/ck/ - Food & Cooking

a lot

>>20044475
Not nearly as much as a night with your mother. Bitch will do anything for 20 bucks

>>20044477
Like how much?
>>20044479
My mother in trans. You fucked a man faggot.

>>20044475
A fuck ton.
Hell a quick search shows me that a small pan made of solid silver is just under 3k

Also did kings and rich people ever used gold for cookware?

>>20044485
Right in the asshole

>>20044487
I mean its a lot of money but this is something that could last many lifetimes, right?

>>20044475
no idea, but gold is a lot malleable than steel so you probably wouldn't want it in solid gold. I think they do make gold casing thou

>>20044475
about tree fiddy

>>20044500

>>20044479
>Not nearly as much as
>names something cheap
stupid

>>20044475
It would be solid anyway if it was made of gold retard.

>>20044570
It was commentary on the inherent value of gold, doofus. Here take this shiny metal that has no practical use other than to attract jews, I own 60 slaves now.

>>20044475
1. Figure out the volume of metal needed to make the pot(s) you want;
2. look up "density of gold" on Google;
3. multiply the two numbers to get the required mass of the metal;
4. convert the required mass to troy ounces;
5. look up "price of gold per oz" on Google;
6. multiply the two numbers;
7. ask a goldsmith how much he would charge you to do the labor;
8. add the price of labor to the price of materials.

Wa-la.

BTW, easy way to figure out the volume of metal is to weigh your existing pots and then look up "density of" either stainless or aluminum or whatever your pots are made of.

>>20044475
Both silver and copper have better thermal conductivity than gold. And like that other anon said gold is very malleable which sucks for a pan you want to throw around.
I think diamond might be even better then both if you include non-metals

>>20044577
>shiny metal that has no practical use other than to attract jews
Retard

>>20044586
Copper reacts with acidic food. Also stains easily and is a bitch to clean

>>20044595
Nigga u gonna eat metal? My 60 slaves will gangrape you and fuck your throat hole. What's your metal gonna do to me?

>>20044475
Wouldn't make any sense. Gold is softer and weighs twice as much as copper and it has a lower thermal conductivity. It'd be worse in pretty much every way.

If anything silver pots might make sense since they have thermal conductivity than copper. But that was mainly used for tableware.

>>20044586
What about netherite though

>>20044586
Why is malleable bad for a pan? Who cares if it gets a little ding? Your mother doesn't mind.

>>20044630
would they work as induction pans? gold is a good conductor of electricity

>>20044647
Nope. You need a ferromagnetic material for induction stoves. That's typically iron but nickel or cobalt would also work.

>>20044630
>Gold is softer
Just use more gold
>weighs twice as much
Just lift
>lower thermal conductivity
Not that low
>It'd be worse in pretty much every way.
Its best in 1 way: 0 reactivity

>>20044653
>Its best in 1 way: 0 reactivity
If that matters then line a copper pot with gold (or even better glass)

>>20044656
Pure gold is just better

that'd be a ridiculously heavy pan
also every time you scrape the fuck out of your pan you'd be getting gold shavings in your food
the pan would lose value over time

>>20044494
sliver is a much better choice because its the most thermally conductive metal and not nearly as soft as gold

>>20044674
In old times paupers would scour the poop of kings for gold shavings

>>20044491
24k gold is too malleable for making pots an pans. you'd need an alloy of gold and copper for this. 14k would probably work.

>>20044475
Their weight in gold.

Well you can actually go buy solid silver cookware.

I don't think anyone sells solid gold cookware because it's not strong enough for regular use and it's less conductive than silver.

>>20044856
hence the phrase "digging for gold"

>>20044491
Why would they furnish servants with gold cookware? They’d never see it, their guests would never see it, and it serves no practical purpose. It’d be a pointless expenditure, retard.

>>20044574
hes clearly talking about gold in a gaseous state

>>20044475
you would get gold poisoning
so go for it

>>20044961
Gold ain't toxic if it's pure and free of impurities

Solid silver is already more than you can afford, why worry about solid gold?

