[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 446 KB, 809x604, 18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046346 No.12046346 [Reply] [Original]

Does it really increase the risks or it's some vegan propaganda?

>> No.12046349

Both. "Risk" is propaganda.

>> No.12046358
File: 31 KB, 470x470, 1510679740702.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046358

>>12046346
>CNN

>> No.12046362

>>12046346
It's nonsense. 2 years from now they'll be saying the opposite

>> No.12046364
File: 54 KB, 568x568, Catastrophe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046364

"study says"

>> No.12046365

>>12046358
Everyone's reporting on it

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2019/03/16/are-eggs-good-or-bad-how-you-should-interpret-this-latest-study/#1847823d6525

https://nationalpost.com/pmn/life-pmn/are-eggs-good-or-bad-for-you-new-research-rekindles-debate

https://news.yahoo.com/eggs-may-bad-heart-study-161850485.html

>> No.12046366

>>12046346
It's just a correlation, skipping breakfast is probably healthier because people who eat it are going to be prone to having excess calories, if you're cooking eggs you'll be more likely to fry up bacon or sausage too since you're already cooking with oil in a pan

Correlation does not mean causation

>> No.12046367

>CNN
studies are worthless unless they are credible btw

>> No.12046368

>>12046346
These studies are effectively worthless, because it's impossible to separate correlation from causation. There are so many factors that cause heart disease and "early death." Just because the egg-eaters died does not suggest, let alone prove, that the eggs killed them.

That's why you can find all these studies that directly contradict each other with equally compelling "evidence," because nobody knows anything, the only certainty is that death comes for us all. You will die, OP. Just don't stuff your face with junk until you're obese, go for a walk every now and then, and your heart will be fine. Or maybe it won't. Maybe the cancer has already spread so thoroughly through your body that chemotherapy will be useless by the time the doctor catches it.

You die, I die, everybody dies, omelettes are pretty tasty though, these are the only facts I know

>> No.12046369

>>12046366
>skipping breakfast is probably healthier because people who eat it are going to be prone to having excess calories,
Are you really this fucking stupid?

>> No.12046371

>>12046365
These same.news sources are saying that even 1-2 alcoholic drinks a day (((can))) lead to high blood pressure. You queers are self fulfilling prophecies. Always stressed clickbait propaganda.

>> No.12046372

>>12046346
Fuck, I eat like 3 eggs a month. I need to step up my game.

>> No.12046374
File: 19 KB, 480x360, Beautiful Vegan Teeth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046374

>>12046346
hm.... the guy who made the "study" looks like this pic related, so do your own math.

>> No.12046378

>>12046346
>CNN

You might aswell read childrens books because they at least admit it's a fucking work of fiction

>> No.12046380

>>12046366
This. The correlation between a person's heath and any particular food a person eats has more to do with a food's reputation of being healthy or not than it does with any nutritional properties of the food.

>> No.12046381

>>12046365
>The researchers calculated that those who ate 300 milligrams of cholesterol daily — about 1 1/2 eggs — were 17 per cent more likely to develop heart disease than whose who didn’t eat eggs

Fuck off.

>> No.12046390
File: 26 KB, 720x684, 81bea2d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046390

>>12046374
>3 proof by examples
>no logical arguments
>strawmans
Your brain on carnism

>> No.12046400

>>12046381
And increases drastically with frequency. You would be surprised with how common heart dosease is. Its the number one killer of people in the world. 17% is massive at this scale.
Also: This is an actual study that isn't funded by the egg industry (99.9% of them since the 90s)

>> No.12046410

>>12046371
Alcohol does have negative impacts on the body with long term consumption, even small moderate doses like 1 beer a day have been shown to have an adverse effect on health.

>> No.12046417

>Additionally, the researchers had information on the participants’ diets based on questionnaires that participants had completed when they had first entered the cohorts. Therefore, they did not track the diets of the participants throughout the course of the studies. Keep in mind that this would eggs-clude any changes in diet during the course of the cohort. Moreover, this relies on the participants to accurately recall what they usually ate and sometimes trying to get very accurate recall can be a bit eggs-asperating.

