[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 119 KB, 540x720, tumblr_o1ab24NZ381snh707o3_540[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8964149 No.8964149 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

old one's autosaging >>8957524

Also, does anyone have pictures of itas wearing VM or MM?

>> No.8964697
File: 74 KB, 506x900, 413_900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8964697

lol this was posted to EGL
>Sorry if this is not perfect,i don't have many accesories for now

>> No.8964700 [DELETED] 

>>8964697
is this a joke?

>> No.8964702

>>8964697
this is almost as bad as that guy wearing a straight up suit with RHS

>> No.8964832

>>8964697
This makes me uncomfortable. Why the fuck is everything so tight? Is he a fetishist?

>> No.8964840
File: 238 KB, 1349x1752, _20160416_154836.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8964840

>>8964149
It's bad, but not really ita-tier IMO. There's a lot of bad stuff going on but overall, not the worst.

Also hasn't this been posted very recently?

Tsk tsk

>> No.8964882

>>8964149
fatty chans' feet always look like they're about to bust out their shoes.

>> No.8965305
File: 60 KB, 480x640, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965305

The brows ruin whatever kind of coord this might have been.

>> No.8965316

>>8964149
I can't stand this Oompa Loompa. He goes on and on about ~plus size~ Lolita shit but is the absolute worst example of how to dress according to body type. You can be a fatty chan and not look a horrid mess like this.

>> No.8965327

>>8964840
It's ita. Bra showing, messy wig, no hair ornament, belt under boobs not at her middle, wrinkled skirt, too-tight cardi, crazy wavy tights, worn too-tight shoes, several pinks that do not match, ivory and white mixed in together and neither match cream f lace on skirt, brown belt matches nothing, fancy lace wrist cuffs with a mostly casual coord, straw bag matches nothing. Huge caterpillar brows but little other makeup. Which part of this is NOT ita?

>> No.8965333

>>8964832
I don't think so, probably just someone that doesn't understand how clothing is supposed to fit. That's not uncommon with people coming into lolita who aren't familiar with that kind of stuff plus if it's a dude so many men are devoid of understanding for that sort of thing (I've seen plenty of men wearing ill fitting suits)

>> No.8965334

>>8964882
In her defense if those are from bodyline there's a model of shoe where the middle of the shoe goes down, so it makes people's feet look like they're busting out of the shoe

>> No.8965341

>>8964832
My guess is because he's wearing women's clothes.

>> No.8965344

>>8965334
This is not that, look at the sides. Middle of foot is literally wider than the shoe. And except for RHS and oxfords, Bodyline shoes are wider range.

>> No.8965381

>>8965327
I'm not saying any of it is good, just that all the neutral and soft tones make her look like a nice comfy marshmallow and don't hurt my eyes

>> No.8965604
File: 209 KB, 1069x1994, _20160417_004445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965604

>>8964149
This is the closest I can find, pretty nitpicky though (fit, tights, hair, cheap hair accessory, cheap shoes, insufficient petti). It's hard to mess up MM. VM would be easier but I can't remember the name of their worst print

>> No.8965608

>>8965604
Is this ita? I like it but I have shit taste

>> No.8965611
File: 311 KB, 1219x1902, _20160417_004941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965611

>>8964149
Here's the closest thing I found to VM ita. Another nitpicky thing, just add a better blouse

>> No.8965613

>>8965604
>the name of their worst print

You must mean Flamant

>> No.8965621

>>8965611
I think even a just more subdued tone of purple would have been fine. It's just a tiny but PASTEL verses the more gentle colors.

>> No.8965624

>>8965381
Well I think it's ita and all that I critiqued does hurt my eyes. I think, "would I be happy if this person was sitting next to me at tea and we had a photo taken?" No.

>> No.8965632
File: 54 KB, 290x387, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965632

>>8965613
>flamant
You'vre got to admit though, the whole flamingo motif thing is fucking hilarious. It's lawn ornament-kei

>> No.8965661

>>8965632
I was thinking of forest rose but couldn't find any bad coords, just stock photos. Goddamn it's fucking hideous, that burgundy x green

>> No.8965712

>>8965632
Can the anon that is hoarding a bunch of different cuts and colorways of this dress please come forward.

>> No.8965718
File: 845 KB, 745x932, whats a brush.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965718

>> No.8965810
File: 38 KB, 528x960, FB_IMG_1460877755058.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8965810

>> No.8965822

>>8965604
Marie might be a cunt for a whole slew of other reasons, but I don't think she's an ita.

>> No.8965823

>>8965810
Unfortunate....everything.

>> No.8966006

>>8965810
Literally everything on this picture is unfortunate from the background to her outfit and face

>> No.8966008

>>8965632
itaqueen has this dress in her closet (I think)

doesn't mean it's ita

>> No.8966070
File: 225 KB, 720x960, tumblr_o5r1i0bACF1teta8mo3_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966070

>> No.8966125

>>8965608
>>8966008
It is nitpick. The poster even said so. Nitpick does not mean ita.

>> No.8966130

>>8964840
Its ita as fuck and she's the size of a small planet. Kill it with fire

>> No.8966131

>>8966008

Itaqueen has this print in multiple cuts and colorways, as well as the bolero. She's obsessed with it. She makes it work though so props to her I guess?

>> No.8966134

>>8965810
Is her face having an allergic reaction?

>> No.8966144

>>8964149
Whats that print tho?

>> No.8966166

>>8966144
I think its metas pink lemonade series from last year. I don't know the exact name tho

>> No.8966167

>>8966131
Pics??

>> No.8966171

>>8966070
I don't see the ita here, really. Could do with a better fitting bra / bodice but that's more nitpick territory considering everything else checks out fine.

>> No.8966172
File: 79 KB, 720x960, 1368867310335.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966172

>>8966167

>> No.8966174
File: 176 KB, 500x750, 1438471892576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966174

>>8966172

>> No.8966175

>>8966171
Funny how ill fitting clothes is what would make someone literally painful to look at

>> No.8966178
File: 61 KB, 654x960, FB_IMG_1460907913803.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966178

>> No.8966179
File: 189 KB, 400x600, 1439237433189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966179

>>8966174
3 different coords is enough. I don't want to post more cause I'm a famous tripfag being Anon rn.

