/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>10352847
Why would you link an article that argues against the point you were making

>There is evidence, for example, that they reduce risk of coronary heart disease and breast and prostate cancer. In addition, soy alleviates hot flashes and may favorably affect renal function, alleviate depressive symptoms and improve skin health. Much of the focus on soyfoods is because they are uniquely-rich sources of isoflavones. Isoflavones are classified as both phytoestrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators. Despite the many proposed benefits, the presence of isoflavones has led to concerns that soy may exert untoward effects in some individuals. However, these concerns are based primarily on animal studies, whereas the human research supports the safety and benefits of soyfoods.
tldr there's plenty of trustworthy evidence for soy being beneficial for your health and none for it being negative. If you think that studies in animals can be conclusive for this matter, read the passage you posted yourself.

>mfw soy posters have so little evidence they post studies that disagree with them in hope no one will actually read it