CoF & Rufflechat Thread

[Anonymous No.8108064]

Let's discuss everyone's favorite FB groups. Old thread fell off the board a few days ago.

[Anonymous No.8108065]

In a few of the previous threads, we talked about what kinds of rules should be implemented on CoF, like no unfinished coordinates, etc. What else do you think would be helfpul?

[Anonymous No.8108093]

>all this fattychan asspatting on Rufflechat right now

[Anonymous No.8108111]

>>8108093
Beautiful.

[Anonymous No.8108143]

Recently joined a new fb group for lolita and j-fashion (won't say which). Become horrified that most of these people are in high school and extremely immature. Some use the group as their personal blog/ status update.... Starting to really hate young people.

[Clockwork Loyalty !!AeVd1sjJ70p No.8108146]

>>8108111
Second post and she goes straight for the jugular

[Anonymous No.8108158]

Ugh.
I'd be down for an 18+ fb comm.

[Anonymous No.8108161]

>"What makes a bag a lolita bag?"

Fucking nothing. It's a bag. You find a bad to match the coord. Too many retarded questions these days.

[Anonymous No.8108180]

>>8108111
Damn,. did this get deleted?

[Anonymous No.8108182]

>>8108158
How would you even check if people are 18+?

[Anonymous No.8108183]

>>8108064
What's with the tight and socks

[Anonymous No.8108201]

>>8108065
No fandom lolita

[Anonymous No.8108207]

>>8108143
I'm more horrified when the posters are all grown, independent adult women who ACT like highschoolers.

Literally the only online comms I know of/have been apart of are Pintucks & Lace (Which is full of asspatting) and my local comm. Any recommendations or a run-down of the popular ones would be appreciated!

[Anonymous No.8108244]

I really wish Lolita could be become some sort of closed fashion where one would have to become part of an officially/universally recognized comm and/or have a respected lolita mentor/sponsor in order to be recognized as a true lolita, and there would be secrets of the fashion that only true lolita are privy to, and we can be selective of who we allow to be a Lolita. Anyone who claims to be a Lolita without these requirements would not be acknowledged in the community as a whole.
If that's too extreme I just really wish all the communities were actually more selective of who we allowed to be members.

[Anonymous No.8108265]

>>8108244
Sounds like you're interested in making lolita some kind of secret society/sorority.

[Anonymous No.8108268]

>>8108146
Stop posting.

[Anonymous No.8108271]

>>8108182
FB had some security thing I think.

[Anonymous No.8108294]

>>8108244
It's just frilly dresses, holy fuck.

[Anonymous No.8108296]

>>8108244
that's a terrible idea honsetly. I agree with communities being more selective (actually have to wear full lolita to meets, introduce themselves before joining, maybe be of a certain age, etc) but excluding people from being called a lolita is ridiculous

[Anonymous No.8108309]

>>8108294
Pretty much. I stopped caring about 'Lolita' a long time ago and just wear loli pieces (including brand) as I like.

[Anonymous No.8108313]

>>8108244

Holy shit, fucking why? They're just clothes. Let people wear what they want and call themselves what they want. Why can't it just be enough to inner eyeroll and talk about them on cgl? Jeez most people are just in it to have a good time, not chain themselves to a secret illuminati fashion group.

[Anonymous No.8108377]

>>8108244
You sound like the most speshul snowflaek in the world, and like you take your frills far too seriously

[Anonymous No.8108388]

>>8108296
>>8108244

It's not like we don't try. When girls post their thriftstore or H&M dresses we try to tell them it's not rori. When girls try to ask about F+F prom dresses we try to tell them it's not rori. When girls try to ask about Nabakov we try to tell them that this rorita and that lolita is not the same. When girls post about anime lolicon we try to tell them that this rori and that lolicon is not the same either. When girls post about Chobits we try to tell them rori is not cosplay. We tell them it's not rori if they buy burando and then wear it without a blouse or petticoat. There's handbooks out there. There's mentoring comms. There are closed comms where you do indeed need to know someone to get in.

