/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>10977665
If these "pink tax" products are actually the same as their non-pink equivalents, why is there even a problem?
Are women incapable of picking out and purchasing products that aren't pink?
I don't get it.

fuck yeah patriarchy
fuck you woman go kys or pay extra and get to see another day
fuck yeah testosterone i'm fuckin diamonds
fuck women physically mentally and financially too
fuck yeah i'll make your wallet as much of a roast beef as your vag
fuck girls, boys rule eternally
fuck yes

Wow, thin and attractive people LOVE Burger King!

Burger king is the crusader of social justice. Ask their workers in Indonesia.

In Brazil, chicken fries are called coxinha fries, thanks to the popular food here.

I'm just pissed that they raised the price on the 10pc nuggets from 1.50 to 1.80

who the fuck even goes to the king for chicken bits anyway shoot them
that burger sauce has some crack or some shit in it better than drugs

>>10977665
Sort of lessens their point, since the women weren't given a choice with the chicken fries, but are choosing to pay more for identical womens' products.

>>10977978
>expecting feminist propaganda to make sense
Companies don't have to change shit. It's a free market, the women who fall for it quite literally need to get smarter. Capitalism would work and the companies would be forced to lower their prices to compete if the people weren't so fucking stupid.

>Women are so stupid they will pay double if you hypnotize them with a color.

>>10977823
>cocks in ya fries

Theres two ways this could go
One, angry feminists who dont get it get angry with the cashier or the company, do stuff like blow their twitter up getting other feminists to do the same
Two, dumb bimbos think its cool to have like a new pink starbucks drink and miss the point completely
Whoever is doing the marketing over at BK should probably be fired, this is just fuckin stupid and risky

>>10978066
Kind of weird when it comes to food everyone is a cheapskate, but when it comes to luxury products (I use luxury loosely, I just mean products that you don't necessarily NEED) women and some men will spend ludicrous amounts of money just for the name on the box or the color of the item.

Clothing is especially bad for this. People pay thousands for clothing that is no better than something you could have created for you by a local tailor for cheap. But then they go and stuff their face with the cheapest and most processed disgusting junk they can. They care more about their appearance than the fuel they put in their body.
It's sad

>>10978081
anon you fucking cunt

I'm actually happy they did this because now I have an excuse to talk about politics on /ck/

Women are inferior to men

>>10978096
It's not too surprising that's the case.
Clothes are permanent (or at least relatively long-lasting) products that you also have displayed for everyone to see as you walk around in public.
While the summation of your eating habits over time is a permanent (or at least relatively long-lasting) thing too, each individual instance of you purchasing and eating food is a lot more transient / limited in scope to just an experience you're buying that'll last a few minutes before you forget all about it.

>>10977665
Oh gee, if those pink razors cost more because they aimed to women and they particular type of shaving that are totally different from men, oh geez, I should buy those razors aimed for men!

I'm convinced that being a catholic priest is like prison sex.

>>10978001
>Women need to get smarter.
But that's sexist Anon, they won't be victims if they do that!

>>10978157
The blades are exactly the same, anon. A mans blade won't all of a sudden make your shred your legs and armpits to hell.

It's called the free market, bitch. Buy blue stuff if you don't like it. Fucking hell.
The "pink tax" ONLY exists because women are stupid enough to buy that shit.

>>10978157
>particular type of shaving
>totally different
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>10977665
>Pink tax repeal act.
>Callmycongress.
>They think this "tax" is something that Congress actually put into law some time ago (probably when Trump got elected) and needs to actually be repealed on a congressional level.
>This is something that we, the tax payers need to waste Congresses time on, working on removing a tax that does not even exist, but in the minds of stupid people with too much of (most of the time) someone else's money.

>>10977665
Advertising is the cancer that ruined this society.

The last thread got deleted?

>>10978179
>>10978186
The blades on womens razors are longer because women have a wider surface area to shave. Mens aren't as long because we generally don't shave our legs or armpits

>>10978209
But we all shave our heads because all men are evil Nazis.

>>10978081
no, dummy. cocks are chickens

>>10978197
OP here, I actually made this thread the moment I learned this was a thing, I made a thread about it on /pol/ too but I figured it was relevant enough to belong on both boards so hoping it isnt deleted

Advertisers think less of you. They think of you as some kind of slightly more sentient type of dog.

>>10978236
Well, women are bitches, so...

Protip; if you're shaving with some overpriced bullshit like a Mach 3 or what you're every bit as retarded as those women.
Use a safety razor.

>>10978194
Letting women vote was a mistake.

>>10978249
But muh dollar shave club...

>>10978209
Gonna need some proof, that sounds like bullshit and none of the articles comparing men's and women's razors that I just read through actually cite a length difference.

>>10978209
Until quite recently most women used men's razors for their legs and armpits just fine.
Gillette found out about this and naturally made a pink girly version so they could make money off the fact that people are idiots.
Many women still use single-use razors and more and more are moving back to safety razors because it's so much cheaper and works very nicely.
Women do shave a larger surface, but since that surface is not flat they don't really benefit from larger blades.

>>10978209
My cheek has a larger surface area than the calf, shin, or armpit of a woman. Cheeks are big, necks can be bigger. My shin is like one of the thinnest parts on my body (if I placed a razor on it, the sides of the razor would be touching air) and women are even smaller and generally don't have man sized legs.

>>10978267
That's the point. Buy the cheaper version you dumb bitch.

>>10978277
But if they don't buy the pink razor the patriarchy wins.

>>10978276
It's bullshit regardless because the lengths aren't actually different in the way that other anon is suggesting, at least not as some industry standard.
At absolute best maybe on very specific brand / product line of women's razors has a modified length, but that's definitely not some normal male / female razor difference.

>>10978249
I grew up with my dad teaching me how to use a straight edge. It seems pretentious, but it really does give me a closer shave at leave. Nicked myself pretty bad a few times while learning.

Wouldn't recommend someone going out and getting one, because then you just look like a fucking asshole unless you are an oldschool italian barber. I know because I look like a fucking asshole.

>>10978277
It sure wasn't the point of the fucking post I was replying to, genius.

>>10978287
at least*
I think I had a stroke.

>burger king makes the most god tier ad in 2017
>makes the cringiest in 2018
What did they mean by this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_taxBRRZ6s

>>10978194
>Pink tax repeal act
>The act allows the Federal Trade Commission to enforce violations and gives State Attorneys General the authority to take civil action on behalf of consumers wronged by discriminatory practices.

If you literally did .5 seconds of research and didn't do some retarded brain gymnastics you'd know that isn't true and the act is logical and benefits everyone

>>10978290
It was my point of not your point

Why don't women just buy the generic product that works or the mens product?

>>10978295
>Willfully paying more for a product when a cheaper one is sitting right next to it is discriminatory.
Alright buttercup.

>>10978307
It's the fact that most people don't even realize

>>10977679
>Are women incapable of picking out and purchasing products that aren't pink?

