[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 226 KB, 1242x1147, IMG_5140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9971921 No.9971921[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Regretsy thread/WTF sales now with vag earrings.

>> No.9971929

>>9971921
It reminds me of that pussy kayak

>> No.9971930

>>9971929
>reminds me of that pussy kayak
WHAT

>> No.9971931

>>9971930
welcome to the internet, I see you're 10

>> No.9971932

>>9971931
Sorry for my surprise anon, just new to /cgl/ and this is the first fucking thing I see.

>> No.9971934

>>9971932
lurk more newfag

>> No.9971937

>>9971921
how come people who make vagina art only represent the WORST looking vaginas?

Like why is it always flared labias and clitoral hoods that are all wrinkled?

Why won't anyone make some empowering puffy soft vaginas that don't have some roast beef flaps drooping out?

>> No.9971939

>>9971930
Japanese artist made it from scan of her vagina. Got arrested for giving the data to people that funded her project. There's a manga about it.

>> No.9971941

>>9971937
But anon, why don't you want some 80 year old whores blown out cunt as jewelry?

>> No.9971944

>>9971939
She also got taken to court and found guilty for obscenity for it

>> No.9971945

>>9971937
Ugly and artistic have a positive relationship with these freaks.

Why does every female artist have to have vaginas and periods take up 50% of their portfolio? College art classes drove me nuts.

>> No.9971947

>>9971921
I think I'm more disturbed by the artist blurring the photo...

>> No.9971959

>>9971947
op probably did, this is a blue board

>> No.9971961
File: 35 KB, 388x425, 1306215371726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9971961

>>9971945
Don't forget the "but vaginas are like flowers!" bullshit.

Super glad I did not go to college.

>>9971941
>blown out cunt
I died.

>> No.9971998

>>9971945
Don't stress anon, they usually get round to throwing a dick in there somewhere, so it's even! That reminds, i remember seeing something about some man who did painting with his donger. Please don't change art world, the world would be boring without you.

>> No.9971999

>>9971937
Maybe the artist wasn't skilled enough to make a nicer one. This doesn't look hard to create for someone with minimal skill with clay.

>> No.9972022

>>9971921
Why do they look broken?

>> No.9972023

>>9972022
You'd be broken too after what looks to be 1000 dicks

>> No.9972043

>>9971921
>vag earings
I thought they were prolapsed anus earings

>> No.9972045
File: 252 KB, 727x617, wtfishethinking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972045

>> No.9972047
File: 199 KB, 1242x986, IMG_5142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972047

>mfw this artist also does anus earrings that have herpes sores on them

Literally why.what purpose does this serve ?

>> No.9972049
File: 262 KB, 1241x984, IMG_5143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972049

>>9972047
>bloody sanitary napkin earrings

very en vouge

>> No.9972050

>>9972047
>mfw I thought it was donuts from the thumbnail...

>> No.9972053
File: 41 KB, 294x352, 0513A268-A3B7-484B-B692-61E1F06BACEE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972053

>>9972047
>vitiligo on asshole
Yeah right, trying too hard

>> No.9972062

>>9972053
Umm excuse you. this is racist....

>> No.9972066

>>9971921
>>9972047
>>9972049
I'd like to be able to say I would have bought or worn all of these when I was in college, but looking back I think I was too repressed. If I were an edgy art student now, I would though.

>>9972045
Now that's just plain depressing.

>> No.9972081

>>9971937
I'm a dude and I think they look fine. Some people like flared labia.

>> No.9972085

>>9972062
....are you a middle aged dyke?

>> No.9972088

>>9972081
>I'm a dude
No one cares.

Get you a girl with roast beef lips and grind her ass on a fuckin hitatchi- you'll know what that anon is talking about.
Fuckin mochi candy lips are where it's at.

>> No.9972105

>>9972088
I'm not asking you to care, I'm giving my post the context of coming from someone attracted to vaginas.

>> No.9972109

>>9972088
>describing any vagina as mochi candy

point and laugh at the virgin, gulls

>> No.9972117

>>9972088
Cringe

>> No.9972136

>>9971937
The whole point of that whole "vaginas are so beautiful they can be used as ornamentation" thing is empowerment and body positivity (genital positivity?), so a big part of that is also praising the "normal" or "real" looking vaginas that most people probably have, and not just the ideal cute little pale 'n pink innie.