But the newbies, they're immune to this kind of advice. They will go ahead and buy all these things and put them in the lolita tag and post them to egl anyway. Then they go ahead and cry about lolitas being elitist bitches when these things are not well received.

And when they get posted in the ita thread they cry "it wasn't rori, how can it be ita?!" anyway.

It's as close to your scenario already, except for the formal stuff. Sure, lazy ass people will label themselves lolita and spam the lolita tag with rubbish, but when they turn up here or there we're pretty quick to say "that's not lolita, this isn't recognized as lolita, what is wrong with this person taking our label without being properly lolita".

[Anonymous No.8108390]

>>8108265
>>8108294
>>8108296
>>8108313
>>8108377
I've got this hilarious image of some mythical high order from fantasy, one of those ones with the absurdly huge thrones where the members discuss things.
Made of like violet marble and swirling with magic of the high wizard council handling the judgement of knights and stuff.
Only it's a bunch of seagulls in frilly dresses.

[Anonymous No.8108393]

I really dislike how lolitas gloat about flying to other Comms to attend a meetup. Fuck off and stay in your own damn Comm.

[Anonymous No.8108398]

>>8108064
Is that an F+F skirt?

[Anonymous No.8108412]

>>8108393
Not everyone has a comm, anon. I certainly dont. I just want lolita friends also.

[Anonymous No.8108415]

>>8108244
>tfw you belong to a closed group specifically for experienced lolitas
>tfw so many good coords
>tfw no more noob bullshit
>tfw it's invite-only
>tfw none yall basic bitches will be there

[Anonymous No.8108417]

>>8108393
>spending hundreds in dollars and hours of travel time to go to a 2 hour event at a bake shop
Too much time and too much money to spend, eh?

[Anonymous No.8108420]

>>8108388
Eh, let them learn the hard way. Fuck em if they don't bother with the handbooks that took forever to put together.

[Anonymous No.8108445]

>>8108412
Start your own comm?

[Anonymous No.8108450]

>>8108388
B-but I like being an elitist bitch

[Anonymous No.8108452]

>>8108398
Yep

[Anonymous No.8108453]

>>8108388
"rori"

Stop. You sound just as retarded.

[Anonymous No.8108456]

>>8108390
Now THAT I could get behind.

[Anonymous No.8108463]

>>8108390
you
i like you

[Anonymous No.8108468]

>>8108065
I think no unfinished coordinates UNLESS you're asking for concrit. If you say "no concrit" on a clearly incomplete/test outfit, instant deletion.

I also hate the "no concrit unless asked" rule, so I'd probably just eliminate that all together as well.

[Anonymous No.8108610]

The way she purses her lips makes her face look like a potato.

[Anonymous No.8108619]

>>8108610
This scared the fuck out of me when i saw it tbh.

[Anonymous No.8108629]

>>8108445
And if no one in their area wears lolita to start a comm with?

[Anonymous No.8108640]

>>8108313
I kinda understand that anon when it comes to meets and be publically seen with itas. Normalfags would still think we're weird, but I hate being misrepresented. For example I hate being seen with this one fugly brolita who just looks like a badly groomed guy in a dress because he makes us all look like some kind of fetish club.

[Anonymous No.8108659]

ok, I was on the group for a few months but I never really check it out, so today I decide to scroll and scroll. I'm so confused, 50% are blatantly insults are the other 50% is circlejerking. You can't post a coord just for share it? Everything needs a concrit? This is like the new d_l isn't? I was overwhelmed with the amount of new faces that get 200+ likes just for put on a full set from AP or Baby and the only coords that stand out were the ones from the old fags. And another thing, with is the deal with the pics with their pets? I notice that awful coord get marvellous comments just for a white cat. I'm sorry, I have mixed emotions right now.

[Anonymous No.8108661]

>>8108619
Yeah, same. I thought someone copypasted a face as a joke.