Yes

>>10978287
They're not as difficult or dangerous to use as people think. I guess everybody gets a nick the second time he uses one because he gets cocky, but if you take your time and pay attention to what you're doing they're great.
I prefer a safety razor because it's faster for me but if I have a full week's worth of beard it's usually easier to take off with a straight razor.
You can get those for regular razor blades that you change, by the way, so you don't have to deal with stropping and all that.

>>10977665
Fast food shilling identity politics. Surely this can't backfire.

>>10978318
Women will get taken out into the streets and beaten for trying to buy a product that isn't pink.
It's the law.

>>10978317
It's also the fact that most people are braindead sheep. Just like you. Government can't touch a free market anyways, so get fucked for wasting my tax dollars and the people's time.

>>10978327
Have you ever taken one of your gf's makeup brushes and rubbed it on your dick? Those things feel soft and great.

>>10978343
i mean seems like you would be the one getting fucked if im wasting your tax dollars. i stopped paying taxes years ago anyway fag

>>10978352
"I live with my mom as a 26 year old NEET, lol get fucked!"

Yeah, sure. Have fun when your only provider dies or becomes physically incapable of providing for you and themselves.

>>10978258
You know what was the first thing to happen when women got the vote? They banned alcohol. Women vote for retarded shit, greatest mistake for democracy.

>>10978359
>not paying taxes=living with mom
lol

>>10978364
Then you are going to get fucked by the IRS. Only neets don't pay taxes, because they don't work. If you have any income, you pay them, or go to jail.

>>10978372
B-B-BBBUT DONAGALD DRUMPFH

>>10978362
Honestly can't say much to argue against that, prohibition is pretty objectively retarded and did immediately follow women getting the vote.

>>10978380
they didnt have science back then they couldnt predict all the negatives that came with it

>>10978382
The mobsters didn't need science to realize it was a really good idea.

>>10978266
also why not just buy then men's razor? what, you scared of blue? I'd buy the damn pink one for my face if it was cheaper.

>>10978351
I have and it does. The ones in the pic are all shaving brushes, though, and some of those are a little rough on the weenus.

>>10978343
>free market
>tax dollars
Anon...

>>10978405
The pink tax makes it literally illegal for women to buy the blue ones.
They can go to jail for it.

>>10978372
>Then you are going to get fucked by the IRS.
>If you have any income, you pay them, or go to jail.
Not him, and I actually do pay my taxes, but that's completely retarded and wrong.
Even H&R Block will tell you that's not true, in spite of how they have an incentive to tell you it *is* true since they're trying to sell you a product that protects you from legal repercussions related to tax laws:
https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/tax-responsibilities/prision-for-tax-evasion/
>Here’s the reality: Very few taxpayers go to jail for tax evasion. In 2015, the IRS indicted only 1,330 taxpayers out of 150 million for legal-source tax evasion.
Your chance of winning certain $1 million lotteries is greater than your chance of facing legal repercussions if you're a tax evader.

>>10978410
>Actually took the time to experiment with the shaving brush on the ol Johnson.
A true soldier.

>>10978405
>I'd buy the damn pink one for my face if it was cheaper.
This
It's not like you have to carry it around and show it to people either. Nobody fucking knows what my razors look like. Why would I care?

>>10978431
>Not taking a pic of every retarded little purchase you make.
Someone isn't going to be an instagram star.

>>10977679
>Are women incapable of picking out and purchasing products that aren't pink?

Its more that if the product is pink, their feminism/vagina forces them to buy it.

>>10978096
>local tailor
Right, I have one of those right between the cobbler's shop and the apothecary.

>>10978504
Just go to a men's warehouse you tard. They have tailors and will tailor suits to you.

It's like you're all willfully ignorant.

Women are socialized to be pretty, feminine, smell like flowers etc etc since that's the "ideal beauty"

So obviously they are going to gravitate towards the pink/flowery products in the aisle and not even look at the prices for men's items. Companies take advantage of this. Since this has been brought to the attention of mainstream media, a lot of women (including my girlfriend) have made the switch to generic or mens products. I believe commercials like this are beneficial in bringing to light the stupidity of a "pink tax" so that more women can make the conscious decision not to spend an extra dollar for a pink box.

And think about it this way, if things were reversed, wouldn't you feel strange having to shave with pic related everyday? Or at the very least, you wouldn't naturally gravitate towards it in a supermarket.

>>10978520
Maybe if women weren't so stupid they wouldn't need to be handheld.

>>10978520
I would if it was cheaper, I look at everything.

>>10978520
Go fuck off with your social construct bullshit. That is libshit propaganda. The fact is our speciese evolved this way because women want to attract the best male to mate with and have children. You can't undo a million years of human and its precursors evolution with feminist nonsense spewed by lesbian professors.

>>10978520
>if things were reversed
Sex differences aren't really "reversible" in the way people pretend.
It's not a symmetrical relationship in the first place, so when you try to "reverse" it you always end up with stupid answers (same reason why complaining about being disproportionately prosecuted for sexual assault just because you're male is stupid, it pretends men and women are the same and that "fair" treatment should involve treating them identically).

>>10978520
Also you're "what if things were reversed" hypothetical is stupid because the products we buy are more often neutral / without any sort of sex specific decoration.
It's not like most of us have clothes or hygiene products with a bunch of "masculine" shit plastered all over it like war movie scenes or something.
Women aren't pressured to buy flowery / pink stuff. There wouldn't be any sort of pressure against a woman buying plain / neutral products. Nobody is bullied for using plain pattern-less grey colored products, that's stupid.

>>10978520
Also your "what if things were reversed" hypothetical is stupid because the products we buy are more often neutral / without any sort of sex specific decoration.
It's not like most of us have clothes or hygiene products with a bunch of "masculine" shit plastered all over it like war movie scenes or something.
Women aren't pressured to buy flowery / pink stuff. There wouldn't be any sort of pressure against a woman buying plain / neutral products. Nobody is bullied for using plain pattern-less grey colored products, that's stupid.

>>10978540
It's not just women- everyone is handheld by some form of media. To think you are an exception is arrogant.

>>10978544
>I look at everything.
I highly doubt that, since looking at everything in the supermarket is just a waste of time. It literally does not make sense to do so.

>>10978574
>The fact is our speciese evolved this way because women want to attract the best male to mate with and have children.

What exactly are you trying to say here? If anything, you're proving my point. Human evolution has lead to women wanting to appeal to men, thus seeking out femininely marketed products. The problem is that these items are priced much higher than the one that is marketed to men. Anyways, you have to be 18 or older to post on 4chan bud.

>>10978591
I'm failing to see why you couldn't reverse this specific situation to illustrate the point being made.

>>10978612
>we buy are more often neutral / without any sort of sex specific decoration
Untrue. Just because it is subconscious does not mean it isn't there.

