/ck/ - Food & Cooking

10/10

>being a pedant

>calling a peanut a "nut"

>calling coffee seeds beans

>calling herbal tea "tea"

>calling dog a genitals

>calling tomato a "fruit"

> Not calling OP a faggot

calling chili with beans "chili"

>>5206051
>greentexting text without green

> calling chocolate globbernaughts "candy bars"
> calling meat water "gravy"
> calling beef wellington ensemble with lettuce a "burger"
> calling breaddystacks "sandwiches"
> calling nutty-gum and fruit spleggings "peanut butter and jelly"
> calling cold on the cob "popsicles"

>>5206270
I was amused until you came.

Hehe that dog looks like a penis.

>>5205989

White chocolate still contains cocoa butter.

It sounds better than calling it "Fat and Sugar".

>>5206284

>calling red apples "apples"

the furry community like this

>>5206458
That's just oil. Real chocolate contains actual cocoa solids. White chocolate may taste all right, it's really a subjective thing, but its lack of the solid matter disqualifies it from actually being chocolate.

>>5207373
Still comes from the same tree, hence it is chocolate.

>>5205989
In other news, peanuts aren't nuts, bananas are a berry, most "xxxx-berries" aren't, tomatoes are a fruit, black-eyed peas aren't peas..... I could go on.

>being dumb enough to complain about established language conventions

>>5207373
>Real chocolate contains actual cocoa solids.
But what if it contains more of something else?

You aware that 9ct gold is actually a little over a third gold and the rest is copper, nickel and other metals? And yet virtually nobody has any problem with it being called gold. Your standard mass-market milk chocolate has far lower levels of cocoa solids than one third.