Closet of Frills Thread

[Anonymous No.8739917]

Old Thread
>>8725775

Starting off with Cadney in gothic.

[Anonymous No.8739922]

>>8739917
She looks really great, I think gothic suits her face much more than sweet.

Also, hahaha when will it stop...

[Anonymous No.8739934]

>>8739917
>>8739922
It definitely helps that she's not doing her usual forced smile. I almost didn't recognize her.

[Anonymous No.8739938]

Posting some recent outfits to get things rolling.

[Anonymous No.8739940]

>>8739938

[Anonymous No.8739943]

>>8739940

[Anonymous No.8739944]

>>8739943

[Anonymous No.8739947]

>>8739944

[Anonymous No.8739951]

>>8739947

[Anonymous No.8739954]

>>8739951

[Anonymous No.8739957]

>>8739954
Girl needs to stop taking pictures from this angle.

[Anonymous No.8739959]

>>8739957
Last one for now.

This coord is so cute, I just wish the shoes were red.

[Anonymous No.8739961]

>>8739944
Very sweet and I love the colour combo. I just wish she had used the darker hair as usual since the blonde is kind of unbalanced (or is not golden enough to recall the golden leafs). But that's just a minor nitpick.

[Anonymous No.8739965]

>>8739957
Maybe her kid is taking them? Or somone who is really, really small? xD Or she has a tiny tripod!

[Anonymous No.8739980]

>>8739938
Sauce on the bag?

[Anonymous No.8739982]

>>8739943
She always looks amazing though

[Anonymous No.8739983]

>>8739957
She never looks happy, that's the weird part.

[Anonymous No.8740023]

>>8739980
Angelic Pretty.

[Anonymous No.8740026]

>>8739980
Her coord rundown says the bag is AP, but I don't know the name.

[Anonymous No.8740056]

She looks so... Angry and stern? I don't like the expression, but love everything else

[Anonymous No.8740065]

>>8740056
This is flawless

[Anonymous No.8740067]

>>8740056
Is this the folk-chan or something?

[Anonymous No.8740076]

>>8739940
What dress is this? Is it the Gobelin print from AP?

[Anonymous No.8740080]

>>8740067
Folk-chan? What?
That's Tyler. She runs Lily of the Valley.

[Anonymous No.8740081]

>>8740076
Royal Unicorn.

[Anonymous No.8740082]

>>8739944
I love this! I wish to add more of those roses to her skirt.

[Anonymous No.8740084]

>>8739947
This looks so wearable and I'm loving it.

[Anonymous No.8740088]

>>8740080
Oh my bad, she looks quite similar to other girl here but forgot her nickname, sorry.

[Anonymous No.8740089]

>>8739983
I feel like there has to be something legitimately wrong w/ her. Aspergers or something? Idk.

[Anonymous No.8740092]

>>8740080
>masculine face
>Tyler
>she
Sorry for asking but is she MtF?

[Anonymous No.8740106]

>>8740056
She looks like she just stepped on some shit

[Anonymous No.8740111]

>>8739917
Aside from the makeup and the super sweet bag, this is more just dark classic. Why do people struggle so hard to actually wear gothic when they say they are?

[Anonymous No.8740125]

>>8739944
Girl has a nice coord, but she definitely should stay away from blonde hair because it doesn't favour mild tan skins at all. Even light brown would be better, or an ashier, milk-tea at most.

[Anonymous No.8740127]

>>8739957
She needs nicer glasses and a surgery for the perpetual "i'm pushing shit out my ass" face, or a face mask

[Anonymous No.8740128]

>>8739983

she might have bad teeth and is afraid to smile, I know plenty of people like that

[Anonymous No.8740129]

>>8740092
No.....

[Anonymous No.8740133]

>>8740111
But why isn't it gothic?
I seriously struggle to identify gothic nowadays.

[Anonymous No.8740170]

>>8740026
>sad bow
>scalloped edging
>deformed shape
It looks like a knockoff.

[Anonymous No.8740174]

>>8740170
It's a schoolbag from 2005. I've been looking for the same one in black for ages.

[Anonymous No.8740202]

>>8740056
She looks like the Duchess of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland

[Anonymous No.8740219]

>>8740202
I was thinking the same thing anon

[Anonymous No.8740246]

>>8740056
I don't like the head piece.
On its own it's goregous, but it looks too elaborate to fit with the rest of the coord.

[Anonymous No.8740252]

>>8740111
>>8740133
People don't call things gothic unless they're wearing Moitie these days.

[Anonymous No.8740259]

>>8740174
Well sorry anon, it looks cheap.

[Anonymous No.8740291]

>>8740170
>>8740259
I think one of those bags was in an AP mook. That's probably why it looks so cheap, most mook bags are of meh quality. I've seen other versions of that bag by AP and it looks much more sturdy.

[Anonymous No.8740293]

>>8740092
>doesn't know who tyler is

[Anonymous No.8740295]

>>8740111
>this shit again
It's not classic at all. Try again, newfag.

>>8740252
This. It's ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.8740296]

>>8740252
That's dumb because Moitie =/= gothic. Motie has stuff that falls out of the gothic category.

[Anonymous No.8740304]

>>8740295
If you can't tell the difference between classic and gothic, you are a newfag. Or one of those idiots who think black = gothic.

>>8740296
Moitie's floral pieces are still primarily gothic, although some of them can work for classic too.

>>8740252
Moitie isn't the only gothic brand. Atelier Pierrot, Atelier Boz, Sheglit, Chantilly, some Millefleurs and AatP (mostly older) stuff is too. It seems to be common for people to wear sweet dresses in black by Baby and AP and think it's gothic.

[Anonymous No.8740308]

>>8740304
Whoops, forgot to also say Antique Beast. Gothic is a very distinct style (as are all 3 major styles). I don't know why it is so difficult to understand the differences but it has been discussed a lot so check the archives if you're confused.

[Anonymous No.8740313]

>>8740246
It reminds me of voodooodolly's head pieces desu.

[Anonymous No.8740336]

>>8740259
Oh my god, get over yourself.

Newfags everywhere.

[Anonymous No.8740352]

>>8739959
She's cute. I like the first two photos the most.

>>8740056
I love headpieces like this.

