Ero Lolita Thread

[Anonymous No.9029723]

Post some good ero lolita coords here.

[Anonymous No.9029734]

>>9029723

[Anonymous No.9029738]

>>9029723

[Anonymous No.9029740]

>>9029723
welll that certainly isn't one

[Anonymous No.9029743]

>>9029723
So posting this in CoF and the ita thread wasn't enough drama for you? You have to make a new shitposting thread? We all know it's bad. Come on.

[Anonymous No.9029754]

>>9029734
be on topic please!

>Erololi is a more uncommon style that resembles normal lolita style on it is slightly more revealing and often has fetish elements such as collars, handcuffs, garters, and vinyl fabric. By revealing I do not mean exposing, the skirts are just shorter and the tops are a little lower cut, or ones that draw attention to the breasts. Corsets are often seen and usually without anything underneath (such as a blouse). The style ranges from the darker stuff you see in places like "Torture Garden" to the adorable pastel frilly clothing of Kana. It's still appropriate to wear in public but it's usually meant for clubbing or going to concert. Despite being "ero" it maintains a certain innocence through frills, loli accessories, and a certain degree of modesty. It fits a more western definition of lolita (a sexual precocious - not promiscuous - little girl) but elegance and class are still important. This is a very tough style to pull off and it helps to have a lot of experience in lolita fashion before you attempt it. Most of the better examples are found in art rather than life. These ecamples are only to give you a sense of the elements that may be incorporated into ero (corsets, bloomers showing, low-cut but still modest an frilly tops), but they are not examples of perfect ero-lolis.

from the lolita handbook so we can kill bickering please. I don't have a ton of ero saved but I would like to! So let's let other people contribute and we can use the site for what it's meant for.

[Anonymous No.9029756]

[Anonymous No.9029760]

>>9029743
Post some good ero!

[Anonymous No.9029768]

>>9029760

[Anonymous No.9029776]

OP, I may still indulge you, but you started this off way wrong.
It's sad to see someone sabatoge their own thread.

[Anonymous No.9029778]

>>9029776
Post coord pics anyway. I'm having to do all the work digging through CoF and other shit.

[Anonymous No.9029780]

Some people still think ero lolita is a thing?

[Anonymous No.9029781]

>>9029778

[Anonymous No.9029784]

>>9029780
People talk about oldschool all the time. And fairy kei and that's kind of dead. Or at least it seems to be transforming into other things and the thing we knew from before isn't what's happening now.

Why does everyone here need to fight every single thing?

[Anonymous No.9029789]

>>9029784
>And fairy kei and that's kind of dead.
Yeah you just lost all your credibility here.

[Anonymous No.9029824]

I guess this might be the place to ask. Where would you say is the best place to order corsets for lolita? I've heard Excentrique has really good corsets, but are there any other brands that make exceptionally good ones? Where do you also buy quality off-brand corsets?

[Anonymous No.9029854]

>>9029824
I've heard orchard corsets is good. I'm planning on getting one of thier mesh waspies.
If it has no waist tape, it's shit. If it has plastic boning, it's shit.
Don't get corset story shit, there's quality control issues with them and there sister companies, bad enough it's a health concern since girls try tight lacing with them. One gull got stabbed really badly when the boning came free. Really shit steel too.
Local is a 100000% better than online.

[Anonymous No.9029868]

OP isn't done defending her shit coord I see

[Anonymous No.9029988]

>>9029789
I'm saying that as someone who lives in a city that has a comm for it.
I never really see new posts for that kind of fashion anymore and a lot of people have posted here in the past that it's kind of transformed into a different fashion than it used to be.
The only place I really see it alive is here and tumblr where people are getting it wrong....

[Anonymous No.9029992]

>>9029723
Still butthurt, are we?

[Anonymous No.9030001]

>>9029992
someone doesn't know how to post coords!

[Anonymous No.9030004]

>>9030001

[Anonymous No.9030011]

>>9030004
fucking hell are her legs okay???