Into the trash it goes.

>> No.12046419

Studies contradict themselves all the time, very often the people who pay for them infleunce the results.

((Feinberg School of Medicine ))

>> No.12046429

>>12046410
"Alcohol IS good for you: Up to 5 drinks each week 'lowers risk of heart failure and heart attack'

Three to five drinks a week lowers risk of heart failure and heart attack
Experts say it doesn't matter if a person drinks wine, beer or liquor
Moderate alcohol consumption 'is part of a healthy lifestyle', they say
Drinking 3 to 5 drinks a week lowers heart failure risk by 33%, study found
And risk of heart attack drops 28% with each additional drink, it revealed "

>> No.12046435

I bet half the people who are worried about this are injecting gear.

>> No.12046443

>>12046429
Those studies have been thoroughly debunked retard.
>even those who met definitions for moderate drinking, saw higher rates of cognitive decline and brain shrinkage than their teetotaling counterparts.
The study followed 550 men and women for 30 years, measuring their brain structure and function to determine how alcohol use affects the mind over time. What they found is that the more people drank, the more atrophy occurred in the brain's hippocampus, a seahorse-shaped structure in your brain that plays a role in storing memories. The highest risk was for people who drank 17 standard drinks or more of alcohol per week. But even people who drank moderately saw an elevated risk for cognitive changes.

>> No.12046456
File: 49 KB, 196x196, wait huh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046456

>Eggs are good for you and are full of protien!
>No, wait, they are bad for you and give you heart disease!

>Alcohol is good for you and prevents heart disease!
>No wait alcohol is bad for you and gives you cancer!

>Dairy is good for you, and has lots of calcium!
>No wait, dairy is bad for you! Eat less dairy!

>>12046419
>very often the people who pay for them infleunce the results.

Literally this. Oh wow, the alcohol industry funded tests and research and found it prevents heart disease? How convenient!

>> No.12046464
File: 121 KB, 1080x1920, d86b6f0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046464

>>12046419
What's the point of attacking a food that doesn't have an alternative then? 99% of pro-egg studies are all paid for by the egg and meat industry. Is Big Carrot trying to get a piece of that egg money?
Also every science organization agrees that cholesterol and the negative fats in eggs are unhealthy. The USA doesn't even let you label eggs as healthy or nutritious.
We know why dietary cholesterol and trans fats cause health issues. We know exactly why. The fact that these industries have to keep shitting out false studies to keep you buying their food should speak for itself.

>> No.12046475

>>12046369
>skipping breakfast makes you fat
only in America because it's all about selling you 10 small meals a day to fit around your 3 big ones

>> No.12046482

>>12046464
Do you have sources anon?

>nutritionfacts.org

>> No.12046486

>>12046429
>>12046443
>>12046456
But doesn't alcohol makes you age faster?

>> No.12046488

>>12046464
>every science organization agrees that cholesterol and the negative fats in eggs are unhealthy
wrong. also
>negative fats
lol wut
> dietary cholesterol and trans fats cause health issues
trans fats yes, cholesterol no

Go be a vegan somewhere else

>> No.12046490

>>12046464
I was under the impression that there hasn't been a solid link demonstrated between dietary and blood cholesterol.

>> No.12046509

>>12046346
>BREAKING NEWS! Studies suggest that those who breathe air are 100% likely to DIE!!! But don't hold your breath, some experts claim that no air may be just as bad!

Reports like this remind me of the hysteria years ago over burnt toast causing cancer. Do people who make these studies think that if people stop eating eggs and everything else, then they will live forever? Everyone dies of something, might as well enjoy good food in the meantime.

>> No.12046520

>>12046368
This is like saying people who die in the woods aren't, statistically, dying because of the woods. Fuck off.

>> No.12046524

>>12046346
still better than soy induced castration

>> No.12046528

>>12046490
You were under that impression due to big egg and meat propaganda; consider yourself cured.

