/ck/ - Food & Cooking

It's good for cooked steak but not so good for tartare or carpaccio

Of course you would think it was some voodoo trick, you can't get dry aged beef from Walmart.

>>4357351

Anything nice is a voodoo trick on /ck/. Penn & Teller proved via bro science and a professional film editing team that the average drive thru customer at Wendy's prefers Two Buck Chuck macerated with fresh strawberries and mixed with 7up rather than a 1er Cru Bordeaux opened the year after it was bottled and served warm in a styrofoam cup. This proves that any time anyone claims that one food is better than another, they're gullible and they think that expensive means it's good.

Now if you'll excuse me, I believe there's an Arbys thread I need to bump to page 0.

how long do they age it and at what temp? Also are there dangerous bacteria or fungi that you have to watch for?

>>4357383

5 weeks and at a temp that sits just above 0 Celsius. You'll also need a space where there is good ventilation and that where it is rather dry. The mold that settles outside is actually beneficial for the ageing process though I don't much about reading mold.

>>4357544

They slice off the nasty outer crust that forms, and it gets thrown out.

>>4357370
How can you claim that something is superiour to something else when you are serving it at less than it's prime. The wine needs to be aged and served chilled to optimize the flavour. You wouldn't drink warm single malt whiskey the year after it was bottled and exclaim that it was amazing.

Your argument holds true though, people's perception of quality is directly affected by their perception of value. Just saw a rather large flaw in their experimental design. bro.

>>4357838
Actually, I would because whisky doesn't really change after it's been bottled and room temp is the way to go when drinking good scotch.

>>4357851
I 100% messed up my example. I meant to imply consuming it before the cooperage was finished.

But yeah, will try harder next time/10

Could you guess at my point though?

>>4357838

The "experiment" was not flawed. It showed exactly what it was intended to show.

>>4357370
>is proves that any time anyone claims that one food is better than another, they're gullible and they think that expensive means it's good
It more demonstrates how bullshit wine culture is, it surely extends to other things to a certain extent, but its much much worse with wine

That is some voodoo shit.

>>4357886
It didn't prove that at all, but plenty who don't know what wine culture is like to accept it as a condemnation of anything they see as hoity toity elitism.