Personally I think it's a bit old. Yes vaginas come in all shapes and colors and whatnot, they're all nice, you should love your body, all that. Doesn't mean it looks aesthetical in realistic detail and should be paraded around in jewellery form.

>> No.9972137

>>9971945
>Why does every female artist have to have vaginas and periods take up 50% of their portfolio?
It's babby's first attempt at being controversial and brave and shocking and political. Feminist art! Instead of flowers in vases, I paint pussies! Look, menstruation! Isn't this bold? It's a super easy low hanging fruit way to get to feel like you're a true counterculture artisté even though nowadays it means you're an unimaginative post-garde copycat, so it's probably very popular in colleges where people work it out of their system.

>> No.9972149

>>9972137
If people make so much vagina art in college how come I never see it in galleries and museums? Naked males usually have their dicks showing but females don't have vaginas in museums.

>> No.9972167

>>9972105
Women are also attracted to vagina.
Being a dude means nothing in this context. You could like dicks.

>> No.9972168

>>9972149
Probably because college art students =/= actual artists who get selected to showcase their work in galleries, let alone get their work bought into collections by the curators.

People often do shit work at college (at first, at least) because they're young and a bit naive while also being overly passionate and thinking their stuff is GROUNDBREAKING. They're just starting out and lack the experience to realise this shit has been done thousands of times before and your "new" and "revolutionary" concept is actually literally over a century old and very famous, which is why you thought of it. Art student art is very often a bit, uh. Heavy-handed? Copying already-famous stuff, themes, styles, and thinking it's all SO IMPORTANT. Of course sometimes there's really great stuff too, and the passion and self-confidence is important and can translate to something truly fresh, and everyone learns by copying and absorbing ideas and working it into something new, but still.

A lot of artists, especially women who are inclined towards activism or feminism, go through a vagina/period art phase. However that theme has been sorta done to death in decades past, esp in the 60s and 70s when women's lib really was revolutionary and current, and it's really difficult to work on those themes now in a way that'd be interesting and original. Just creating pussy sculptures or paintings or smearing period blood on something because MENSTRUATION isn't interesting any more, it's just lazy and unimaginative and trying to cover up your lack of creativity with shock value and regurgitating old ideas. So a lot of curators and gallerists aren't interested, and you have to approach things differently to get visibility if you want to do feminist art.

>> No.9972170

>>9972168
>>9972149
Okay sorry I may have misunderstood your question.

If you're asking why there are more visible penises than spread-out vulvas on display in museums, it's probably due to historical attitudes (partly based on antiquity), where men were nude because sports and art and Spartans rah rah and Ancient Greece and all that while women, while also nude or clad in a translucent shroud or whatnot, were nevertheless kinda coyly posed. Also due to physiology, if you just stand there, the male genitals are kinda more obviously there, they don't need to spread their legs for an unobstructed view.

However there's been plenty of nude women in art throughout history, also with their genitals shown. Possibly these pictures just haven't been chosen for exhibitions because oh my, female genitals.

For example https://img.culturacolectiva.com/content/2018/02/22/1519338664957/hans_memling_vanite_ca_1490-medium.jpg

or "L'Origine Du Monde", from 1866, quite famed and on display in Musee D'Orsay: https://thearthistoryroom.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/image6.jpeg?w=840

For contemporary art, I'm not sure if there's that much purely dick- or semen-centric art on display, actually? Kinda like look at this, it's a massive copy of my penis, this is art. Look, I smeared my sperm on this here canvas, it's a statement. I know there's some, but it's not that widespread, I don't think.

Thanks for coming to my art talk, sorry bout the length.

>> No.9972207

>>9972081
yeah but you're a guy on 4chan so you probably have really low standards.

>> No.9972209

>>9972136
>"real" looking vaginas that most people probably have
what kind of insane assumption is this?

Good thing you used words like "probably" and "most" but I don't think I can agree with "most".