>> No.8966181

>>8966070
>>8966171

>pinks dont match, especially shoes
>boobloaf
>utks on those ham legs
>shitty pose
>bonnet falling off head
>no coherent theme

yeah totally just nitpick m8

>> No.8966190

>>8966172
Ugh, you've made me reconsider selling mine. You really make it work; I haven't even tried to wear mine out yet.

>> No.8966192

>>8966190
No, you should definitely sell it. I'm ready to buy.

>> No.8966198

>>8966070
uh. I call her the blob.

>> No.8966202

>>8966070
I'm always so confused when I see this girl's coords.... like does she honestly believe she looks good? I can't fathom it

>> No.8966205

>>8966192
It's one you already have, though; the one in the top photo. I'd trade it for one of the other colors, though! I have that harsh fucking pink and want the navy.

>> No.8966209

>>8966205
I'm not the person in the picture though

>> No.8966217
File: 792 KB, 1536x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966217

>> No.8966221
File: 1.09 MB, 911x1620, Screenshot_2016-04-17-11-11-09_mh1460909688954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966221

>>8966217
This dumb lardass posted this in Lolita Updates.
>my sides

>> No.8966223 [DELETED] 

>>8966130
kek

>> No.8966238

>>8966178
Meh. This could be a lot worse. The color balance is very nice.
>them white dad sandals tho

>> No.8966248

>>8966178
Ugh
That burgandy looks so good with her skintone and I love the volume that her hijab has but why would you pair it with such a light colour dress!!

>> No.8966276

>>8966221
That 6L Bodyline dress

>> No.8966341

>>8965316
he? like legit man or "gender-fluid-transboy UWU"?

>> No.8966353

>>8966221
the asspats man, Someone even commented on how well the dress fits her and I'm like "NO IT DOESN'T!!!"

I'm not in love with the dress, I like and would like to own it however I keep seeing itas wearing it and it keeps doubting me on buying it because of it.

>as well as the bright colorways that would be difficult to coord corectly

>> No.8966480

>>8966221
Literally zero effort. This isn't even a coordinate, just a dress and shoes.

>> No.8966593
File: 37 KB, 480x640, please stop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966593

this person called the cof mods snobs because they took down a different outfit of his

>> No.8966602

>>8966593
How bad was it?

>> No.8966635

>>8966602
I think it was posted in the last thread? If it's the person I'm thinking about, p bad.

>> No.8966639
File: 116 KB, 720x960, 1460498084832.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966639

>>8966593
>>8966602
>>8966635
Here you are

>> No.8966643

>>8964149
Ita? More like Ota

>> No.8966645

>>8966639
>>8966593
What's wrong with his face?

>> No.8966646
File: 494 KB, 1015x923, 1460792748060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966646

>>8964697
Well i know what not to do now

>> No.8966649

>>8966645
its a different color, for one

>> No.8966651

>>8966217
>>8966221
>>8966221
.... does this even count? Its just the dress.

>> No.8966657

>>8966639
Jesus christ, that's bad. Did they state a reason outright for deleting it? I mean it's obvious it's not Lolita but they do let a lot of shit through.

>> No.8966680

>>8966341
Fake ass "trans" boy basically. I think they also call themself a brolita.

>> No.8966694

>>8966680
>i sexually identify as a Boeing 747

Got a nice rack for a dude

>> No.8966698
File: 76 KB, 450x322, 1437344035962.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966698

>>8964697
>mfw I almost dressed very similar to this to my junior prom because I was an ~alternative Japanese tomboy princess~
I do not need those memories right now!

>> No.8966736

>>8964149
If I saw the items laid out flat I would think this was a not great, but not terrible coord. The main problem is the fit, which is arguably the most important thing in any outfit, jfash or otherwise.

>> No.8966737

>>8966694
Is that for real or are you just kidding
Sage for being stupid

>> No.8966740

>>8966070
I saw this in real life and literally no colors match at all. And that dress looked disgustingly cheap.

>> No.8966743 [DELETED] 
File: 777 KB, 750x1334, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966743

>>8966221
It gets better.

>> No.8966745
File: 1.82 MB, 850x1137, 1455580528704.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966745

>>8966737
Anon, im kidding.

>> No.8966751

>>8966743
I don't mean to be nasty, but is she mentally all there?

>> No.8966752
File: 517 KB, 245x150, 1447376620663.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966752

>>8966743
Dont. Im having a good day today

>> No.8966754
File: 124 KB, 595x1057, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966754

Lol I have no clue what's going on here.

>> No.8966755 [DELETED] 
File: 2.24 MB, 750x1334, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8966755

>casual country
No. You look a hot mess.
Sorry, phone won't let me save photos off of FB.

>> No.8966756

>>8966754
Coun...try?

>> No.8966767 [DELETED] 

>>8966754
Whoops. Hive mind.

>> No.8966877

>>8966754
Is this another muslim lolita that's popped up? I can't tell because this coord is so normie.

>> No.8966923

>>8965611
This and daintier shoes.

Damn. I love those tights and I've always wanted to see them coordinated, but this was pretty disappointing. I know that Oxford type shoes are common in classic lolita, but the tights are meant to be showed off at the top of the foot.

>>8966174
>>8966172
This looks fun.

>>8966877
Yee. It took me forever to realize that was the other. The other Muslim lolita has over 100 likes, wtf. I'd share the pic, but I'm on a different computer right now and don't want to save it here (plus I hate saving ita pics). That girl's outfit looks tolerable from far away, but upclose you notice the choice of shoes and pants w/a long skirt.

>> No.8967036

>>8966755
It took me a minute to realize she wasn't in blackface, and that no, her head really wasn't that long.

>> No.8967122
File: 556 KB, 2048x1365, 1452387523518.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967122

These are the maids from that cringy mint maid cafe from Philly. Well their not just ita when it comes to being a maid..

>> No.8967127

>>8965810
This one claims she's a plus size model.