>> No.12046546 [DELETED] 

>>12046369
Intermittent fasting is healthier because you your insulin levels aren't constantly elevated because you're constantly feeding. Our grazing lifestyle and our inability to not eat for 16 hours out of the day. Shit, half the time you're supposed to be sleeping anyways.

>> No.12046555

>>12046369
Intermittent fasting is healthier because you your insulin levels aren't constantly elevated because you're constantly feeding. Our grazing lifestyle and our inability to not eat for 16 hours out of the day is partially why everybody is becoming diabetic.

>> No.12046574

We're back to this shit again, huh?

>> No.12046588

>>12046346
"says" is vastly different from "proves"

>> No.12046591

Nutrition science is constantly changing, contradictory studies come out constantly

>> No.12046626

>>12046362
this. its always back and forth. just look at the reports on coffee and how that fluctuates

>> No.12046644

>>12046488
Imagine being this uneducated. The American public education system failed you anon.

>> No.12046665

>>12046366
>>12046380
just saying, you have to be pretty dumb to think that the people who conduct these studies aren't aware that correlation doesn't equal causation. there's lots of ways to deal with this. it's called confounding, look it up.

>t. epidemiologist

>> No.12046689

>>12046665
That's pretty cool but as an epidemiologist you should be annoyed with this study as the researchers did no actual measures other than asking people how many eggs they ate a day on average, at the start of the 17.5 year study, with no actual dietary measures or control for variations and changes over time. Ultimately making this study fucking worthless.

>T. Biologist that's published research papers.

>> No.12046701

>>12046665
>>12046689
>NEETs larping as important people

>> No.12046727

>>12046701
I wouldn't call myself important, just assisted in the recreation of studies to validate their findings. I was basically a peer reviewer.

>> No.12046743

>>12046574
Honestly, speculating on wine and eggs and tea and coffee should be a market with futures by now.
It's legal gambling!

>> No.12046756

>>12046665
You have to be pretty dumb to assume authority implies infallibility

>> No.12046760

>>12046346
everybody know these academic research papers are bullshit and its all about publishing if you're not publishing x amount of bs papers a year your not getting funding.

>> No.12046768

>>12046346
Dietary cholesterol has a very limited effect on serum cholesterol, besides which your diet 100% needs at least some cholesterol in it because it's what a lot of your brain is made of.

A lot of vegetarian/vegan statistics are misleading because the stories they come out with them consistently ignore the rule that correlation doesn't imply causation. Obviously people who take a lot of care about what they eat with the goal of being healthier are healthier than the general population that contains people who eat nothing but McDonalds and pizza. Unfortunately it's ridiculously hard to compare properly 1:1 because of this. IMO if you eat a balanced, varied diet and get plenty of exercise your risk of diet-related health issues is pretty minimal.

On a related note, one of my favorite examples of confounding in studies is one where it was found that there was a REALLY strong correlation between drinking coffee and lung cancer. People panicked about it for a bit until it was revealed that there was also a really strong correlation (at the time) between drinking coffee and smoking. The coffee had no direct effect on the lung cancer at all, it was just tied to a hidden variable that was.

>> No.12046774

>>12046760
>based relative literally dropped out of grad school from a research position after he realized it was a scam and you only got paid to confirm their beliefs
People with integrity just get tossed aside. Stoicism is punished these days.

>> No.12046786

>>12046774
Unfortunately many good ethical qualities are punished these days. It's all about the almighty dollar.

>> No.12046810

lmao i basically live on sardines and boiled eggs and im probably one of the healthiest people on the planet. fuck cnn

>> No.12046818
File: 56 KB, 540x540, 1526148574085.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046818

>>12046390
>carnism
thinking people exclusivly eat meat
not omnivores

>> No.12046820
File: 95 KB, 800x800, -14524853531964341794.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046820

I'm trying to save money and realized how much i fucking love eggs. I cook them very differently than before and i believe it's one of the most basic things you should learn first to cook if cooking were to be taught. I'm getting me one of these bad boys soon.