[Anonymous No.8740360]

>>8740313
I dunno if you just meant the exact detailing or whatever, while voodoodolly makes some gorgeous ones they aren't unique to her. they're tudor headpieces/french hoods and you can find similar headpieces all over etsy and other historical costuming places

[Anonymous No.8740363]

>>8740360
I think maybe they just meant that voodooodolly does the tudor style headpieces. It didn't sound like anon was implying it was a copy or anything

I think it fits in with the print on the dress very nicely

[Anonymous No.8740409]

>>8739917
>isn't wearing 50 million crosses.
Erm excuse me dis isn't gofic.

[Anonymous No.8740433]

>>8740293
I've come here for five years and I have no idea who Tyler is. Enlighten me.

[Anonymous No.8740456]

>>8740304
I know Moitie isn't the only gothic brand. I was exaggerating for comic effect. Have you heard of sarcasm?

In my opinion it is possible to do a gothic coordinate with a solid black AP dress, provided it's not an overly sweet dress. The styling matters more than the brand. In >>8739917 the main piece doesn't have a ton of bows or any other sweet motifs (and it's not Angelic Pretty anyway, it's Atelier Pierrot). I would say the bonnet and floral hair accessory are neutral since they could be used in any substyle but they don't detract from the gothic feeling here. The gloves lean gothic to me. The purse is sweet, and the boots are more western goth/normalfag fashion (though certainly other people have worn JC style boots in gothic lolita). Having one sweet accessory (the purse) with a gothic main piece and otherwise gothic-leaning accessories doesn't somehow demote her coordinate from gothic to classic.

[Anonymous No.8740462]

>>8740313
There are definitely people knocking off Voodoodolly but this isn't one of them. Like >>8740360 I think the coloring and detailing are completely different. It has more of a historical feel and not the "gothic kokoshnik" look that VD's have.

[Anonymous No.8740503]

>>8740456
I think she said she as doing a style-swap with another girl and they incorporated some of their own items into it, so it's not super gothic for Cadney and not fully sweet for the other girl.

That said, I agree with you, still gothic. WTF is with people trying to pigeonhole lolita even further into their special snowflake subcategories.

[Anonymous No.8740585]

>>8739940
Angelic Pretty

[Anonymous No.8740586]

>>8739940
>>8740585
Shit I meant to reply to this, stupid phone.

[Anonymous No.8740590]

>>8739980
>>8740586

God fucking damnit I feel like a fool.

It's Angelic Pretty

[Anonymous No.8740598]

>>8740296
Wow are you seriously saying Moitie isn't a gothic brand? You know who invented "elegant GOTHIC lolita" right?

[Anonymous No.8740603]

this is the angriest COF thread I've seen in a long time hahaha

[Anonymous No.8740623]

>>8740603
really? I feel like I've seen way worse recently.

[Anonymous No.8740740]

>>8739959
Would be so much cuter if the socks weren't so mismatched.

[Anonymous No.8740745]

>>8740291
http://yaplog.jp/ap-tokyo/archive/434
It looks like a regular release to me.
Why AP.

[Anonymous No.8740748]

>>8740598
It is a gothic brand but not everything they put out is goth.

[Anonymous No.8740844]

>>8739957
Dress looks nice on her though. I remember her wearing a similarly coloured dress a while ago but it was really badly fitted. Looks like plum/maroon is her jam

[Anonymous No.8740958]

>>8740304
No, you're a fucking moron. The dress is a decadent, detailed chiffon piece, a common dress type in gothic. The off-the-shoulder is slightly seductive, another gothic hallmark (not ero, obviously- but gothic often leans slightly sexier than any other style). The shoes, while not my personal taste, are extremely common in gothic- clunky and a bit edgy. The bonnet and other accessories have a slightly vampiric aristocrat feel to them with the feathers and dripping details such as venise lace and pearl strands. Her makeup is subdued and dark.

As said, the bag is sweet, but NOTHING about this coord is classic.

Please try to learn about substyles before you spout off bullshit. The fact that you're bringing up the 'b-but kuro sweet isn't gothic!!' argument like that has anything to do with this shows that you're a cgl newfag regurgitating whatever arguments you see on here.

>>8740409
lol

[Anonymous No.8741097]

>>8740623
It just feels like every opinion stated is a fight; the civility feels lower than others in this one.

[Anonymous No.8741111]

>>8740958
>this shows that you're a cgl newfag regurgitating whatever arguments you see on here.
Kek, I love when people try to act like oldfags by spouting off shit you'll learn after a day on /cgl/.

[Anonymous No.8741113]

Jesus Christ can we post some fucking outfits please

[Anonymous No.8741163]

>>8741113

[Anonymous No.8741170]

>>8739917
this reminds me of that thread where anon was saying that lolita couldn't be off shoulder. yet the only arguement here is if it's trugaff or not. kek.

[Anonymous No.8741239]

>>8741163
The photo on the left is really unflattering but he coord is nice. If she'd put a sticker over her face it'd make me a lot more comfortable.

[Anonymous No.8741263]

>>8740089
There is. I believe she's in her 30s and still lives at home with her parents. I knew some people like her in high school... they can have conversations and do everything normally but their brains don't work like they should. They don't really think about their surroundings or notice if they act inappropriate. They can't catch onto social queues and have a hard time making friends. I know I don't know her personally, but I'm getting that vibe just from the way she comments, takes photos, and her overall facebook page.

[Anonymous No.8741267]

[Anonymous No.8741268]

>>8741267

[Anonymous No.8741269]

>>8741268

[Anonymous No.8741273]

>>8741269

[Anonymous No.8741276]

>>8741273

[Anonymous No.8741277]

>>8741276

[Anonymous No.8741278]

>>8741277

[Anonymous No.8741280]

>>8741278

[Anonymous No.8741282]

>>8741280

[Anonymous No.8741284]

>>8741282

[Anonymous No.8741286]

>>8741284
Aaaaand done.

[Anonymous No.8741293]

I wish she used a wig or something

[Anonymous No.8741296]

>>8741293
There's nothing wrong with her hair she looks beautiful.

[Anonymous No.8741316]

>>8741293
What would a wig even contribute in this outfit? The bonnet's covering the majority of her hair.

Personally I wish she'd pick up a couple of other lolita-appropriate cardigans, she wears that IW one quite a bit. It's cute but it'd be nice to see something else.

[Anonymous No.8741322]

>>8741163
>>8741239
I always get weirded out by lolitas with Santa. We argue so often it's not ageplay, and then go sit on Old Nick's knee every Christmas.