Why is a blown out cunt supposedly the norm? Mine doesn't look like that. The girls I've been with in the past didn't have that look.

I've only seen those in like gross porn and lesbian "art".

>> No.9972226

>>9972149
To be fair, I visited the MONA gallery in Tasmania years back and they had an installation that was just hundreds of plastercast vaginas from all different women. It ran throughout a good length of the gallery and just took up whole walls.
They are out there, anon.

>maybe we should all get back on topic now

>> No.9972227

>>9972209
Just because you haven’t seen any doesn’t mean they aren’t the norm. I’m glad mine doesn’t hang out like that though, that’s just not kawaii

>> No.9972243

I've eaten a lot of puss in my day, flaps are far more common than no flaps. I'm a flapless specimen, but I never knew how uncommon it was until I started fucking around. Honestly, though, it's all pink on the inside, so don't worry about it unless your labes are big enough to get stuck in your zipper or something.

>> No.9972244

>>9972088
Thanks for outing yourself as an incel

>> No.9972245

>>9972170
I get the historical argument but I mostly go to contemporary museums and galleries with artists who are still alive

>> No.9972246

>regretsy thread
>4 pictures
>50 posts about vaginas, virgins, and other shit
Let's just nuke this one and start again

>> No.9972247

>>9972246
You should work on your defeatist attitude

>> No.9972251

>>9972245
And you see a lot of male genitals? But not female ones?

I go to contemporary galleries and museums too and haven't noticed that many dicks around. Maybe it depends on the curators and their tastes?

>> No.9972253

>>9971939
>>9971944
i feel like it should be added that the whole reason behind her doing that is that if she made a giant dick kayak it WOULD NOT have been an obscenity in Japan. Japan literally has giant dick festivals where everything is completely covered in dicks, but she got in actual legal trouble for producing something with a vagina on it. it was an intentional message about that.

>>9972136
i think among college student "queer" culture this is the case, but i think that a lot of it is likely about the destigmatizing the female form (outside of a purely sexual, objectified context) or lesbian women expressing their attraction in a non-pornified way. i still think vagina earrings are tacky though.

>>9972243
this, flaps are typical.

>>9972246
try posting something then dipshit

>> No.9972255

>>9972251
I never said I see a lot of them. I said WHEN I see naked males they have penises but the naked females don't have vaginas.

>> No.9972256

>>9972209
Counter-culture artists love to do this, making body parts ugly and arguing that it's what "real" people look like.

>> No.9972260

>>9972209
I don't think there are reliable statistics on what type of labia is the most common one, sadly. There's a lot of variation, just like when it comes to breast or nipple size or shape, and somehow I don't quite buy that the majority of all women have perfect and cute wrinkle-free puffy soft labias.

While a larger flappy labia possibly isn't the vast majority either, the reason for trying to present them as the norm is probably body positivity or something, idk. Like, the people who have the ideal thing are already satisfied with the way they are, and presenting the cute ideal as the normal thing suggests that deviating from that means you're flawed. Which doesn't quite sit with the message of positive empowerment - so the point is to present the not-so-perfect end of the spectrum as also perfectly fine, normal and nice.

Instead of going "ew that's fucking gross you should be ashamed and never get naked in front of anyone".

>> No.9972264

>>9972256
>making body parts ugly
Maybe rather "displaying the uglier bodies", I don't think they specifically uglify anything tho.

But yeah it's sort of a trend, it seems. "This is reality, look at it!"

>> No.9972266

The only people that would turn you down based on the size of your labia are the ones who have never seen one up close and unedited.

>> No.9972321

>>9972209
aroused vags also look different from flaccid ones since the lips puff up

>> No.9972322

>>9972321
The word flaccid to described unaroused is only applicable to male genitals unless you think female genitals become hard when aroused, and in that case I'm concerned you may have a medical issue

>> No.9972331

>>9972137
I was actually talking about established artists that we learn about in art classes. I wasn’t clear.
>>9972168
The time thing makes sense. I wish I could remember the dates and names of some of the shit. Some of them had to have been modern though.

>> No.9972404

>>9972322
nayrt, but female genitals do swell when aroused.
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/sexual-health/sexual-arousal-in-women/

>> No.9972414

>>9971937
The vag looks fine.

