/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.10752881]

>i dont have tats

am i going to make it in the food industy bros?

[Anonymous No.10752884]

>>10752881
Tatted retards are almost always idiots who run hipster burger bars and never achieve anything good with their food

[Anonymous No.10752886]

>>10752881
Shut the fuck up you pathetic faggot

[Anonymous No.10753007]

>>10752881
No, you dont have enough street cred

[Anonymous No.10753128]

tfw no skeleton barber bf

[Anonymous No.10753455]

>>10752881
Yes indeed! Myself and everyone I know only eats at ink-free establishments. God bless you anon, the world needs more people like you.

[Anonymous No.10753472]

>>10752881
you need at least 2 felony's to make it in the food industry tattoos are optional.

[Anonymous No.10753492]

>>10752881
Why is he threatening that guy with a modern safety razor but dressed up in old timey clothes when a straight razor would have been standard equipment?

[Anonymous No.10753507]

Can you choose an OP image that is a little less homosexual?

[Anonymous No.10753509]

>>10753492
It's hawt

[Anonymous No.10753516]

>>10753507
It's all in your head, queermo.

[Anonymous No.10753529]

i wish i could be a skeleton

[Anonymous No.10753679]

>>10752881
you also need gauges and dick augmentations

[Anonymous No.10753721]

I'm an old man, and I have hired literally thousands of people in my career. For those of you who have tattoos and weird piercings, I never even considered hiring you. Yes, you think that you're clever with your long sleeves and buttoned collars, but your low-class body mutilation is evident even if it's covered. You're not fooling anyone. It's like a stink that makes you forever recognized as a loser with horrible decision-making skills.

Boys with their greasy long hair pulled into a ponytail and tucked into their collar? Skanks with gross visible piercing holes? White people with dreds? Resume in the trash.

Also, I loved spending idle moments searching for applicants on the web, and if you were conservative or in a frat or a racist or even liked country music I blacklisted you.

[Anonymous No.10753733]

>>10752881
You might be able to make it as a waiter but the other tatted up waiters will look down on you. You literally cannot be a """chef""" without prison tats proving you are a convicted felon. People who are not felons that enjoy food are called "customers".

[Anonymous No.10753736]

>>10753721
What if we can cook though? You might miss out on the next Bourdain

[Anonymous No.10753742]

>>10753721
>if you were conservative
This doesn't really make sense or gel with your desire to avoid human trash.

Anyway, this is why I maintain no social media presence. Literally just my resume.

[Anonymous No.10753746]

>>10753721
Isn't the op asking about the food industry? I think it goes without saying that people with tattoos can't be trusted with anything requiring responsibility but we're talking about chopping onions and shit.

[Anonymous No.10753752]

>>10753742
Makes sense to me, why would anyone want to be around conservatives? I could understand the kind that keep their mouth shut, like this one guy I work with who I strongly suspect is a republican but has the good sense to shut his trap when politics comes up. But an actual committed conservative? Lol, no. Resume in the trash.

[Anonymous No.10753757]

>>10752881
Is this Jojo and Dio?

If you have tats, get a job where you stay in the back.

[Anonymous No.10753763]

>>10753721
>For those of you who have tattoos and weird piercings, I never even considered hiring you. Yes, you think that you're clever with your long sleeves and buttoned collars, but your low-class body mutilation is evident even if it's covered. You're not fooling anyone. It's like a stink that makes you forever recognized as a loser with horrible decision-making skills.
>conservative or in a frat or a racist or even liked country music I blacklisted you.

So no white people?

[Anonymous No.10753764]

>>10753721
t. underage LARPer

[Anonymous No.10753768]

>>10753763
Where I work we've only hired Asians for like 3 years now. As the meme goes, white people were a mistake.

Not the guy you're responding to, btw.

[Anonymous No.10753770]

>>10753752
>why would anyone want to be around conservatives?
they tend to be against all that degeneracy that triggers you

>>10753757
Fuck, I think it is.

IS THIS
A FUCKING
JOJO REFERENCE!?

[Anonymous No.10753779]

>>10753752
Conservative vs liberal is retarded at this point. The "liberals" want double the laws to force everyone to their viewpoint. How is that liberal? And the "conservatives" want to spend as much money as possible on the corporations they invest in.

The realistic simplistic view is left and right. The left wants more government control, the right wants less. And almost every politician is a fucking authoritarian leftist.

[Anonymous No.10753813]

>>10753779
I like ya

[Anonymous No.10753816]

>>10753721
Im sorry, but I personally disagree with this and I would like it if you could explain your point further so we can understand each other.
What is it about having tattoos that makes someone unable to do their job? As far as I'm concerned, if you can do the job and do it right that's all that matters. Someone "multilating" their own body seems like none of your business, and this is coming from someone without any tattoos.
If you're just a troll then you got me lol

[Anonymous No.10753818]

>>10753736
>What if we can cook though? You might miss out on the next Bourdain

Why would I hire someone that's gonna self destruct after a bit?