>It's not like most of us have clothes or hygiene products with a bunch of "masculine" shit plastered all over it
You don't buy men's cut clothing? And again, most of the marketing is subconscious. Men's products tend to have darker colors, be either blue or red, square fonts, different scent names, etc etc

>>10978666
>You don't buy men's cut clothing?
I have the same clothes in my 30s that I originally acquired in my early 20s, and it's just a few pairs of regular / unfitted blue jeans and some shirts that anyone could wear with no designs on them and no special fitting there either.
>Men's products tend to have darker colors, be either blue or red, square fonts, different scent names, etc etc
Gray products with no patterns aren't "male" specific.
It's seriously not a reversible situation for most of these cases. Women's products are blatantly trying to be feminine in loud and obvious ways. It's really women's products vs. normal products, not women's products vs. men's products, for the most part (yes, you can find some male specific branding, but that's the exception not the rule).

>>10978666
Also another reason why it's not reversible: I wear some minimalist clothes (underwear, shirt, pants socks, and shoes) because that's the minimum of what I need to be able to show up at work and not have people thinking I'm homeless and/or calling the cops on me.
Women wear way more than the minimum required most of the time, not because they need to but because they actively want to do some weird kind of expressive behavior thing where they try to promote an image / style for themselves.

>>10978694
>I have the same clothes in my 30s that I originally acquired in my early 20s,
Please understand that this is not the norm and shouldn't be the standard you hold the rest of the country to.

>>10978694
>it's just a few pairs of regular / unfitted blue jeans and some shirts that anyone could wear
If you think a woman could wear men's clothing and look remotely presentable you are failing to understand the core of the issue at hand.

>>10978694
>Gray products with no patterns aren't "male" specific.
Except they are- darker gray/black packaging is a subconscious flag that the product is for men- even if it doesn't outright say "men's" on it. This is one of the first things anyone in marketing or graphic design learns.

>>10978666
>I'm failing to see why you couldn't reverse this specific situation to illustrate the point being made.
Because women are the ones doing something special with their products, not men. You're acting like it's two different opposing special things when it's really just normal things vs. feminine things.
You're being intentionally obtuse if you don't recognize a man dressing up like a woman would be a lot more noticeable as unusual than a woman dressing up "like a man" (which really just means dressing up in normal casual clothes without drawing attention to themselves with feminine accessories).
Men and women aren't opposites like up and down or black and white. Women are smaller, softer versions of men with less hair, less physical strength, higher pitched voices, and everything else that comes with the burden of pregnancy / menstrual cycles.
The forced idea of "opposites" here is part of this retarded just-world fallacy people have where they assume everything tends to be fair and equal, so women aren't less than men, they're just equal and opposite in lots of mysterious and convoluted ways that fall apart when you try to examine them.

>>10978666
They are not getting pink flowery crap because they are marketed that, they are marketed that because its what they want. There is no pink tax, its just the market reacting how it should.

>>10978727
Black, white, and gray are the definition of neutral colors. They don't say anything, they aren't even really colors at all.
If those things are more associated with men it's because men are more OK with not making a spectacle out of their appearance, not because those things actually have any "masculine" characteristics.
Women could try not making a spectacle out of their appearance too.

>>10978694
>>10978694
>>10978694
>Women's products are blatantly trying to be feminine in loud and obvious ways
So do men's products.

>>10978694
>It's really women's products vs. normal products
No, its not. Generic products are usually the cheapest, then men's products, then women's products.

>>10978707
>>10978707
>I wear some minimalist clothes (underwear, shirt, pants socks, and shoes) because that's the minimum of what I need to be able to show up at work
Please understand the the minimum of what is acceptable for woman is different than a man. There are certain expectations that women need to meet with their appearance to be taken seriously that do not apply to men.

>>10978707
>Women wear way more than the minimum required most of the time
So do men, but this is not the issue we are discussing. The problem is not what men and women decide to do with themselves, but rather than men's products are cheaper than women's for the same product.

>>10978752
>You're acting like it's two different opposing special things when it's really just normal things vs. feminine things.
I am specifically discussing products marketed towards men vs marketed towards women.

>>10978752
>You're being intentionally obtuse if you don't recognize a man dressing up like a woman
In this specific situation, I am discussing a man using a women's razor rather than a men's razor. I understand that not all scenarios in gender based issues can be reversed, but in this specific one it can.

>>10978752
>Men and women aren't opposites like up and down or black and white.
I understand this- but that doesn't justify a higher price for female-marketed goods when compared to male marketed goods.
>>10978760
>they are marketed that because its what they want
Please read what you wrote here several times before attempting to post again. People do not inherently gravitate to pink or blue. Actually, in the early 1900's, pink was considered a men's color and blue was feminine.

>>10978760
Yeah, that's a good point.
Why the fuck would a marketer want to try to force people to start liking things they don't already like when they could just market to what they do already like?
That doesn't make any sense, you try to exploit what you know people are want in coming up with marketing, you don't try to disregard what people want and try to force them into something different.

>>10978783
Fuck off back to your shithole you cretin. And while you are there, learn what marketing is.

>>10978784
But even if women do inherently want the pink shit- why is it more expensive than the blue shit? That's the issue, not that women like to be feminine.

>>10978783
>Actually, in the early 1900's, pink was considered a men's color and blue was feminine.
That's a baseless myth, try to be a little less gullible.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229437155_The_Twentieth_Century_Reversal_of_Pink-Blue_Gender_Coding_A_Scientific_Urban_Legend

>>10978795
Since you've resorted to namecalling, I'm going to assume you have nothing else of value to say.

>>10978798
>But even if women do inherently want the pink shit- why is it more expensive than the blue shit?
Because women are stupid enough to pay more for it.
If it's truly a reversible situation like you're claiming than the free market would result in vendors charging men an equally higher rate for everything you're claiming is "male specific" (which of course mostly isn't "male specific" at all and just neutral instead, but there you go).

>>10978798
>But even if women do inherently want the pink shit- why is it more expensive than the blue shit?
Because women are stupid enough to pay more for it.
If it's truly a reversible situation like you're claiming then the free market would result in vendors charging men an equally higher rate for everything you're claiming is "male specific" (which of course mostly isn't "male specific" at all and just neutral instead, but there you go).

>>10977665
If I wasn't boycotting Burger King for serving shitty fast food I would now be boycotting them over this. I don't know how this chain keeps their doors open.

Let the market work itself out you dumb feminists

>>10978835
But they would rather over complicate it and tear down as many industries as they can along the way.

>>10978809
Where the fuck do you think you are? This isn't leddit you faggot.

I see the shitlords ITT haven't gotten the memo.

Newsflash: you LOVE this ad!

>>10978804
I was under the understanding that Time magazine and Ladie's Home Journal both claimed pink as a boy's color and blue as a girl's color around that time period.

>>10978814
>Because women are stupid enough to pay more for it.
Just as you probably do not look at the women's aisle for certain products, women do not typically look at the men's aisle. People are not stupid for minimizing their time spent shopping.
Now that the issue is being brought to light, women are making the switch to generic or even men's products in response.

>>10978835
>>10978841
This is exactly that- the market working itself out. With backlash against higher prices for female-marketed goods, women are putting pressure on companies to change the price.

>>10977665
that last message in the shop was the based and redpilled message: it's your fault, women.

