/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>18279698
>>18279719
The positive associations were consistent across several demographic and lifestyle factors. There were also positive associations between tuna intake and non-fried fish intake, and risk of malignant melanoma and melanoma in situ. However, fried fish intake was inversely associated with risk of malignant melanoma, but not melanoma in situ.
from their study

so basically canned tuna is giving you cancer, probably because of the fact that its a long lived carnivorous fish mercury bioaccumulation, also canned food might be associated BUT as it says FRIED FEESH = LESS MELENOMA

~~~~~SCIENCE~~~~~~
so is it canning? or tuna? or bad study? or what because thats some retarded association

Conclusions
We found that higher total fish intake, tuna intake, and non-fried fish intake were positively associated with risk of both malignant melanoma and melanoma in situ. Future studies are needed to investigate the potential biological mechanisms underlying these associations.

fried fishu goodu for ur skinu!

pointing more fingers at this being sloppy science is the rates of melanoma in america compared to japan, japan being one of the highest fish consumption countries on earth

tldr; statistical science is low tier brainlet trash