/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>11056540
Me by pure chance. Ate 5 eggs though.

The state should literally have no say in how you treat your property.

not me, mmmmm meat yummy had some quesadillas with ground beef earlier

I can’t wait to get a bigger place and get a dog. I’m going to have sex with it constantly it’ll be the best.

>>11056551
how do you define property when it's alive?

>>11056583
whether something is alive or not is not a qualifier for property

>>11056583
>being this much of a retarded child

Animals are legally considered property you fucking imbecile

Why is ck obsessed with vegans?
Literally living rent free in your small heads

>>11056590
>>11056591
No living being belongs to you

>>11056551
Yeah, I do whatever I want with my niggers and harem. FUck off.

>>11056540
Yeah, so far I don't think I've eaten anything meaty. Just a handful of assorted nuts and cauliflower.
Did have a slice of old cheese though.

>>11056594
I'm not vegan, I'm just cutting down on my meat consumption because I want to be more environmentally conscious. Going a whole day isn't that hard.

>>11056595
Legally it does

>>11056595
>you can’t own a potato mannn

Had a turkey sandwich today and it was pretty darn good.

>>11056591
>>11056590
I'm not saying that they aren't property
but I am saying that not all property is treated equally by the law

>>11056622
>the state can’t say what i can do with my property

>the state defines my property!!!

>>11056624
Potatoes aren’t living

>>11056636
first (You)

>>11056636
You’re not making any sense. Good try at “trolling”, you should go back to redit though

I'm in meatless millennium so it doesn't affect me.

>>11056595
Yeah, they do. Call it slavery or whatever you want, but many animals have human owners and if you take them away to release them, it's considered theft.
In the west you may just get arrested, in other countries you'll probably get shot if you even try.
But to a certain extend the animals are free to do whatever they want, as long as it happens within the confines of what their owner allows.
Hey, it's a tough and unfair world, but pretending your ideological/theoretical world is real doesn't change it.

>>11056646
>>11056658
Stellar arguments fellas

>>11056663
Yeah meatless because you haven’t got a dick, faggot

Oooooh blown out!

>>11056664
Im not debating law. That much shouldve been clear. But whatever makes you seem like you’re winning argument

White vegans are just a bunch of self centered hypocrites looking for attention.

If they really cared about the lives of animals, they wouldn't wear cotton, wouldn't eat mass farmed grains, and wouldn't drive cars.

But no, cuz "that would be inconvenient."

>>11056685
>t. uneducated

>>11056685
>White vegans are just a bunch of self centered hypocrites looking for attention.
>If they really cared about the lives of animals, they wouldn't wear cotton, wouldn't eat mass farmed grains, and wouldn't drive cars.

>>11056685
>If they really cared about the lives of animals, they wouldn't wear cotton, wouldn't eat mass farmed grains, and wouldn't drive cars.

They're too busy virtue signaling and patting themselves on the back to actually research how much other industries kill animals.

>>11056672
It's far beyond law, anon with self proclaimed flawless argument. Law just supports it, which already says a lot. The animals have no choice in the matter. We're in control. If they escape, they'll be found and returned. And you'll get a rake (or worse) up your ass if you think you can set them free.
The animals have no say, you have no say. You theories mean nothing. This is the world we live in. Deal with it.

>>11056685
>>11056689
>>11056693
>durrr hurrr guys veguns are duh real bad guyz!!!

>>11056700
No, they're just arrogant assholes, dipshit.

>>11056685

Not to mention vegan agriculture and mass use of pesticides is one of the main reasons for the mass bee extinction. A true environmentalist would grow their own foods without killing everything around with pesticides.

>>11056694
>its far beyond law
Then you should’ve made that point to begin with anon with apparently flawless argument

>which already says a lot
Yeah, how horrible and dumb people like you are

>DURRR MUH LAWS
Great explanation, thanks for explaining the non-legal concepts so thoroughly and gracefully

If you try putting anything near my ass ill snap your neck. Thats my world, faggot, deal with it

>tfw 6'9" vegan with exceptional academic record and 300k (30k of BTC last year) at 21

Carnies are a joke. Always have been always will be.