>>10978877
>I was under the understanding that Time magazine and Ladie's Home Journal both claimed pink as a boy's color and blue as a girl's color around that time period.
That's addressed here:
>>10978804
>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229437155_The_Twentieth_Century_Reversal_of_Pink-Blue_Gender_Coding_A_Scientific_Urban_Legend
The reason it's a baseless myth is because everyone went overboard in trying to extrapolate from a couple of anecdotal examples instead of looking at the actual evidence for color association trends.
If you read what was written in those couple of anecdotal examples you'll also see they actually refer to blue as a male color and pink as a female color being the then current norm when discussing how they're recommending the opposite i.e. They were just a couple of contrarian articles, not evidence of a reversed color association scheme in the past.
>Now that the issue is being brought to light, women are making the switch to generic or even men's products in response.
How did this "issue" end up a women specific thing in the first place if men and women are interchangeable opposites and are both marketed to and women haven't done anything different from men in their buying behavior?
I think you need to pick one or the other here. Either women were treated differently from men because they actually behave differently and men wouldn't net marketers more money if they tried the same thing on them, or women don't behave differently from men and both just follow their social influences, in which case it'd make no sense why women would be stiffed with higher prices but not men.

>>10978157
It's called brand loyalty anon. Women tend to have it more than men.
If I see stores own anti dandruff 2in1 is cheaper than head n shoulders I'm buying it. My gf however has to have her Revlon Panten pro v or her is ruined for months

>>10978372
I gross 300,000 a year in rental income from my real estate and havent had to pay taxes in 5 years. Get fucked wagie.

>>10977665
so the jews are taking BK from us...great. What's next? Is Wendy going to come out and say we dont deserve tendies??
It's not just a pink box at the drug store, it's another product, if you dont want to pay more for the "same" thing, then dont.

>>10978877
>This is exactly that- the market working itself out.
Well in a sense, but it's more like, other companies literally SPELLING it out for women to stop being retarded and buying overpriced pink shit, but somehow they managed to blame the companies for women's retardness.
If this campaign is effective, some companies will lower their prices to avoid possible fallout in the future from feminists not because of current supply and demand.

>>10979120
More like they will jack up everyones prices "for equality"

>>10979024
so you haven't been paying income tax on 300k for the last 5 years
you're gonna get fucked

>>10978752
/thread

>>10979024
I'd delete this post if I were you. It won't be pretty when the tax jews in your country finds out that you haven't been paying the reparations for Israel.

>>10977665
so there's a box for no specified sex and a box for girls?

>>10979471
>t. Based IRS agent who easily nails his IP and ravages him for every penny possible
Ahhh, the land of freedom, so comfy.

>>10978294

When tumblr gets their hands on something, that tends to happen.

>>10977665
Automatically associated pink with femininity is incredibly cis privileged

>>10978510
Yeah let me just buy a suit for casual wear after I head over to the candle stick maker.

>>10979730
Don't forget, the apothecary has a sale on leaches.

>>10979730
Tailors still exist because a made-to-fit suit will always be superior to a template fit.

>>10978096
Shut up i'm /fa/ af

>>10977665
>that like/dislike ratio

>>10977665
>I see you are a girl. I'll give you the chick container, because you are a girl. It's pink and the chicken has lipstick and long eyelashes. You'll like it, because that's what chicks like you like.
>It's OK because it's the same price as the one for people.

>>10978157
best bit is mens razors are still jewing you. I bought a D/E razor and 100 blades 7 years ago for £20 and I'm about three quarters through the pack.

I get less burn and irritation since its one blade on my face.

Gilette is one big Jewish meme

>>10977665
Get woke, go broke.

>>10977857
How will you ever survive now?

>>10978157
>Different shaving style
We're all just trying to get rid of hair, what the fuck are you smoking.

Yknow I'm actually a girl and was going to give a throwaway e mail so we could talk but your immaturity ruined it

>>10977665
What about for other stuff like hair dye which is more expensive because it says "for men" on the container. I guess that doesn't count.

>>10977665
a pink t-84 calc is 20 bucks cheaper than a non-pink one.

>>10977665
Put cute anime girls on it, watch weebs pay double for it.

It's called the weeb tax.

>>10979993
no? They exist because they've memed themselves into surviving. If they all disappeared, nobody would notice. get a real job

>>10980824
What makes you think I'm a tailor? Because I can afford a suit that fits?

>>10980701
It works on weebs, horsefuckers, women, and any brain dead sub species of human.

>>10980701
>>10981014
dont forget gamers

>>10981017
I thought I mentioned sub-humans.

>>10981014
don't forget men, the dumbfucks who give their daughters, girlfriends, and wives money to waste.

What is the purpose of this product when people are just going to buy the regular chicken fries anyway?

This doesn't really seem to make sense even from a political standpoint when the "Chick Fries" was never really a thing before this promotion started.

>>10981123
Alright, I guess they are protesting a "pink tax" thing which makes this seem reasonable since taxing items for using a color is beyond r-worded.

>>10980104
yet people say we are in the worst generation ever, decadence and all.
This proves that SJW's are just a noisy minority whom opinions don't matter to anyone.

>>10978520
OK BUT WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH MY HAMBURGER

>>10981136
It seems reasonable, but companies only charge what customers are willing to pay. This whole thing stinks of mansplaining.

>>10977665
>This entire thread
when /ck/ discusses /biz/ better than the /biz/raelis. I fucking love this board.

>multibillion dollar corporation is so woke!
Capitalism was a mistake

>>10979471
I don't make 300k, but I make ~145k after bonus, and legally, I haven't paid taxes in 3 years. You just gotta know what to claim, and how to maximize your deductions

>>10978365
the true choice. Cheaper, provides a better shave and less waste.

>>10977665
>Pink Chicken Fries packaging available only at select BURGER KING® restaurants in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco and Miami

They're advertising commie shit to commies. Big deal. I went to Burger King today and didn't see any pinko shit.

>>10977665
so basically women are stupid and will pay more for pink shit

So.. Burger King is willing to burn down the entire post WWII corporate/advertising order just to make a buck? That's how bad business is for them right now? Wow

>>10982089
this gimmick is a last ditch effort before bk has to shut down, anon
it's not going to bump up sales
don't read too much into it

>>10977665
>let's insult a customer base that never even buys our stuff anyway
>the misogynists will love it
Amazing stratagem

>>10982123
>women are dumb lol
>EAT MY BURGER
extraordinary strategery

>>10979120
The video doesn't seem to be about educating women on making smart decisions, no. It's about demanding intervention from the State in the Market.
I'm surprised they didn't go all out and try to get a law on the books that says you can't use a clown to sell burgers.

>>10980385
Truth

>>10981721
So where's the other 155k going?

>>10982089
PEOPLE are stupid. It's not just the ladies.

>>10982014
I don't know that insulting big city commies to their face is necessarily going to bring in big city commies back to a fast food chain like BK. Whoever thought up this campaign should be fired. Better yet, just close BK all together.

>>10982147
Men aren't really human, so yes, it is just women.

>>10982159
Men are essentially drones who live purely just to serve the women they fall in love with. They are nothing more than slaves to women. Female spiders eat the males who copulate with them. This is not much different. Men think themselves superior. They do not realize that their intelligence, musculature and adventurousness are pre-programmed into them by nature so that when they meet "the woman of their lives" all of those things will be at her and her offspring's service.

>280 upvotes
>7600 downvotes
based

>>10982172
Yes.

get woke go broke

>>10977665
They should do a Black Tax where the fries are just free.

>>10982183
That doesn't even make any sense. Fuck off, Carlos.

>>10982188
You're right. They should do a White Tax where you have to pay for all of the shit that nigs steal.

>>10980824
>no? They exist because they've memed themselves into surviving.
Except that the suits you buy at stores are incredibly comfortable, unlike the ones you buy at pret-a-porter stores. In fact, a good way to tell if somebody is not particularly wealthy is have them complain that suits in general is uncomfortable to wear: not only a tailor-made suit will last you for a long time (meaning that, once you buy one, you can wear it up to your funeral and sill look good), they are MEANT to adjust better at your changes of bulk than ready-made suits.

.t I have worn both. Ready-made suits: not even once.

>hire women
>same productivity, accept lower pay

>make product pink
>women pay 80% more for it

>>10982230
>not even once
then you admit you don't know what you're talking about

>>10982230
One of my professors wore the same suit every day and I could smell it from the back row

>>10979696
So niggers are bad for stealing, but you are in the clear? What's the difference? Dumb faggot lolbertarian.

>>10977679
>>10978318
>>10978486
You joke but basically, yes. This: >>10978520
anon is correct. They're conditioned, and then that conditioning is exploited. Is it on them to break that? Yeah kind of.

also I can't lie that spa razor looks nice I wouldn't mind my face to be lush and smooth or my balls

>>10982367
can you post a picture of your lush balls, please

>>10978520
I would, but then I'd see the price tag and be discouraged. As a guy, there's nothing like freshly shaven legs underneath cold bedsheets.
but my other stuff that is the same price, like hair brush, towels, pot holders, magnets and other little things like clips or post its, slippers, phone case, all of that is pink/cute/flowery

>>10982360
>lolbertarian
What do you think that word means and where exactly did he defend thieving darkies?

>>10978962
But social influences on women CAN condition them to pay more for 'feminine' products because being feminine is what's expected of them from society. You'd probably find a woman wearing a man's suit pretty funny, wouldn't you?

>>10982381
The only clowns who think taxation is theft are lolbertarians. He is implying that IRS agents are pathetic for doing their job of catching tax evaders. If you think it's pathetic, clearly you think taxation is bogus. Did that make it all clear, retard?

I never said he defended niggers. I am assuming he also thinks theft from thugs is bad but seems to think theft from the government is okay.

>>10977679
>>10978318
Yeah, they seem to be to a certain degree. I've watched a fair few videos on a particular female focused finance youtube chanel who have used razors as their main object on this topic. You can get "womens" razors for a price, "mens" razors for less, and then just blades for even less.

Yes, its just fucking stupid. If women could stop buying gendered products, there wouldn't be an issue

>>10978849
Insults are accompanied by arguments here retard

>>10978096
I mean, I know I'm on a food board but I tend to be the opposite. My biggest expenses are food, booze and bills

>>10982371

>>10982172
>t. incel

>>10982424
What you said was "So niggers are bad for stealing, but you are in the clear?"
So it follows that you think Libertarians think they're allowed to steal. Because you're a fucking retard.
Let me guess; you are such a bootlicking cuck that you think NOT paying taxes is theft.
Was that what you meant?

>>10982424
>theft from the government

>>10982459
>hahaha this post is so stup-
>wait a second
>it's s- saying things i simply c- can't deny
>w- whatever will i do now
>i know
>i'll call him an incel

>>10978151
I wish clothes were permanent, I wear them for years, they often start falling apart before I want them to

>>10978249
>>10978287
I'm on a safety and looking at a straight, I just feel like it will in theory give me more control. I took up my dads old safety, it might not be the best shape but I find I knick myself more often than I'd like

>>10982485
You may just need to slow down or get a safety razor that's less aggressive (i.e. has less of the blade exposed. Some of them let you vary that)
If you switch to a straight razor you'll still have to go slow and focused at least for a while until you're comfortable with it.
Like I said in an earlier post; everybody nicks himself the SECOND time he uses one.

>>10982460
That's literally what I said you drooling brainlet. Holy shit. I hope you are deliberately acting retarded.
>>10982464
>lolbertarian weenie detected

>>10982460
Also, yes, stealing from the government is theft. Holy shit. How dumb can one chimp be?

>>10977665
>they had to be so blatant with it because otherwise women would pay for it and not think twice

>>10982497
That was indeed what you said. I guess it was just too fucking stupid for someone who doesn't suck Government cock to believe.

You ACTUALLY think that keeping your own money that you were paid for YOUR work is "theft from the Government"
The unit cost of a Javelin missile, and only the missile, is $174k
Do you feel that YOUR money that the taxman takes from you by force is well spent? Do you think it all goes to maintaining the roads?
How much did you pay in taxes last year? How much of one missile did your year's work of labour pay for?

>>10982524
Pic related, first off, disinfo-spreading hooknose.

See, I knew you were some half-a-brain-only lolbertarian. Can smell you delusional fantasy lovers anywhere.

Where to begin? Well for starters, the tax you pay is part of your duty to the state and your fellow people. If you don't pull your weight towards maintenance of the state, but use the assets of the state (which we both know you do since you are utilizing Internet that is only available due to the state,) then you are stealing. That is pretty cut and dry.

The government is a central authority that helps keep order in a society. There never has been and never will be evidence of a stateless society, because such a society would be anarchy, of course, and a disaster for everyone. Even the rich and "powerful" would have to fear that at any moment, one of their henchmen could decide to turncoat and kill them. I mean, why not? There are no laws. No consequences to your actions.

Your retarded argument (which hilariously features the meme "muh roads") is easily beatable with two points: one, only like five cents of my taxes each month goes specifically towards military budget (I live in Canada, not the US... your military budget is insane, but then again you need to maintain that huge army,) and two, maintaining a military is essential to protecting a nation's sovereignty. By no means is a military expenditure a bad thing.

You seem to have a very weak grasp on just how much having a government makes life easier.

>>10982557
>but then again you need to maintain that huge army
not if amerikeks leave the world alone.

>>10982588
The Middle East, Russia, China, and North Korea are all totally innocent though, right?

>>10982459
He's right. Men have stopped taking charge of relationships and let women walk all over them to the point where sex becomes a bargaining chip even though sex is not worth that much at all. Hilarious to read, hear, and see what some men do to have sex with an attractive woman as well. Her past sexual relations does not matter either.

>>10982604
>Iraq had WMD
>CIA didn't arm Afghanis
>Obama did not send weapons to peaceful rebels in Syria

>>10982634
Nice nigger-protecting logic. "They were slighted in the past, therefore they can rape and pillage all they want as reparations."

>>10977679
Social justice advocates believe that individual market choices need to be regulated to achieve “socially just” outcomes. Individuals are incapable of achieving “socially just” outcomes through their own choices.

If women are unable to purchase a product at a lower price or to forgoe the purchase the government needs to force firms to lower their prices.

>>10978096
lel I saw some douchebag in his brand new bmw pulling up at a taco shop in the ghetto lmao

>>10982675
I've seen this too but it was late at night and he was fucking swerving *in* the drivethru

>>10982634
Why would rebels be peaceful?

>>10978860
Mathematic is a construct of the patriarchy, really makes me think.

>>10982557
I don't think bombing the Middle East has helped maintain the peace in the US. If that's what they really wanted they should have posted those troops on the Southern border.
I apologise for getting the unit cost of the Javelin wrong; my source was the wikipedia article which is teased in your screenshot.
I don't know why you assume that I am American or why you think your Canadian (lol) taxes would apply in an argument against taxes in the US.
I'm well aware that not all taxes go to Javelin missiles specifically. I used that as an example of taxpayer money, which belongs to the taxpayers, NOT the Government, being wasted on shit the taxpayers will never benefit from.

But let's use your numbers; how large a portion of one missile, at 100k dollars each, did your taxes for all of 2017 pay for?
How many taxpayers like you does it take to support these expenses?

And yes, I very deliberately bring up the roads because that's the classic "argument" against Libertarianism. I use the scare quotes because the roads are poorly maintained by your beloved State despite the taxes, and we've already seen with the RAILroads that private enterprise can build "public" transportation.

I do know that being the property of a government makes life easier. Some of us would rather be free than have a bunch of assholes tell us what we can eat, drink, wear, and charge for our product, though.

>>10982675
Maybe the guy wanted a taco. I don't think I'll ever be too rich that.

>>10980104
>implying is not a MRA/4chains/incel/troll/men/[insert group here] conspiracy

>>10977665
Wait I've been posting ITT but didn't actually watch the video until now. They are calling for government intervention?
Lmao, companies will just remove all pink shit all together to cut costs.
Nice one feminists

>>10982720
>Mathematic is a construct of the patriarchy, really makes me think.
https://github.com/ErisBlastar/cplusequality

>>10977679

A great many of them aren't actually the same product. Men's razors and women's razors are sharpened to different degrees and angle differently because they're intended for different parts of the body, and often have different lifespans before they need replacing. Women's deodorant and skin care products usually have WAY more ingredients than men's do, because your skin is affected by your hormone balance and so men and women tend to have different traits to their skin.

If you're paying a different price because it's actually a different product, it's not discrimination.

If you're paying a different price because it's from a different company, that's not discrimination.

If you're actually paying a different price just because it's pink, then buy the non-pink one you idiot. Nobody's making you buy the pink one.

>>10982367
womens razors are actually pretty shit when compared to mens razors.

>>10977665

>>10982157
>Whoever thought up this campaign should be fired. Better yet, just close BK all together.

It's obviously from some third party marking firm. They don't keep these losers on the payroll when they only put out 6~8 new adds a year at best.

Attacking BK isn't going to do anything, the feminists that made the ad are probably already working on similar ads for other companies...

>>10982735
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5464/text

>To prohibit the pricing of consumer products and services that are substantially similar if such products or services are priced differently based on the gender of the individuals for whose use the products are intended or marketed or for whom the services are performed or offered.

It feels like what could potentially be a good idea but that could backfire in unexpected ways.

>>10982807
If it passes, a whole bunch of products are going to cease to exist, because they were actually different but got labeled "substantially similar" by government idiots, and the companies making them won't like the lower profit margin so they'll just discontinue the thing.

There's no way this law doesn't backfire.

>>10982807
Messing with the market is almost always a bad idea tho. Companies will figure out ways around it, maybe they'll keep releasing pink products but will just remove the 'women's' word from the package or make really slight changes to the product to claim they are different or something.
This is discouraging companies from making products for women, which is pretty stupid, why can't women be free to buy expensive pink shit if they want to?

>>10982793
BK signed off on it, genius.

>>10982807
>>10982835
The products are just going to be called "Pink Edition" and shit like that instead of "for women"

>>10982847
I can see it coming
>We need to ban pink NOW.
Who is this benefiting again?

>>10982664
>>10982696
>uncle Sam knows what is best for us surely they never made mistakes in the past. shut up goy and pay the war tax.

>>10982858
Not breast cancer awareness, that's for sure.

>>10977665
Lmao ridiculous, america is such a joke country now, the entitlement of women and the american negro is so off the charts it seems out of a post modernist book. Good thing this shit is not sustainable, bad for this generation who has to live through all this shit

>>10982858

>>10978520
>oh no I can't shave with the blue razor, that's for boys!
The absolute state of progressive feminism in 2018

>>10977665
I had to pay the Chick Tax at Burger King even though I had my license that says male. I just wanted them so bad and the girls working there refused to sell them to me for the normal price. I was very disheartened and humiliated by this experience. I think I will get my tenders at McDs from now on.

>>10978877
>This is exactly that- the market working itself out

>pushing new intrusive legislation
>market working itself out
Ok this is based you trolled me epic style

>>10983400
Hardly. In fact it's cuckservative braindead parents who futilely grasp at a 1950's pipedream of a mythical Leave it to Beaver 'murrica who enculturate their children into outdated gender roles through the use of symbols one of which is color association. That's one reason the time has come to rip children from their parents at birth and place them in govt. nurseries where they can be raised according to recognized best practices and reach their full potential w/o brainwashing by ignorant, superstitious, prejudiced parents if we are to progress as a species.

>>10982172
Reproductively you could argue the same for women. I suppose if men didn't remain monogamous the entire argument falls apart, though. Or you know, if they retained sole custody of their kid.
A man wanting to take care of his offspring isn't him getting gamed by the woman, it's basic biological programming.
If you mean socially, I suppose that's a different argument.

>>10982807
This doesn't help at all. It just makes things worse because it's a band aide solution that doens't address the actual issue.

Now companies are either just going to
a) charge more for everyone, hurting the customer because congress is retarded
or
b) stop labeling them by gender to get around this poorly written law

>>10977665
>42% of products for women cost more

Doesn't this imply 58% of products for men cost more? Am I retarded?? I feel there must be some alternative conclusion like 42% of the time women's products cost more, 20% of the time men's cost more and the remainder are products with no possible gender distinction, but it doesn't /feeeeeeel/ right.

>>10984455
>Am I retarded??
Yes

>>10982588
> Let's remove any military deterrent from a nation with two major rivals
No thanks anon

>>10984455
Far be it from me to defend the "pink tax" retards, but you're a fucking idiot if that's what you derive from that statistic.
It could just as easily be that the other 58% of products are evenly priced.

>>10981636
I left biz a long time ago sine I realized its just pajeet shilling coins for their own gain

>>10982751
incel spotted

>>10979730
Nigga every man over the age of 16 should have a single suit for formal occasions.

>>10982258
how did that nigga get tenure?

>>10978249
But Safety razors will cut you more if you are sloppy.

That said I pay like $10 for two years for of blades since I change them once a week

>>10981732
I feel a little shitty throwing away those razor blades into the trash

>>10977665

I watched like half of this and just laughed thinking about how fucked their board must be right now being completely held hostage by the marketing geniuses that forced this messaging out of their company.

I bet their CEO is explaining his inaction after the fact like a real fucking pro lol ...

>>10977665
So what's stopping women from just not buying the women's razor and going for the cheaper generic brand one instead? Is there some sort of law preventing them from buying a big bag of disposable razors for $10 that can last them months?

>>10978249
I can't shave my balls with a safety razor.

>>10978520
>wouldn't you feel strange having to shave with pic related everyday?
No because I buy razor blades based on the price and how long it will last me. Also you're totally ignoring that there is the inverse for men with those stupid $30 Gilete Pro Fusion razors that look like you're using a god damned Transformer to shave.

>>10985128
OY

>>10978783
>that image
The females' razor is more expensive because it has a shitton more lubricant on it compared to the one strip on the men's razor, so it's better for shaving armpits and ballsacks

>Women are too stupid to buy blue razors
>Women are forced to buy anything pink
>This is a failure of capitalism
Whoa, so this is how it feels to be woke

>>10978520
Men are socialized to like sports, explain why so many dress like girls and watch anime if socialization is as powerful as you claim

>>10985249

>so many

Just because you fap to shota doesn't mean the rest of the men do. Statistics doesn't work inside your personal bubble.

>>10982751
>Nobody's making you buy the pink one.
You really think you aren't affected by marketing? In truth no one really has agency over what they buy, it's all influenced by marketing and you don't even know it. Wouldn't be surprised if big corporations got women to pay higher prices for kicks. This is why we need government to reign in corporations and marketing practices so we might actually have choice again.

>>10977665
Mansplaining at its best. They could have easily used another woman behind the counter to slam dat bitch down, but nope. It had to be a man.

>>10978877
Since razors seem to be your example for argument, you should be aware that all razors are on the same aisle in stores. Right next to one another, in fact.

I had a look at the supermarket today and the only noticeable difference in prices was that men's razors had more bulk purchase options. Other than that, there were expensive and cheap razors for both genders. I don't think Burger King did their research.

>>10985118
Put them in a safe container, ffs.
I use a sharps container from the hospital since I can get that for free. You could use an old beercan or shampoo bottle or something.
Some of the nicer brands come in a plastic container that lets you put the used blades into a separate compartment on the bottom. Mine don't, though.

>>10985175
I do
If you just throw the blades in the trash as they are you're a scumbag.

>>10985118
Put them in a safe container, ffs.
I use a sharps container from the hospital since I can get that for free. You could use an old beercan or shampoo bottle or something.
Some of the nicer brands come in a plastic container that lets you put the used blades into a separate compartment on the bottom. Mine don't, though.
If you just throw the blades in the trash as they are you're a scumbag.

>>10985175
I do

>>10977665
BASED and PINKpilled.
> 4CHAN INCELS ASSRAPED.

>>10977679
Women don't purchase shaving supplies at the same frequency men do. Aside from that, they have the choice to use the standard male models.

>>10977679
of course
thats why the prices remain higher, those dumb cunts will continue to buy it

>>10977679
If a woman purchases an item specifically tailored not to a woman they magically grow the evil patriarchy penis.

>>10985128
>Schwartz

>>10977665
based!

>>10978081
lol

Bait threads like this are why m00t bailed on his baby.

>>10977679
>are women retarded
Yeah anon

>implying the negative backlash will actually hurt BK sales at all
>implying obese subhumans care about the politics of their closest fast food place

That said, I will avoid them from now on. "Republicans buy sneakers too" in full effect.

>>10977665
Here ya go. Instant relief. Sound like ya need summa dis . . .

>ethical consumption
>labor aristocrats insisting we can make the public relations apparatus "less exploitative"
wew buddy

>>10978860
I like how it exposes women for being retarded.>>10978877

>>10978520
>women are too stupid not to cave to social pressure on something as insignificant as the colour of a fucking razor they'll use once

>>10989709
I don't think it's even a social pressure issue in the first place since that suspect conclusion is based on taking the way men would be shamed for doing feminine things and trying to reverse it, which I don't think makes sense in reality because the non-feminine options are neutral / normal.
My personal take on this is women are spending money that isn't theirs so they don't care about paying more for flashy pink shit they don't need.

>>10977665
this surely is a joke

>>10982360
>So niggers are bad for stealing, but you are in the clear? What's the difference?
Maybe the fact that he earned that money through his job and put in the hours to get the paycheck while Tyrone and his buddies robbed a convenience store for blunt wraps. How are you any better than the latter for wanting to steal money from a hard working American?

>>10982424
>He is implying that IRS agents are pathetic for doing their job of catching tax evaders
They are, if I break into your house at gunpoint and demand you give me money that you earned I would get thrown in prison for 15 years for armed robbery. The IRS agent does the same thing only he gets a bonus for sending a bunch of armed bureaucrats to my house to terrorize me and rob me at gunpoint. Fucking hypocritical cowards

>>10982725
>do know that being the property of a government makes life easier. Some of us would rather be free than have a bunch of assholes tell us what we can eat, drink, wear, and charge for our product, though.

you we're never "free", a place like that doesn't exist because if it did, everyone there would be dead.

>>10989829
based but sincerely

>>10978081
cocks in her fries to be fair

>>10989829
you live in a place, you have to pay the dues for living in that place. good luck finding a livable place that isn't the sovereign territory of one world power or another.

>>10977665
>11k dislikes
>less tan 400 likes
I gotta give them kudos for not taking down this trashfire of a video and leaving it be. You cna bet your top sheckle they are in the process of firing half of their marketing department that greenlit this shit.
I'm lovin' it.

>>10990127
BTW, forgot to ask. I'm un united states right now and few days ago I noticed I have a White Castle nearby my place.
Worth checking out for breakfast or not?

>>10978317
I'm as big a lefty pinko liberal faggot as you'll find, and even I don't think it's the government's job to legislate stupidity. Homeopathy is one of the biggest scams out there, but if companies want to prey on the retarded, they have the right to.

>>10990127
You serious, this is probably the most attention they've gotten in years. The people who eat at Burger King aren't going to change to McDonalds or Chick-fil-A if they haven't already, BK's the Pepsi of fast food chains.

>>10990173
>The people who eat at Burger King aren't going to change to McDonalds or Chick-fil-A
Why not though?
I don't usually eat at such places, unless I'm at an airport and nothing else is open, but I could imagine avoiding a brand after such a performance.

>>10980686
Yeah, I've seen a ton of electronic accessories and the like go for cheaper than standard variants because of garish coloring like pink or neon green.

>>10981543
If Youtube user opinion were actually indicative of a generation's, gay marriage would never have passed given how many hate gay "decadence".