>> No.8967130

>>8966070
Ultra rare Pepe

>> No.8967137

>>8967122
What the fuck is that makeup?

>> No.8967153

>>8967137
>>8967122
Shes trying to be a fawn, more than likely

>> No.8967157

>>8967122
Jesus H. Christ, they look like they just picked a piece each out of someone else's closet and slapped on their own normie clothes over them. I actually don't even doubt that's what happened.

>> No.8967173

>>8967153
>>8967137
Jesus I thought that was supposed to be ganguro makeup at first

>> No.8967204
File: 55 KB, 540x960, 1458291014747.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967204

Apparently >>8966754 and >>8967122 know each other. Its true that itas stick together then.

>> No.8967232

>>8967122
The girl in all black has really weird proportions. Seriously a third of her body is tits.

>> No.8967239
File: 844 KB, 964x921, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967239

Why...

>> No.8967246 [DELETED] 

>>8967239
not lolita

>> No.8967250

>>8967239
What group was this even posted to? Its a nitpick outfit, but its not lolita. Sounds like vendetta since you also posted her name.

>> No.8967285
File: 3.18 MB, 1410x1866, tmp_430-61693530.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967285

...

>> No.8967299

I'm not sure where to ask this but is it ita to have a dark classic navy dress but wear black blouse/tights?
The white blouse I ordered is not going to come in on time

>> No.8967301

>>8967299
I dont think so in general, just depends on the dress/rest of the coord

>> No.8967302
File: 80 KB, 720x960, 10923599_10152656702637423_491861706112520762_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967302

>>8965712
>>8966008
>>8966131
>>8966172
>>8966174
sup
>>8966190
if i don't have the cut/colour combo, i'm VERY interested
>>8966205
>>8966192
neither of these are me lmao

shitty picture because it was like 3/4 am after a very long day of at ALA
whenever someone asked me who i was cosplaying i'd just tell them i was florida, it was a pretty good time
the flamant series is amazing in hot weather by the way, they're very, very lightweight and comfortable dresses

>> No.8967305

>>8967122
>pastel crocs

even outside of Lolita those are fucking atrocious

>> No.8967313
File: 1.24 MB, 640x1136, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967313

CoF has just been a goldmine today. Jesus fuck.

>> No.8967325

>>8966192
fwiw i have the navy bolero on lacemarket right now, i wound up with two and i'm selling the extra
http://www.lacemarket.us/rare-vm-flamingo-bolero/

>> No.8967346

>>8967239
Calling vendetta on this one, that was posted to the fairy kei international group. While its not the best coord, its not ita tier.

>> No.8967354

>>8967299
You could ask this in the coord help thread.
Navy and black aren't necessarily ita but it is a combo usually reserved for gothic. Depends on the jsk I guess.

>> No.8967359

>>8967313
It's Spring, the time of year itas come out of the woodwork and present themselves in public in a terribad way.

>> No.8967389

>>8966217
Literally disgusting. There is nothing about this at all.

>> No.8967744

>>8967285
>wearing a peignoir instead of a blouse
fucking WHY

>> No.8967792

>>8967744
I personally LOVE peignoir but this one with this dress.... Meh...

>> No.8967819

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TgLhz8nLWU

I cried

>> No.8967974

>>8965632
I legit need this dress in my life. Anyone selling?
[email protected]

>> No.8967995
File: 31 KB, 615x409, local loli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8967995

>>8966593
Reminds me of Edward and Tubbs

>> No.8968292
File: 82 KB, 1080x1350, 12998248_1705163199758872_5514200615282828892_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968292

So this girl went dressed like this at school today. She posted a pic on her fb tonight and everyone rushed to say how beautiful it was.
The second hand embarassment was strong at school and my inner lolita self was trying really hard not to say anything

>> No.8968295

>>8968292
This doesn't seem to be an attempt at lolita. I think she just likes certain pieces and wears them randomly. It would be better if it were true a la mode and didn't have the shoes and tights

>> No.8968299 [DELETED] 

>>8968292
not Lolita

and your post reeks of vendetta

>> No.8968306

>>8968292
>Harley Quinn dyejob
>Visible Disney Alice tattoo

The outfit is sadly not the most cringeworthy part of this photo.

>> No.8968322

>>8968292
Meh outfit, I don't really like it personally, but if she didn't call it lolita there's no reason to have this much vendetta.

>> No.8968335

>>8968299
>>8968322
>vendetta
Sheesh you guys are so quick to say vendetta. I don't even know her she's just at the same school as me.
But yeah her outfit is probably not meant to be lolita. But the cheap bodyline skirt,the alice tattoo and harley quinn dyejob combination is just cringy to me.

>> No.8968337 [DELETED] 

>>8968335
>probably not meant to be Lolita
>she goes to the same school as me
>posts in an ita thread

and you wonder why we call vendetta? really?

>> No.8968339

>>8968335
Our point is though, if she didn't really say it was lolita, even if she's wearing bodyline and a fugly dye job, it doesn't really count as ita. Plus the lead-up "Omgz u guise, this bitch at my school wore THIS" just comes off as very vendetta-y.

>> No.8968363

>>8968292
>"at school"
You have to be 18+ to use this site.

>> No.8968367
File: 395 KB, 720x1280, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968367

The shirting is completely stretched out.

>> No.8968370
File: 124 KB, 800x450, 16-04-18-22-13-59-445_deco.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968370

>>8966070
All I can think of is Kotonon from Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei

>> No.8968388

>>8968367
Yes, it's my dream dress and yes, I'm salty.

>> No.8968389

>>8968363
There are countries where you attend secondary school until at least the year you turn 19 and it's not out of question to call a university school either. So that's not what's bad about that post.

>> No.8968391

>>8967122
a-are those fucking crocs? this is a joke, right? someone please tell me this is just a joke..

>> No.8968395

>>8967346
that's not fairy kei.

>> No.8968410

>>8967313
fuckin yumi king, man... Sick of those awful monstrosities popping up everywhere.