>>11056700
>veguns are duh real bad guyz!!!

No. They're just obnoxious, self glorifying white kids who really are ignorant and full of shit.

>>11056718
>durrrr wypipo
Post your skin so everyone can laugh

>>11056685
>White vegans are just a bunch of self centered hypocrites looking for attention.
>If they really cared about the lives of animals, they wouldn't wear cotton, wouldn't eat mass farmed grains, and wouldn't drive cars.

this. Vegans have very little self awareness.

>>11056706
Vegan agriculture? Do meat eaters grow their crops on Mars or something?

>>11056721

Yes little vegan. You are better than everyone else.

>tell everyone to stop direct mass murder of animals through something simple as diet

>WHY HAVENT YOU CURED MY AUTISM YET VEGKEK

>>11056718
>No. They're just obnoxious, self glorifying, upper class, white kids who really are ignorant and full of shit.

FYP

>>11056734
I hope belittling people passive aggressively online while criticizing people for the same thing gives you fulfillment because clearly nothing else does

>>11056736
>>11056734
>>11056724
>>11056718
>>11056706
>>11056703
>>11056693
>>11056689
>>11056685

>>11056685

Pop culture veganism is purely an upper class white people phenomenon. It allows the aimless rich kids to look down on others and make them feel better about their idle lives.

>>11056759
How many times are you going to respond to your own post about white people? The unique post count hasn’t changed once

>>11056768
Are you suggesting that he is wrong?

>>11056768

Hit too close to home, I see. Go cry in your safe space, white children.

>>11056769
Oh look. You found out how to phonepost

>>11056774
>is insecure about not only being a subhuman for his morals but also his skin color

>projects this unto people who loves animals that arent him

Sad

>>11056759
>Pop culture veganism is purely an upper class white people phenomenon. It allows the aimless rich kids to look down on others and make them feel better about their idle lives.

I'mma keep bumping this cuz it's so true.

>>11056714
>I can't win the argument with normal debate, so I'll just throw a tantrum like a 5 year old.
Yeah, you're a dumb shit, that's what you are. At least try to learn something/.

You missing the point by a lightyear (again), so repeat after me:
It's not about law.
It's about who is more powerful.
Again: it's about who is more powerful.
It doesn't change on whatever island in the middle of nowhere, you absolute ridiculously dumb fuck.

Why are all ideologues so god damn dense? Stop being an ideologue, it's bad for your brain, anon.

>>11056775
Nope, new poster here. And you didn't answer my question.
Care to try again?

>>11056789
>i cant win the debate
What debate? Nobody’s debating legal semantics, you said you were going to expand on this but didn’t

>its about who is powerful
You didn’t make that point at all. Or just assumes everyone understands your autism garble. You’re not powerful

>ideologues
>while spouting a bunch of shit about power
Fitting picture, monkey fuck

>>11056759
>Pop culture veganism is purely an upper class white people phenomenon. It allows the aimless rich kids to look down on others and make them feel better about their idle lives.

This triggers the spoiled white 30yo boomervegans still living off of their parents.

>>11056790
>Nope new poster
Mhm ;)

>answer muh question
You’re insecure about your own status as an animal and project this unto people like me

Next question

>>11056803

You're not doing a very good job of evangelizing. Maybe you should take a few more Nutrisci 101 courses at your community college.

>>11056548
>only five
had six hard boiled with my coffee this morn

>>11056803
>I just keep claiming the discussion is law even though it's been repeated over and over it's not about law.
Hopeless...

>You’re not powerful
Ah, making it about me personally now? Like clockwork with you raging dipshits.
Alright, let me explain, as I'm a patient person: People control the animals, my retarded friend. People are more powerful, so they can. If we weren't more powerful, then we wouldn't be able, now would we? Wrap your tiny brain around that. You can't, because it's too tiny.

>Fitting picture
Sure is. Even a monkey would see that you're stupid as fuck. Yet you keep talking. Even though you have nothing to add anymore.
But by all means, go on...