>> No.9972416

>>9972404
Okay, but they don't HARDEN which is what is implied by saying it has a flaccid state(which means soft/loose)

>> No.9972417

>>9972416
gets firm tho

>> No.9972419

>>9972417
Seek medical help immediately if your vagina is noticeably hardening

>> No.9972423

>>9972416
The clit and inner labia are literally erectile tissue, the same stuff as a man’s dick but in smaller quantity. The clit gets swollen with blood and feels different (looks different too if you pull it out), the inner lips will be visibly spread out and slightly stiffened (looks very different between women)

>> No.9972425

>>9972423
We're talking about vag lips, not clits. If your vag lips are getting as hard as a dick does you are a freak or need to go to a doctor. Jesus is reading that hard for you??

>> No.9972426

>>9971934
why so hostile, it's okay for someone new to join in as long as they're not giving bad advice or w/e

>> No.9972436

>>9972426
lurk more newfag

>> No.9972439

>>9972425
why the fuck are you assuming the opposite of flaccid HAS to be hard? firm is as much an antonym to flaccid as hard is

>> No.9972445
File: 64 KB, 1242x510, IMG_5147.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972445

>>9972439
Firm and hard are synonyms you retard. I hope you're actually esl and not actually this retarded.

>> No.9972447
File: 49 KB, 1242x491, IMG_5146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972447

>>9972445
>>9972439

>> No.9972476

>>9972445
>>9972447
>wants to be right so bad that they post it twice
chill.

>> No.9972486

>>9972476
>proving you don't know how to read

One shows synonyms and the other antonyms. How dumb can you actually be???

>> No.9972688

>>9972414
You fucking have low standards.

>>9972321
I've never seen this - also mine doesn't do this. Not sure what you're on about.

>>9972260
I was never trying to say that small puffy vaginas were the norm, I was more pissed that the only ones I see really represented in art are blown out cunts with wrinkles in the skin. Sorry but shit is nasty to look at.

I'm kind of surprised at the amount of "body positive" comments considering this is cgl we're on. But as per usual, the girls here are taking it too personally.

>>9972227
You haven't seen every pussy either, so really it's just guessing but I think you can tell just by looking at body types and crotch area and tell if they're gonna have a mess down there or if it's a regular smooth vagina.

>>9972243
Dude, I have flaps but they don't fucking sag and hang out - I'm not talking about not having flaps when I say puffy vagina.

I wish I could post an example but y'know...

>> No.9972691

>>9972423
>looks different too if you pull it out
WHAT are you talking about???

I can't pull my clit out wtf... can other people do this?? are we sure they aren't fucking intersexed?

>> No.9972698

>>9972691
women can't pull their clit out I'm assuming this is a man talking out of his ass

>> No.9972700
File: 10 KB, 320x240, i don't understand this shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9972700

>>9972698
Just the thought of doing that was horrifying.

>> No.9972723

>>9972691
you can but not very far, it's the little white bump under the hood

>> No.9972725

>>9972723
that's not pulling it out, that's pushing the hood up unless your clitoral hood is mega loose in which case i'm sorry your cunt is rekt

>> No.9972726

>>9972725
>>9972723
like i can push my hood up a tiny bit but i can't just yank on my clit and expose more of it which is what pulling it out implies

>> No.9972727

>>9972688
>the only ones I see really represented in art are blown out cunts with wrinkles in the skin
Have you seen any drawn or animated porn ever? It's literally 99.9% just a plain line with no flaps because it's more youthful and easy to draw

>> No.9972729

Can mods please nuke this thread its literally just Vagina Arguments

also surprised to see OP picture was deleted after what, a few days?? Fucking state of the board honestly

>> No.9972741

>>9972244
>>9972117
>>9972109
what the fuck, have you never used one before? Pussy pumps do the same thing. It's because it's all puffy and swollen with blood. That sounds awful but it looks cute.
>Mochi candy hate
wtf, it's squishy and soft, you know it to be a fuckin accurate description.
Unless you never condition your skin, fucking why not.

>> No.9972754

>>9972688
I like rosst beef.