[Anonymous No.8108673]

>>8108629
Ugh this. There is like no one where I live who wears lolita. It's already hard enough to find people interested in cosplay and they're all poor fag children still.
I have zero friends who like the cons or can afforrd it so I went by myself to one once and made lolita friends. It's a 9 hour drive to that comm for me.
Like you just don't understand how lonely it is to have to live in bumfuck nowhere and have no one interested in the same things to do things with.

[Anonymous No.8108688]

>>8108388
>Closed

[Anonymous No.8108695]

>>8108415
i know that feel. just start or be good enough to be invited to secret and/or closed groups.

[Anonymous No.8108701]

>>8108468
Meh, that would still leave us with "I just bought this kawaii skirt at H&M pls tell me what blouse, shoes, legwear and accessories I should wear with it!" posts.

[Anonymous No.8108725]

>>8108244
What if I don't care about comms? What if I wear my frills for myself only and don't care how people represent lolita?
Seriously I know why I'm not participating in my local comms, it's so bothersome to think of this as a cult.

[Anonymous No.8108764]

>>8108309
That picture is gold.

[Anonymous No.8108809]

>>8108182
Only have meet ups at cocktail bars and see who complains/can't go.
>Why are there no longer opium dens to hang out in?

[Anonymous No.8108810]

>>8108244
It will turn into something like Paris Is Burning, but with lolita.

[Anonymous No.8108836]

>>8108640
I know that feel... I'm one of the organizers in our comm. We got a few attendees that obviously disturb the others by not being really interested in Lolita at all. I still don't know if I should do something about it or not...

[Anonymous No.8108934]

>>8108265
>>8108296
>>8108313
>>8108377
>>8108388

Yeah you guys are right... My comment went overboard last night and I just woke up to it. Still, I think there needs to be some quality control, especially with the big online groups. The shitstorms in RC and the itas on COF are all fun and all, but I'd like it if there were separate groups for better coords and better discussion. COF:U is ok, but it hasn't picked up as much as COF. Who knows, maybe there's some great secret lolita comm's I don't know of because I'm not ~*initiated*~ haha.

>>8108390
This though, I can get behind.

[Anonymous No.8108948]

>>8108629
I have the same prob anon. I wish I could start a FB group for all the lone Lolitas with no comm

[Anonymous No.8108974]

>>8108468
there are groups for coord help though

[Anonymous No.8109020]

>>8108934
Christ, then make one instead of whining that there isn't one that already exists.

[Anonymous No.8109026]

>>8108836
Yes, please do something!

[Anonymous No.8109032]

>>8108393
But it's fun to travel, meet new people, expand your circle. You are missing out, Anon! I'm going to one less con this year so I can go to one more far-away lolita event, I can't wait!

[Anonymous No.8109035]

>>8109020
I would prefer to support one such group that already exists as opposed to creating yet another obscure group. I want such a group to break into the Lolita "mainstream" like COF and RC which are universally known, but with a completely different culture of not asspatting. Like I said, COF Uncensored exists, but it isn't as huge as COF.

[Anonymous No.8109091]

>join Rufflechat
>all that sanctimonious self-righteousness

what the fuck, i thought /cgl/ had the reputation for being snooty bitches. this is just snootiness of a different kind.

[Anonymous No.8109121]

>>8109091
Lmao right? The moment I hear the terms body policing and fat shaming, I stop reading.

[Anonymous No.8109128]

>>8109091
This is so true. It's not quite as bad as tumblr, at least, but still a general feeling that if you're not super nice and accepting of everything, you're horrible. It drives me nuts because no one will be able to improve if no one wants to be the "bad guy" for fear of being shit on by everyone else.

[Anonymous No.8109152]

people like this need a smack in the mouth. essays are ballin'.

[Anonymous No.8109911]

Anybody see this?
>>8109091

[Anonymous No.8109917]

>>8109911
Yeah. I almost commented on it, but it went kind of crazy. I definitely agree with being honest about your hobbies if you're pursuing something serious, but for a blind date it seems perfectly reasonable not to go all out from the get-go...