>> No.8968436

>>8968292
Needs some combat boots and fishnets. those tea parties really throw the vibe off

>> No.8968438

>>8968367
between this girl selfposting and you fags bitching about her I can never find peace. We get it, shes fat and has mediocre coords. Lets move on

>> No.8968471

>>8968367
Not ita. Poorly fitted, but the coordination is fine.

>> No.8968474

>>8968370
Can someone give me context for this screenshot? Is it about Western Lolitas being fat and not kawaii while the Japanese ones are laughing at her?

>> No.8968479

>>8967122
>crocs
>in lolita or anything ever
No

>> No.8968499

>>8968389
True, but everything about this post screams high school to me, it's just so petty.

>>8968474
In this particular scene, I think it was about "people telling others they're cute when they're not". Also, Kotonon is a net idol who shoops herself and is ugly in real life. It has nothing to do with being Japanese.

>> No.8968553

>>8968438
Wait, she's been posted before? At least she got the colors right but I have more of an issue with the fit. If she got a breast reduction she'd probably have much better coords.

>> No.8968562

>>8968367
The underskirt really isn't working.
Know how people with AP who want to coordinate underskirts have to avoid dresses with those built in petti or else the underskirt will hang inward while the dress flows outward? That's happening there for some reason.

Also the black on the jsk is washed out compared to the black pleather purse and underskirt. It's a nitpick but it bothers me.

One last thing, just to eliminate the problem of the mismatched blues wear black shoes and ditch that weird shade of navy. Other than that everything else is ok.

>> No.8968566

>>8968553
I mean this coord hasn't been posted in the ita thread before, but her other coords have been.
They're all the same sort of not terrible but not particularly good quality
this coord alone has been posted in the CoF thread, draw thread, coord help thread, and now this one. Call me bitter, but I'm pretty tired of seeing it

>> No.8968571

>>8967995
Royston Vasey-kei

>> No.8968576

>>8968566
Yeah, sorry about that. I hadn't checked the CoF thread in over a week so I wasn't aware she was being discussed so much.

>> No.8968622
File: 118 KB, 781x781, 1934733_932677696845899_1701329963339484577_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968622

>>8966221
Oh jeez, I was here yesterday, too. The one in houston, right?

Gah, this makes me not want to go to cons or anything. I have an ugly face, shitty hair, and very dark skin, so I worry that I'd be considered ita no matter what I tried. Like itd be a nice coord wasted on a shit person. I left pretty quickly after realizing it was probably a mistake .-.

>> No.8968642

>>8967995
>>8968571
There's nothing for you here!

This is an ita thread! For ita people!

>> No.8968679

>>8967173
You are not the only one anon. It was the only logical explanation I had for whatever that makeup is.

>> No.8968700
File: 91 KB, 581x630, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968700

>> No.8968705

>>8964697
this looks like it's from a high school production of hamilton

>> No.8968711

>>8966178
This would be fine if it was a plain white dress...but the socks/sandals, though...

>> No.8968712

>>8968700
is that a vibrator on the floor

>> No.8968713
File: 134 KB, 620x356, ayy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968713

>>8968705
too soon

>> No.8968717

>>8968712
yes

>> No.8968733

>>8968700
Ew why the fuck would you keep your hitachi wand on your dirty ass floor.

>> No.8968739

>>8968733
she wants the world to know that she requires extra...power...

>> No.8968742

>>8968739
lmao

>> No.8968767

>>8966643
kek

>> No.8968791

>>8968717
She's probably a cam girl "Daddy want me to take off my pretty loli dress?"

>> No.8968792

>>8968700
The only other lolita in my tiny ass town does shit like this

>> No.8968879
File: 23 KB, 480x640, FB_IMG_1461036937713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8968879

My EYES

>> No.8968891

>>8968717
Noooo........ omg

>> No.8968895

>>8968879
Something about this person's face is legitimately scary. I'm sitting alone in the dark and it's creeping me out.

>> No.8968908

>>8968700
>replica
>cat ears
>sex toy on floor

Are you sure this isn't it's dress up?

>> No.8968909

>>8967122
Oh man, I saw them later in the day at Chinatown, the girl in Chocoberry's dress was way too short for her.

>> No.8968912

>>8966070
Every time someone says 'Hey Little Bo Peep' to us she gets stronger.

>> No.8968914

>>8966178
if she didn't have all the underlayers I think the colour scheme would have worked.

>> No.8968921

>>8967122
if the girl with the round classes hadn't worn that leopard print top her outfit would be almost salvageable.

>> No.8968923

>>8968622
As long as you put effort into your coords and try your best to look polished no one would. But seeing how you have such a weak mentality perhaps ot is best for you to stay away from meanies like us.

>> No.8968925

>>8968914
Nah, there's no maroon in the dress. This entire thing could be saved if she just had anniversary rose or something else darker

>> No.8968975

jesus this thread got me hurtin

>> No.8968985

>>8967313
That looks like that one skirt you can get in miitomo

>> No.8969015

>>8967122
Guys, ive posted them before in the Maid threads but do not attend any of their maid cafes. There cringy as fuck uggos who can't dress to save their lives and their maid service is horrible. The leader, the one in the blue dress, also talks about her fetishes to unwilling customers. She tried getting me to play along with her fetish stuff by calling me "daddy". Just please avoid them if you are in Philly.

>> No.8969019
File: 35 KB, 299x375, 042647024-2464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8969019

>>8967239
I had to.

>> No.8969021

>>8966639
are those hamburger socks?

>> No.8969024

>>8968622
Oh wow, Lor has not aged gracefully.

>> No.8969025

>>8966178
she should've worn a white sleeved blouse and maybe a very light seafoam/white hijab. The shoes and pants confuse me.

>> No.8969026 [DELETED] 

>>8969024
ugly people generally don't

>> No.8969028

>>8969021
Look like Macaroons.

>> No.8969036

>>8966593
looks like a prepubescent Frank N. Furter, before he got hot

>> No.8969037

>>8969024
To be fair, she never looked young to begin with. She has always looked old.

>> No.8969044

>>8967302
those sunglasses are a great and hilarious touch

>> No.8969053

>>8969024
Isn't she in her twenties?