>> No.12046824

>>12046810
Dietary cholesterol isn't linked to blood cholesterol in any comprehensive studies we have.
That said, I'd avoid overdoing it, just like drinking nothing but soylent probably does make you borderline tranny.

>> No.12046832

>>12046820
Make 'dem tamago rolls, anon. They're so fluffy and delicious.

>> No.12046861

Just use one egg yolk and just use the egg whites from the rest of the eggs.

>> No.12046868

>>12046774
I have a brother who is a chairman of the statistics dept. of a large university and he sits on boards that allocate grant money and the criteria they use is how well constructed the hypothesis and research proposal is, nothing more nothing less. Face it, your relative flunked out of grad school because he couldn't formulate a solid hypothesis and methodology. Stop believing in academic spooks and hobgoblins when research hurts your feefees and indicates shit needs to change.

>> No.12046869

>Dr. Susan Scutti
>Dr. Susan
>Susan
>Dr.
lol, no thanks

>> No.12046885 [DELETED] 

>>12046689
yeah, i'm not commenting on the value of this particular study, just that i see people say this all the time and it bothers me.
>>12046701
i am important
>>12046756
where did i assume that? that most public health researchers aren't aware of confounding? that's a pretty reasonable assumption

>> No.12046889

>>12046689
yeah, i'm not commenting on the value of this particular study, just that i see people say this all the time and it bothers me.
>>12046701
i am important
>>12046756
where did i assume that? that most public health researchers are aware of confounding? that's a pretty reasonable assumption

>> No.12046890

>>12046365
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2019/03/16/are-eggs-good-or-bad-how-you-should-interpret-this-latest-study/#1847823d6525

>Additionally, the researchers had information on the participants' diets based on questionnaires that participants had completed when they had first entered the cohorts. Therefore, they did not track the diets of the participants throughout the course of the studies. Keep in mind that this would eggs-clude any changes in diet during the course of the cohort. Moreover, this relies on the participants to accurately recall what they usually ate and sometimes trying to get very accurate recall can be a bit eggs-asperating.

Why do they even bother with this shit?

>> No.12046910

>>12046346
Dose makes the poison, the evidence for negative effects for 1 egg a day is weak (except for diabetics). The evidence for high intakes is also weak, but stronger. Why take the risk?

Here's what's known without a shadow of a doubt, arterial plaques contain a large amount of oxidized LDL and macrophages filled with saturated fatty acid. Potentially most of the compounds in plaques might have been synthesized in the arterial wall itself, but higher concentrations in your blood (especially after eating) seem likely to be counterproductive to clearing them out.

Try to stick to 1 egg a day on average, eat some tomatoes at the same time.

>> No.12046927
File: 1.75 MB, 365x205, poss.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046927

also just want to say, you distrust the media for everything, but then turn around and assume they're accurately reporting this information? And then you go on to deride the field because of the poor quality information/interpretation you received by the media? think for a second.
the media's portrayals/interpretations of epidemiological evidence is awful, just like their interpretation of everything else. It doesn't mean that the field is useless. They pick up on stupid meme studies that concern things people care about, grossly misinterpret them to spin them as click bait, and that becomes the public's image of epidemiology.

>> No.12047047

>>12046868
Write an objective paper about Che and get back to me.
Your brother is a fucking stooley.

>> No.12047057

>>12046555
Facts senpai

>> No.12047061

>>12046701
>biologist
>important
Kek

>> No.12047073

>>12046346
What about people in long-living cultures that eat eggs everyday, is their diet otherwise lowering the risk?

>> No.12047175

>>12047047
See, this is why literally everyone laughs at you, magatard.

>> No.12047221

I really really really want to strangle journos

>> No.12047493

>>12046456
This. One day coffee is good, one day it’s bad. The government based America’s entire meal plan off a stupid study later - DECADES LATER - debunked. You never know who is benefitting from these “studies” and who they are paid to promote.

“Everything in moderation” and “the less processed (prior to purchase), the better” are 2 things that almost no one has any qualms with.