Some girls in my comm are planning meets to do photos at a big, fancy display that is put up every year, which sounded nice ... until someone said "and then we can do photos with Santa!"

So now the meet is ALL about photos with Santa.

[Anonymous No.8741501]

>>8741268
You're a wizard Harry

[Anonymous No.8741504]

>>8741293
I think her hair looks fine here

[Anonymous No.8741545]

>>8741322
Hey anon here's a fun fact: you don't have to take a picture if you don't want.

[Anonymous No.8741563]

>>8741239
It's a man.

[Anonymous No.8741566]

>>8741267
That hat is perfect with the dress!

[Anonymous No.8741571]

>>8741316
Agree on the cardigan front, it looks a bit tight on her here though but she looks fine otherwise.

[Anonymous No.8741581]

>>8741269
oh my god anon senpai i love everything from the top section

[Anonymous No.8741583]

>>8741269
I'm not feeling the bag with this, and the distribution of white vs black in the coord is too half and half for me. Her hair is really cute, though.

[Anonymous No.8741589]

>>8741282
She looks super cute in the first image - and the second is almost reaction image tier.

[Anonymous No.8741593]

>>8740056
She looks like a female Technotropism

[Anonymous No.8741595]

>>8741097
I love how this comment came right after
>No, you're a fucking moron

Fair enough, anon. People are really riled up in here.

[Anonymous No.8741599]

>>8741545
No shit! I never knew that!

My GOD! Anon, you've freed me from a terrible burden!

[Anonymous No.8741615]

>>8740958
Chiffon can work in gothic, but the cut is more suited to classic. The style of the detailing such as the ruffling and the sleeve detailing is very much classical. Off the shoulder sleeves are probably the least common in gothic and when they are worn, it is usually with a blouse underneath. Those shoes are Western goth at best and seem to be worn a lot in coords like this. I also see them in attempts at "bittersweet". JC knockoffs don't belong in a gothic lolita coordinate. The bonnet could also work in a gothic coordinate if the overall styling was more gothic, but it and the detailing (that rose with pearls can even work in sweet more than gothic) is not gothic itself. Feathers are used more in classic than gothic also. Gothic tends to use lace like chemical lace rather than venise. Her makeup has already been stated to suit for gothic, it is the most fitting part of her coordinate.

I made these same mistakes years ago as I actually learnt how to tell the difference between the three styles, but you can too if you do more research and accept that you might actually be wrong.

[Anonymous No.8741619]

>>8741269
The disgusting Loris bag ruins this, as it does so many outfits

[Anonymous No.8741620]

>>8741284
why does it look like someones finger is in the bottom of both pictures....

[Anonymous No.8741627]

>>8741619
It's really not that bad, IMO.

[Anonymous No.8741632]

>>8739922
what the hell does this mean ?

[Anonymous No.8741637]

>>8741632

It's peacockfeather; she comments on every single coord in the group with just "cute" and this time she didn't even spell it right.

[Anonymous No.8741688]

>>8741282
I actually like the sneakers here though the eyeshadow looks weird.

[Anonymous No.8741689]

>>8741620
Some phone cases make that happen or if the screen is cracked near the bottom it can cause that.

[Anonymous No.8741812]

>>8741581
I'm confused, sorry?

[Anonymous No.8741823]

>>8741637
>>8739922

sage for OT but is anyone else friends with her on facebook? she sent me a friend request after i posted on closet of frills. her facebook is... interesting, to say the least. (Yes, I know who she is and that she is disabled, but the stuff she posts is wild, even for me.)

She also posts "cute" on any of my Lolita coordinates that I post to my fb.

sorry for the off topic post.

[Anonymous No.8741836]

>>8741113
>complains about lack of outfit posts while not posting an outfit
okay.jpeg
I haven't seen this dress worn before, I'm a sucker for tartans. she seems to have a bit of boobloaf going on though

[Anonymous No.8741849]

>>8741836
It's cute but a little plain. There's so much going on in that dress that the cream/brown accessories don't really play off it enough. I can understand how those colors would be hard to match though. But I think yellowish socks and maybe some green leaves in her hair accessory could balance it out a little more

[Anonymous No.8741855]

>>8741268
>>8741501

[Anonymous No.8741856]

>>8741849
Anon I'm sorry but that sounds hideous.

[Anonymous No.8741857]

>>8741316
A ton of people overuse those millefeuille and similar IW cardigans, and they are one of my huge pet peeves. The milktea lace rarely matches anything else in their outfit.

[Anonymous No.8741859]

>>8741286
>>8741269
Fuck both of these coords are so cute!

[Anonymous No.8741864]

>>8741849
I just saw her picture with the red coat and i like it a lot better with that!

[Anonymous No.8741873]

>>8741849
Honestly, I'm glad she played it safe by going plain. I think it looks cute. Maybe she could make a matching yellow headbow. I'm also curious to see her bag.

Yellowish socks and green leaves in her hair sound yuck as fuck.

[Anonymous No.8741909]

>>8741856
Lol I totally agree, I think a brown blouse would actually be much more suitable.

[Anonymous No.8741914]

>>8741615
>the cut is more suited to classic
An Atelier Pierrot off-the-shoulder, low neckline, empire waist OP is classic? I could *maybe* see a claim that the ruching at the hem is more of a classic detail because quite a few oldschool classic pieces use that, but that is very much pushing it. The other details you listed are not classic-leaning details in the least. AtPie is a gothic brand. I think it's clear what style the dress is intended for.
As for the off-the-shoulder being least common in gothic.. sorry, but that's an asinine claim.
>I also see them in attempts at "bittersweet".
Which are usually intended to be fusions of gothic influence and sweet. So obviously, yes.
>JC knockoffs don't belong in a gothic lolita coordinate.
Personal taste is irrelevant here, but I'm not a fan of them either. They are still most commonly worn in gothic or "edgy" outfits.
>that rose with pearls can even work in sweet more than gothic
VM and MM are likely the progenitors of their popularity. Between the two I don't know who made them first, but seeing as VM is commonly worn for gothic it isn't hard to see how they made their way into the stream of OTT gothic styles.
>Feathers are used more in classic than gothic also.
Since when? I've seen maybe a small handful of headpieces with small, subtle feathers come from classic brands/coords. Gothic brands use them ALL the time in headpieces and hats. 3F uses feathers commonly in their bonnets, but their bonnets are generally usable for any style depending on the specific details/color of each bonnet. Since they've been more popular lately, maybe that's what has you confused.
>Gothic tends to use lace like chemical lace rather than venise.
Plenty of gothic items use venise. I would say the use between gothic and classic is about even, but this isn't related the point I was making about it.