>> No.8969073

>>8968622
Have more self confidence in yourself anon. And if anyone says anything about your skin color they can go fuck off to a salt mine. If you practice and work on your coords you'll be fine.

>> No.8969083

>>8969053
Yeah she's 24 I think

>> No.8969141

>>8968908
from what I know she's a furfag. Regularly dresses up in gothic/lolita

so I don't think so anon.

>> No.8969147

>>8964149
The eyebrows are killing me

>> No.8969148

>>8967122
is the one in black in WHITEFACE ?? be PROUD OF YOUR HERITAGE BITCH

>> No.8969153

>>8965604
>>8965611
Jesus fucking christ anon, just start a nitpick thread. You said yourself that these aren't ita.

>>8965632
>mfw this is my dream dress
What? I love flamingos. Fite me.

>>8969148
What the fuck are you smoking?

>> No.8969156

>>8969153
did you not read the thread? Op asked if anyone had pictures of itas in VM and MM and those pics were about as close as people got.

>> No.8969268

>>8968879
old gregg?

>> No.8969478

>>8969015
Doesn't surprise me. She's also a part of a cringy "burlesque" troupe that's lead by a chick who's salty she couldn't get into Cosplay Burlesque.

>> No.8969488

>>8967137
>>8969148
I'm pretty sure that's Steam Powered Giraffe inspired makeup.

But I suppose it's only a matter of time before SJWs start screaming that it's "whiteface" or "appropriating robot culture" or something and try to get it banned.

>> No.8969500

>>8969024
Actually she used to look much worse, her older photos make her look really bad.

>> No.8969546
File: 48 KB, 720x1078, FB_IMG_1461077328802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8969546

Casual aristo steampunk lolita...

>> No.8969565

>>8969546
that blouse is upsetting me on many different levels

>> No.8969573

>>8969546
Jaundiced knees

>> No.8969578

>>8969546
Lol at first I didn't even realize it was a salo, I've never seen anyone that much too big for them

>> No.8969582

>>8969573
I think they're tights on or some sort of leg coverage. at best it's shoop

>> No.8969742
File: 182 KB, 1365x2048, FB_IMG_1461088993479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8969742

From the Lolita Collective fashion show coord contest whatever

>> No.8969756

>>8965810
Ugly ppl shouldn't do lolita. They tend to dress badly, but not even dressing well could make them look good.

>> No.8969771

>>8969756
Well, then there would be barely any lolitas left. The average lolita is "ugly", even in Japan.

>> No.8969777

>>8969756
idk man flattering clothes and makeup can make anyone look nice as long as they don't have, like, physical deformities or whatever

>> No.8969826

>>8969756
Nah people should just learn how to do basic makeup, hair, and have basic coordination skills. Just makeup can go a long way.

>> No.8969842

>>8969777
Loads of deformed ppl wearing lolita in this thread. I wouldn't say I'm as ugly as these freaks but I can safely say I'm not beautiful enough for lolita myself. If that means less lolitas, I'm all for it...quality over quantity and all that.

>>8969826
Idk if I had to put loads of make-up on every day just to look presentable I think I'd kill myself. Anyway, make-up couldn't fix most of the ugly in here.

>> No.8969892

>>8969015
i'm grossed out by people who consider their fetishes such important parts of their identity that they mention them to complete strangers (or worse, customers). also that group looks so pleased with themselves it's pitiful and repulsive.

>> No.8969985
File: 109 KB, 1474x1081, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8969985

>>8969742

>> No.8970002

>>8969742
Those sad little OTK's...

>> No.8970112

>>8969546
You mean the point of lolita isn't to risk showing your vag?

>> No.8970115

>>8970002
they probably were supposed to be thigh highs...on someone. they look like the stripey ones you get from costume shops.

>> No.8970118

>>8965718
Hangover-kei

>> No.8970133

>>8970118
I've been there too, anon.

>> No.8970150
File: 1.44 MB, 1176x1180, Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 17.54.22.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970150

>>8964149
God have I been waiting for the ita thread. Last night I was going through the lolitafashion tag on insta. Found this "designer".

>> No.8970158

>>8965718
>>8970118
The period sweat pants version of lolita.

>> No.8970190

>>8967819
>>8967819
She isnt a "perfect" lolita, but she is sweet. I see no reason to pick on her.

>> No.8970205

>>8969044
thank you! they're very handy in the california sun since i come from a place that rains most of the time

>> No.8970210

>>8967819
>Fat teenager with brand
>That hair and no makeup
>Nooo
>Sees Ivory CCC

I cried too. I don' like to pick on teenagers because It's probably her parent's fault that she's fat and I see she has potential to be cute buried under her lipid layer, but I never wanted something to be a replica so badly.

>> No.8970230

>>8970150
I have to know: what was the caption? And is this the designer or just a model wearing their stuff?

>> No.8970238

>>8970210
I think she has potential too! It almost makes me want to help (?) her

>> No.8970251
File: 56 KB, 446x400, 1453001647973.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970251

>>8970190
I'm sure your friend is nice but she's also a fat ugly replica-chan who belongs in this thread.

>> No.8970263

>>8970251
she looks like 14 or something. relax

>> No.8970276

>>8966743
>>8966751
I was at this event, and i thankfully didn't see her, but I saw SO MANY itas looking just like her... wish I'd had my camera on me.

>tfw well-dressed lolitas ask for pictures WITH you
>tfw no itas approached all day
>got to be in the promo video

It was a pretty good day.

>> No.8970280

>>8969742
Oh my god is this pancake tits Loki? I really think this is her.

>> No.8970285

>>8967819
>click on this video expecting embarrassing hamplanet
>it's a 5/10 teen with an average body showing off her tiny wardrobe
Chill your salt, hags.

>> No.8970431
File: 68 KB, 1080x720, 13047717_1293125024034989_2547382356594675844_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970431

>I received pure happiness in the mail.

>> No.8970505

>>8970431
FUCK. I was just about to post this. What is going on with this outfit?

>> No.8970508

>>8970505
>sack OP ok
>shitty UPSIDEDOWN corset story corset
>underskirts? actual skirts?
>bats because bats

>> No.8970511

>>8970431
>>8970508
goddamnit, the fucking corset is upside down. what the fuck. how do you even do that?

