12214131
it has more protein and calcium too

>> No.12214871

>>12213340
That's correct from wojak's perspective

>> No.12214878

>>12214871
quit calling it "wojak" you tremendous newfag

>> No.12214889

>>12214878
IT

is

WOJACK

>> No.12214891

>>12214871
back to rebbit

>> No.12214897

>>12213220
>eating any seafood fried
disgusting

>> No.12214921

>>12213220
Depends on what fish and what part of the chicken?

>> No.12214924

>>12213277
But chicken is heavier than fish

>> No.12214927

>>12213274
The fish would hit the ground first because black people would rush in and grab the fried chicken out of the air before it got all the way to the ground.