/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>11593076
egg based diet

>veganism

>light based diet

>>11593081
>egg based diet

>>11593076
>eating 42 eggs each and every day you spend alive on this earth

>eating a normal balanced diet that includes meat, plants, and dairy

>>11593105
>eggs give you cancer
What mommyblog did you read that off of?

>pizza based diet

>>11593110
THIS

>>11593116
>not understanding that every health study points towards eggs being carcinogenic

>listening to tool as a meal

>>11593119

>>11593110

>pussy. Based diet

>>11593132
>reading faggy "science" instead of just eating eggs like a strong boy

>>11593151
>science is gay

>>11593132

>studies

>>11593156
>science is 'mossexual

>>11593164
wtf is this real

>>11593142
Complete distrust in authority: the one thing veganiggers and infowars conspiritards have in common.

>>11593156
>science is straight

>>11593132
What in then is a carcinogen? By what mechanism does an egg damage the cellular nucleus?

>>11593132
Life is carcinogenic.

>>11593076
>not just eating whatever you want while keeping the portions at sensible levels

>>11593177
https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150%2812%2900504-7/abstract

>>11593202
What does plaque buildup have to do with cancer?
Also the study itself says it's only an issue if you're already at risk for cardiovascular disease.

>age 105
>people think I'm in my twenties
Thanks veganism

>>11593202
Did you even read the fucking abstract?

>>11593202
ok ill stop smoking

>>11593235
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=choline+cancer

>>11593241
>live longer
>have to spend two hours eating five pounds of lettuce at every meal instead of just eating a small chicken breast for the same protein

>>11593170
no, but we had fun with it on /x/ a few weeks ago

>>11593264
>its only chicken or lettuce

>>11593253
You didn't respond to his question.

>>11593253
>first link
>It is important to note that so far, no one has shown that choline increases the risk of getting prostate cancer in the first place, this is really just about worsening existing cancer.

Why are you posting things that hurt your argument?

>>11593324
Because he's a dumb veganigger who thinks spamming links makes him look intelligent.

>>11593283
they never do, they know they are wrong

>tfw vegetarian who hates vegans more than meat eaters

>>11593277
>the two sources of protein arent chicken and lettuce
retarded faggot

>>11593324
>news article
>believing "suggested" SEO
>not believing all current studies on the matter
Are eggtards all this retarded?

>>11593368
Beans have more protein, vitamins, and Fiber. Nice try retard.

Cum Based Diet
>picture_of_big_brain.jpg

>>11593357
Of course you do. You're the worst of both worlds.

>>11593399
>asked for evidence
>posts evidence
>point out that evidence is bad
>LMAO why are you reading that shit how retarded can you be

Why even post it, then? If you have direct studies in mind, post links to those. Don't go "do your own research" and then get mad when it doesn't support you.
It's not even like I went digging for my viewpoint either, that was literally the first result in the page YOU sent me.

>>11593429
I led you in the right direction. I'm sorry that your cancerous diet restricts your ability to research.

>>11593448
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. It's a free country, you don't have to provide any evidence, but claiming to be right about something and then just saying "look it up yourself retard" just makes you shit at arguing.
I might as well tell you to go find all the studies that say eating eggs gives you wings and immortality. They totally exist, trust me.

>>11593470
Eggs causing cancer is common knowledge. Do you want me to find you studies on how the earth isn't flat?

>>11593480
You made a claim and now are trying to jusitfy that claim by saying it's a well known claim? Please hand in your high school diploma. Obviously you learned nothing.

>>11593480
If you intend to seriously argue that the Earth isn't flat, then yes.
You can insult people who don't know or believe things that are supposedly common knowledge, but that doesn't educate them or change their minds. If you don't intend to do the latter, that's fine, but why argue at all in that case? You might as well just say "lol retard" and move on.

>>11593489
Not him, but :
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=egg+consumption+cancer

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dagfinn_Aune2/publication/41164026_Egg_consumption_and_the_risk_of_cancer_A_multisite_case-_control_study_in_uruguay/links/0c9605301f2d1b0a86000000/Egg-consumption-and-the-risk-of-cancer-A-multisite-case-control-study-in-uruguay.pdf

From that last one :
"We also had information on intake of fried and boiled eggs in this study and the results were in general similarly elevated both with intake of boiled and fried eggs"

>meat based diet

>>11593499
That said, 16% increased risk on average for a couple of eggs a week is really not that much.

>>11593499
>However, other studies reported no association [...] or even decreased risk with higher intake of eggs [...] and the report from the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research from 2007 suggested that the evidence was too limited to draw any firm conclusions
I'm sure evidence exists, but I think it's far from a settled issue or "common knowledge."

>>11593156
>science is science

>>11593516
That's why I picked a recent sizeable study instead some older meta-study bullshit based on poor evidence.

To use their complaints against older studies as an argument against their current study is either disingenuous or stupid ...

>>11593527
>recent
It's still 10 years old and was only published two years after the AICR said there was no strong evidence.
Is this really the game-changing study that conclusively proved eggs cause cancer?

>>11593076

>>11593570
Because the animal has a digestive system more appropriately equipped to extract nutrients from its plant based diet, and is far more energy dense than the low quality food it spends almost all its time consuming just to fulfill its basic metabolic requirements?

>>11593557
No, and in fact because it goes against the findings of other contemporary studies its results should be viewed with increased scrutiny.

>>11593570
Because I can't digest cellulose.

>>11593076
but what if I'm cellulose intolerant?

>>11593570
The animal condenses the nutrients for more efficient delivery. Cows spend almost every waking hour eating plants to get the nutrients that I get by spending 15 minutes eating a piece of the cow.