[Anonymous No.9030016]

>>9029780
This is why people assume there is a hivemind mentality here. And then you guys act all culitsh about it when people don't agree with you or they like something you don't.

HOW DARE ANYONE DO ANYTHING POSITIVE IT MUST BE A LIE

[Anonymous No.9030023]

>>9030011
She's not the best at posing. I like her head gear though.
I'm just posting stuff from past threads cause you guys aren't.

[Anonymous No.9030025]

>>9030011
i know her. she's a tallita (tall lolita).

[Anonymous No.9030030]

>>9030023

[Anonymous No.9030031]

>>9029988
You have no idea what you're saying. There's entire groups on Facebook with thousands of members. You're just trying to defend a shitty substyle that is hardly ever pulled off well.

[Anonymous No.9030034]

>>9030030
this was posted in an old thread under sweet ero as well.

[Anonymous No.9030039]

>>9030031
You keep glossing over how I said the fashion was changing - also it's not really alive in Japan anymore it seems.
Is it still j-fashion if it comes to the west and the east just kind of forgets about it?

[Anonymous No.9030048]

>>9030039

[Anonymous No.9030053]

>>9030048

[Anonymous No.9030058]

>>9030053
this got posted several times in the archives as some fucking amazing ero coord
is it because of the texture of the fabric? isn't this just goth?

[Anonymous No.9030067]

>>9030058
latex... this is fetishy and that makes it more ero than goth. it is definitely less skanky than OP pic though, maybe this is what confused you

[Anonymous No.9030071]

>>9030058
>concept wise, I didn't personally *hate* the idea this girl came up with. I guess if you're going for the "Oh you caught me in the midst of dressing in my coord" idea, it's almost there.

>The thing that throws this off is that she just looks too put together for that to be the inspiration. It just looks as if she forgot to put a blouse on..


>So I guess what I'm saying is until someone, a designer, or someone comes out with a very concise example of ero lolita, that the substyle simply doesn't exist.

This sounds like there is almost nothing to go off really?
I think pic related fits what's in the lolita handbook though?
As does OP's pic.. which everyone drove home the idea it was a bad ero coord.
How exactly?

[Anonymous No.9030082]

>>9030067
So all you need to include is a fetish? It doesn't also have to be short?
Plus cage skirts and corsets?
What about just corsets? Still ero? Verging on ero?

[Anonymous No.9030084]

>>9030071

[Anonymous No.9030087]

>>9030082

[Anonymous No.9030097]

>>9030087
Love this one - I was hoping I'd find it in the archives.
I kind of get what the other anon was saying in the CoF thread now. You want to look more like an upper class escort, the kind that would charge 5K an hour. Not a camwhore that sometimes meets guys on craigslist but only when they need the extra burando money.

[Anonymous No.9030106]

>>9030097
Wasn't this called cosplay at some point?
You guys are fucking priceless with your overly predictable responses to everything.

[Anonymous No.9030110]

>>9030106
This girl was called a hobo hooker.
Her hair is a little sloppy but she doesn't look at all like the hobos I've seen in real life.

[Anonymous No.9030111]

>>9030053
cage skirt is not insta-ero...

[Anonymous No.9030112]

>>9030110
Okay, I admit. I was reaching with that one. Clearly I know the other anon was just trying to insult the girl in the picture which is what everyone does on this board after all.

[Anonymous No.9030113]

>>9030067
It's not latex, idiot

[Anonymous No.9030115]

>>9030111
Tell that to who ever originally posted it. Read the thread. This is from the archives.

I'm mostly trying to prove a point that people just come here and say shit, as you can go see in the archive. No one here has changed their opinion on this fashion and have just become more stubborn.

[Anonymous No.9030118]

>>9030113
What is it though? Just straight up polyester? I have a dress that has a similar sheen.. but it's a cheapo F21 thing. I thought the girl in the pic was wearing brand?

[Anonymous No.9030123]

>>9030112
This one is a self post that got quite a bit of praise. Maybe due to its simplicity.

