/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>19186066
Wow, lucky you. What a genius.
If only I had a coffee mug and a microwave...
Oh wait.

>>18801758
>emocrat-run plantation
So "your people" escaped American conservatives, only for you to become one of your own people's oppressors?
Congrats on going from victim to your own bully.
Not sure I could live with that level of cognitive dissonance, but good for you (I guess).

>>18538454
>Not him but they sell the food at pretty much 0 profit.
Still not hearing anything about my two points.
Let's try again:
What are your credentials? Are you a purchasing agent for IKEA? Is there any documentation about what they're spending vs their sale price?
Second point: If it's a successful loss leader, it's a profitable choice for them. You might as well call the building lease cost a "loss", even though it's got to be justified by the profit from furniture sales.

>>18207987
>give me your best recipes for offal meat, heart, liver, tripe
While the heart IS meat, offal, liver and tripe are NOT meat.
Eating that shit is an abomination.

>>17946633
>Microwave eggs are rubbish.
Sorry, but you're wrong, and for the sheer act of snobbery, no less.
Wow.

>>17783404
>Is it too American to put beef into tacos?
>It feels like pork would be more authentic?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisket

>>16927565
>Do Americans really?
It's British.
And while Americans do eat some stupid things, this isn't one of them.

>>16822778

>>16804573
>a mashed potato food truck would be more unique.
Selling broken glass on a bun would be "more unique".
Think before you post.

>>16735071
Good luck with your remarkable choice to risk food poisoning for the sake of being more hipster than the average Seattle underground jazz-baroque fusion band.

>>16712778
imagine not understanding you don't season steel, then pretending another poster is the one who's actually confused while not articulating you point, but just blindly spouting smug nonsense.

>>16653326
>i hate them
Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you.

>>14172308
>That's my point. Agriculture is harder, unhealthier for the body and gives a less reliable and less nutritious source of calories than hunting and gathering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipse_dixit

>Agrarian societies only popped up after the population density had reached a certain threshold
You've still got the cart before the horse.
In your world people with an excess of babies said "hey! let's invent agriculture!", which somehow fed more people than hunter/gatherer mode, despite your claims to the contrary.

Nah, if you want, you "win", CTRL-F4, I'm out.