[Anonymous No.8109924]

>>8109917
It's like showing up wearing a prom dress when you're going to McDonalds.
Lolita is too Ott in most casual settings. Unless you have pieces that can be toned down to the point of looking like a normal "vintage" esque outfit, you're just not going to look right.

[Anonymous No.8109944]

>>8109917
On the one hand, I agree that going all out is a bit stupid the first time you meet someone. On the other hand, I wonder if it's not worse to spring it on them suddenly after you've been dating a while.

There's got to be some kind of happy medium.

[Anonymous No.8109951]

>>8109944
ease into it with more casual looking outfits.
Berets and cardigans with plain tights and small poof instead of bows,veils, prints, blouses and big poof

[Anonymous No.8109954]

>>8108146
kill yourself tripfag

[Anonymous No.8109968]

>>8109951
Yeah, likely the way to go with it. I already knew my partner when I got into lolita, so he saw the transition as it was happening (and the transition now as I'm slowly moving out of being so active in it). So I didn't have to worry about any of that and wonder sometimes how others handle it.

Reminds me of that comic someone did with the girl and her boyfriend. Starts with a dress. Then a petticoat, shoes, blouse and bow. Then false lashes, circle lenses, and a huge wig...

[Anonymous No.8110523]

>>8109968
I remember there being one anon on here who talked about how she would show up to first dates in lolita 4 the lulz. If you see this anon-san tell us stories I want to knooow

[Anonymous No.8110538]

>>8109911
If it is a date where he already knows (like via a dating site where you've mentioned it), yeah sure whatever. But for a blind date? You will either spend the entire date having to explain the fashion and will look like an obsessibe freak, or he'll go out and talk on facebook and reddit or whereever about "OMG I hate a blind date with a baby age play girl!!!"

I wish people would stop trying to foist their weird ass hobbies on other people.

[Anonymous No.8110550]

OP's outfit is gaudy as hell.
Holy shit.

[Anonymous No.8110555]

>>8110550
I'm hoping it's only because she upped the contrast to hell. Seriously though, those red railings are going to burn an afterimage into my laptop screen if I keep on it too long.

[Anonymous No.8110586]

>>8108064
Who is this, she looks familiar but I can't place her...I can't subject myself to those groups tonight to find out, I'll never sleep if I read that crap.

[Anonymous No.8111346]

>>8109911
The otome, more toned down suggestion was good. I think full on Lolita is a bit much at the start. Tbh I wouldn't date anyone who had a major problem with it after a while.

[Anonymous No.8111714]

So apparently Chanel Harris wants to meet up with the Paris comm. Watch out for the plastic face!

[Anonymous No.8111904]

>>8109091
/cgl/ is bitches, but more like brutally honest bitches. RC is bitches, but silly prissy bitches who don't want anyone to have their fee-fees hurt

[Anonymous No.8111920]

Did a anyone see the idealistic sew-along post on pintucks and lace? Hell no not ordering some shitty spoon flower print

[Anonymous No.8112278]

>>8109911
>mfw I wear OTT lolita 24/7
>mfw I feel kawaii as fuck
>mfw I don't a shit about what other people think
>mfw interviewed in full lolita and got a call back the next day
>mfw $$$ stacks on deck

Sucks to suck

[Anonymous No.8112281]

>>8109968
I remember that comic, wish I had saved it.

[Anonymous No.8112282]

>>8109911
>being so socially inept you can't wrap your head around the context in which you should wear lolita, or what to wear on a date

who fucking cares.

[Anonymous No.8112305]

Praying she could screw up somehow and never get to meet the Paris comm so she wouldn't embarrass the rest of America.

[Anonymous No.8112318]

>>8111714
>>8112305
Ugh I know this is awful. Why don't we pool our funds so GirlyHoot can go to Paris for Spring Break and we meet with the Paris Comm?

[Anonymous No.8112319]

>>8112318
lol nah.