I suggest you study the aesthetic differences in gothic vs classic to figure out what you're missing here. There is a huge difference.

[Anonymous No.8741933]

>>8740111
>dark classic

Please stop.

[Anonymous No.8741942]

>>8741282
I think she cut up the waist ties for her headbow, I cried a little
I hope she loves it and keeps it forever

>>8741293
Probably an unpopular opinion, but I hate the bonnet. It looks wonky and just sort of weird. Cute coord otherwise.

[Anonymous No.8741949]

>>8741163
My favorite part of her post was how she managed to misspell "turquoise" in two different ways

[Anonymous No.8742235]

>>8741914
>There is a huge difference.

Yep and if you still can't see it you're a lost cause. VM hardly ever works for gothic (their materials are thick cotton with classical cuts and detailing, wtf) but you don't know what you're talking about, so...

[Anonymous No.8742238]

>>8741933
>because classic doesn't exist in dark colours

That's all it means.

[Anonymous No.8742242]

Anybody else tired of these fucking strict as shit "rules" for substyles of lolita? Who the fuck cares if it classic or gothic, some things walk that line and that's fine. Sweet and classic also often walk that line. I just find the constant bickering really takes up so much time and space and honestly contributes nothing.

[Anonymous No.8742247]

>>8741914
Bitch, please. Stop talking in a condescending manner when you don't know what you're talking about. Change the color to white. Does it still look gothic to you? Nope? It never was gothic.

[Anonymous No.8742248]

>>8742242
Fucking this.

[Anonymous No.8742268]

>>8742238
Yes, classic does exist in dark colors. Especially jewel tones and yes, even black!

However, the coordinate is gothic. It's fucking gothic. Stop shoving your stupid fucking bittersweet-dark classic substyles into everything.

[Anonymous No.8742280]

>>8741239
So, you're saying she should hide who she is to make YOU more comfortable? Who the fuck are you? You do realize how unreasonable that sounds, right?

[Anonymous No.8742322]

oh shut up with that stupid "is gothic/no is dark classic" argument. I'm more worried about her legs: something feels off, maybe her ps.

[Anonymous No.8742335]

>>8740111
>dark classic
shut the fuck up. People complain about gothic dying out, yet when someone wears gothic, someone will 100% go "no, it's dark classic/not gothic/whatever"

[Anonymous No.8742339]

>>8742335
BACK IN MY DAY When classic was all black it would be considered gothic. Same goes for sweet.
It was so much easier when the styles were separated by color. pastels, muted and black.

[Anonymous No.8742412]

>>8739917
What happened to actually giving a rundown of what you're wearing in CoF? Why does everyone rattle off brand items like the dress and sock, have on 7 other accesories that REALLY pull the look together and then say some shit like "everything else is offbrand"
Bitch I don't care!!!! I'm just trying to find a beret like the one you got on. That is totally irrelevant in terms of finding matching accessories and in my opinion sometimes matter more than the dress. Not to mention, Toabao shops deserve just as much credit
/end rant

[Anonymous No.8742545]

>>8742412
Some people want to be original and put some time and work into searching for good accessories. Looking around stores takes a bit of effort and even with Taobao you need to learn how to use the site a bit.
Personally I'm fine with sharing my offbrand finds but I think just using others (even minimum effort) work just takes the spark out of the hobby. It feels wonderful to spend hours searching and finally finding the perfect item.

[Anonymous No.8742557]

I'm surprised no one posted this coord.

[Anonymous No.8742558]

>>8742557
Why? It's a nice photo but the coord is nothing special

[Anonymous No.8742606]

>>8741286
I saw this on coord help recently, it looks good.

[Anonymous No.8742626]

>>8741286
>bright gold wristcuffs
>light gold bag
>silver shoes

Sorry for being an autist, but why.

[Anonymous No.8742636]

>>8742412
Usually I'll do it if it's like "hat from ebay, tights from target" and just say "offbrand" but nothing is stopping you from asking on the photo where they got X item. If someone asked me I'd be happy to dig up the ebay link or whatever, but usually I assume no one gives a shit about my Target purse or whatever.

[Anonymous No.8742641]

>>8742412
Why don't you just ask on their post? I don't write them out because if you buy things from a bunch of different taobao shops and rattle them off, it can get kind of wordy.

[Anonymous No.8742644]

>>8742626
I think they are gold, but the lighting is making them appear more silvery.

[Anonymous No.8742654]

>>8741293
I think her hair looks fine but dang girl that cardigan don't fit.

[Anonymous No.8742659]

>>8742626
I think they are gold shoes, but because of the lighting and the shine of it they look a little silver

[Anonymous No.8742662]

>>8742412
I think it's often subconscious shame about taobao and cheap shit. If by offbrand they meant Vivienne Westwood or Jean Paul Gaultier they'd write it down.

[Anonymous No.8742667]

>>8741293
Is that Voldie and did she get fatter again?

[Anonymous No.8742672]

>>8742667
Voldie is pregnant with Drake's babby.

[Anonymous No.8742676]

>>8742412
You can always ask. I usually don't feel like listing every single brooch and hair clip I'm wearing, but I'm happy to share it if someone asks.

[Anonymous No.8742679]

>wow, everything in this thread is really good so far! CoF is not disappointing this week!
>>8739957
>welp.
>>8740844
>plum
>her jam

[Anonymous No.8742907]

>>8739944
I really hate this color combination

[Anonymous No.8742962]

>>8742557
did you have something specific you wanted to say about it or

[Anonymous No.8742982]

>>8742557

[Anonymous No.8742991]

>>8742982
Are those... legwarmers?

[Anonymous No.8742996]

>>8742982
Why is everything else casual but the dress

[Anonymous No.8743004]

>>8742626
The shoes are clearly gold.

[Anonymous No.8743007]

>>8742991
Fahr has worn legwarmers in her past coords. I think they look cute in some of her other coords, but not so sure about this one.

[Anonymous No.8743048]

>>8742991
It's fucking freezing out.

[Anonymous No.8743058]

>>8743007
All year or just in winter?

