/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.11998524]

Hell yeah, /ourguy/ wins again.

[Anonymous No.11998536]

>>11998524
How is that not discrimination? It's not as if he's begrudgingly following a specific tenet in his religion which precludes him from making gay cakes. He's just taking the Bible's hatred of homosexuality and using it to make a personal judgment against somebody so he can deny them a service. Or maybe I just haven't read the passage he's read, so correct me if I'm wrong.

[Anonymous No.11998552]

>>11998536
Why would you want to give money to a dude who hates you? Why not patronize a baker that supports the community? The whole thing seems like a non-issue.

[Anonymous No.11998554]

>>11998536
>I havnt followed the case past the headlines but I feel the judgement is wrong
This is as if you walked into a halal butchers shop and demanded they make you sausage from a hog you slaughtered at home. He didnt refuse to sell them a cake, he offered many cakes that were already made. He just wouldnt design a cake that goes against his religious beliefs.

[Anonymous No.11998568]

>>11998536
We're proud to be against women, fags, nonwhites, kikes, niggers, and liberals on this board. Try the redpill, or fuck off back to plebbit. This board is for real men.
Fags should be discriminated against, as they are abominations to God, unlike us white virtuous conservative men of anime and vidya.

[Anonymous No.11998571]

>>11998524
I hope he makes a big fat "I hate fags" cake

[Anonymous No.11998574]

>>11998536
Only the government can't discriminate, legally speaking
At least if you give half a shit about the Constitution

[Anonymous No.11998580]

[Anonymous No.11998581]

>>11998568
Based

[Anonymous No.11998583]

>>11998580
never understood that pedophile argument

[Anonymous No.11998584]

>>11998568
Total support

[Anonymous No.11998586]

>>11998583
Gays are pedophiles

[Anonymous No.11998592]

>>11998583
well, all the evidence points toward a clear connection between homosexuality and pedophilia, i.e. gay men are also pedophile sexual predators, it's that simple

[Anonymous No.11998597]

>>11998552
Exactly. This is another example of government sticking it's nose where it doesn't belong. Go to a different bakery that does want your business and if enough people feel the same then the other guy will go out of business. No government needed.

[Anonymous No.11998602]

>>11998592
>>11998586
That was convincing. Even if fags are - in general - more often attracted to kids than adults, then it still doesn't follow that they act on it, want to act on it, and much less that they'd advocate it

[Anonymous No.11998603]

>>11998583
You will in 5 years.

[Anonymous No.11998607]

>>11998603
le slippery slope fallacy

[Anonymous No.11998613]

>>11998607
>the overton window is a fallacy

They just legalized abortions after birth in virginia. You can get arrested for misgendering someone in Britain.

[Anonymous No.11998614]

>>11998613
>abortions after birth
Genius.

[Anonymous No.11998616]

>>11998613
>You can get arrested for misgendering someone in Britain

Prove it

[Anonymous No.11998618]

>>11998613
separate issues, dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.11998619]

>>11998616
Lol i don't doubt it. You can be arrested for attacking someone who breaks into your house in britain.

[Anonymous No.11998621]

>>11998536
why shouldnt businesses be allowed to discriminate customers? most businesses already do, this is just a special case because of public outcry

[Anonymous No.11998623]

>>11998554
>You make cakes, I want a cake.
>No fag, fuck off.
Hardly the same as
>You make beef & lamb products, here's this pig I butchered, go make me some sausages this instant.

[Anonymous No.11998624]

Glad to hear it.
It's absolutely no business of the State to force a man to create art against his will or conviction. That this made it to court at all is sickening.

[Anonymous No.11998627]

To clarify, he didn't refuse them service for any of his regular cakes or wedding cakes, he said he'd gladly sell them one, he refused to make a gay-themed wedding cake because it goes against his beliefs. There's a big difference between refusing someone your regular service and refusing to do something outside of it.

[Anonymous No.11998633]

>>11998536
So if i go into a bakery and say i want them to make me a KKK cake with a black guy being lynched on it they should have to do it because the can't discriminate against my beliefs and life choices?

[Anonymous No.11998638]

>>11998623
>You make cakes, make me a cake
>Alright what do you want
>Design a gay wedding cake for me and my husband
>Ill sell you a cake we already made but im not designing a pro-homo cake
Why do people who dont read past the headlines feel like they deserve to say anything about what happened?

[Anonymous No.11998639]

>>11998536
It is discrimination. He didn't win his case, he "didn't lose" it. It was basically tossed on a technicality because, specificially in his case, the judge felt he'd been fucked with.

The ruling applies exclusively to his one case, and he got off on hairsplitting bullshit.


The SC doesn't want to tip its hand yet that it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin, so they're making all these fine thread rulings that don't actually affect all that much.

>>11998554
Nope. They wanted a cake the shop already made. They just wanted "Adam & Steve" or whatever on it and the guy freaked. It's not about not being forced to do things that are "against his religion" (pro tip: Selling gay people a cake is not against his religion), it's about forcing his religion on others.

These people don't feel safe unless others are crushed beneath the same shitty rules they are, so they're playing the victim hardcore and trying to use it to regain the power they lost decades ago when people realized God was allergic to any device that takes video.

[Anonymous No.11998641]

>>11998633
this would have actually been an interesting test case had the supreme court sided with the queers over the baker

[Anonymous No.11998642]

Who here also hates gay "people"?

I sure do!

[Anonymous No.11998644]

>>11998624
The fact that two supreme court justices voted to try to force him to do it is horrifying.

[Anonymous No.11998645]

>>11998627
That's the opposite of what happened.

The court briefs are public. Go read them.

[Anonymous No.11998646]

>>11998607
we went from both presidential candidates opposing gay marriage in 2008 to court-ordered hormone regimes for transgender children in less than 10 years

[Anonymous No.11998651]

>>11998639
>The SC doesn't want to tip its hand yet that it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin

[Anonymous No.11998655]

>>11998621
We kind of had a big civil rights movement in the 60s to make sure that isn't allowed. I'm not sure how this is different but it must have something to do with religion

[Anonymous No.11998657]

Personally I'm sick of other people in total and their individual agendas. Yeah, especially YOU!

[Anonymous No.11998658]

>>11998646
Why don't you move to Saudi Arabia?

[Anonymous No.11998661]

Are american service personell legally obligated to do anything anyone tells them?
In my business (not food related) I can deny somebody my services if I don't like them or think they are an asshole or some shit. Nobody could sue me for that I think

[Anonymous No.11998665]

>>11998661
Of course you can deny service to people in the US, except if your gay or black. If you say no to one of them the media will crucify you.

[Anonymous No.11998669]

>>11998665
Oh well that makes sense considering the times..

[Anonymous No.11998672]

>>11998661
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
the discussion belongs on some other board

[Anonymous No.11998673]

>>11998536
remember when conservative Christians were the most insufferable people we had to deal with instead of rank and file liberals?

[Anonymous No.11998678]

>>11998552
They actively seek out places like that shop to make a big fuss.

[Anonymous No.11998680]

>>11998613
>abortions after birth

[Anonymous No.11998688]

>>11998678
I wish this weren't true. I forget the name but there's a group that actively tries to organize and manufacture fake police brutality. They got themselves a bunch of wheelchairs at a hospital or something and when the cops told them they had to leave they refused. After a while of the cops being nice and polite they started tipping these perfectly healthy people out of the wheelchairs to get the hospital their property back. The group then edited the video to make it look like cops were throwing cripples out of their wheelchairs.