>>8482130
>Other than that, who cares?
I feel like after two seconds of thought it should be obvious. This woman is profiting off of stolen artwork and has been for years, even after the major brands have asked her to stop and publicly declared their disapproval. If you don't care yourself, that's all fine and dandy, but to not get why others do indicates you either haven't put any form of real thought into the subject or are just a idiot.
>>8482131
>>8482516
Yeah, I really don't get the position of being against replica print dresses, but not other things made with replica fabric. She's still profiting off of AP's stolen art, regardless of what she's making with it.
>>8482551
>Meh, if you take some inspiration from other artists but create your own version of it that doesn't look literally identical, who gives a shit?
... are you missing the part of how she's still using replica fabric? This isn't a case of taking inspiration and creating your own version, it's copy/pasting AP's fabric and making it into different random shit.
>Brands kind of copy off one another with inspirations anyway. I mean why else do you think there was a sudden influx of space themed things. Deer prints.. etc.
There's a world of difference between ripping off another brand's theme and directly stealing their images. Print replicas are in no way comparable to IW doing a deer print and then BtSSB and AP coming out with kind of similar looking ones.