/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>16758030
>makes incel comment born from impotent resentment about the woman instead

>>16758043
first post tranny post

>>16758030
Seems like a good idea, I don't see why it wouldn't work

>>16758065
>first post tranny post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWkU_xlHTSo

I guess they could get super hot, but were also incredibly expensive.

>>16758030
There is a reason you don't see them, they flopped.

>>16758230
I actually ask because a house in my town just went up for sale and surprisingly enough still has one of these in the kitchen

>>16758185
I'm gay, btw. Not sure if that matters.

>>16758323
this looks comfy, id buy it

>>16758223
>infinite heat
holy shit
I wonder how effective those old electric burners actually were

>>16759032
that's fine and all but i don't know what that has to do with the other anon's incel post

>>16759419
when safety meant 'get under the desk' for a nuclear explosion? probably very.

>>16759452
The reason they said to duck and cover is because the shockwave shatters glass and kills. They weren't intending for that info to save people too close to survive anyway

>>16759452
The desk was to save you from things falling from damage, not the blast. Why people claim that I don't get.

I imagine it ruined a lot of shelf casings when dumb people would shove it back in while it was still red hot

>>16759515
>tell me you'er a chinkoid who doesn't understand how to design something without telling me you're an ip stealing chinkoid
theres a layer of metal and insulation there just like there is around an oven

>>16758030
It was expensive, so it needed to impress the right people.
It looks bizzare. Nothing flows with the rest of the kitchen. The range is lower than the counter, and the rest of it sticks just barely above the upper cabinets.
The range also sticks out like an open drawer, which is a huge safety issue. Not to mention, you might need to reach over a boiling pot to access the oven.
Rotisseries are a niche feature that takes up way too much space in this appliance.
The oven doesn't even look like it can fit a standard sheet pan.

>>16759497
because people that were kids and lived through it talk about it like they knew they were probably going to die anyways, but they were still told to get under desks

>>16759497
Years of propaganda from the Kremlin-backed anti-nuclear movement.
Tons of people still believe in nuclear winter too

>>16759497
>>16759838
some people also think cockroaches can survive being in a nuclear blast, in reality its just the radiation dont do too much to the lil guys

>>16758043
Shut up u chud

>>16758030
Looks like an enormous amount of heat loss from the oven and I could see the pull-out range being named in a few lawsuits.
But I'm just going by the drawing.

>>16759419
I've cooked on a '54 electric range before. It honestly heats things faster than my usual gas one.

Nah.
Having one was a status symbol for a while, but eventually they just stopped showing up in kitchens altogether, and for good reason. Getting them to do what they were meant to do was a right pain in the ass, and even when they worked the results were worse than what you could do yourself.
That pull-out stove looks kinda cool though. I wonder if they worked.

>>16758030
They worked pretty well until they were given greater freedom to apply for divorce. Letting them vote wasn't a great idea, either. Now getting one is extremely risky.

>>16759842
So in other words they can survive.

Combining heat and cold is not a good idea.

>Did these actually work?
well they used to, now they are entitled and not worth the trouble anymore. Women are not worth it anymore and the risks massively outweighs the rewards. Women are whores. We need a disaster/apocalypse scenario so these whores get in line.

>>16761521
Kek

>>16760986
Are you talking about the stove or the woman?

>>16761521
Just never marry and never move in together, problem solved