[Anonymous No.9030127]

>>9030123
this is fucking nice but I love H+n

[Anonymous No.9030168]

>>9030118
It's pleather, which is vinyl. Latex is rubber and looks nothing like that.

[Anonymous No.9030171]

OP, I'm sorry no one likes your ugly as sin coord, but you need to lurk more.

You don't caption every fucking picture that you post, you ostrich headed cuckoo. Can't you just go sulk like a normal person? Your coord was, and always will be, ita as sin.

Inb4
>YOU AREN'T POSTING ERO!!!

No I'm fucking not, because you're a retard.

[Anonymous No.9030186]

Dumping my folder. imho best ero lolita is just a bit revealing, but emphasis is still on elegance.

[Anonymous No.9030195]

>>9030186

[Anonymous No.9030200]

>>9030195

[Anonymous No.9030202]

>>9030118
>not even knowing it's Moitie

So many newfags.

[Anonymous No.9030207]

>>9030200

[Anonymous No.9030257]

>>9030171
>you ostrich headed cuckoo
That's what you came up with?

>you don't caption every photo
I do whatever the fuck I want and I already did and it's here to stay.

[Anonymous No.9030261]

>>9030257
kys

[Anonymous No.9030271]

>>9030261
Look how mad you are. Little miss 2009.

[Anonymous No.9030274]

>>9030271
I'm a different poster you dense twat. You're just shitting up this board.

[Anonymous No.9030279]

>>9030274
She's just lashing out because daddy never loved her and nobody's giving her the attention that she so desperately craves. Dress like a cheap whore all you want, just don't call it lolita.

[Anonymous No.9030281]

>>9030261
I'm not the one that's so mad no one liked her coord that I had to start an entire thread dedicated to asspats.

[Anonymous No.9030282]

>>9030004
>rickets-chan

[Anonymous No.9030295]

>>9030274
>I'm a different poster
Prove it. Oh wait you can't!

>I wouldn't just go on the internet and tell lies!!!

[Anonymous No.9030296]

>>9030279
Again, it's really fucking unlikely she's in this thread.
Like what makes you actually think she's here replying?

[Anonymous No.9030298]

>>9030001

holy shit man, i love this. I love the fur on her upper body, gives it such a regal look. Reminds me a bit of those really flouncy fabulous looking house coats

[Anonymous No.9030299]

>>9030274
>little miss 2009
Did you not understand this?

[Anonymous No.9030305]

>>9029781
She has this really strange Olive Oyl thing going on.

[Anonymous No.9030306]

>>9030295
Except for the poster count went up and you can check for samefagging, you're just too dumb to know how.

[Anonymous No.9030313]

>>9030306
Oh am I.
Also I thought this was proven to not work? I never bother a I don't usually care who I'm replying to since everyone is anonymous.

[Anonymous No.9030318]

>>9030106
She looks so much like Mary-Louise Parker!

[Anonymous No.9030329]

>>9030318
I kind of see it. Every time I see her pictures I think she looks like someone famous but I can't place it.

[Anonymous No.9030355]

>>9030313
If you ~totes~ didn't care why did you bring it up as a point?

[Anonymous No.9030361]

>>9030313
kek you thought I was referring to an obvious troll tutorial? Dumb cunt.

[Anonymous No.9030582]

>>9030071
Because this and OP'a pic are ugly

[Anonymous No.9030592]

>>9029824
I ordered one from restyle and it's very good for the price! steel bones, waist tape, and the shape is perfect. I got the "wide hips" in black cotton. iirc they're also cheaper than orchard corsets, and if you're from europe the shipping cost isnt really too much.

[Anonymous No.9030616]

>>9029768
>good ero
These look like cheap costumes you'd find on ebay if you searched moulin rouge burlesque...

[Anonymous No.9030624]

>>9029723
>>9029738
>>9029754
>>9029760
>>9029768
>>9029781
>>9030004
>>9030071
>>9030123
Far from good, some far from lolita.

[Anonymous No.9030669]

>>9029723
I think with ero its about balance. If you're gonna have boobs out, then cover up on bottom. If you show a lot of leg with a non traditional lolita skirt, then cover up a bit more on top.

