[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 494 KB, 600x400, url.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6836857 No.6836857 [Reply] [Original]

Is chili still technically chili if it has beans in it?

>> No.6836859

>>6836857
yes?

>> No.6836863

no if you're a pedant
yes if you're wrong

>> No.6836865

>>6836857
yes, but they're better prepared separately.

>> No.6836866

Chili without beans is called meat sauce

>> No.6836867

>>6836863
Yes, even if you are a pedant. Chili is rancher food. You take your meat and chili powder out on the drive. You can add whatever else you want to the pot. It's really not a hard concept.

>> No.6836875

>>6836857
What about spaghetti? IMO Chili isn't Chili without spaghetti in it.

>> No.6836891

By definition it can exist without beef; figure the rest out.

>> No.6836904

>>6836866
>she means chili con carne

>> No.6837138
File: 312 KB, 1200x1641, 1490ad1417412041699.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6837138

>>6836857
>Is chili still technically chili if it has beans in it?

Chili _without_ beans technically isn't chili, it's just spicy meat stew.

Chili is a bean stew that was developed by Mesoamericans, which may or may not have had meat in it depending on availability and that meat would have been whatever was around, venison, rabbit, turkey, etc.

>> No.6837149

>>6837138
how does it feel to be wrong.
In order to be chili you only need two fucking things
chiles and meat
How did you fuck that up?

>> No.6837165
File: 400 KB, 1250x950, 1500ad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6837165

>>6837149

Sorry, but chili is an ancient Mesoamerican dish that consists of beans and chili peppers eaten with corn tortillas, meat was optional and for dirt-poor Aztec peasants, a rare treat.

>> No.6837189

>>6837165
>[citation needed]

>> No.6837197

>>6837189
Read the Cambridge World History of Food

>> No.6837202

>>6837165
Let me guess. Wikipedia is wrong about everything and you have detailed historical records that can back up your claim, but you don't want to actually post them because the world isn't prepared for the knowledge, right?

>> No.6837215

its chili with beans in it. pure chili does not have beans, beans are a side dish.

>> No.6837217

>>6837202
Yes

>> No.6837222

Isn't texas the only place on earth dumb enough to care whether "true" chili has beans in it?

>> No.6837226

>>6837217
I'm not buying what you're selling. You want to convince me that YOU know more than the ICS? Scan it and post it.

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

>> No.6837228

It's only chili if it does have beans in it

>> No.6837246

>>6837228
incorrect. it can have beans. it must have meat and chiles. period

>> No.6837248
File: 63 KB, 508x700, typical_native_american_woman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6837248

>>6837189
>>6837202
>>6837215
>>6837226

Corn, squash and BEANS were the basic foods of N.American Indians and chilies were developed in Mesoamerica and used to flavor BEAN stews that everybody of all social ranks ate, with meat only being included if one could afford it.

>> No.6837256

>>6837248
>[citation needed]

>> No.6837266

>>6837248
>white lady wearing shitty hippie clothing
gay

>> No.6837268

>>6837248
chili isn't an indian or mexican dish.

>> No.6837273
File: 2.60 MB, 200x250, 1439479624614.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6837273

>>6837268

>> No.6837283

>>6837273
shouldnt you be playing minecraft right now