>>20044580
you are posting with 15 year old bangladeshi rejects and the collective mental sucksoup that is canada, your post is much too reasoned, mature and useful. if people followed it, there'd be no (You)s or opportunities to call each other faggots

>>20044570
$20 is a lot to most /ck/ posters

>>20045010
>$14,000 for a 12.5" saute pan with a lid
wewlad

>>20045010
can I GET ONE WITH TEFLON

>>20045995
no

>>20045010
>>20045794
considering silver only costs around $25 dollars an ounce, that's one hell of a markup
assuming the pan weighs 10lbs of solid .999 fine sliver for ease of math, it'd be $4000 in material
those pans are also sterling silver, which is around 92.5% pure

>>20044580
now gold on the other hand, like this guy points out, is around $2000 an oz.

>>20046297
Yes but you're paying for some autist to make that silver pan by hand

There isn't some big factory pumping out silver cookware

>>20044653
>0 reactivity
What if I frequently use my cookware to prepare boiling hot aqua regia?

>>20044475
they would melt retard

>>20046528
100% pure gold melts at like 2000f, but if it's alloyed with other metals (almost always) the resulting melting point changes

>>20044642
Quite the opposite, she complains a great deal if the dingaling is little.

>>20046396
Interestingly, boiling gold in aqua regia won't dissolve it. It has to be enquarted, or alloyed with silver first.

>>20047355
no it doesn't, only when the silver content is above 8% do you need to inquarte your gold. The silver creates a protective layer around the gold which is why the aqua regia won't work.

But if you have 21-24k gold, there is too little silver content to protect it, and it will dissolve directly without inquartation.

>>20046528
this

>>20044475
Depends on their total volume (in material, not what can be fit in them).

Somewhere around $3400-3900 for the material alone for a thin-walled stock pot.

Not a good material to make them out of. Temperature shifts deform gold more easily than it does normal cooking vessel materials.

>>20044586
Diamond IS the hardest metal anon

>>20047444
>rock
>metal
This isn't the right chan for you

>>20044475
whatever their weight combined with the current price of gold is

>>20047444
>>20047486
Jesus Christ Marie how many time do I have to tell you, they’re MINERALS

Bump

>>20049511
why

>>20046297
>now gold on the other hand, like this guy points out, is around $2000 an oz.
Gold is also about twice the density of silver.

a 15 inch cast iron pan is about 12lbs gold is about twice the density of iron so you would need 24lbs or 384 ounces gold costing $791,000 dollars for just the gold. Add a 30% markup for crafting the pan your looking at around a million dollars for one pan

>>20049652
7.8 vs 19g/cm3
Its even heavier, anon

>>20044475
OP, you are a cooklet
No one wants to use a pan that's too heavy to move

>>20044477
checked

Is there a lay-away plan?

find the area of circle with 6 inch diameter.
That multiply by gold rate

>>20044479
Where the fuck can you get solid gold pots for far less than $20?

>>20044475

Consuming gold lowers sperm count. Even wearing it lowers test and sperm count. This is why my wedding band is silver. Gold is a great conductive metal though, and heat would be evenly distributed throughout the cookery...so it's a weighted issue really. On one hand it would be great to cook with, but knowing my testes were shrinking with every meal would be a buzz kill. Cast iron is better just because your body wants and needs a lot of iron to be healthy.

>>20050941

Forgot to post the science behind gold killing the male endocrine system.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124326/#:~:text=Conclusion%3A,rate%20of%20sperm%20DNA%20damage.

>>20044625
>>20044577
It's vital in electronics

>>20050949

Silver is the most commonly used conductive metal in electronics manufacturing.

>>20044479
is anyone else getting tired of these edgy/wacky/random posts on /ck/?

>>20050977
Yes, so please stop posting anon

>>20044683
Wouldn't it tarnish pretty quickly though? Cook anything with high sulfur content like egg would probably turn it black.

>>20047486
I think you need to go back to X, newcancer

You can buy platinum and gold crucibles as lab equipment. 100mL is about $8k USD.
https://www.coleparmer.com/p/platinum-crucibles/48327

>>20051023
Not any more than silverware does. So polish it every few weeks, should take less than 5 minutes. Maybe a deeper polishing once every 6-12 months that would take 15-20 minutes.