It’s the same thing with “superfoods”. Nutritionally, yes, some foods ARE better than others. But that doesn’t mean that drinking pomegranate juice and eating like crap will save you because it is a “super food”, nor will it be harmful if you never eat a pomegranate but you eat a diet rich in various vegetables and fruits.

>> No.12048343
File: 23 KB, 256x256, 1432265662028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12048343

I THOUGHT YOU SAID CHOLESTEROL IS GOOFD FOR YOU

>> No.12048993

>>12046346
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn.

>> No.12049026

I used to eat a bowl of cereal every day for breakfast. Now my breakfast each and every day consists of two egg burritos made with three scrambled eggs, some bacon, and cheddar cheese. The second I made the switch, I felt a lot healthier, and to this day if I do not eat some kind of animal protein for breakfast I generally tend to feel like crap for the rest of the morning.

Generally speaking, my body doesn't complain at all about meat, and whenever I test my blood pressure, it's relatively normal unless I'm really stressed out over something. Fast food makes me feel a bit sick often, but if I cook up a steak or a porkchop in butter... no issues.

>> No.12049028

>>12046626
Having basic knowledge and understanding of what you eat is important for making a conclusion yourself.

>> No.12049029

>>12046818

It's an attempt by vegans to create a term to refer to anyone who eats meat (omnivores, carnivores), as opposed to someone who only eats meat (carnivores). Since the word "carnist" and "carnism" are both not in the Oxford English Dictionary, and furthermore produce red lines underneath them when you type them in the post reply box, you can conclude that these are not real words and you should ascribe whatever meaning you want to them. For instance: non-moron.

>> No.12049047

>>12049026
I made a similar transition. I can't believe i went eating cereal for breakfast so many years. I finally feel alive since I started eating 3 eggs daily. I don't preach my diet to everyone I come across, but I think people need to seriously start questioning the conventional wisdom of "plants = healthy" and "cholesterol = bad" etc. Just my experience.

>> No.12049092
File: 19 KB, 123x150, ;).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12049092

>>12046346
breathing increases risk of death, study says

>> No.12049214

>>12046346
Well a high protein and fat diet does have its problems, but eggs are nutritious generally. I mean who eat's that many eggs a week?

>> No.12050241

>>12049214
> I mean who eat's that many eggs a week?

Nearly everyone of European descent for the last several hundred years. It was a staple food and far more available source of protein than meat to most.

>> No.12050248

>>12049214
You serious nigger? I go through a dozen a week and that's low

>> No.12050660

>>12050248
When I was into natural body building I'd eat a dozen a day, sometimes more. Got sick of them because I'm not a good cook but felt great

>> No.12051014

as long as diet soda is still okay im good

>> No.12051039

>increase your risk
Literally a meaningless fucking sentence.

>> No.12051048

>>12046346
Someone in the know likely is figuring on an egg shortage in the coming few years. So instead of just letting people know, they try and scare tactic the public into not eating so many eggs.

>> No.12051057

>>12046626
It can seem that way if all you read is "man bites dog" headlines, but the data have been very consistent for decades. There's better stuff to eat.

>> No.12051172

>>12051039
>meaningless
>risk grows as opposed to remaining static or decreasing
So, since that's the meaning, how is it meaningless? Did the conclusion hurt your feefees?

>> No.12051179

>>12049092
>A lot of studies are bullshit so ALL studies are bullshit ehehehe *smokes 6 packs a day*

>> No.12051188

>>12051172
Not that anon but the increase needs to be actually meaningful. Having sub 1% increased risk of something is usually not worth paying attention to.

>> No.12051204
File: 40 KB, 1920x1080, cv7q3dp2x1911.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12051204

>>12046346
>Three or more eggs a week.
I eat aground 9 to 12 a week, in servings of 3 sunny-side up eggs every other day. Life is good.

