/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>16085907
>thinking there was ever soul in mass-produced shit-tier unhealthy garbage "food"
Have sex, incel

>>16085912
Baste

>>16085907
Those look like chips, not bread.

>>16085938
Or, as they say in the UK, crisps.

u guys r like those autistic people who makes logo videos online

>>16085956
Looks like it gained soul

>>16086127
>t.

>>16085951
1906, 1973, and 2003 undoubtedly the best designs with 1950 as a runnerup

The top left nacho cheese bag is the only one I’ve ever even seen irl. Wtf even is “Diablo” flavor?

>>16085948
>Back in merry ol' London, we call fries "chips" and we call chips "crisps"!

>>16085907
Do zoomers really get a sensory overload if they see more than a few colors on a bag of chips? I guess it saves the company money when they do stuff like this, so it's a win for them.

>>16085951
1973 is best

>>16085907
new design is actualy breddy gud. the ones on top seem so 2001

>>16086353
>new design is actualy breddy gud.
It's also inaccessible to the barely literate share of minorities.

>>16086306
I still can only imagine the 2003 one in my head, the newest one every time I see it I wtf internally that they still haven't changed it lmao

>>16086368
The fact that they paid artists and psychologists literally millions of dollars to research symbology and semiotics to design the new logo speaks to how lost we are.

>NO YOU DONT GET IT
>THE WHITE PART IS NOW A FRENCH CURVE.
>ITS A CIRCLE THAT INCORPORATES EVERY POSSIBLE ANGLE INTO ITSELF

What a bunch of spergs.

>>16085951
1973 for me

>>16085951

The 1898 logo has to be one of the weirdest things I’ve ever seen. Wtf

>>16085912
fbpb, opiaf

NOOOO YOU CANT JUST ENJOY A SOFT DRINK WITHOUT BEING LECTURED AT

STOP DRINKING PEPSI

STOP BEING WHITE

>>16085907
>thinking right is soul

>>16087290
>white

>>16085907
>cool original
what the fuck

>>16085907
Why do they do this? Cost cutting?

>>16085951
For me, it's 1991-1992.

>>16087313
i dont remember the middle one

>>16087415
i think its saving them a lot on printing costs. its always about money

>>16087415
>Why do they do this? Cost cutting?
Attempting to appeal to the garbage globohomo aesthetics of the millennial generation with oversimplified designs, dull colors and boring fonts.
Millennials do not have the same shopping patterns as boomers and gen x, and big corporations are shooketh at how to get them in the door

>>16087266
Agreed. Looks surreal

>>16087516
I think of a few reasons that don't involve globohomo
Franchises don't always make it and it can be real hard to sell a branded building, putting franchisees deeper in the hole when they fail.
Plus sometimes a lot of branded buildings are just plain ugly. RIP to any Tim Horton's franchisee who remodeled in the 2000s.

Notice also how a lot of fast food buildings in the 80s and 90s borrowed design cues from houses. There's been a lot of research into the psychological effects of different building aesthetics and it turns out that when your house is shaped like a house and your workplace is also shaped like a house, neither really feel like "home". Urban planners now believe that house shaped commercial buildings are a contributor to depression among a few other building trends that are fast becoming faux-pas.

>>16087470
it's not real

>>16087542
not only is what you posted retarded, but it's gay.
"as it turns out" means it's a lie kys.
also, "franchises don't always make it"... but doritos is an established franchise, as are maccy d's, borger (we wuz) kangs, and wendays, so what the fuck are you on about? it really is just to appeal to globohomo because there is no need to appeal to the senses anymore and put up a charade. get in line, goy cattle.

>>16087553
Oh I see, you just want to bitch and moan rather than have an actual discussion.
Well let me put it in a way you can understand: shut the fuck up you stupid whore, you don't even know what a franchise is.

>>16087553

>>16087325
nice one

>>16087592
how many versions do we need

>>16087592
what was schizo about what he posted? He's right mcdonalds is an established franchise it's not in danger of going out of business because some locations aren't cube shaped yet

>>16087542
But we're not talking about franchise restaurants
We're talking about fucking bags of doritos corn chips.
The reason for the changes are entirely globohomo.
Millennials seek "authenticity" so big brands are astroturfing themselves to look authentic with more "natural" looking packaging.

Here's a jar of pickles by vlasic, but the label sticker is a dull brown paper color, with a hand-written looking label to communicate the mental image of a farmer's market.
The more you look around, the more of this type of shit you'll see, until you see it everywhere.

>>16085956
>>16086128
>>16085907
Eat shit wonder cum, based bimbo coming through.

what kind of autist thinks beyond a single "huh" at these things, like, alright cool, its more modern, sure, nigga you aint eat the bag, why care?

