[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 37 KB, 600x600, Cuisinart-GR-300-Elite-Griddler-dc45115f-d56a-4d67-873f-c0dad1d3ce8a_600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13627236 No.13627236 [Reply] [Original]

Griddler Elite is the patricians choice of cooking apparatus

>> No.13627257

>>13627236
he eats food cooked on non stick surfaces

>> No.13627283
File: 1.16 MB, 1280x720, nonstick.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13627283

>>13627257
Teflon is inert and cannot harm you in any way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FNNKhVoUu8
Also. I looked for a long ass time to find an electric flattop that was stainless/steel
No one makes them

>> No.13627298

rice cooker

>> No.13627334

>>13627283
The video refutes itself in the first 60 seconds.

>> No.13627347

>>13627334
No, it doesn't

>> No.13627377

>>13627298
I got an instant pot to cook rice. I was going to buy a rice cooker, but for those prices I just bought an instant pot and saved a little money.

>> No.13627386

>>13627347
1. The argument that it does not matter because PTFE is hyperprevalent is dishonest and ultimately nonsensical as it does not sufficiently negate the fact that using such cookware, especially to the point of scraping/ high temperatures, exposes one to a much larger dose than otherwise would be encountered through second and third hand environmental exposure. Second, he implies its pyrolysis is harmless to healthy individuals, whenever it clearly is lethal to birds and "those with respitory illness (something that also is contradicted by the literature, as healthy individuals can succumb to it). He further refutes himself later in the video by admitting this, which means he was deliberately dishonest. He also refuted his own argument as to the utility of human studies by mentioning the extremely small sample size of 4 individuals which is not sufficient to determine harm of exposure or establish safety. Lastly, going back to the first 60 seconds, an appeal to authority is made because DUDE SCIENTIST USES IT. This retard soy boy knows nothing about science and is just a stupid rhetoerician peddling pop-science and platitudes. His video and life belongs in the trash, just like you and your machine.

>> No.13627413

>>13627386
Find me a link to an electric, adjustable temperature, griddle that doesn't have nonstick and I'll be content.
Until then, I'll cook on nonstick, because I'm not dusting my food with PTFE, nor heating it to its pyrolysis temperature, so my exposure will be nil.
Maybe you should go back to your soccer mom health blogs instead of being on this site.

>> No.13627423

>>13627413
My issue is with pop-sci retards and H1B toxicologist, and their poor arguments, not teflon. I wouldn't have wasted my time if it was about the teflon.

>> No.13627431
File: 8 KB, 250x241, 15432377984880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13627431

>>13627283
I really hate this guy. Just watched his most popular video.

>the maillard reaction is a myth

>> No.13627519
File: 58 KB, 574x574, breville-the-control-freak-smart-induction-cooker-c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13627519

>> No.13627520

>>13627236
>rice cooker
>crock pot
>dehydrator
>smoothie blender
>french press

>> No.13627535

>>13627431
What is even his argument there? Or is it actually a click bait and he just rewords the wikipedia page on the maillard reaction.

>> No.13627573

>>13627535
"Adding salt doesn't increase browning, it's a myth as far as I am aware"

>> No.13627576

>>13627236
i too love my george foreman grill :^)

>> No.13627600

>>13627573
That's not what the maillard reaction is though. idgi

>> No.13627607

shit, i left the oven on all night. 13 hours

>> No.13628074

>>13627600
>adding chocolate chips to brownies isn't what baking brownies is though. idgi
Retard.

>> No.13628268
File: 2.86 MB, 960x540, 1559885974718.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13628268

>> No.13628464
File: 1.40 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13628464

>>13627236
Opening a restaurant and scooped one for $4

>> No.13628465

>>13628464
What kind of restaurant?

>> No.13628485
File: 2.05 MB, 3264x2448, 8CB36A59-89BA-40C1-864D-484C8DEC9666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13628485

>>13628465
Bakery/ deli

>> No.13628494

>>13628485
I hope you succeed m8.
Unless you’re a bad person.