>> No.12051227

>>12046464
>eating food with cholesterol causes high blood cholesterol
2004 is back that way

>> No.12051232

>>12046890
>Therefore, they did not track the diets of the participants throughout the course of the studies. Keep in mind that this would eggs-clude any changes in diet during the course of the cohort. Moreover, this relies on the participants to accurately recall what they usually ate and sometimes trying to get very accurate recall can be a bit eggs-asperating.

What the fuck?
This isn't science!
This is bullshit!

How the fuck are they getting published with sloppy garbage like this?

>> No.12051234

>>12046346
>Totally non biased or agenda driven study, we promise, shows that meat, eggs, dairy, are all bad and you have to get your protein from SOY!

>> No.12051261

>>12051204
nice knowing you

>> No.12051279

Eggs go back and forth twice a decade between good and bad.

>> No.12051636

>>12046429
thoroughly debunked at this point i thought

>> No.12051943

>>12046889
You're a fucking retard

>> No.12051959

>>12046456
The RESVERATOL in red wine is good for your heart, not the alcohol. As a matter of fact, it's the chemical components in liquors that bestow any healthy effects, not the alcohol itself; pure alcohol solution like vodka is one of the worst things you can put in your body, even before you start cutting it with sugary mixers.

>> No.12052150

>>12046346
Who gives a shit? Eat what you want, you're going to die eventually anyway regardless of what you eat.

>> No.12052352

Go directly to the study. Don't trust what laymen report about scientific findings.

>> No.12052409

>>12051959
vasodilation surely holds it's own benefits in a society where obesity and inactivity cause poor circulation

>> No.12052415
File: 177 KB, 800x809, boy-who-cried-wolf-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12052415

I have seen this thread all week, purge these vegan "influencers" please

>> No.12052418

>>12051048
I believe it, eggs have gotten considerably more expensive where I live, roughly a 30% increase in bulk price over a couple years

>> No.12052442

>>12046346
but eggs are vegan

>> No.12052474

>>12046346
Never cared for eggs anyway, I'll eat them scrambled maybe two times a year when I'm at a breakfast diner.

>> No.12052848
File: 82 KB, 536x598, 1484162915073.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12052848

>>12051232
they have an agenda, anon. no matter how retarded their study is, as long as it fits the narrative then it gets published.

>> No.12052852

>>12051232
>..how bad things really are

https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-statistical-crisis-in-science

>> No.12053183

>>12052474

Try frying them in butter with some bacon. Put 'em on toast with a slice of cheddar cheese. Now tell me you don't like eggs.

>> No.12053222

>>12046346
How many times have we gone back and forth on eggs being bad? It's like the climate change of dieting.

>> No.12053269

>>12046365
So did the Egg farmers forget to pay tribute or something??

>> No.12053628

>>12049214
Ive been eating at least 2 a day for the past 15 years

>> No.12053875

>>12046346
EVERYTHING you consume has benefits and draw backs. Everything. Even smoking cigarettes has tons of health benefits, mostly psychological. Disregard this clickbait shit. Keep everything in moderation and you'll be just fine.

>> No.12053973

>>12046400
>17% is massive at this scale.
17% is so small in this scale that it might even be statistical variance.

>> No.12054069

>>12051232
If you want stronger studies the Health Professionals Follow Up study has a bi-annual questionnaire. The Physicians Health Study had an annual one. Both showed increased risk for diabetics, the latter showed increased risks for >1 egg a day (very few studies have enough participants to say anything meaningful for consumption that high by the way).

If you oppose questionnaire's and epidemiological studies on principle, then it simply becomes impossible say much of anything about it. Aren't allowed to put people in cages and give them controlled diets their entire lifetime and we certainly can't simulate the exact mechanisms at work.

>> No.12054091

>>12046346
wtf i love eggs now

>> No.12054166

>>12046346
It’s propaganda, dude. I remember when everyone freaked out because they thought bacon gives you cancer and never bothered to check a list of “carcinogens” to see that just about fucking everything gives you cancer according to studies and treated bacon like fucking asbestos.
Eggs won’t hurt you. Just some Vegans masturbating all over MUH HEALTHY LIFESTYLE

>> No.12054220
File: 311 KB, 1200x862, 1542175188977.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12054220

>>12051057
>data has been very consistent

>> No.12054320

>>12046520
>t. man who knows nothing about research.