>>16087636
>bimbo
Imagine naming your company Dumb Blonde Bakery and expecting to be taken seriously

>>16085917
sbpb

>>16087682
>its more modern, sure
you mean more boring?

>>16087617
how is this globohomo? it's just a fad, once everyone does this something else will emerge to 'break out', rinse repeat. same as ever. as for pic related, I could see it as it's been overstaying its welcome, but I'll be surprised if it's as prevalent in new media in five years

>>16087739
man I'm not fucking jizzing myself over food packaging. who fucking cares? it's the same shit regardless.

>>16087925
the fact they went to the effort to change it, would seem to imply that they cared enough to change it

>>16087950
Doesn't mean you have to care about it. This was just some mid-level executive trying to come up with a project to justify his massively bloated salary because he can't just jack off at his desk the entire year and the wheel landed on 'packaging redesign'.

>>16087965
how is this going to increase sales?

>>16087990
...Chips?

>>16087725
IMAGINE KNEELING TO BASED BIMBO BREAD THE BREAD KING.

Modern designs can suck my ballsack.

>>16087725
I actually live near one of their factories, apparently it's pronounced beembo, which doesn't really make sense to me but that's what I heard at a temp agency

>>16088091
>get so tired of people calling you a dumb bimbo that you make the pronunciation into your corporate motto
nigga just change the name

>>16087613
Because you can't even comprehend what the guy meant by franchisee.

>>16088121
That's exactly how I saw it kek

Who the fuck keeps approving these lame, minimalist designs? They clearly don’t work and I wouldn’t be surprised if they lost a fair amount of business doing it, yet every company hops on the globohomo art bandwagon anyways.

>>16085951
I miss the hyperrealism of the early to mid 00’s.

>>16087636
>bimbofication.jpg

>>16087415
A lot of people in charge of designs for big companies likely got the job through connections or prestige from their degrees. Chances are they’re affluent enough to be extremely detached from the average consumer, think most target audiences are completely homogeneous, and are trying to target all people in the 18-30 age range with stuff that would’ve appealed to them when they were college students. So the laziest/easiest way to attempt to market to these guys in their mind is to make all their product packaging look like it’s make of recycled plastic and has words like “natural” written in blocky or a stylized font against a bold plain background.

>>16087516
Your /pol/ psyop ain't working. They make these restaurants uniform for the resale value. Turns out there are more important things for getting people in the door than gaudy building shape gimmicks.

>>16087313
i walked past my old school a couple years ago and found one of the nostalgic bags that looked untouched by the weather.
really made me sad

>>16086342
>>16086353
>>16087415
>>16087513
>>16087516
>>16088300
>>16088696
You know that this is fake, right? It's literally some design student's practice:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CJEQkr4AyuV/
The actual redesign would be more conservative and at least feature a photo of a chip and an idealized picture of a flavor source.

>>16088696
do agree that's a part of it but my main theory is that by trying to appeal to do many wildly different types of people now, it appeals to but offends no one which is why minimalism is so in vogue right now

>>16085951
>1898
>Pure soVL

>>16088308
same man

>>16085951
1940 is best

>>16087516
Wendy's solarium ~~~

>>16085951
Don't forget.

>>16085907
>soul
Nah, they went from dirty soulless to clean soulless

>>16087266
That hp Lovecraft font. But yeah it looks like the most complex one even though it's the oldest

>>16085951
>>16086306
>>16086368

2003 design literally made want to drink Pepsi regularly and I did. After the logo change i lost interest and went back to coke.

>>16085951
73 is best, 03 is comfiest

>>16088308
you don't know what hyperrealilsm is

>>16085951
Coke was losing the soda wars and infiltrated Pepsi's marketing team from the top down and was able to push the horrific modern redesign of today which helped reestablish Coke as the dominant global soda brand. This has been proven several times over if you look into it.

>>16088300
You need to get off the "but what about profits?" train already. They haven't needed your money for decades now.

>>16085951

>>16085951
miss 2003 like you wouldn't believe

>>16091741
for me its the 1998, but really its all about those Phantom Menace cans

>>16091771
73-2003 were all good designs, what the fuck were they thinking with the current one
can't wait for them to someday revert

>>16090011
What the fuck even is this?

>>16085951
bepis

>>16091860
there is some weird document for whomever proposed this new logo. hard to tell if its serious or not, lots of pages of shit like that

>>16085917
>Crispy jews
>Now with moustache

>>16087753
>how is this globohomo?
when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail

>>16091880
it is real. google "pepsi universe" the ad agency got paid 1 million for this. goes to show how retarded the ad industry and marketing execs truly are.

