lolita online comm thread

[Anonymous No.9498341]

Last one died a while ago I think. Discuss things happening in Rufflechat and other FB groups, Amino, etc.
Local comm thread is here >>9487275

[Anonymous No.9498343]

[Anonymous No.9498345]

>>9498343

[Anonymous No.9498346]

>>9498345

[Anonymous No.9498352]

>>9498346
>don't worry, brand whores don't exist and nasty people are few and far between
Clearly she didn't do her research, because I knew damn well there was going to be some shit in a hobby that is about FASHION

[Anonymous No.9498363]

>>9498352
I've honestly never seen someone get shit on for not wearing brand, only for wearing offbrand badly. If you wear offbrand well you get just as much praise as someone wearing brand, if not more.

[Anonymous No.9498374]

>LOL People are such elitist bitches these days, how dare she call me out on my opinion
>all I said was that her dress was cheap looking and that I thought it was garbage because it was brand! I am ALLOWED AN OPINION

[Anonymous No.9498378]

>>9498343
Who are these people, where are they from even? Cause they aren't living in the same lolita world that I am.

[Anonymous No.9498381]

>>9498343
I wonder what print it was

[Anonymous No.9498387]

>>9498374
I know, right? Apparently, telling someone that the dress they like looks like shit is only ~toxic~ if it's happening to them and not if they're doing it themselves.

[Anonymous No.9498389]

> have opinion about print
> someone disagrees with that opinion
> for some reason this is a huge deal

[Anonymous No.9498392]

>>9498389
More like
> Have a bad opinion about a print or a dress and shit all over it even though opinions are subjective
> Get butthurt when someone disagrees and is tired of your shit so they push back
> Make a big deal of it and cry to your friends when you could have mentioned disliking the print in a polite way in the first place and avoided any fuss.

RUDE much?

[Anonymous No.9498414]

>>9498343
>>9498345
>>9498346
>mfw the biggest shitstirrers in my comm are currently posting to agree
Maybe the reason they're the ones having problems with the comm while everyone else is fine is because they are the CAUSING the problems? Like just leave, everyone will be happier if you just leave, including you.

[Anonymous No.9498785]

>kinkshaming

[Anonymous No.9498987]

>>9498785
>ooo let's not forget the kink shaming in the comm when they can't handle pets/littes like kawaii fashion

Nobody wants you to bring your gross fetishes into jfashion or into a comm for that matter, just keep it in the bedroom where it belongs

[Anonymous No.9499004]

>>9498785
>so much anti-male
>which can also manifest as transphobia
Sorry I don't understand why any guy, trans or otherwise, would dress up in this hyper-feminine fashion. It completely rubs me the wrong way. I feel like they always do it for kinky reasons and it paints the rest of us girls who just like to be frilly and cute in a really negative light

[Anonymous No.9499012]

>>9499004
Honestly, guys who feel discriminated against only have other males to blame. It's not hard to understand why we would be suspicious when it's been proven time and time again that creeps will find their way into your community if you let them.

[Anonymous No.9499018]

>>9498785
>kinkshaming
>implying this is a negative thing
>implying anyone is obligated to accept your sexual degeneracy when you parade it in public

[Anonymous No.9499022]

>>9498785
i want to see how god awful the coords of the girl complaining about not being able to share her coords are

>>9499004
my boyfriend likes to have makeup done and wear dresses and stuff because he says it makes him feel pretty. it's probably an insecurity thing i'd assume. overall i think usually guys are painted as being "gross" so i think it would make sense for someone thinking that replicating a woman's look would make them feel pretty, since women for the most part are the "standard" for looking good.

that being said though on the flipside i def do know sissys/traps who buy lolita simply because it's a sexual thing for them. it really depends on a person-to-person basis.

[Anonymous No.9499030]

>>9498414
kek
It's always the shitstirrers who complain about elitism and drama

[Anonymous No.9499035]

>>9498346
>Thank Mana I'm part of a comm where everyone is generally nice and pleasant ^^

Yeah no one is gonna shit talk you to your face

[Anonymous No.9499038]

>>9499022
Since we have no real way to know in advance which it is and since it is more often than not a sexual thing, I can't say I'm sorry for casting a suspicious eye at males dressed in the fashion until they can show that it is not sexually linked. It's unfair and I'm sorry for it but I'm not sure how a comm should deal fairly to all involved with the issue especially since most comms have underage members.

[Anonymous No.9499043]

>>9498785
If I want no part of your sexual kink and I'm being unwillingly exposed to it through conversation and discussion then you are violating your own basic consent tenet of the bdsm 'safe, sane, consentual' agreement by involving me without my consent.

Dumbshits. And a big sign that they have shitty boundaries.

[Anonymous No.9499050]

>>9499012
This. Every single 'brolita' my comm has ever had turned out to be a creep and many of them sexually harassed members. Excuse us for being careful when there are a lot of minors in the group.

[Anonymous No.9499064]

>>9499035
Some of the people posting there are members of my comm who've made secrets, talk shit behind people's backs, and vaguepost on FB to stir shit without naming names. Talking shit to someone's face would actually be an improvement but ofc then they don't have plausible deniability and can't pretend to be poor boolied luvlies uwu

[Anonymous No.9499118]

I guess it's a good thing the people who complain like this are always the ugly fattychans who don't even belong in the fashion to begin with.

[Anonymous No.9499122]

>>9499064
Where is this stuff being posted?