[No.8743007 No.8743062]

>>8743058
idk, I'd presume just in the winter. Haven't seen anything that says otherwise from her.

[Anonymous No.8743072]

>>8743062
I guess it's ok with she sees it as casual and it's for warmth and not because she believes it is super original.

[Anonymous No.8743074]

>>8742672
Don't encourage beating that dead horse into the ground.

[Anonymous No.8743081]

>>8742962
I, no only wished for more coords itt instead of bickering.

[Anonymous No.8743141]

>>8742672
>>8742667
Why are you guys still ragging on her, she stopped the drake thing and looks cute in that coord

[Anonymous No.8743346]

>>8743141
I'm not ragging, she looked fatter to a point where I wasn't sure it's Voldie.

[Anonymous No.8743777]

>>8742268
I don't think you know what greentext means. If they didn't think classic existed in dark colours, they wouldn't be saying it's not gothic. You're a moron.

[Anonymous No.8743779]

>>8742339
>BACK IN MY DAY When classic was all black it would be considered gothic. Same goes for sweet.

Nope. I guess you're one of those people who never learnt and never will learn the difference between the main styles because you're too stupid or lazy to.

>>8742335
That's because hardly anyone posts gothic coordinates anymore, and most of the time (such as this case), it isn't actually gothic.

[Anonymous No.8743812]

>>8743779
You're making things way more complicated than they actually are. Lolita isn't algebra.
Did you know goth can be cutesy and not about death and crosses? Just because there are bows on my shoes doesn't it make my coord sweet.

[Anonymous No.8743817]

>>8741942
You're going to cry over jewelry jelly anon? Over waist ties?

[Anonymous No.8743836]

Jesus christ this thread is a train wreck.
>how to bait cgulls 101

[Anonymous No.8743856]

>>8743812
>Did you know goth can be cutesy and not about death and crosses?

Doesn't make it gothic though.

[Anonymous No.8743982]

thisshitagain.jpg

Can we stay on fucking topic.

[Anonymous No.8743986]

>>8743836
Thread OP here. Mildly regretting using Cadney as the main image.
I just wanted to see what seagulls thought of this coord compared to her usual stuff. I guess this is why we can't have nice things.

[Anonymous No.8743987]

>>8743982
Posting anything I've seen from the past week or so that looks half-decent and hasn't been posted, since anons haven't been too active lately.

[Anonymous No.8743989]

>>8743987

[Anonymous No.8743991]

>>8743989
Apologies if any of these have already been posted in the last thread, it's hard to keep track.

[Anonymous No.8743994]

>>8743991

[Anonymous No.8743995]

>>8743994

[Anonymous No.8743997]

>>8743995
Sharing this with it because it seemed like a particularly horrific comment, I'd be so fucked skeeved out of someone posted that one one of my pictures.

[Anonymous No.8744000]

>>8743995

[Anonymous No.8744003]

>>8744000

[Anonymous No.8744004]

>>8742982
ugly

[Anonymous No.8744006]

>>8744003

[Anonymous No.8744007]

>>8744003
cute! shame her petticoat is poking out..

[Anonymous No.8744009]

>>8744003
Keep getting duplicate reply errors if I don't put different text in for each pic for some reason.

[Anonymous No.8744011]

>>8743997
I can't find the post, did it get deleted already?
And I had my popcorn all ready for the ensuing uproar too...

[Anonymous No.8744012]

>>8744009

[Anonymous No.8744014]

>>8744012


>>8744011
It's still there, it's just really far down the page.

[Anonymous No.8744016]

>>8744014
Finally found it, that was a wild ride.
I'm surprised no one responded, that's a pretty creepy thing to offhandedly post.

[Anonymous No.8744018]

>>8744014

[Anonymous No.8744019]

>>8744009
That might just be because you're reposting

[Anonymous No.8744021]

>>8744016
I know right? I guess she didn't want to dignify it with a response, but damn. That would have scared me.

[Anonymous No.8744023]

>>8744021

>>8744019
Nope, if I actually repost I get a different error specifically saying that the image has already been posted upthread, with a link.

[Anonymous No.8744024]

>>8744023

[Anonymous No.8744026]

>>8744024

[Anonymous No.8744028]

>>8744026

[Anonymous No.8744029]

>>8744028

[Anonymous No.8744032]

>>8744029

[Anonymous No.8744033]

>>8744032

[Anonymous No.8744035]

>>8744033

[Anonymous No.8744038]

>>8744035

[Anonymous No.8744039]

>>8744038
Aaand that's all I've got.

[Anonymous No.8744041]

>>8739938
she looks like shes about to pee

[Anonymous No.8744045]

>>8743997

[Anonymous No.8744047]

>>8744028
For fucks sake if youre gonna wear kitty ears at least make sure they match the damn coord. Why would you do this? I could of forgiven it if they were white.

[Anonymous No.8744051]

>>8741282
Fuck her ugly face.

[Anonymous No.8744052]

>>8742557
ok. great self post. lets move on from your boring coord

[Anonymous No.8744069]

>>8744039
and once again. who the fuck likes this bitch. next coord. lavender x black...how creative

[Anonymous No.8744071]

>>8744029
Looks like she spent all her money on the Classic Fairy Tales set and was left with nothing for the rest of the coord. A shame, too, because she could look really cute if she actually put an effort to finding a suitable blouse and accessories. I don't like those OTKs either, to be honest. The print is busy and cluttered enough as it is; having it on the bow, the dress AND the socks is overkill.

[Anonymous No.8744073]

>>8744012
Adorable!

[Anonymous No.8744097]

>>8742280
baaaaaaaaaaack to tumblr

[Anonymous No.8744132]

>>8744069
I've got no objections whatsoever to lavender and black but I really don't like this outfit. Even if you say it's ouji or pastel goth or whatever, I just don't like the way it looks at all.

[Anonymous No.8744135]

>>8744071
Agreed, with a nicer blouse collar this would be great.

[Anonymous No.8744275]

>>8744023
I looked at the pic of this coord. I'm staring at her eye and it seems she has no soul inside.

[Anonymous No.8744281]

>>8744033
That boobloaf.

>>8744052
I was the one who posted it and that's not me in the pic.

[Anonymous No.8744312]

>>8744029
I get so turned off seeing full sets with meh items. Should have saved money on the KC and Socks, and gotten nicer coordinating items that are more versatile.