>> No.13628499

>>13628494
I’m trying to see how long it REALLY takes to bake 6,000,000 batches of cookies.

>> No.13629745

>>13627519
Now that looks patrician. What do you use yours for?

>> No.13629750

>>13628268
There ought to be one for unthickened liquids, like vinegar.

>> No.13629753
File: 2.69 MB, 960x540, 1557330953409.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13629753

>> No.13629763

>>13629753
I thought this was a parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stTzLmoStsU

>> No.13629768

>>13627283
My non-stick cook surface is the appropriate oil and temperature for the application.

>> No.13629773

>>13629763
What's a flesh toltiya?

>> No.13629821

>>13629745
don't have one unfortunately, they're like $1800. I would prob use it for more control when reducing stock, cooking meats, sauces, ice cream bases etc. don't have much trouble with these tasks even with my shitty electric stove

>> No.13629899

>>13627519
What is that? A fancy PID controlled induction burner?

>> No.13630562

>>13629899
Exactly that. There's a sensor in the plate to hold pans at a certain temperature, and I think there's an attachment for a thermocouple probe to hold the food itself at a certain temperature for a more accurate reading.

Sounds really nice for candy, chocolate and oil.

>> No.13630588

>>13628464
where?
i had an induction cooker. surprised you fat women on here don't have one. cooks faster than flame, costs $30 and you don't need a kitchen if you just fry instead of baking unhealthy shit

>> No.13630596

>>13627283
>Teflon is inert and cannot harm you in any way*.
>*except for the polluted waterways in the regions where it is manufactured, causing cancer, mutant babies, shrivelled balls, and subsequent emasculation/low birth rates

>> No.13630601
File: 315 KB, 2048x2048, 80272612_987199988311581_5968485007780478976_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13630601

>> No.13630609

>>13630601
You know, as goofy as "automatic lifting" is, I can't believe I've never thought of using a fryer as a boiler. That's brilliant if it cleans easy enough.

>> No.13630754

Sous vide.

>> No.13630763
File: 13 KB, 352x500, 500_500_productGfx_5925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13630763

If you don't have one of these you're nobody

>> No.13630966

>>13628499
Based

>> No.13631010

>>13630763
phallosan is way more comfortable

>> No.13631391

>>13630596
Low IQ post.
The stuff contaminating the waters is PFOA which is used during the production. Teflon is PTFE and does not cause "cancer, mutant babies, shrivelled balls, and subsequent emasculation/low birth rates"

>> No.13631402

>>13631391
>they don't really release deadly toxins by making the teflon. Well, they do, but they don't. That makes perfect sense to me: the HIGH IQ POSTER of SMARTS (who works for DuPont)buymyshitguysit'stotallygooderduuuhhh

>> No.13631408

>>13630763
This isn't the goodlookingloser forum

>> No.13631423

>>13631402
The PFOA is released into the wild and dangerous but is not a concern in TEFLON products. This was about the safety of TEFLON products not how environmentally friendly its production is. I bet you were top of the class in your homeschooling program though.

>> No.13631436

>>13631423
>Uhhhhhdurrhurrdlederdle it totally makes no difference if you complete the consumerist cycle of deadly manufacturing practices by buying these shitty pieces of shit, guise! Rewarding them with money magically makes TEFLON not assrape the area where the people who make it live. I have no responsibility for that. I do not work for DuPont at all, ferreal. Buy me a mansion, guise! (PS–I'm a smarter then you and ur a dumpoopooface)

>> No.13631447

>>13631436
No im sure youre super educated :^)
On every post you attack something new and unrelated I didnt even mention. Maybe you should take a deep breath you seem to be getting a bit emotional over things you dont understand.
Haha down with the evil consoooomers bro REVOLUTION TIME. Enlightened King lmao.
By the way PFOA has been phased out by 3M and DuPont for years.

