/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>20359361
People don't realize how flimsy many of these study designs are. The conclusions of the researchers don't matter as much as the methods. Journalists reporting on these studies don't care about the quality of the research or to represent it accurately, they just want views.

>>20167071
>In recent years the link between dietary cholesterol and blood cholesterol have been found to be pretty weak
The main danger has always been saturated fat, which OP's "carnivore" snack of melted butter is very high in.

Dietary cholesterol increases the cholesterol-elevating properties of saturated fat and can have a significant effect on its own. It's true that recent studies have downplayed the effects of dietary cholesterol, but you have to understand the history of the research, where most research for decades showed a clear and reproducible effect of dietary cholesterol on blood cholesterol (such that the Hegsted equation was developed to predict changes in cholesterol from dietary factors), which lead to industry funding their own research in response with study designs intended to get favorable results that they could then lobby the USDA with and improve their marketing. You can see how they design their studies and how they interpret their data.

>>20127722
>data expires after X years and then you have to get rid of all evidence and start over from scratch
I don't think it works like that.

Even studies designed by people trying to market eggs show dietary cholesterol increasing blood cholesterol and harming arterial function.

>>19258041
>Eggs are a superfood
Or so says the egg industry. And you might believe it too if you squint out all the details.

>>15339572
Reminder that this is the kind of research they look at when they state that dietary cholesterol/eggs have no effect on serum cholesterol.

>>7544105
>>7544105
you are wrong

>>7454395
>>7454395

>>7153867

>i mean, one last reply. its a goddamn egg. every mammal on the planet starts thier life in an egg using the nutrients in that egg

One fallacy after another. Why can't you just argue scientifically with data? "It's an egg, it's just good for you, it has nutrients" doesn't count as an argument

Pic related. Your arteries aren't a fan of eggs.

I'll be leaving too then. I've got some finger wiggling to do elsewhere.