/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>20373347
>>20373349
>>20373352
They STILL won't listen..Even if you SHOVE their face in it.

>>20150706
>dipshit didn't even see the catbox link
Again...If you aren't even going to READ the shit you are "Debunkinggngng", faggot, you aren't even worth responding to.
BTW, you PULING hypocrite:
1) YOU show ME a human study confirming YOUR posits--You can't.
Either use equivalent standards or fuck off.
2) Point out the "Falsehoods" in ANY of those studies I cited--You can't.
Why are you so invested in defending this proven toxic shit?
...And don't give me that lame bullshit of "I just don't want people believing disinformation "
That's bvullshit and you KNOW it.
I have ALWAYS cited studies.
How many human studies were there for the Vax??(it was brought up to ad-hom, so, fair game.>>20149820
)
ANY OF THEM??
That's right, NONE.

>>20086818
>studies

>>20072755
>checked
The only lucid post ITT ATM.
>aRE YOU DREAMING?
Truly though, why does 60% of this site just seem like bait, 30% B0tz and trolls, and the remaining 9% just seem like self-assured morans?
Time to seek out Alternative Channels.

>>20019188
Wise choice when tracking down hard info that hasn't been digested by 6 other sources for "Flash Headlines"
I tend to take them with a heavy dose of skepticism anyway, having met some of the scientists who do the studies--often through universities, which while they can CLAIM no COI, very often have the tacit understanding that if the results aren't favorable to a profitable cause, the next round of funding isn't likely.
>if only you knew just how bad things really are