/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>19354127
im pretty sure i learned that in school like 20 years ago

I'm sure you'll forgive me if I ignore someone who can spell neither 'sweetener' nor 'cardiomyopathy' correctly, right?
You needn't bother telling me either way.
I'll have already started ignoring you.

>>19354142
I have seizures from aspartame poising and its hard to spell

ItS oN yOuTuBe

People who buy food marketed as being less nutritious deserve their cancers.

>>19354127
so if i drink enough coke zero ill be disabled and get compensation?

bet

>>19354142

>>19354127
>Thread about Aspartame bad
>Thread about Splenda bad
>Many threads about sugar bad
>Assume stevia bad too according to (((experts)))

Listen up bitter faggots, go suck an asshole.

>>19354539
stevia is probably bad. it's an artificial sweetener and i assume it nogs your insulin receptors and gut biome and so on in a similar way. just a fact, if it binds to the sweetness receptors in your mouth it'll bind elsewhere. structural similarity to sugar is a requirement and that brings functional similarity.

This thread was brought to you by the Sugar Industry!

>>19354127
>Aspartame was illegitimately forced through FDA
Yo I may be mistaken but is it not the entire reason we have an FDA for this not to happen?

>>19354127
worse still - it tastes bad

>>19354547
>it's an artificial sweetener
It's literally a plant, anon. Not saying it's good for you but it's at least not Splenda-tier.

>>19355907
apparently monkfruit is the best sweetener out there. haven't tried it yet though

I like how you think you need to explain to people who Donald Rumsfeld is...

>>19356171
zoomers weren't around for him. sign o the times...

>>19354644
the purpose of the fda is so corporations can use governmental authority to convince retards that their slop is "nutritious" and that other corporation's slop is harmful.

I drink 4-8 cans of diet pepsi every day.

>>19356912
Absolutely based

>>19354127
i consume an enormous amount of aspartame. nothing has happened to me.

>>19354127
Why can't we have reduced cane sugar products? Why not a soda with 15 grams tops of sugar in a 12 ounce drink? Or a Lil' debbie that is full sized with maybe 10gs?

I fucking hate sugar and sugar alternatives. Sugar is in literally everything and there's pretty much no way to avoid consuming large quantities of it. And if it's not sugar it's some disgusting sweet chemical.

>>19354127
I'm not falling for your tricks, big sugar!

>>19354127
>>19360062
thanks, but I'm sticking with coke zero

>>19354127
I don't like artificial sweeteners in general. Sucralose leaves an awful aftertaste, particularly. I either go whole hog with the sugar or drink sparkling water if I'm being a baby that wants fizzies.

>>19357980
I've asked this for ages and the reason is just that no soda company wants to give up shelf space on their already very lucrative super-sweet stuff for less-sweet stuff. The best you can find is prepackaged tea jugs that now come in "subtly/slightly sweet" with like 75% less sugar.

>skip to the end
>it's some psycho bitch on prison who killed her husband with methanol rambling about how her husband's body must've somehow produced lethal amounts of methanol because he drank a lot of diet soda and ate creatine
>despite this being an incredibly common combination
>source: just trust me bro
Are conspiracy theorists the most gulloble people on Earth? No I will not watch the rest of your schizo video. I already wasted 5 minutes listening to that dumb bitch babbling.

>>19354127
None of this would exist if George McGovern didn't force his nutrition beliefs onto the American people.

>>19360123
Dude no one cares if you want to give yourself cancer. Do it, one less car in traffic.

>>19360193
Why the fuck would I believe a filmmaker who believes you can make methanol by drinking gatorade zero and creatine? That's so fucking stupid it beggars belief. If that were true /fit/ would be dead by now.
>no one cares
The whole point of this thread was to make me care by watching that crackerjack "documentary "