>> No.12054587

>>12047175
Aren't the social "sciences" in a reproducibility crisis at the moment?

>> No.12054622

>>12046346
https://medium.com/the-mission/why-japanese-men-have-far-less-heart-disease-badbc3841322

Japanese people eat eggs all the fucking time. And apparently their risks of heart disease are low.

>> No.12054666

>>12046365
>everyones reporting it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM8L7bdwVaA

>> No.12055875

>>12046346
I eat that many in a day! What bullshit! Something is going to kill me someday so what's the point of worrying about these (((studies)))?

>> No.12055886

>>12054587
Your mum's in a reproducibility crisis at the moment after I just got done with her, lol!

>> No.12056145
File: 592 KB, 960x1279, 1550010899816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12056145

Never forget goys.... Who is making the "study?"

Seventh day Adventist shills, vegan activists, paid off shills for the (((establishment))))

Listen to whatever these lying Jews say, and do the complete opposite, if you want to be healthy.

>> No.12056308
File: 145 KB, 878x961, farm share.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12056308

>>12056145
this

>> No.12056329

>>12046868
bet i could end your brother's life with one punch

>> No.12056374

>>12046346
bullshit

>> No.12057329
File: 11 KB, 975x273, Brain Food.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12057329

>>12046346
>vegan propaganda
Eggs is one of the best brain foods and good for everything else as well.

The problem is sugar, fructose etc and that is what causes heart disease and early death.

>> No.12057343
File: 131 KB, 526x294, gaston_2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12057343

>>12046346
But how else am I supposed to get roughly the size of a barge?

>> No.12057344

>>12046346
The risk of heart disease is inflated to begin with. Your heart stops when you die, and often this is automatically attributed to heart problems even when it's not necessarily the root cause.

>> No.12057351
File: 32 KB, 720x736, 5f3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12057351

>>12046410
>what's a french paradox

>> No.12057360

>>12046346
to give this to you straight dietary cholesterol and saturated fat do not increase you LDL directly. But a certain large cross section between 1/4 and 1/3 of people have increased response to those substances and develop vascular problems as a result. The only way to tell if you're one of them is to get your veins checked. The only non medical way to reverse it is a practically fat free vegan diet for a year and supplementing k2. At which point you can reintroduce lean meats and not expect much deterioration assuming the rest of your diet is in check. Yeah it sucks but if it's in your genes there's nothing you can do about it. Same way if eskimos eat carbs they get diabetes really easy but if they eat tons of fat they barely get any atherosclerosis. Genes play a huge role in how healthy any diet is for you and is worth looking into.

>> No.12057398

My grandpa had whiskey and eggs for breakfast nearly every day of his life and lived till he was 97.
I miss his cooking.

>> No.12057438

heart problems are increasing, egg consumption is decreasing, blaming eggs is simply silly.

>> No.12057592

>>12046346
The study might not be, but the tendency to only report sensationalist findings can make it look like that. And then that gets cherry-picked to prove whatever point the person wants to make. Nobody cares if your study finds no relation to cancer. Even if it's a correction on your own flawed study.

>> No.12057664

>>12057329
Saturated fat increases insulin resistance (relative to MUFA/PUFA) so it will make sugar and fructose worse.

>> No.12057675

>>12046768
But a lot of statistics about dairy and eggs are misleading as well because they are funded by the dairy and egg industries.

>> No.12057706

>>12046346
It's probably bullshit.

>> No.12058811

>early death
God I wish it were so. Been eating eggs since I was a kid and nothing has happened.

>> No.12058819

>>12046365
>yahoo news
Lmao

>> No.12059154

>>12046346
Because eggs have a lot of cholesterol
If you eat just the whites, you'll be fine though. All the cholesterol is in the yolk

>> No.12059263

then I embrace death

>> No.12060201

>>12046365
>Everyone's reporting on it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo