/ck/ - Food & Cooking

Because caffeine dual roles as fat burner and appetite suppressant.

DNP for breakfast lunch and dinner

bump

Because it is poison. Drink milk.

>>14884083
>Because it is poison.
How so?

>>14884100
Mortality is just measured if it gives you something that kills you abruptly. Coffee shortens your lifespan gradually like all poisons.

>>14884590
Are you stupid?
All-cause mortality includes things like CVD, diabetes, stroke, cancers.
Also coffee has been associated with longer life expectancy so you're still wrong.

>>14883006
Bump

>>14884721
Bump

>>14886621
Bump

>>14884100
He's just talking out of his ass like most anti-coffee people.

>>14884611
Not him but you're the one who is wrong here. Coffee significantly lowers lifespans through weaker hearts, i.e you die of heart causes later in life. Though the effects of coffee are not as high as energy drinks, you will still lose around two to five years of your lifespan.

>>14886805
Go ahead and back up your claims, liar.
>A 2012 systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies observed a statistically significant J-shaped relationship between coffee and heart failure. Compared to those who did not drink coffee, the strongest inverse association was seen at 4 cups per day, with a potentially higher risk reported at higher levels of consumption. There was no indication that the relationship between coffee and heart failure risk varied by sex or by baseline history of myocardial infarction or diabetes1.
>A 2013 review on coffee consumption and mortality, with over a million participants, suggested a significant inverse association between coffee consumption and CVD mortality risk, especially in women. Intakes of coffee at 3-5 cups per day showed the most significant protective effect, whilst quantities over 5 cups per day were associated with a smaller reduction in total mortality2.
>However, a 2013 large American cohort study of over 2,500 CVD deaths suggested a positive association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality in men, and also in men and women below 55 years of age. The authors advised that younger people should avoid heavy coffee consumption, cautioning that the finding should be assessed in other populations3.

>>14886811
>A 2013 meta-analysis of well-controlled prospective studies suggested that coffee consumption was not associated with risk of coronary heart disease, weakly associated with a lower risk of stroke and heart failure, and not associated with a higher risk of fatal cardiovascular events. Overall, the authors concluded that for most healthy people, moderate coffee consumption is unlikely to adversely affect cardiovascular health4.
>Two 2014 meta-analyses suggest an association between coffee consumption and CVD risk, proposing a ‘U-shaped’ pattern whereby optimal protective effects were achieved with 3-5 cups of coffee per day. According to these two studies, the greatest risk reduction may be seen at 3 cups of coffee per day, with a reduced CVD mortality risk at 21%5,6.
>A 2017 review of observational studies and meta-analyses concluded that habitual consumption of 3-5 cups of coffee per day is associated with a 15% reduction in the risk of CVD, and higher consumption has not been linked to elevated CVD risk7.

>>14886813
>A 2018 report concluded that habitual coffee consumption is associated with lower risks for cardiovascular death and a variety of adverse CV outcomes, including coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, and stroke, whilst coffee’s effects on arrhythmias and hypertension are neutral. Habitual intake of 3-4 cups of coffee appears to be safe and is associated with the most robust beneficial effects8.
>A 2018 review of the cardiovascular effects of caffeinated beverages concluded that a moderate intake of coffee and tea may be beneficial for a range of cardiovascular conditions including coronary artery disease, heart failure and arrhythmias9.
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/coffee-consumption-and-cardiovascular-disease-risk/

>A 2009 meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies on coffee consumption and coronary heart disease showed variation between the results of the individual cohort studies, with two studies reporting a positive correlation, and two a negative correlation both for the group who drank 4-6 cups of coffee per day and for those who drank more than cups per day10. However, the overall evaluation did not show a statistically significant association between coffee drinking and long-term risk of coronary heart disease. In addition, habitual moderate coffee consumption was associated with a lower risk in women.
>A meta-analysis published in 2013 suggested a small protective effect (5% risk reduction) of coffee consumption on CHD2.
>A 2014 meta-analysis of 36 studies with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases concluded that coffee consumption was associated with small reduction in CHD risk. The authors suggested an 11% risk reduction at lower coffee intakes (1.5 cups per day) and a 7% risk reduction at higher coffee intakes (5 cups per day)5.

>A number of studies have considered coffee and coronary heart disease, also suggesting overall that there is no association with CHD, and indeed in some cases a protective benefit was observed at moderate coffee intakes:
>A Japanese study followed 37,742 participants over 10 years, with 426 deaths from cardiovascular disease and 2,454 deaths from all causes. The study observed statistically significant inverse associations between coffee consumption and both mortality from all causes as well as mortality from coronary heart disease in women. In men, no association with coronary heart disease was seen11.
>A Dutch study followed 37,514 participants over 13 years with 1,387 cases of coronary heart disease. For coffee consumption, a U-shaped association with slightly reduced risk for coronary heart disease was observed, with the lowest risk in the group seen at 2-3 cups per day12.
>A Swedish study assessed 37,315 male participants over 9 years with 784 cases of heart failure. In this study, coffee consumption was not associated with incidence of heart failure, including those consuming more than five cups per day14.
>A further Swedish study, using case-control instead of the prospective cohort design and smaller in size (375 cases of first myocardial infarction), observed a statistically significant positive association but only for filtered coffee in men. In women, no association reached statistical significance15
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/coffee-consumption-and-coronary-heart-disease-risk/

>Data from a 2011 meta-analysis of 11 prospective studies, with 10,003 cases of stroke and 479,689 participants, concluded that moderate coffee consumption may be weakly inversely associated with risk of stroke. Compared with no coffee consumption, consumption of 2 cups of coffee per day was associated with a 14% reduction and 3 cups per day with a 17% reduction in risk of stroke. The reduction in risk was reduced at higher intakes of coffee16.
>A further meta-analysis of 9 cohort studies published in 2012 concluded that coffee consumption of 4 cups or more per day showed a preventive effect on stroke. In the European subgroup, increased coffee drinking showed an 18% reduction in risk of stroke17.
>A 2018 overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses concluded that a high consumption of nuts, fruits, vegetables, dairy foods, fish and tea, and moderate consumption ofcoffee and chocolate demonstrated a protective effect on the incidence of stroke23.

>A number of studies have considered coffee consumption and the incidence of stroke, concluding that there is no indication of an association and some suggestion of a protective effect:
>A large prospective cohort study from the US Nurses’ Health Study of 83,076 female participants, followed over 24 years with 2,280 cases of stroke, observed a significant inverse association for coffee consumption and incidence of stroke. This association was even stronger in the subgroup of past and non-smokers. The authors concluded that coffee consumption may modestly reduce the risk of stroke in women18.
>Two further studies, one prospective cohort study from Japan11, and a case-cohort study from the Netherlands19, included male and female participants. Both studies were smaller in total number of participants, number of years of follow up, and number of cases. Neither of these studies observed any association between coffee consumption and stroke.
>In a study on thromboembolism in women with 37,393 participants, followed over 19 years with 1,950 incident cases, no statistically significant association with coffee was seen20.
>A further study in 33,994 adults, where daily coffee consumption ranged from 0 to 20 cups, concluded that heavier daily coffee consumption is associated with decreased stroke prevalence, despite a smoking tendency in heavy coffee drinkers. Interestingly, heart failure, diabetes, and hypertension were less frequent, and high cholesterol more frequent in those consuming more than 3 cups of coffee per day21.
>A Japanese study of 82,369 Japanese adults aged 45-74 years without cardiovascular disease also concluded that coffee consumption was associated with an inverse risk of CVD and cerebral infarction22.
>A Korean study concluded that coffee consumption of more than 3 cups a day was associated with a 38% lower odds ratio for stroke in women, although no significant association was found in men24.

>>14886834
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/coffee-consumption-and-risk-of-stroke/

>>14886811
Yes I know you're butthurt but my sources are from nih.gov, and yours are from a lobbyist website backed by coffee bean corporations. When you can link actual data sourced from real studies I will link you all the nih mandated and peer reviewed links I have in my paste. But you won't - stay mad.

>>14886839
You posted no sources whatsoever. Also the site in question references meta-studies which weren't carried out by them, you fucking idiot. Feel free to find studies of that caliber backing up your claim.

>Two 2013 reviews considered the effects of coffee on various aspects of health, concluding that coffeeconsumption is associated with reduced mortality risk4,5.
>Additionally, two 2014 papers suggested that there was no association between coffee intake and an increase in all-cause mortality6,7. One concluded that an inverse association was observed that was similar in men and women, but varied by location with a stronger association observed in Europe and Japan when compared to the USA7.
>Two studies considered associations at specific intakes of coffee. A large prospective study of 90,317 US adults concluded that coffee drinkers had lower risk ratios for overall mortality, and the risk was reduced with increasing cups of coffee, up to 4-5 cups a day. Similar findings were observed for both decaffeinated and caffeinated coffee8. A further review suggested that the largest risk reduction for various health outcomes was observed at 3-4 cups of coffee per day9.

>A 2016 review of over 95,000 individuals suggested that, observationally, coffee intake is associated with a U-shaped lower risk of cardiovascular disease and all-causemortality10.
>Data from a 2017 study of over 500,000 participants found a significant association between a higher coffee consumption (calculated as more than 3 cups per day with 1 cup equal to 237ml) and a lower risk of all-cause mortality. The strongest associations were observed with digestive disease mortality, mainly due to the lower risk of dying from liver disease in both men and women1.
>A population based cohort study, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), concluded that a moderate caffeine intake was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality, regardless of the presence or absence of coffee consumption11.

>>14886845
My sources are in my paste, i.e my cloud, which will be posted when you present the actual sources citing your babble. But you can't - because you don't have any - and if you did have any they would of course link to non gov cited sources - i.e nih.gov. The reality is you don't have any proof, and thus this argument is not able to continue, because you are not an actual legitimate who knows what he is talking about. You can have my verified .gov sources when you link actual bread. Stay. Mad.

>Research from the Multiethnic Cohort Study concluded that coffee consumption was associated with lower total mortality after adjustment for smoking and other potential confounders, with similar trends seen for both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee intake. Significant inverse associations were observed in four ethnic groups: African-Americans, Japanese-Americans, Latinos, and Caucasians, however the association in Native-Hawaiians did not reach statistical significance12.
>A 2018 population study of over 120,000 adults considered the effect of coffee consumption, tea consumption, and the substitution of coffee for tea on mortality risk13. A higher coffee intake was significantly, non-linearly related to lower overall and cause-specific mortality in women. The authors suggested that for men, compared to exclusive coffee drinkers, those drinking 30-50% tea showed the lowest mortality risk, and any tea drinking resulted in a greater reduced risk than coffee drinking exclusively. For women, those who drank coffee exclusively, or up to 40% tea had the lowest mortality, but those drinking higher percentages of tea were at increased mortality risk compared to exclusive coffee drinkers13.
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/all-cause-mortality/#:~:text=Data%20from%20a%202017%20study,risk%20of%20all%2Dcause%20mortality.

>>14886858
All the sources are listed at the bottom of the page. Cope harder.

>>14886872
No they're not, great lie but I guess that's what happens when you talk negatively about someones coping mechanisms (coffee), lol.

>>14886886
Here you go, mouthbreather.
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/references-12/

How about both of you faggots just link directly to the journal

>>14886896
Thanks.

>>14886886
https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/topic-overview/references/

>>14886904
And to anyone who is wanting an archive, I made one so you don't have to click his grimy corporate lobby website. Big brain plays here.
https://archive.is/teKyQ

>>14886858
>My sources are in my paste, i.e my cloud, which will be posted when you present the actual sources citing your babble

"it's all written on these golden plates, don't worry", are you also a mormon?

oh god you are a mormon aren't you, that's why you hate coffee so much

OH NO NO NO NO, WE GOT TOO COCKY, JAVABROS
https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/news/20060815/coffee-may-trigger-heart-attack

>>14886987
>2006
>may
>in SOME people
You lost.

>>14886858
Holy crap, I've not seen someone cope this hard about being wrong since 2009 /g/.

A recent study showed that drinking coffee before any food intake halves the body's ability to absorb sugar by half

>>14886987
>Little effect was seen among heavy coffee drinkers (those who drank four or more cups per day).

>>14887049
>>14887080