>>11056812
>Mhm ;)
Sure, because there couldn't POSSIBLY be more than one person here who thinks you are a fucking idiot.

>You’re insecure about your own status as an animal and project this unto people like me
That's not an answer. You were asked a yes/no question. Your answer should be a yes or a no.

So let's try yet again.....do you think anon was wrong when he stated that veganism is an upper class white fad?

>>11056540
>This is a crime

I'll say! Both animals need to be cooked to an internal temperature of 125F and let carry over heat bring it up to a succulent medium rare!

>>11056715
>6’9 vegan
Were you always a vegan?

>>11056920
go ahead then, be the leading example

Do any of you people understand the long term consequences of using livestock as a means of food? With our ever so growing population more land and animals will be required and the toll they have on our planets environment is devastating in the present and in the future as well. For example the destruction of land in the amazon rainforest, so many trees must be cleared for more livestock further harming the earth we all live on, a plant based diet is far more sustainable and healthier in general.

>>11056971
There is a distinction between LESS meat and NO meat, anon.

I agree 100% that the current situation with industrialized factory farming is horrible in many ways, and is unsustainable. But that doesn't mean we have to eliminate ALL meat eating. We can simply reduce it.

The system which has sustained most of humanity throughout history is the best: small scale local agriculture. The diet is mostly plant-based, supplemented with small amounts of meat, raised synergistically with crops.

>>11056971
Did you know it’s possible to raise livestock and improve the land at the same time? The problem isn’t what’s being raised it’s how it’s being raised.

Is that goat in a car? LOL who puts a goat in a car?
Get out of that car, goat, you can't drive.
Silly goat.

>>11056984
But ARE we reducing it? are YOU reducing it?

I'm 80% vegetarian due to being a cheapskate, does that count?

>>11057015
Yeah vegans are totally reducing animal dependency by eating organic crops fertilized with animal byproducts. Don’t worry you can always get non-organic which is fertilized with petroleum byproducts.

Me. I had 2 eggs, 3 strips of bacon, a sausage link, toast, and OJ for breakfast. FOr lunch I had a turkey club and tea. Inbetween when I felt a little hungry I had a bit of beef jerky

>>11057048
>edgy

>>11056689
>cotton, grains and cars
You know none of those come from an animal right

>>11057074
I feel that posting graphic images of dead animals is far edgier than having eggs and bacon for breakfast

>>11057077
All of those things result in significant numbers of dead animals, indirectly.

>>11056595
You're right, it belongs to the state :^)

>>11056551
Unironically based

>>11056548
Those cholesterol levels...yikes

>>11056685
They're still better than you who does not do anything for the plight of animals.

>>11056714
>hurr hurr ill kill you
Yes and so will the owners when you try to "redistribute" their property to the "proletariat". I suppose you get points for causing a response despite the lack of subtlety.

>>11056622
Go be a faggot libertarian retard somewhere else.

>>11056715
Why is your ankle on the inside of your leg

>>11057117
What do you think would happen to domesticated pigs and cows if they were let loose in the wild?

>>11057141
Not an argument.

>>11057143
Why not? They would die.

>>11057153
>>11057141
domesticated pigs adjust frighteningly well when turned loose. cows? i don't even know. there's so many fucking cows being farmed right now. that'd probably annihalate several ecosystems.

>>11057015
>But ARE we reducing it?
I doubt it. Regardless of the answer to that question doesn't it make more sense to advocate for LESS rather than NO meat eating? After all, the "less" approach is not only more enviornmentally friendly, it's also easier to get people onboard with.

>> are YOU reducing it?
Yes. I consume little meat. Most of it comes from hunting. The rest comes from my chickens, and heritage breed meat that I buy from small farmers. I also grow a lot of my own veggies.

>>11057163
Well pigs are smart so they could probably learn by experimenting. Cows are dumb as a rock. Both would still freeze to death anywhere with even mild winters because they have been bred to have almost no fur.

>>11057216
pigs actually turn feral pretty quick and even grow out a thick coat and tusks