[Anonymous No.8744329]

>>8739957
.... You know, I wonder if this expression IS her smile. It feels like she's TRYING, but she's said herself that she's uncomfortably shy and must suffer from an extreme form of social anxiety disorder.

I bet if she kept working at it with someone physically there at her side to coach her through it, she could take decent photos. She just needs to hold the camera up higher and at an angle, right, and look up INTO the lens instead of down into it. This dress actually looks really nice on her; the coloring and fit suits her. I love her headpiece, and even her hair seems like it looks nice here. The earrings are kinda cute, and the necklace seems to suit the look. The only thing I'm not sure about are those puffy sleeves. Maybe a princess blouse from GlitterTale would look cuter. I feel like black chiffon would be cute with this dress.

[Anonymous No.8744331]

>>8740056
That bodice fits her so nicely though, but I agree that the headpiece seems a trifle too elaborate. A circlet with a Renaissance-inspired braid maybe threaded through with gold or silver ribbon would have been cool.

I do like this dress.

[Anonymous No.8744332]

>>8740748
This dress is so cute! Does anyone know which it is?

[Anonymous No.8744336]

>>8740056

I want this dress but I also have three more coming in the mail.

The last thing I need is more dresses.

[Anonymous No.8744338]

>>8741267
*wistful sigh* dream dress. Perhaps not as an apron, however.

There's something about the wig I don't like.

[Anonymous No.8744342]

>>8741269
She said it was oldschool-inspired but apart from the hair I'm not getting much of an oldschool vibe from this. It seems more otome than anything else.

[Anonymous No.8744343]

>>8741836
This is SO cute!!

[Anonymous No.8744347]

>>8742982
It looks like she will come in the night to eat me and several children.

Ugh.

[Anonymous No.8744354]

>>8744003
She makes this dress look grown-up and sophisticated. Props to anyone able to do that with Angelic Pretty. /unpopularopinion

[Anonymous No.8744357]

>>8744342
How is that otome at all?
lmfao, I understand that you're new but stop trying to seem like you know what you're talking about senpai.
She didn't succeed in making it old school but
>rectangle headdress
>big peterpan collar with lace
>red RHS
Honestly if she had on the white color way of this and different socks it would be really nice.
>>8741269
Some white lace OTK's would improve this immensely.

[Anonymous No.8744361]

>>8744012
Pinkie Pie.....?

[Anonymous No.8744367]

>>8744342
Really? The headdress, blouse, shoes, and general vibe of disarray don't seem oldschool to you? I'm not saying the coord is perfect (though it is pretty cute imo) but there's absolutely nothing otome about it.

[Anonymous No.8744370]

>>8744357
Maybe it's the silhouette, then. I get the peter-pan collar + headdress + hair + RHS (all I ever wear is oldschool), but to me, in my opinion, it doesn't seem oldschool. It seems just thrown together. Maybe it's that oldschool and newschool don't quite mesh as well together in this particular coord. I do, however, agree that she ought to have used more oldschool-inspirated legwear. It would tie in all the white that's at the torso-and-up of her coord. That might just be the issue for me; that might be why it's irking me.

[Anonymous No.8744371]

>>8739917
I'd have never guessed this was Cadney if you didn't say anything.
>>8740409 sums up how I feel about the whole "this isn't gothic" debate.

[Anonymous No.8744372]

>>8744370
Inspired*

[Anonymous No.8744380]

>>8743991
Saves immediately because a rare red haired lolita coord. I really love it.

[Anonymous No.8744400]

>>8744361
Definitely not a fan of the brightly coloured wigs (and dyed real hair) Fahr uses, she's been doing it for years and I think it ruins so many of her nicer coords.

[Anonymous No.8744408]

>>8741273
This is too cute to handle

[Anonymous No.8744414]

>>8741284
very unflattering wig for her face shape

>>8744021
This might be just my personal taste but I hate seeing ankle socks with a dress that is short like this... not cute at all

[Anonymous No.8744428]

>>8744275
lmao at least she's wearing an underskirt in a way that doesn't look like shit.

>>8744312
Agreed. This would look so much nicer with solid or less-patterned legwear, I think. That print is just so busy - I'm honestly not sure how someone could coord it in a way that's not eye-murder. Anyone have decent Classic Fairy Tales coords?

[Anonymous No.8744439]

These images are just uncomfortable to look at.

[Anonymous No.8744445]

I mean this is kinda cute but it doesn't feel lolita to me

[Anonymous No.8744450]

>>8744445
The color blocking is cute but that sad, sad deflated skirt...

[Anonymous No.8744457]

>>8743982
She's becoming my new queen

[Anonymous No.8744460]

>>8744439
I mean, if you cover up her face and ignore her boobloaf, IMO this is her best coord yet. It all goes together, there's nothing glaringly wrong with this, and a cute simple coord to go out and about in. Her other coords often have some sort of issue relating to color themes and shit just being thrown together but this is all pretty cohesive. She looks nice for once.

The main thing that can be fixed is probably better angles/posing, makeup, and a different pair of glasses. (doesn't necessarily need to be "lolita" type glasses but a pair that doesn't make her eyes look so small)

[Anonymous No.8744467]

>>8744021
Aside from the gloves and velveteen/velour(?) bow this is a really cute coord, but it's so unflattering on this particular girl. The ankle socks+shorter skirt combination is hard to pull off for anyone who doesn't have very slim legs and that dress cut makes her look pregnant.

It seems AP's measurements have been getting more and more plus-size friendly but their cuts are going in the opposite direction.

[Anonymous No.8744483]

>>8744445
Oh my god I love this.

[Anonymous No.8744485]

>>8744445
I thought I was on the otome coord group instead of CoF for a second there.

[Anonymous No.8744489]

>>8744439
She always makes me feel uncomfortable whenever she posts an outfit picture. Can she breathe in that? Judging by her face in practically every picture, she's not feeling very comfortable either.

[Anonymous No.8744493]

>>8744445
It doesn't feel lolita to me either but damn this is cute as fuck.

[Anonymous No.8744745]

>>8744023
Every time I see a mint Chess Chocolate coord that isn't some horrific monstrosity with a dirty, stretched-out OoJia replica, I get unreasonably happy inside. That said, I like this coord except for the hair. I'm not very partial to straight styles in lolita.