>> No.13631460

>>13631447
>haha jk guys. it's totally super safe to trust chemical companies now I swear. I'm not shilling at all lelelel. But you're still a big stupid doodoobrain ;o)))

>> No.13631471

>>13631460
Ran out of new goalposts?
Evil big companies! Me and my caravan of dread locked natural weed and unemployment enthusiasts will bring you down and start the next revolution! Youre my favorite joke in 2020 so far.

>> No.13631488

>>13631471
>Ya Mon, we be Jamaican now! We're just like you! haha! Buy our shit! Teflon pans are the voice of a generation, mon!

>> No.13631571

>>13627298
Can't underestimate how convenient a rice cooker is.
Sure, I CAN cook many different types of rice and watch over them as I do several other parts of a dish.
Or I could just put the stuff in an press go.

I tend to use mine more for stews though

>> No.13631580
File: 22 KB, 624x364, 01GnWw783pnsQfdgf17gwF2-9.fit_lpad.size_624x364.v_1569474906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13631580

>> No.13631631
File: 2.88 MB, 640x360, 1558359849307.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13631631

>> No.13631640

>>13630588
If you fry in a restaurant, you need a vent hood. And they are round $6000

>> No.13633014

>>13631571
i often use mine for fried rice since it has a saute function, that function makes it far more useful than just for cooking rice.

>> No.13633055

>>13631391
How much of a consumerist are you m8
The other anon said Teflon is bad even if it doesn’t cause health issues in pans because it’s production is really bad for those around it
You retort in such a way which illuminated your pathetic consumerism

>> No.13633062

>>13631447
The DuPont heir literally raped his own 3yr old baby and didn’t go to jail for it
No joke I’m practicing forgiveness and luv but if you truly think like a lawyer this way you are a legitimate target

>> No.13633064

>>13631640
more like $15,000-20,000 with installation

>> No.13633065

>>13631471
Nice projections
Black and white dichotomies
Typical boomer mindset

>> No.13633070

>>13631631
what can honest men do against such reckless faggottry?

>> No.13633091

>>13629773
>>13629753
>>13629763
Why.
>all that power usage for a single toltiya

>> No.13633109

>>13629763
>>13629753
I guess just as long as they don't make it proprietary and you can only use flatev™ brand pods for your flatev™.

>> No.13633122

>>13633109
come one anon why would you not think your tortilla maker will be drm free.

>> No.13633144
File: 311 KB, 2000x1240, juicero.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13633144

>>13633122

>> No.13633148

>>13633144
NFC IOT
was a mistake

>> No.13633227

>>13627413
Despite what you may have been told, most people do not care about you, nor what you do with your health. You're retard that will ingest poison, but saying it is harmless is dishonest, and your dumb shit video will not negate any research done on PTFE coated pans

>Find me a link to an electric, adjustable temperature, griddle that doesn't have nonstick and I'll be content.

No one gives a shit about, faggot, but that video did not debunk anything.

>> No.13633231

>>13627573
>>13628074
Well retard, does adding salt aid in the reaction or not?

>> No.13633267

>>13628485
I’d love to visit but i wouldnt imagine you name dropping ur restaurant so that retards could roll up

>> No.13633929

>>13631391
Kill yourself.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00028896809342978

>> No.13634486

>>13633014
You can also make risotto in them aswell because of that.

>> No.13635680
File: 2.95 MB, 1080x606, drunk girl oksikset.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13635680

>>13631631
>grey steak

>> No.13635696

>>13627377
Why the fuck do you need a special appliance To make the world’s most easy to make food? You literally throw rice in water, bring it to a boil, put a lid on it, turn the temp down to the lowest setting and walk away for 15 minutes. Done.

>> No.13635704
File: 263 KB, 480x228, americans.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13635704

>>13635696
>hey look I can ruin rice in 15 minutes!
Sounds like you're a case study in why rice cookers are useful

>> No.13635705

>>13635696
Not him but I don't need it for rice, I bought one to use as a pressure cooker. If it also happens to cook rice well and consistently then I see no reason not to use it for that.