>> No.8970513

>>8970508
There's so much excess fabric bunching above the bust. Why is she pairing a corset with a sack dress?

>> No.8970514

>>8970431
This is the epitome of "I'm not like the other girls" only for lolita instead

>> No.8970522 [DELETED] 
File: 249 KB, 1104x870, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970522

>>8967819
what in the fuck

>> No.8970783

>>8969546
this is none of those things.

>> No.8970788

>>8970150
"well you know I take a lot of my inspiration from Milanoo, they're really a cornerstone of the fashion with really classic looks"- this designer probably.

>> No.8970818

>>8969546
What is with itas calling their outfits casual lolita?
Lolita is more than just wearing a skirt and a bow.

>> No.8971402

>>8969268
He's definitely got a mangina.

>> No.8972558

>>8971402
And drinks old bailey's from a shoe

>> No.8972789

>>8970431
why is that underskirt longer than the dress itself

>> No.8972793

>>8972789
...Isn't that the purpose of an underskirt?

>> No.8972799

>>8972793
Well, technically yes
but what I was trying to say was there is more underskirt showing than printed dress and it looks off. Like, proportion wise the underskirt part is larger than the part of HL that you're seeing

>> No.8972800

>>8972799
That would be because she's wearing a corset. ...And wearing it wrong, mind. It's bunching the fabric up so you're seeing significantly less of the main dress, and significantly more of the underskirt (which may not be affected by the corset, due to starting at the waist.)

>> No.8972801

>>8972793
>>8972789
i think you mean the petticoat? or whatever else that is that's hanging out there..

>> No.8972803
File: 80 KB, 640x960, 13048253_1163657780340725_3894933756886774829_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8972803

>> No.8972806

>>8972803
Is it possible to have well polished ita? Because that's what I'm looking at right now. The outfit, in the context of the fashion itself, is disgusting. but everything is just...really well put together?
I'm confused and don't know how to vocalize it.

>> No.8972808

>>8972806
It's really not though. The bow placement on her head is awful, the shoes don't match anything, the dress doesn't even fit her properly. I think what's striking you is the clear photography and reasonable makeup skills

>> No.8972810

>>8972808
Maybe. I'm just...what the hell. This is the second hobby today that has rendered me completely befuddled with a photo.

>> No.8972816

>>8972810
It's alright, we all have those days.

>> No.8972817

>>8972806
No, she just has a pretty face and therefore why you think its /all/ good. Her outfit is ita shit.

If she wore a potato bag and called it lolita you'd probably say polished loleetaaahh as well.

>> No.8972820

>>8972817
Dude, I fucking said the awful was awful. You don't need to be a salty cunt. I didn't say it was GOOD. I said it was just kind of put together in a non-eye burny way. If you hadn't noticed (or, y'know, read anything in your life), we already covered why it started me.

>> No.8972829

>>8972820
>You don't need to be a salty cunt.
Take your own advice and choke on it like the cocks you choke on.

>> No.8972830

>>8972829
Way to prove what I said LMAO.

>> No.8972833

>>8972806

I have the answer for you anon. It's a nicely shooped photo. The colours were tweaked so that the background is white and neutral while the blues and pinks are super bright and oversaturated. The whites are very clean, almost blown out -- not ugly dirty grey shadow smudges. Photog knows how to blur the background and keep her in sharp focus. Her hair and face is nearly perfect -- if there were any flyaways or smudges they shooped that away too.

It's basically a really nice shoop of a really decent portrait of a very shitty ita.

>> No.8972836

>>8972833
Fair enough. I have no idea why anyone would put so much effort into such a shit outfit.
Thanks for being so sweet.

>> No.8972839

>>8972836

I just figured whoever this was is better at shooping and photos than they are at dressing lolita.

>> No.8973137
File: 133 KB, 635x960, 13062006_10208342226811904_3295132030353028252_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973137

>> No.8973176

>>8969546
She needs a bra that fits.

>> No.8973277

>>8973137
This could be so darn cute, but the wig, footwear, and potential Tumblr-kei (y'know, all the edgy political statements and crap) buttons are so off.

>> No.8973327

>>8973277
so you're saying this could be cute if she changed literally everything but the dress

>> No.8973335
File: 103 KB, 540x540, tumblr_o5fnb4uBGt1v7j2qfo1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973335

>> No.8973337
File: 111 KB, 540x540, tumblr_o52ypgJP3J1qkuxrmo1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973337

>> No.8973338
File: 180 KB, 539x810, tumblr_o4ksi3VXKA1qa541ko1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973338

>> No.8973339

>>8973337
This isn't Lolita. Why do people keep posting things that aren't even remotely Lolita in these threads? For it to be ita it has to actually encorporate SOMETHING Lolita.

>> No.8973340

>>8973339
Because if someone has said they've attempted lolita and it looks like that, it's ita. Not a difficult concept.

>> No.8973344

>>8972836
Why are you so obsessed with people being polite to you on 4chan? Jesus Christ what an idiot

>> No.8973347

>>8973340
There is not one Lolita element in it. It's just a shit outfit for normie wear. That's like me sitting in the passenger seat of a car and saying I attempted to drive. It's not ita if absolutely nothing about it remotely looks like Lolita or anything close to any sort of Jfashion. Reeks of vendetta.

>> No.8973357

>>8973347
It's easy:
>is it tagged as lolita?
>if yes, fair game
>if no, keep it out of the thread

So as long as on the source they tagged it in any shape or way as lolita, it goes. Stop crying vendetta for every little thing.

>> No.8973360

>>8973357
I come into these threads expecting actual ita, not some fat chick wearing a normie outfit.

>> No.8973369

>>8973360
Then go tell that fat chick to stop claiming her normie outfit is lolita.

>> No.8973372
File: 4 KB, 175x103, there you fucking go.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973372

>>8973360
Then fucking post some, hide the post you don't like and then fuck off, you whiny cunt, holy shit.

>> No.8973374

>>8973360
You need to calm down. Why don't you contribute if you want to bitch so badly?

>> No.8973377

>>8973369
It's obvious to anyone who knows anything about Lolita that it isn't.

>>8973372
>>8973374
I did contribute earlier, actual ita. Why is everyone getting so upset at me pointing out this post isn't at all ita?

>> No.8973378

>>8973347
Okay but I think they're saying that this person put this picture up saying it was Lolita? Which, if it was the case, makes it ita because they obviously tried and failed to put together a Lolita outfit.

Don't get so mad so easy anon
I mean the chick even looks like she's trying to pull off a Lolita pose and 'show off' the skirt

>> No.8973401

>>8968335
>I don't even know her
But you're still creepin on her personal fb?

>> No.8973403
File: 66 KB, 406x960, gothic_lolita_by_lelamimi-d95mrf8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973403

>> No.8973407
File: 50 KB, 428x643, lolita__noflutter_by_mitchi_chann-d9t9fjb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973407

>> No.8973410
File: 171 KB, 730x1095, strawberry_lolita__by_sennfrehe-d9k8bn6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973410

>> No.8973411
File: 33 KB, 480x681, sweet_lolita___proyecto_1_by_dk_nightmare-d8vxqse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973411

>> No.8973413
File: 133 KB, 1024x683, dolly_on_a_dresser__by_dollyprincess-d90s6w9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973413

>> No.8973415
File: 172 KB, 730x1095, lolita_fashion__sweet_lolita_by_arnold_s_photgs-d9pkvu2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973415

>> No.8973416
File: 53 KB, 720x960, my_cupcake_lolita_by_cutefuzzybunnies123-d8zawum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973416

>> No.8973434

>>8973377
Because you're wrong.

>> No.8973437

>>8973335
I was going to buy this dress but I'm feeling quite put off now.

>>8973410
...Is her skirt on backwards?

>> No.8973444

>>8973413
OTT ita

>> No.8973450

>>8973416
OH MY GOD

>> No.8973511
File: 43 KB, 445x503, 1455567068281.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973511

>>8973416
OH NO!

>> No.8973555

>>8970431
I DO remember a lot of gulls saying that they were tired of seeing HL coorded the same way, over and over. You got your wish.

>> No.8973592

This girl claimed to be wearing Lolita

>> No.8973594
File: 76 KB, 635x960, 9578_10206395537787025_5212675077715414216_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973594

>> No.8973604
File: 84 KB, 528x960, 6890_983416008392528_8270542976915605797_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973604

>> No.8973605
File: 160 KB, 243x247, 1461126409356.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973605

>>8973416
This is what "Sexy Lolita" would look like as a mass produced halloween costume

>> No.8973636

>>8973594
This isn't that bad. New blouse, nix the fur, better petticoat and this one is fine.

>> No.8973637

>>8973327
Nah, I think the vest could look ok in some sort of sweet/punk hybrid. And of course if the buttons aren't cringeworthy, they look fine.

>> No.8973642

>>8973594
She is so pretty. The hair is a mess though and the fur is strange

>> No.8973675

>>8973344
Why do you have so much sand in your vag? Yikes. I thanked someone for being nice, while I bit someone's head off for being a cunt for no reason when the conversation had already finished. Fucking chill.

>> No.8973678

>>8973411
I want to say this could be done well... It's just so poorly executed but I kind of like the dress? It could use some detail work, but it's kinda cute.

>> No.8973698

>>8973642
>She is so pretty
Am I new to something or are you blind?

>> No.8973721

>>8973642
Do you think man faces are pretty?

>> No.8973722

>>8973642
You need glasses, she looks like a tranny.

>> No.8973753

>>8973722
She looks like a cis woman, good god. She's not beautiful but she looks like a normal ass human. She kind of has the same face a friend of mine has.

>> No.8973773

>>8973753
Your friend looks like a man then.
You must hang exclusively around inbreds and hons to think this is how typical women look.

>> No.8973798

>>8973137
Was this at the DC Sakura Matsuri? There was a lot of ita there with some nice coords mixed in.

>> No.8973802
File: 363 KB, 504x266, 1458129065333.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973802

>>8973416
Oh honey...

>> No.8973811
File: 381 KB, 403x488, Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 8.45.15 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973811

>> No.8973821

>>8973811
What the fick

>> No.8973824

>>8973821
*fuck lol

>> No.8973830
File: 386 KB, 421x544, Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 8.55.34 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8973830

>>8973824
He's ita sissy cringe gold

>> No.8973832

>>8973811
>>8973830
I can't get over the clock, the couch and the borderpaper on the walls. Holy shit. hahaha

>> No.8973833

>>8973137
90% sure this is a "lolita" vanelope cosplay from wreck it ralph.

>> No.8973834

>>8970431
its not the best but they were prolly trying to coord it a little ero like a corset isnt the most absurd idea, my biggest critique is the underskirt but this is obviously not a finish coord she was just excited about her bag

>> No.8973957

>>8973604
Nitpick, change the shoes and cardigan and this is fine

>> No.8973991

I should post the ita from the DC cherry blossom festival

>> No.8973997

>>8973798
I was there! That was not a 10 dollar event desu

>> No.8974028

>>8973411
I kind of like the dress. The wig, choker, and wrist cuffs all scream cheap Hot Topic though.

>> No.8974062

>>8973773
Why are you such a sour human? It isn't how PRETTY women look, duh. But average people don't look pretty.
But you don't need to be a transphobic cunt to get your point across about her being ugly. I bet you're the salty bitch that is always in this damn thread.

>> No.8974082

>>8974062
Not even who you're responding to, but let's not get all PC tumblrite about a classic insult. Calling someone manfaced has been a thing long before trannies were ever mainstream common knowledge.

>> No.8974102

>>8974082
Man faced is one thing, but y'all don't need to be using tranny at all. I don't care if you think it's classic. I've seen it like twice in all the years I've been on /cgl/. (Which, frankly, has been since 2007. So.)

>> No.8974109

>>8974102
Go back to tumblr

>> No.8974113

>>8974109
Beautiful canned response. Clap clap. Very nice.
(Tip: Don't have a tumblr. Still think you're being an edgy asshole by using slurs.)