>>8744024
That raven clip is precious, but I don't know how I feel about the feathered bolero or the cheap-looking watch.

>>8744035
I thought the fringe at the bottom was the underskirt or the JSK fraying and got very alarmed.

[Anonymous No.8744760]

>>8744445
I love this, but it does look more like otome due to the lack of poof.

[Anonymous No.8744836]

>>8744445
See, I always feel that the most important aspect of making a coord should be looking nice and cohesive first and foremost. Even if you failed to make it lolita people still wouldn't be calling you ita.

[Anonymous No.8744851]

>>8744745
What bothers me about the hair is not that it's straight, it's the bangs; side swept wig bangs always look bad, imo. Please trim your wig bangs into straight bangs or something, people.
I'm also really not a fan of the blouse, but the coord is cute overall.

[Anonymous No.8744859]

>>8744489
I think she looks a little slimmer here actually, so props to her if so
>>8744445
She looks like a cute but peppy tv show main character

[Anonymous No.8745488]

I am happy for the more casual wear but her face looks so scarily shooped.

[Anonymous No.8745490]

>>8744023
I don't know why but I just don't like her styling in this at all. Both her make up and her hair look like basic bitch style and then she is wearing full lolita. Something about it looks awkward an incongruous.

[Anonymous No.8745511]

>>8743048
why you gotta be so defensive, fahr
>>8744038
This is very cute. I'm not sure about the legwear, but at least it's pretty cohesive anyway.
>>8744457
back off, I saw her first!!!1

[Anonymous No.8745512]

>>8745488
That face has been shooped into oblivion.

[Anonymous No.8745514]

all you women are annoying shoo shoo

[Anonymous No.8745519]

>>8742982
> dat shoop
How old is she again?

[Anonymous No.8745521]

>>8745514
First day on /cgl/, is it?

[Anonymous No.8745537]

>>8744028
Ew, she looks like a 40 year old who is trying to look young and cute again.

[Anonymous No.8745541]

>>8745521
no

[Anonymous No.8745602]

>>8745488
>>8745512
Here's some photos from her lj account, around 2008

[Anonymous No.8745608]

>>8743997
Sorry to be that person but what's the deal here? What is a Little and why is it creepy?

[Anonymous No.8745611]

>>8745608
it's a "acting like a child" for daddy thing. They tend to like the other Lolita

[Anonymous No.8745612]

>>8745608
a "little" is the "little girl" half of a daddy dom/little girl fetish relationship

[Anonymous No.8745628]

Do you snoop through peoples profiles when they post?

[Anonymous No.8745652]

>>8745628
I just like seeing worn dresses, I don't care about the people actually.

[Anonymous No.8745662]

>>8743997
Eeeewwwwww

[Anonymous No.8745721]

>>8743997
I just saw this and was grossed out. Why the fuck would you tell this to someone, please don't shove your fetish into someone's face randomly. God.

[Anonymous No.8745802]

Holy shit lol

[Anonymous No.8745804]

>>8744039
I don't feel like this is even lolita.. like at all

[Anonymous No.8745810]

>>8745602
Her face looks perfectly fine, why did she shoop it so much?

[Anonymous No.8745829]

>>8745488
Her face looks like its plastic. I like the outfit but the abuse of ps makes it too uncanny valley.

[Anonymous No.8745844]

>>8739947
Personally I don't get the love for this. She's pretty and t's very cute, but it doesn't look lolita at all.

[Anonymous No.8745943]

>>8744014
The underskirt looks so bad here...

[Anonymous No.8745946]

>>8745488
dude what the fuck her face seriously is creeping me out, like this is some uncanny valley shit she looks like a robot

[Anonymous No.8745949]

>>8743997
oh my god if someone posted this on one of my coords I would be so PISSED. I hate ageplayers, fuck and I hate this fucking daddy/little/nymphette bullshit that's been propagating on tumblr. literally kill it with fire because it's the worst fetish ever. go suck on a toe or something

[Anonymous No.8745953]

>>8745949
>go suck on a toe or something
Anon I'm sorry I'm totally with you there but this made me laugh

[Anonymous No.8745966]

>>8745946
Me too anon, me too. There's something very very off about that makeup.

[Anonymous No.8745976]

>>8745488
Dis me.

Sometimes it's way too easy to go overboard with kawaii-ifying oneself like all of the kids are doing these days. I kinda like looking like a robot but I get that it's not everyone's cup of tea, lol. I'll try to keep it more natural in the future.

Here's a completely untouched pic straight off my phone if you'd like to compare. I'm not tryna pull some Barbie elf goddess shit and claim my face really looks like that.

[Anonymous No.8745983]

>>8745976
looks waaaaay better

[Anonymous No.8746001]

>>8745976
Do try not to shoop yourself too much, you don't need it. You look very cute!

[Anonymous No.8746050]

>>8745976
Oh I like that! Don't edit your pics, you're adorable

[Anonymous No.8746085]

>>8745810
She might have aged since then, still odd though.

[Anonymous No.8746088]

>>8745976
This looks great, the shooping definitely wasn't needed!

Also I'd love to ask how being an elementary teacher and also an outlandish dresser works for you. I'm thinking of getting into primary teaching and I'm always worried this fashion will call me problems even if I just wear it in my time off, due to the associations of the name lolita. The situations might be different though since I'm mostly classic/gothic/oldschool and UK-based, don't really wear sweet unless it's sweet-classic.

[Anonymous No.8746108]

>>8746088
>sweet-classic
Don't say wrong things if you want to become a teacher

[Anonymous No.8746112]

>>8746108
Ahh /cgl/, never change.

[Anonymous No.8746114]

>>8746088
Different anon, but I work for a classical liberal arts academy (private yadayada fancy and kids in uniforms). I stick to a cross between classic lolita and otome. The students like it because it fits the atmosphere with the art and literature they learn about. My coworkers (who are downright scary if you look at their resumes and accomplishments) are accepting as well, because I try to just look well put together. You won't find that everywhere however however, with staff and students. It really is up to the school. I also don't call it lolita/otome unless a coworker asks, then I give the introduction that it is a fashion style stemmed from Japan.

[Anonymous No.8746118]

>>8744445
I love this, her coord is so cute. Although I don't consider it as lolita.

[Anonymous No.8746128]

>>8742982
She looks cute in her Instagram videos, so I guess she just auto mode on beauty apps? She is in her late 20s or earlie 30s. I don't get why all Lolitas use those apps all the time, they never improve selfies.