[Anonymous No.10753836]

>>10753818
You could cash in on the fame

Consider it an investment

[Anonymous No.10753846]

>>10753768
same here, not him

[Anonymous No.10753853]

>>10753816
People who get tattoos are damaged. Not by the tattoo, but by their need to pay money to be forever changed to fit in.

I am not a hiring manager, but I would avoid tattoed people like the plauge.

[Anonymous No.10753861]

>>10753455
This but unironically
People without tattoos are generally more normal and much less bitter people

[Anonymous No.10753873]

>>10752884
Tell that to Chuck.

[Anonymous No.10753879]

>>10753813
>>10753779
>le both sides maymay
The most degenerate people in the country are conservatives
Pro child rape, pro spouse abuse, believe that an invisible space daddy commands them to diddle kids

[Anonymous No.10753886]

>>10753879
forgot mudslimes were conservatives

thanks

[Anonymous No.10753888]

>>10753879
Most cathocucks identify politically as liberal.

[Anonymous No.10753897]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kentucky-child-marriage-ban-delayed-vote-conservative-group-opposition-lawmakers-us-a8240121.html
>>10753886
>>10753888
So this was the muslims and the papists, is that what you’re going with?

[Anonymous No.10753910]

>>10753897
Guessing from the url, i assume that you think a 16 year old woman doesnt have a will of her own? How liberal.

[Anonymous No.10753919]

>>10753910
I guess you didn’t read the article
Ask an adult to help
Offer sex in return because sex with kids is normal and natural right cleetus?

[Anonymous No.10753924]

>>10753919
>ad hominem
typical liberal

[Anonymous No.10753937]

>>10753919
No I didn't read the article and fucking stated it so there is no need for you to guess. I don't know a thing about this cherry picked instance in UK media of a Kentucky law. But from the url I can decipher that it's about under age marriage. So tell me, how is it liberal for the government to decide who can get married? That was my original argument that the term liberal is a misnomer.

[Anonymous No.10753953]

>>10753937
>facts aren’t real unless it’s a murkin paper

http://www.newsweek.com/conservatives-opposition-stalls-anti-child-bride-bill-kentucky-where-girls-829631

[Anonymous No.10753973]

>>10753873
He looks like a faggot who loves taking cock

[Anonymous No.10753977]

>>10753879
>t. Never been on a liberal college campus

[Anonymous No.10753981]

>>10753721
This character you've created is very contradictory, and not in a poetic way.

[Anonymous No.10753987]

>>10753873
You're not helping your cause, you know?

[Anonymous No.10753988]

>>10753977
I went to an infamously liberal school
They’re harmless
Veganism or child rape
If you think the vegans are the issue you’re mentally ill

[Anonymous No.10753994]

>>10753953
Decisions involving a minor child should be made by a parent, not the court."

That seems pretty liberal to me, not a court arbitrarily enforcing age restrictions on people they do not know. I am not arguing right or wrong, I am arguing terms. And the term "liberal" fits in every sense other than the extremely narrow sense that the left has decided upon and pushed into the media.

I feel bad for child brides and would hope that the stakeholders in these relationships would see more clearly. But the idea of "liberalism" equating to the government taking a more pro active approach than personal stakeholders is ridiculous. It is literally the definition of authoritarianism.

[Anonymous No.10754001]

>>10753988
>false equivalency
wew

[Anonymous No.10754010]

>>10753994
Enforcing property rights is no less authoritarian than banning child rape

Liberalism is an economics concept, which was extended to mean other things later

If you’re trying to argue that classical liberalism has nothing to say about morality then you might have a point

The issue is that neither does it hav much to say about matters beyond supply and demand

[Anonymous No.10754024]

>>10753973
>>10753987
Yeah, he only owns his own successful restaurant and all.

[Anonymous No.10754041]

>>10754010
You are so woefully wrong. Liberalism is about controlling all that is in your purview, without worry of government. A 13 year old girl is in every sense under her families purview unless a ward of the state. Liberalism in essence requires that the family, the stakeholders, the people who will be effected have the only claim against the marriage. And in perfect liberalism could sue based on those claims.

The government issuing a decree stating the age of legal marriage is 100% against liberalism. Read up nigga.

[Anonymous No.10754043]

>>10753988
>Not thinking the highest liberal politicians are in a child pedo ring

[Anonymous No.10754048]

>>10754010
Do you think women are property?

[Anonymous No.10754071]

>>10754041
So basically authoritarianism is good when it keeps a thief away from your truck title but evil when it keeps your dick away from a 12 year old vagina
>>10754048
Apparently that guy does. Kids too

[Anonymous No.10754079]

>>10754043
This.

[Anonymous No.10754112]

>>10754071
No, I think either way a person trying to take something against your will is wrong. My f150 doesn't have a say in the matter so you try to take that and I stop you. A 13 year old girl, which the article does not cite and is probably from 100 years ago, does. If i, as a father, beleive my 13 year old girl is ready for marriage (which I cannot ever see as possible), I can use the court to stop it. Based on my knowledge of marriage, the probable outcome, and my obligation to provide as a father. The law as stated in your article needs parental consent.