>> No.8974129

>>8973830
Looks like that fat Swedish girl who always wears two wigs sewn together.

>> No.8974134

>>8973675

Person you thanked here. I appreciated it. cgl could do to be less edgy sometimes. Thank you for the thank you.

>> No.8974136

>>8974134
No problem. /cgl/ could definitely stand to chill a little. It's making the other boards I visit look downright tame.

>> No.8974143

>>8974062
Well, I'm actually not the same replier who called her a tranny, but thanks for the (You).
More than one person uses this board, just so you know.

>> No.8974162

>>8974136
what other fucking boards do you go too? /po/? /wg/? cgl is tame as fuck

>> No.8974164

>>8974162
/cgl/ is...definitely not tame. I cannot even begin to fathom why you think it would be. We only got a mod to stop us from ruining people's lives. Come on.

>> No.8974166
File: 220 KB, 500x378, blackmoon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8974166

>>8974164

>> No.8974168

>>8974164
...you haven't been around long, have you?

>> No.8974170

>>8974168
I've been around for 8 years, as previously stated. You clearly have not.

>> No.8974171

>>8974170
Didn't read any of the rest of your dribble, I was just passing by and saw you acting like cgl is still the cesspit it used to be.

>> No.8974174

>>8974136
Seriously fuck off, you're being annoying now. I would rather deal with a salty full than this shit. Go ahead and call me a cunt.

>> No.8974175

>>8974171
>dribble
(You mean drivel?)
The same people are here, and they do the same shit, as evidenced by the fact that everyone is salty as hell whenever someone says something in the ita threads. >>8974174 See here, because they want to be called a cunt. (Maybe they get off on it?)
The only difference is that a mod cleans up all the nonsense. Don't pretend you're any better than you used to be. You're not.

>> No.8974510

>>8974113
Tumblrite pls. If you seriously have been on /cgl/ since the ice age, then you'd know not to be this salty when 4chan uses slurs. Real old flags will tell you it's always been that way.

>> No.8974513

>>8974510
*oldfags

>> No.8974515
File: 57 KB, 480x314, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8974515

>>8974164
>ruining people's lives

>> No.8974587

>>8973811
Jfc that furniture is ratchet

>> No.8975232

>>8974515
>>8974510
WELL, do we need to get into the ginsingteacat thing and how we contacted her school, which spurred a suspension, her eventual dropping out of school, moving cross country, and living with some guy she met on the web. Oh, and the active harassment at a con? Or...????
Some of them do it to themselves but y'know.

(Pst: maybe I don't like slurs that hurt my community. GASP. I know, such tumblr. Ain't no one that ran around using that slur in the old days, sorry. Fag/faggot is the worst I ever saw used on this board.)

>> No.8975353
File: 111 KB, 415x915, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8975353

>> No.8975526

>>8973416
From the thumb I thought she was bald

>> No.8975562

This is autosaging, as far as I can tell. Maybe we need a new thread?

>> No.8975579

>>8975562
yes

>> No.8975834

>>8973413
>>8973415

oh god why. it looks like they're from milanoo

>> No.8975885

>>8967285
I love the peignoir but WHY with that dress?

>> No.8975888

>>8973411
Dress brand name?
Everything else is shit though

>> No.8975892

>>8975232
Newfag here
Tell story please

>> No.8976567

>>8975892
Summery: Ginsingteacat was this weird girl we found on dA. (She was obsessed with Japan, kinda racist, and was determined she was going to become a yaoi uke boy or something.) She posted a lot about how she wanted to punch two girls at her school (we think they were her ex-friends). We wound up contacting her school because of the posts. She received suspension and the school found her social media accounts. She got suspended, and then a bunch of shit that was hard to keep track of all happened and she wound up in a mental ward for some reason. By this time, she has offended the Homestuck fandom so badly (aka: she said she didn't like homestuck lmao what) that it was no longer us doing anything so much as the Homestuck fandom doing it. (We just got it started.) She wound up dropping out of school and moved from Iowa (where she and her mother lived), to somewhere in I THINK upstate New York with this guy she met on the web. I think she was 17 at the time.
She went to some north east con of some sort and someone on here decided it'd be funny to not only stalk her through con, but make her VERY paranoid, which she was already apt to being. I recall there being a confrontation, but I can't remember what happened.

The accuracy is so-so because of the site it's on, but here's some reading material.
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Neo-classic-neko

I legit feel kind of bad for her, at the end of the day. It was a wild few months.

>> No.8976982

>>8969742
Lolita collective?

>> No.8976993

>>8973347
No, if you sat in the passenger seat and said this IS driving, and I AM currently driving, THAT would be a similar analogy.

>> No.8977005

>>8975232
Hangon, if you know about Ginsingteacat, why the fuck do you think that calling someone man faced is so bad? Additionally If you know about that why do you think that "fag/faggot" is the worst thing you've seen on this board?

little off topic, can anyone remember that harassment issue with 'something-bee' or 'bee-something' I can't remember the name or the details much basically the girl was getting harrassed so bad people where pretty much one footstep away from showing up at her house and the cops got involved. Sorry my memory is so bad, but the fun story might help to put things in perspective for this tranny faggot cunt about the tameness of this board.

>> No.8977571

>>8977005
>this tranny faggot cunt

3edgy5me there.
Chill.

>> No.8977655

>>8977005
Asherbee, she is still talked about on the farm.

>> No.8977709
File: 115 KB, 540x701, tumblr_o65laoYPj31uy9c39o1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8977709

This outfit is a complete mess

>> No.8977820

>>8977655
LMAO, this idiot is talking about Asherbee? The ginsingteacat situation was worse than that, don't even dare to pretend like that's vindication to use tranny.

>> No.8979468

>>8968499
>True, but everything about this post screams high school to me, it's just so petty.

agree with petty, but that girl has facial piercings and tattoos...not typical for the underage crowd.

since op was able to find this so quickly on fb i'm thinking it's a small art school.

>> No.8979737

>>8977709
This would be cute if she ditched the poncho and underskirt (or at least use a shorter underskirt).

>>
Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action