[Anonymous No.8746202]

>>8745949
I would flip out

Fucking disgusting
>kekked at sucking toe part

[Anonymous No.8746204]

>>8746108
Lol wat?

[Anonymous No.8746212]

>>8746088
I'm the original anon. Honestly, it is entirely dependent on the school. I work with a science enrichment program that travels around to different schools teaching specialty classes. It's very hands-on, Bill Nye the Science Guy type stuff, so I'm kind of seen as the "cool teacher" anyway since I'm the one who brings dry ice and rockets and hovercraft and stuff. A little eccentricity or goofiness is actually encouraged. Our job is to get the kids excited about science and make learning fun and interactive. I'm an outlandish dresser even outside of lolita, and the kids always love my outfits, as do the other teachers. Some of my classes even have a game where they try to guess the class topic based on my outfit.

However, I definitely tailor it to the school environment. I live in LA and I teach at a couple of really uppity private schools (children of celebrities and such) as well as some catholic schools. For those, I generally wouldn't wear Lolita or stick to a very simple outfit with little or no petii or accessories, make sure the skirt is knee length or past, etc.

I'm also required to wear a lab coat at all times while teaching. It helps keep my clothes clean, which is nice, but it also interferes with things like pettis (I usually wear a very minimal one or none at all if the skirt has some built in fluff) and certain collars/sleeves.

[Anonymous No.8746220]

>>8746088
And regarding wearing it on your off-time, just be very careful of your social media. My mom was an elementary teacher for 30-something years (she just retired at 62) and didn't even have any social media accounts because her job was strict about how teachers could behave online. Students will find you and try to add you, etc. either keep everything really locked down or use an alias. It's mostly just so the students can't find you; unless you're badmouthing your job or being racist or something most places don't care what you do on your off-time.

In my case, I had a girl who stalked me online email my boss and try to get me fired. She sent him a selfie I had taken in a classroom during my prep time and said I was "making a blowjob face" (my mouth was open in the pic, I guess that's all it takes lol) and accused me of inappropriate behavior around kids. My boss was basically like "lol fuck this bitch, you should take legal action against her." Most of my co-workers and bosses know about my hobbies (cosplay, etc) and don't care at all.

[Anonymous No.8746446]

>>8746220
Yeah blackmail is a huge issue as a teacher.>>8746220

[Anonymous No.8746485]

>>8744467
>It seems AP's measurements have been getting more and more plus-size friendly but their cuts are going in the opposite direction.

Holy shit, yes. That's exactly what's happening.

[Anonymous No.8747227]

This is very pretty.

[Anonymous No.8747236]

>>8744467
>>8746485

To be fair, it's a pull-over dress, there's no zipper. So the max measurements are actually so that girls can pull the dress over their head comfortably, it's not really designed for plus-size girls to stretch the shirring out on.

Their sizing *is* all over the place, though. Celestial OP has a listed length of 89cm and bust of 98cm. Celestial dress on the other hand has a length of 98cm and bust of 91cm. Does their clientele only consist of tall skinnies and short fatties or something.

[Anonymous No.8747245]

>>8747236
You can wear them without damaging the dresses or your boobs, up to a small M,UK 10-12. More is getting rather painful to watch. So no, NOT for fatties!

[Anonymous No.8747299]

>>8746212
Ms. Frizzle posts on /cgl/?

[Anonymous No.8747338]

>>8744467
I'm down with AP upping their maximum measurements, but I wish they'd use corset lacing on more of their partially shirred JSKs for us tiny people like they used to. I have to wear maximum bra and tie the waist ties really tightly on some JSKs for them to fit me, but it looks awkward as hell anyway because it will gape in some places and fit in others.

[Anonymous No.8747433]

>>8747227
It's gorgeous but it looks like every single other gorgeous classic underskirt coord I've ever seen.

[Anonymous No.8747435]

>>8745976
>completely untouched pic straight off my phone
Lol sure.

[Anonymous No.8747521]

>>8747433
To be fair, it's that Infanta underdress I never seem to see worn well, but I get what you mean.

[Anonymous No.8747624]

>>8747435
Right? I'm surprised anons are falling for it.

[Anonymous No.8747626]

Can unfunny joke coord posts please die

[Anonymous No.8747660]

>>8747626

[Anonymous No.8747668]

>>8745976
considering phones have built in face smoothing and I have a phone that does it--you definitely turned it on.

[Anonymous No.8747674]

>>8745488
can we talk about how none of this coord even goes together properly.

[Anonymous No.8747683]

>>8747626
I reported this post to the admins. screw this crap.

[Anonymous No.8747693]

>>8747683
I was about to, but was worried that they's see who reported it and kick up a fuss with me for being anti-fun or some bullshit. Can group mods see who reports things? I'm such an awful wimp.

[Anonymous No.8747694]

>>8747693
Fuck it, reported it anyway. I really want to comment something like "This really belongs on a personal blog" but then there would DEFINITELY be a fuss.

[Anonymous No.8747756]

>>8747683
>>8747693
>>8747694
no fucks given, reported as well. don't need or want this shitting up my feed

[Anonymous No.8747886]

>>8747683
>>8747694
>>8747756
Bless you anons, doing Mana-sama's work you are

[Anonymous No.8747896]

>>8747626
Cannot see it anymore in the group, they must have delete it. YAY

[Anonymous No.8747901]

jfc this one girl who keeps posting herself everyday always has the shittiest coords. why do the bad ones always feel like they have to share so much?

[Anonymous No.8747997]

>>8747521
Fahr pulled the same with a straight from the phone photo under her last coord! Kek

[Anonymous No.8748050]

Good coord, and she looks almost genuinely happy.

[Anonymous No.8748076]

>>8748050
She's come a long way and looks pretty good now.

[Anonymous No.8748244]

>>8748050
dude, finally...gosh, the angles she was using before were so horrendous.
seems she does have an okay-looking face unlike her other pics made me think.

[Anonymous No.8748637]

>>8747997
...I think you replied to the wrong comment

[Anonymous No.8748885]

>>8747997
Yes.

[Anonymous No.8749475]

>>8741322
But she is into age play.

[Anonymous No.8749488]

>>8744097
>back to tumblr because I called you out for expecting others to cater to your special snowflakeness.
LOL. Ok.