[Anonymous No.8112325]

>>8108610
it's called duck face

[Anonymous No.8112357]

>>8112318
Wait, did I miss something, who is that?

[Anonymous No.8112364]

>>8112318
She's already rich. She jets all over the country on constant vacations. Also yeah she's a semi cute girl, with semi cute coords (Most of the time. Her old glasses and wigs were trash) but she's not the epitome of the best american lolita.

[Anonymous No.8112384]

>>8112318

You're kidding right?

[Anonymous No.8112426]

>>8109911
I had to go through the Rufflechat thread again because I seriously thought that was a brolita for a minute. I just want to reach out to the kid and try to make her over into something date appropriate at the least - idk, some people can't pull off crew cut socks.

[Anonymous No.8112460]

>>8112364
You're thinking of the wrong person. This is Chanel Harris, infamous for whiteknighting sissybro, photoshopping herself with Michael Jackson, wearing a mask as makeup, and wearing a Hello Kitty bedsheet as a dress.

[Anonymous No.8112482]

>>8112460
Huh. So that's what her face kind of actually looks like

[Anonymous No.8112530]

>>8112460
>tfw probably as ugly as her
Oh well, at least my coord and shooping skills are better than hers.

[Anonymous No.8112646]

>>8112460
Pretty sure anon was talking about GirlyHoot being rich and going all over, not this girl.

[Anonymous No.8112699]

>>8112646
Which is not the person who posted on RC about going to Paris in >>8112305

[Anonymous No.8112714]

>>8112460
But we don't want her in our comm. She's a nobody, if she host something at home most people won't come. Asking on the local lolita comm for a meet is another story though.

[Anonymous No.8112727]

>>8112460
What the fuck is with her SHOES?!

[Anonymous No.8112789]

>>8112699
No, but anon was replying to
>>8112318

Is it really that hard to follow a conversation on 4chan? It went like this:
>anon posts about Chanel going to Paris and probably embarrassing herself
>"we should pool our money to send Kate instead!"
>wtf no Kate's rich and doesn't need that
See?

[Anonymous No.8112815]

>>8112482
Yo, if you go to her instagram it is so confusing. Like she can actually look pretty and normal in some pictures (ones out side of lolita), but for some reason when she wears lolita she gets a smooshed face and hunches her shoulders up so she loses her neck. I don't get it. She's actually not scary ugly but actually MAKES herself scary ugly.

[Anonymous No.8113353]

>>8108143
Almost sure I joined the same group as you hoping I'd meet friends I could relate with but it's all tumblr-esque 15 year olds trying to promote their blogs and being mad at the world.

[Anonymous No.8113359]

>>8108161
Because there are still many purists who insist offbrand items don't belong in lolita. I can understand not wanting to tell people a quicksilver gym bag will totally go with their gothic coord but not every bag has to be $100 and shaped like ponies and covered in bows or some shit.

[Anonymous No.8113395]

>>8113353
Sounds about right, and I often cringe at the new posts, especially because often it has nothing to do with fashion, but I find myself not wanting to screencap and post the idiocy elsewhere because it should be a nice place or whatever, and it will most certainly start drama.

[Anonymous No.8113414]

>>8108610
I clicked the picture thinking "meh, can't be worse than pastel-cuties duck face"
I was so wrong, now my screen is covered with tea because I spat it all out when I saw her face. Thank you anon.

[Anonymous No.8113532]

>>8112789
Yes I was talking about Kate/Girlyhoot not needing the money. Sorry for the confusion I guess?

[Anonymous No.8114009]

I feel bad that I kinda like this concept even though I usually hate fandom coords. I think with a nicer blouse/vest and styled hair it would be understated enough to be cute as fuq.

[Anonymous No.8114050]

>>8114009
Fandom coords are normally dumb, but Harry Potter ones are either nice or inoffensive. I mean, they're just making a school uniform lolita, which is a fair inspiration source. They aren't using things like quidditch bed sheet skirts and Harry Potter costume glasses the way Doctor Who coords do.