I am arguing that this is the truly "liberal" viewpoint. Just like my truck. If you steal my truck in the middle of the night I'm not going to go consult the Westlaw terminal, I'm going to shoot your ass because it is wrong.

[Anonymous No.10754136]

>>10752881
Gonna be tough

[Anonymous No.10754157]

>>10754112
And if I succeed in taking your truck? Will you turn down police assistance when they offer to arrest me in another faraway city? I consider it mine now, and you lack the means to locate it on your own.

Why should you be afforded such protections when a 13 year old girl’s vagina can be passed around as long as older men consider it theirs?

[Anonymous No.10754188]

>>10754157
No one is talking about super libertarian anarchy. Yes if I miss I would hope the limited police I pay would return my truck.

I literally talked for many posts about a court system. No true liberal, or modern libertarian other than meme bros, wants to defund courts. They are essential and have been since ancient times.

I am saying if a 13 year old girl wants to get married against her father's better judgement let her have her day in court. That is the liberal stance. Not arbitrary age laws.

Modern "liberals" just want laws. Which is in essence opposed to the idea of liberalism.

[Anonymous No.10754200]

Crap...I'm a cook with a tattoo. :/

It doesn't really mean shit in the food industry. People in general are just more lax about tattoos. If you think it matters if you have tattoos or not, just hang yourself.

I think Anthony Bourdain sets a good example.

[Anonymous No.10754304]

>>10754188
>I am saying if a 13 year old girl wants to get married against her father's better judgement let her have her day in court.
What? Read the damm article, you're a waste of time.

[Anonymous No.10754325]

every thread is a political thread

[Anonymous No.10754330]

>>10752881
Gonna have to start smoking cigarettes and being inexplicably mad/set upon all the time I guess. Also, make sure you're loudmouthed and always feel the need to "stand up for yourself" and be "brutally honest", even when it's clearly a losing battle.

[Anonymous No.10754359]

>>10754304
But if a 13 year old wants to get married with her parents and community backing her, you beleive it is the federal government's responsibility to stop it? And you think that is a "liberal" viewpoint?

As I said I am sorrowful that child brides happen. But if we enforce that the communities that let it happen have to clean it up, maybe it won't. The only way to stop it is to stringineltly enforce arbitrary laws. Which is not liberalism.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you this. I am not for child rape. I am simply telling you that your idea of "liberalism" is pretty much disneyfied fascism. Bow down to your state.

[Anonymous No.10754367]

>>10754359
No. Read it first, you're arguing for something that has nothing to do with reality. I've wasted enough time on you. Good night.

[Anonymous No.10754393]

>>10754359
>>10754367
Shut the fuck up and kindly kill yourselves, fags. I'm not even sure which one of you is the pedo/pedo apologist, but I'm sure it's one of you. Either way, you're both fucking cunts that are shitting up one of the only good boards left.

[Anonymous No.10754420]

>>10754393
>Shut the fuck up
The true "liberal" argument

[Anonymous No.10754447]

>>10752881
>don't smoke cigarettes
>doesn't drink
>enjoys cooking
>doesn't do drugs

am i gonna make it or are the 40 year old line cooks crying about their lack of red seal going to consume me

[Anonymous No.10754456]

>>10754393
>one of the only good boards left

this board is long gone

[Anonymous No.10754620]

>>10754330
Cooks shouldn’t smoke. Anyone who says otherwise should have their cooking licence revoked.

[Anonymous No.10755377]

>>10753816
It shows poor decision-making skills, as I clearly stated. Any idiot who would pay to have some scummy meth addict scrawl into his skin or punch holes into his face obviously has no taste or ability to anticipate the future.

[Anonymous No.10755409]

>>10755377
My god. This is certifiable, clinical autism.

[Anonymous No.10755421]

>>10753757
>>10753770

I figure it's either them or Hannibal Lecter and Will Graham. The latter two would make more sense, as this IS the food and cooking board...

[Anonymous No.10756124]

>>10755409
I agree with you. Tattoos are pretty gross.

[Anonymous No.10756288]

>>10753988
>he probably cried when Trump won

[Anonymous No.10756319]

>>10755409
nah, degenerates think their bodies are a canvas. it isn't, people think less of you, except other fags who got drawn on by a stranger.
you got a tattoo that 'means' something you 'want to remember' ? get a fucking pencil and a piece of paper.

[Anonymous No.10756700]

>>10756319
Your bodies are whatever the fuck you want them to be, what the fuck are you talking about lol. "Wow I'm really gonna care about how people think about my tattoo when I'm dead"

[Anonymous No.10756714]

>>10756700
in the meantime
>why can't I get a job with my rad neck tat? waaaaa

[Anonymous No.10758386]

>>10753721
God bless you, anon.

[Anonymous No.10759610]

>>10753721
Ah yes the tatted up, punk rock listening, Sean Hannity watching crowd...

[Anonymous No.10759617]

>>10753861
People with tattoos grew up poor and stupid.

There is a reason most people get tattoos before their frontal lobes develop. It's because it's a poor decision.