/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>20384853
If you're not willing to violate another nation's sovereignty, you can't tell it what it can and can't produce. If you want to violate another nation's sovereignty to enforce such a measure, you need boots on the ground and a regime change. If you try to invade a nuclear-armed power and put it into existential threat, nuclear war is the result. There's no other way to stop the flow. Your post reads like coping because you know I'm right. Monitor your shell corporations of shell corporations, ban all foreign nationals, hell, guillotine them in the streets while you fight off those insurgencies, ban all trade and have the country plunge into third world-tier poverty, no authoritarianism is good enough to prevent good ol' smuggling. So, your choice: WW3 or fentanyl. Pick one and stick with one, now, no backpedaling!
>Only known offenders likely to repeat.
'kay, then the people who are smart enough to not get caught will profit. We called those people 'bootleggers' in the old days, you know, anon. Joe Kennedy was one!
>The game is easier to beat when you own the board
Lol, you wish. America is vast and its population densities are skewed toward the coasts. The infrastructure is garbage beyond freight rail - highly tied into global trade which you clearly want to ban so it won't be great under your system either for long - and there's vast stretches of fuck all mountains and deserts for people to hide in all they want. It's ten Iraqs and Afghanistans all in our backyard, and we all know the land. Probably better than the US military itself does, lmao, given >military intelligence. We're gonna run meth and shoot your soldiers and pick apart your tanks and you're going to seethe about it like a fucking tranny.

>>14934623
America is half empty, so that's a misleading image. I'm sorry nobody cares about the thoughts and feelings of the one inbred cow rancher in Montana.