I actually like the top half of op coord and her boobs look nice imo, but the skirt looks tight in the waist and the rest of the way down is yuck. I think it could work quite well with a long aristo skirt (then i guess its not lolita anymore though)

[Anonymous No.9030699]

>>9029824
I'd buy non brand corsets over lolita brands. Corsetry is a whole specialised thing in itself; lolita brands are mainly good at lolita.
In terms of cheaper corset brands:
Orchard corsets and timeless trends are pretty tubular, but good if you just want the look of a corset and aren't particularly curvy.
Mystic City Corsets on ebay has no quality control - you can get amazing stuff as well as absolute shite from them, I've seen detailed reviews on both.
Restyle is up and coming as a corset brand, but I haven't bought from them myself. They have recently released some curvier corsets that I may check out next paycheck.
I personally like my corsets from What Katie Did and Isabella Corsetry, but they don't have as many patterns and styles as some other brands.

[Anonymous No.9030702]

>>9030058
I would say this is definitely ero desu, it is still modest and not trashy, the skirt is slightly above the knee with a small section of skin showing and the fabric is vinyl but the most important part is that it is STILL OBVIOUSLY LOLITA. Ero is supposed to be lolita it must be recognisable as lolita - good shape, good construction , good fabric (unlike OP where that lace is painfully cheap and automatically rules it out for being good lolita ero or not). Yes this could be more ero e.g. A lower neck line, shorter sleeves, shorter skirt but it's a solid starting point and example of not looking trashing - sometimes subtly wins.

[Anonymous No.9030707]

>>9030669
I agree, if it wasn't so cheap the top half would be pretty good

[Anonymous No.9030747]

>>9029754
>elegance and class are still important
That needs to be hammered into a lot of people's heads

[Anonymous No.9030755]

>>9030071
This isn't lolita, the girl said she was going for a lolita inspired look.

[Anonymous No.9030757]

>>9030755
Wasn't it still posted in CoF though? I think I remember seeing it there.

[Anonymous No.9030758]

>>9030669
I agree, but having that much boob hanging out in any kind of lolita isn't classy desu. I think >>9030186 pulls off a low neckline well; she still looks elegant.

[Anonymous No.9030790]

>>9030757
It was posted to COF, and she certainly did try and pass it off as lolita.

[Anonymous No.9030937]

>>9030624
Then most people don't know what they're talking about because that's all images from past ero threads. Some of those got nothing but praise.

[Anonymous No.9030938]

>>9030747
Right? I think most of this thread is ignoring the handbook rules and just going off what they think looks good and their opinion of "trashy"

[Anonymous No.9030992]

>>9030937
Because people who are into ero are generally itas. It does not looks good 99% of the time

[Anonymous No.9031014]

[Anonymous No.9031029]

>>9030039
By that logic, Cult Party and Mori and other vintage based fashions wouldn't be jfashion as wlel considering being dead in Japan. Oh, and visual kei.

[Anonymous No.9031215]

>>9031014
Thought the parasol was her leg for a second.

[Anonymous No.9031230]

>>9031014
isn't this pretty much visual kei though?

[Anonymous No.9031234]

Did this baby get janitor status? This thread has been swept up.

[Anonymous No.9031248]

>>9029789
Uhmmmm we even say in the Fairy Kei thread that's kinda dead (and that we're sad about it). Nowadays it's all Tumblr OTT decora stuff.

[Anonymous No.9031284]

>>9031230
No.

[Anonymous No.9031400]

>>9030071
>all those mismatching whites
>those brows

[Anonymous No.9032158]

>>9030071
God I hate this one. Sweet ero is such a minefield in general and this look steps on every mine in said field.

[Anonymous No.9032305]

>>9030758
>that much boob
That's her chest, anon. She doesn't even have visible cleavage.

[Anonymous No.9032307]

>>9032305
Sorry anon, I thought you were commenting about another picture and not the op, which is nasty.