>>16087592
>>16087606
What's up my fellow three letter agents

>>16086306
>>16086368
>>16090113

2003 looks terrible you are just stupid millennials

>>16085951
>>16086306
>>16086368
>2003 logo
this is the easiest way to tell what ice/roller skating rink / lakeside food court will not only have "the good shit" but also be worth supporting. AKA SOUL

>>16093952
i know what you mean but
what the fuck

>>16092727
>>16091880
>>16091860
the PDF is wild, it feels like actual schizo posting. https://jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/pepsi_gravitational_field.pdf

>>16093969

>>16093965
it's a pickle flavored otter pop, basically. although some of them are made using frozen pickle juice in a plastic cup that is then frozen with a stick in it. It's probably a way to not be wasteful with the pickle juice from the regular pickles that they are selling.

>>16085917
FUCKING KEK

>>16094006
I figured it's probably as such... so what the fuck is a hot sickle?

lol

>>16094067
>The white man will try to satisfy us with symbolic victories rather than economic equity and real justice

>>16094022
uhhhhhh i have no fucking clue

>>16085951
>1898
0/10
>1905
4/10 - I see where they were going but it just went wrong
>1906
a lot, lot better. easy 7/10
>1940
5/10 generic, nothing else.
>1950
classic as fuck with the cap, 7/10
>1962
generic, 5/10
>1973
9/10 this one is based
>1991-92
feels souless 1/10
>1998-today
3/10, I thought the 03 looked like dogshit and still do.

>>16087313
the change really threw me off at the time, the new style looked so bad

>>16088854
, xe says as xe posts a /pol/ gif

>>16085951
50s, 70s, and early 90s are peak design

>>16087470
I had completely forgotten about it too, but know I remember that teenage me hated the change.

>>16086341
>London
>UK

>>16088091
>which doesn't really make sense to me
It's a Mexican brand, that's how it's pronounced in Spanish.

>>16090403
You will never be a woman.

>>16094472
They really had to add in LATE NIGHT LAST CALL? Silly as fuck

>>16087617
Tbh I like being able to see the product so this doesn’t bother me
The 90’s and early 2000’s were like a dark age of consumer ignorance and companies pulling all sorts of bullshit to scam people

>>16094067
Yeah whatever, just bring back Collisions retards.

>>16091741
):
me too anon
me too

I tried 3D Doritos today. Would not recommend

>>16085951
'73 is the best.

>>16085907
>top : recognisable, familiar, eye-grabbing
>bottom: happy orange merchant

>>16087553
>doritos is an established franchise
I don't think that's what the other anon meant when he used the word "franchise".

>>16085907
I am not even a consoomer but this pisses me off. Thankfully i come from a country whose culture values tradition order and identity and this extends to our products as well. So our company logos and packaging look virtually unchanged (a part from a few minor stylistic updates) for literally decades.

Fuck marketing bullshit.

>>16093969
Holy shit

The top is what's soulless you zoomer shithead.

>>16085907
They brought back 3D Doritos but didn't bring back the jalapeno flavor, and the texture is completely different :( you boys remember those?

>>16095993
fucking based

>>16094572
Doritos Late Night was the product line, chips that all taste eerily like the drunk food you get from the gas station.
Last Call Jalapeno Popper is the flavor. There was also All-Nighter Cheeseburger and Tacos at Midnight.
Foreign markets had similar foods like ribs and barbecue chicken.

>>16096013
Fuck I miss being treated to a code red and these niggas

>>16085907
They should make throwback bags with the older 70s/80s designs.

>>16091872
Based.

>>16087415
Simplified logos is so they don't lose detail as tiny app icons.

>>16094067
Imagine being supported by a corn chip

I miss the old school dorito recipe, new doritos are shit in comparison. It was early 2000s iirc

>>16085951
'73 is the best

>>16085917
Magnificent
Saved

>>16096136
The have done that before.

>>16096180
you mean pepsico

>>16096136
They do.

>>16087636
It didn't need to change from 2010. I don't get why companies do things just for the sake of it. The change has no significance.

>>16087725
bimbo in its original italian means dumb, cocky teenaged male.

>>16085917
How do I be your friend

>>16096372
They have retro ketchup flavoured ones here. Theyre a bit too sweet though

>>16096030
the jalapeño popper one was just too good, fuck.

assuming this is sort of a doritos general now, how is the spicy ranch doritos 3d? I got the chili cheese nacho ones and they just taste like fritos (I'm pretty sure they're the same company so it checks out)

>>16085951
1973 > 1998 > 91-92 > All else

>>16093952
>this is the easiest way to tell what ice/roller skating rink / lakeside food court will not only have "the good shit" but also be worth supporting. AKA SOUL
This is uncannily true.