>>10977665
this is genius. u bet im gonna bring my fat gf a few of those pink boxed chicken dicks

>>10977665
yikes if real

Is this like how hard bristle toothbrushes continue to be sold because of demand even though they actually damage teeth

>>10978520
Reminds me of the time my cousin's husband wanted to cook and threw a tantrum because the only oven mitts in the kitchen were pink.

>>10978096

I call that getting swindled and pimped.

Get some of those pink boxes while you can. Request that no chips get put in. You want them clean. You want to keep them in good condition. With this story behind them the surviving boxes are going to be worth a bit of money in ten years time.

>>10977700
kys?
kiss your sister?
btw nice digits

>>10986726
>my store's layout is the same as everywhere else in the country

>>10977679
Like another anon said, in many cases these "equivalent" products like razors are NOT the same thing.
In the case of things that are the same but just have a different paint job, it's simple supply/demand.
A woman may buy the non-pink one but a man would not likely buy the pink item

>>10978752
To be fair, being female is the biological default until the hormones kick in and turn you male during fetal development and then again during puberty
why do you think women who wear dyke haircuts look like boys?

>>10980385
Gillette literally invented those DE blades you're using, their patent expired some 100 years ago.
They, along with their contemporaries built up this idea that men have to be clean shaven to be taken seriously, you're STILL falling for one big jewish meme, only this one is hundreds of years old.

>>10991186
You're the kind of autist who says "Oh, mean a deck of cards?" when someone says he had the first Nintendo as a kid, aren't you?
Just because the company made a good product almost a decade ago doesn't mean it's not a big nasty scam by now.
Hell, Walt Disney hated Jews and look what happened to his company.

>>10991198
He said that shaving at all is a scam. He's wrong, but your response doesn't address what he's trying to say.

>>10990277
soft and medium bristle brushes are a scam
they dont scrub your teeth at all and leave plaque on your teeth to harden and become unsightly enough to warrant a dentist's intervention
if hard bristle brushes damaged teeth, why do dentists use LITERAL pneumatic air tools and water jet cutters on your teeth to remove that shit plaque?

>>10991205
>He said that shaving at all is a scam
He literally didn't. He's obviously talking about shit like Mach 3 and Fusion etc. that cost ten fucking dollars for a single cartridge.

why are men on 4chan so fragile?

>>10991211
I wish you took the time to read over what he wrote again instead of sticking to your original interpretation.

>>10991211
No, I literally wrote that shaving in general is a jewish scam.
What better way to make you buy useless things than to convince you that you're ugly till you forcibly remove body hair?
This hits women especially hard because men can get away with having beards but women with armpit and leg hair is considered absolutely disgusting.

>>10991207
>if hard bristle brushes damaged teeth, why do dentists use LITERAL pneumatic air tools and water jet cutters on your teeth to remove that shit plaque?
Because you don't get that treatment two or three times a day, genius.
Soft brushes should really only be used by children or people with some kind of condition. A medium brush works fine for most people.
If you want a brush that actually scrubs plaque off your teeth once it's formed you can try one of those BBQ ones with the metal bristles, because a hard toothbrush isn't going to do that either.
Also, I don't know what your dentist uses for cleaning teeth but mine uses a "brush" made of rubber. No bristles at all.

>video is about Burger King and their weird "Pink Tax" awareness marketing
>suddenly everyone begins posting about razors and shaving
What the fuck?

>>10991322
If you keep complaining I'll go into extolling the virtues of shaving your legs as a male

>>10991337
Great, less wind resistance when you're cycling and sprinting. There's a reason these aren't considered particularly masculine sports.

>>10978276
Your body is FUBAR. End of discussion.

>>10977679
>women are retarded
kek

If women are not capable of making a decision on their own, then maybe we should not have given them the right to vote.

>>10991322
Are you stupid?
Razors are always brought up when people discuss the "pink tax".
The video brings it up too around 0:40

in Japan they have women parking spaces with pink lines. they're extra wide and men aren't allowed to use them.
they also have female-specific food that's supposed to be less-bad for you. not sure if it costs more, but it should, because now your storage space is being used by low-calorie and fat free garbage, so you hold less regular food everyone normally orders.

>>10992182
The writing on that pinku (pink) burger is Corean (Korean), though.

>>10980435
Are you the kind of twink that shaved his whole body?

>>10985112
Only if you’re retarded anon. Or if you have an aggressive razor matched with an aggressive blade

>>10978125
>thread

>>10978125
One time I was permabanned from 4chan for posting something against the law, and was never told what I posted that was against the law. Why isn't your post against the law?

Mens clothes are more expensive than womens clothes. its because men buy less of them so economies of scale fuck us. We never go around bitching about sexism or whatever

Corporations aren't sexiest. they aren't charging women more for fucking razors because they don't respect them or hate them. What kind of business decision is that? It all just boils down to them charging what they know their customers will pay.

>>10985175
i can c:

>>10992230
>trusting anyone else with a razor on your boys
not in this lifetime

I'm glad we have a shave general on /ck/ it gets boring when everyone on /fa/ has a DE or straight razor

>>10992259
I don't go on /fa/. What's a DE?

>>10992264
a double edge razor like >>10978365

>>10992267
Ohh of course. Of COURSE /fa/ can't call it a safety razor like the rest of humanity.
Especially not since the word "safety" might make them feel that it's the kind of razor used by a cowardly femboy.

>>10992286
Well there are things like a single edge safety razor

>>10992286
It's an outdated term because disposable razors are distinctly safer. It's practically impossible to cut yourself on one.

>>10992296
Not edgy enough for me. Also "safety" is a female concept except when it comes to birth control. I'm not dragging literal cuck metal against my skin, it might impart some homo genes.

>>10978783
>that doesn't justify a higher price for female-marketed goods

nigger the prices of goods and services aren't determined by what you (or anybody else) consider "justified"

sellers charge as much as they can, buyers pay as little as they can.

women paying extra for the same products maybe tells us something about men being more frugal and women being more wasteful when it comes to money, that's the end of it.

people blaming marketing for their spending behavior are some of the most pathetic retards on the planet. it's like fatties blaming mcdonalds for their obesity, or drunks blaming the jack daniels company for their alcohol addiction. fucking disgusting degenerate faggots.

>>10978096
>when it comes to food everyone is a cheapskate
I'm one and i eat healthy as fuck because doing so is the proper cheapskate way.
I save on medical bills for not getting sick, being overweight fat sack of shit and atleast in my country processed food is really fucking expensive compared to just cooking some superior product by yourself from fresh vegetables & meat.

>>10977679
it looks like according to the video that they are given the pink one because they're a girl. I dont think they have a choice.

>>10990220
Youtube user opinion is muddied by the masses of third-world shitskins using it.

>>10990040
>he doesn't create a secessionist militia whenever he moves to a new place

>>10991217
>t. mohammed abdul al-britani

>>10992182
>women parking spaces with pink lines
Those are Chinese. Japs can park just fine and the vast majority of cars are reverse-parked in Japan.