/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>16785878
Cornbread, and baked potato

chilli burrito.

Nachos

>>16785878
Oops, that's not a chili

Sorry, try again

>>16785910
It looks like a chili

>>16785914
Look closer, it's not

I eat mine with garlic bread and tortilla chips with mine uwu

>>16785910
>>16785920
Oh god...oh no...i-is that? Is that BEANS?!?! NOOOOO GOD WHY!!! WHY GOD! HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME!!! CHILI IS SUPPOSED TO BE JUST MEAT AND SPICY TOMATO SAUCE, NOOO THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING, YOU CANT JUST ADD SUBSTANCE AND FLAVOR NOOOOO I'M MELTING, IM MEEEELTIIIING

Chili mac

>>16785956
>spicy tomato sauce
Also not a chili. You might as well call it a bolognese

>>16785920
>beans
>chopped meat
>tomato based sauce

yeah it's chili

>>16785983
nope that's bean stew

>>16785910
what the fuck is chili then

>>16785983
sounds like a bean soup to me

>>16785994
>beef
>chilis
>spices
>minor additives that complement but do not overpower this basic formula

>>16786002
so chili is just spicy bolognese

>>16785972
Is this a chili? Eat it up, fuckwad.

>>16786002
>Minor additives that complement but do not overpower
So, beans.

>>16786002
This nigga eating dry spiced beef and completely forgetting that it's a saucy stew.

>>16786009

not even close, fuckwit

the only thing they have in common is beef

>>16786016

no, that would make it stew. it is argued that tomatoes are permissible in chili because they're of the same family as peppers. onions and garlic are somewhat permissible in chili.

beans? no. when you add beans, it stops being chili, and become stew.

>>16786036
Wikipedia seems to think that chili is a stew, regardless of the beans that may or may not be in it. I don't use beans in my beef stew, does that mean it's not a stew? Chili fags like to say a lot of shit without understanding anything they say.

>>16786067

wikipedia is wrong. adding beans to a chili makes it a stew. stew doesn't need beans, but that's what it because when you take chili and add beans to it.

you don't understand this because you've probably never had chili, and are not knowledgable on the subject. chili is a recipe, beans are not in that recipe. that's not up for debate.

>>16786080
>Beans magically turn it into a stew because... because they just do, okay???!!!!
Idk I was born and raised in Plano, and I've always had beans in my chili, whether from my mama or having it at any restaurant I've been to, and I've been all over Texas. But you keep stomping your feet and insisting you know chili.

>>16786080
Also, by definition, chili is a stew. Learn what stewing means.

>>16786107
lol autists btfo by facts and logic

>>16786098
I can tell you're lying

>>16786244
I can tell you're sucking my Texas cock.

>>16785878
chill it cold
scoop onto tortilla
add cheese/rice ect
roll it up and freeze
deepfry them frozen until golden

>>16785910
No one cares about your opinion.
Beans fuck in chili
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxP442T-aZ0

>>16785878
nothing to crazy but my gf is making some bread bowls right now, and i thawed out some frozen chili i made awhile back to go in them. sprinkle some cheese on top and thats dinner.

>>16786080
I have more chili recipes with beans than without. In fact, I don't believe I have any recipes that don't have beans

>>16787659
sounds awesome

>>16785878
Well, deys uhhh chilli fries, chilli dogs, chilli nachos, chilli on rice, chilli tacos, chilli and eggs, chilli and cornbread, and uh, thats about it

Serve over white rice, obviously. That's what you're supposed to do.

>>16785878
chili on rice is superior to all alternatives

>>16788061
I prefer macaroni or tortilla chips
>>16787824
You forgot chili burgers and chili mac. And also chili on baked potato

>>16785878
put cheese on your chili, dont put chili on your cheese

>>16785878
Call me crazy, but chili makes leftover pizza wonderful.

>>16785878
>i have a good chili recipe
You can't say shit like this without sharing the recipe.

>what are dishes that involve chili?
Chili mac is nice and simple. If you are feeling particularly lazy, you can just chuck some shredded cheese in there and eat as is.

>>16785910
Explain chili con carne you retard

>>16788737
Not him but it's quite simple
Chili con Carne translates to chili with beef
Therefore it's chili's with beef.

>>16785878
If you need to put your chili on anything it's shit.

Literally every single chili thread derails into beans vs no beans argument. No fail.

>>16789204
Texans, not even once.

>>16787705
>thats not chili theres vegetables in it!
Dont give a fuck, I added them as filler.

>>16785878
imagine making chili so horrifically bad you have to eat it with something else...

>>16786067
citing wikipedia as a source

>>16788758
Carne means meat, not beef in particular. If you're gonna try to argue semantics at least get it right Anon.

>>16790817
>citing something with citations behind more than 95% of everything on the site
>billions of dollars a year spent on peer-reviewed academic journals
people who tell us not to use wikipedia are gatekeeping indoctrination advocates

>>16790853
look dipshit, all you need to cite as a source is link it to something written on a website. but it doesn't matter that it could be wrong or a lie, bruh I cited a source it's canon now!

There was a story about an author trying to correct incorrect information on wikipedia and they wouldn't let him because even though he was the person that wrote the book and knew what was what in it "dude no source).

so he started a blog and wrote it up there then cited it. oh ok now it's good.

>>16790872
That sounds stupid until you think about it a bit. If they'd just accepted him correcting the information, how would that be recorded on wikipedia? A note that says "dude the author totally told us this trust us"?

>>16790853
didnt your teachers tell you that wikipedia isnt a source you fucking monkey? hell just look something up you actually know about that is not everyday knowledge to see the bullshit they claim.

>>16790872
woke idiots also rewrite constantly, look up gamergate for some recent history revision

>>16785878
I eat with rice and mix in avocado and sour cream or you can just put it in burritos or on buns for sloppy joes.

Larry Sanger, the man who co-founded Wikipedia, has cautioned that the website can't always be trusted to give people the truth.
And wikipedia itself has at least some sense and states on its own website that its not a trustworthy source

>>16790758
i make stew, with chili peppers, all the veggies, tons of beans and tofu, and call it chili, the anger is delicious

>>16786023
That liquid is added is self-evident unless you're a retard.

>>16787769
That's many words for saying "I never had chili".

>>16789204
And Americans complain that Italians are autistic about their recipes.

>>16790853
Are you retarded? Lots of those citations are to bullshit sources like a blog or hobbyist website that might not even be online anymore, not peer-reviewed academic journals.

Sometimes the citations aren't even relevant to the claim.

And even if it is to a peer-reviewed academic journal, it's not like "a peer-reviewed academic journal said it, therefore it's true". No, one has to look at multitudes of studies and interpret them. (For example, me citing one study about how wine is healthy, does not prove it's healthy.)

Some people think just because something has a citation, it's true.

The quality on Wikipedia varies a lot. On certain topics it can be very good, on certain topics very bad or straight out misinformation. The problem is unless you are an expert on a field, it will hard or close to impossible to find the faults without much effort.

A real encyclopedia will always be a better starting point than Wikipedia, since you can usually trust encyclopedia editors and writers a lot more than random people on the internet.

>>16785983
>tomato based

Post chili recipes

Does red onion belong in chili?

>>16785885
I made a chilly cheese burrito with a hotdog in it and felt sick, 6 months later did again, felt sick. FUCK YOU

>16786010
I have that same disease, help me!

>>16785910
kek. gr8 b8 m8

>>16785878
rice