>>16088308
same

why did they remove the cornucopia bros....

>>16096704

I don't get it. It always had a cornucopia.

>>16096743
KFC in general has just gone downhill, at least in the US. Their chicken is simultaneously greasy and too dry. At least they're attached to A&W's here mostly so I can get some cheese curds and a root beer

>>16085917
It's fake you fucking retard

>>16094022
jalapeno popsicle?

>>16096743
I swear I see the 1991 logos all the time in Canada to this day

>>16096522
They just taste like a bugle with shitty ranch powder on it. Nothing like the original at all

>>16096704
The realities shifted

>>16096461
GarlicBread#1237
Don’t worry, I am not a discord tranny

>>16096734
this is probably one of the most retarded changes, the 1982 one reads the best and can be identified by even the blind. the new one just looking at it on its own is kinda hard to read it easily.
getting rid of the green white and yellow leaves them with no identifying marks other than the name

>>16085956
The current is a nice fishing lure color pattern.

>>16097283
>I am not a discord tranny
pass

>>16085917
kek

>>16085951
For me, it's 1950

>>16094472
They had a number of different Late Night flavors. They also included a code or something to access their Late Night website for music and stuff.

>>16096724
1994-99 is great

>>16085951
1962 was the year that it went to shit for the Pepsi logo, what a tragedy, RIP Pepsi.

>>16097897
And by this I mean 1962 was the last best good Pepsi logo. 1973 and onwards is dogshit.

oh look it's another
>muh heritage is corporate brnads
>muh globohomo
>muh nostalgia
>just want to go back to when i was a little child and mommy did everthing for me
>companies know best thats why muh gommunism dont work
>but when companies change stuff its jews
>i have a whole folder full of soyjacks to reply to this post with
thread

have sex losers

>>16096724
Crap and corpo-cringe past 1969. No soul or originality. No fun. Just BURGER KING. No king on the logo. Fucking crap.

>>16096730
McD's logo was always uninspired but the current, simple "M" is garbage. This logo IMO was corpo-cringe since 1953.

>>16096734
The 1965 logo is good. Anything since is corpo-cringe. It looks like something a juvenile manbaby eats at. And guess what? Jared Fogle did.

>>16096739
The Coca-Cola company "gets it"; they have since 1905 had a uniform, nice, clear logo that people like to look at with a fun, old-time font. The only slip-up into major corpo-cringe was 1985 but that whole new Coke saga is well noted so I won't talk about it here.

>>16096743
It's KFC. The logo has always had a clear sense of self image because it was lucky enough to have had a guy as eclectic as Colonel Sanders found the company and run it for so long. However, I think the only logos here that are corpo-cringe are 1991 and 2007. I think the best one here is 1978.

>>16085951
I don't like how the logo went from a stylized version of their bottlecaps to some random, round circle that is supposed to represent the bottlecap, but has been so long out of circulation that no-one now realizes the logo is in fact of the bottle cap; a case of hyper-reality in marketing, the picture of the thing is now so disconnected from the thing that it can be said to be something else entirely. From 1973 on, the logo has been corpo-cringe.

>>16096734
this image is outdated

>>16087587
I wish I could like a reply on here

>>16096704
It never had the cornucopia the leaves in the background were just brown and are green now

>>16087553
why would they spend billions on wrecking and rebuilding almost every location then?

>>16098037
I don't trust you native, you have never experienced the other reality... oh how good it was back there......

>>16096730
it's grim times when you look at a mcdonald's logo and think to yourself: soul

>>16098037
Yeah in your shitty reality

>>16098037
I used to go to school in the United Kingdom, and our uniform polo shirts & school jumpers were made by Fruit of the Loom, and they all had the cornucopia on them. I also had some awful 1990's-era green jeans from Fruit of the Loom with the same logo. That logo really did used to have a corncucopia on it.

>>16093969
this reeks of architectural academia bullshitery

>>16093969
Wow... page 6 is something else. Holy shit.

>>16096739
Coke, fuck yeah!

>>16096514
>ketchup
>its too sweet

>>16098250
It really didn't

>>16097958

>>16098562
g-d I wish that were me

>>16098095
>>16098246
LE REDDIT ALTERNATE REALITY MANDELA EFFECT BRO LMAOOOO

>>16085907
I love the new design

Get on domino's nz level.
Got this last night wtf.

>>16097958
you are corpo-cringe faggot

>>16088645
small kek
>>16094496
But it is pronounced as it reads: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6JoaMI9ZXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie2HUY9arYM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qjrg_-CR02g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFS2u_Nyg0c