[Anonymous No.8114052]

>>8114009
I agree. A better blouse and if the vest were more fitted and nicely made. I kind of like what she was doing with her hair, though it could be styled in a much neater fashion. There are far worse fandom coords to cringe over.

[Anonymous No.8114378]

Any other groups that are nice to just look at that I can join without participating in and wont kick me out? I'm shy and just want some daily lolita on my newsfeed and to peek at.

[Anonymous No.8114436]

I am so fucking sick of the big sisters group. Kanonique if you read this please make a rule about actually giving decent advice and not allowing people to say "No they should do what makes them happy" or "the rules are made to be broken" or "Wear what you want and still call it lolita they can't say it isn't!" This is NOT okay. I am sick of it. Two girls specifically keep getting picked on for giving good solid advice and actually being honest when something is fucking ugly. Also maybe add a couple more mods to step in in these situations...

[Anonymous No.8114715]

>>8114436
THIS SO HARD
I try to be helpful but it's so hard to be the voice of reason when no one will back you up because all the other sane people are afraid to get attacked by the ita hoard.
There need to be more mods with the ability to put their foot down as a final authority on a subject.

[Anonymous No.8114729]

>>8114436
If you're talking about the girl who wanted to chop up that kimono earlier...I was the one that said not to do it and told the other girl that the ita monstrosity she posted wasn't okay (which she was okay with and deleted it) I wasn't mad until that girl who isn't even a lolita yet told me that it's mean to tell someone they are wrong. I'm sorry? I've been a lolita for 8+ years. I help people out all the time. I like to think I give good advice. I'm not the most tactful at wording things sometimes...but I'm really sick of people coming in behind me and calling me mean. The girl who isn't a Lolita but who is a "fashion student" really ticked me off too. I get that fashions evolve and that things change...but there are some things that will always look bad and never be lolita. Just telling people to do whatever they want is the worst answer possible.

[Anonymous No.8114745]

>>8114729
If you're Joanna, you may want to chill a little bit...you started off by saying the dress was "seriously awful" The kimono itself was a lovely kimono, it just wasn't suitable for lolita. I'm not saying I don't agree with you, I didn't say anything because you pretty much covered the bases, but those girls just aren't ready for someone that blunt. If you want them to actually take your advice, you have to word things in a both honest and delicate way Honeyed words, honey.

[Anonymous No.8114801]

>>8114745
No the dress that was seriously awful was a wa lolita lace monster another girl posted. Not the kimono!

[Anonymous No.8114803]

>>8114801
Forgot to add she deleted it which is why there are a few things there that don't make sense.

[Anonymous No.8114808]

>>8114803
Oh! I didn't get to see that.

[Anonymous No.8114809]

>>8108610
What print is this?

[Anonymous No.8114824]

>>8114808
Yeah I guess I could have tagged her to delineate who I was referring to...but even /I/ thought that was going to far lol. It was like ebay quality, made of shiny polyester/fake silk, with really bad rachel lace. The whole shebang. I still should have been nicer but I was so shocked to see someone suggest something like that my first step was to harshly (maybe too harshly) over correct for it. I'll work on not being a bitch.

[Anonymous No.8114828]

>>8114824
You weren't a bitch at all lol just too harsh for them to handle. I wish they all had as thick of skins as those on /cgl/ but alas...

[Anonymous No.8114830]

>>8114809
It's Lumpy Princessfag's Cocktasm in teh Mystical Derpfacia.

[Anonymous No.8115409]

>>8114436
my main issue is people abusing the "big sister" tag
i feel like anyone should be able to self identify as middle or little but to use big you need to apply to the mods? maybe answer a few questions, give a wardrobe picture and some coordinate shots?
some of the girls using the big sister tag are middle at an absolute stretch and it just becomes the blind leading the blind

[Anonymous No.8115438]

>>8115409
I can think of two girls specifically that give terrible advice on the regular under the big sister tag. The one with the bearded dragon pic is one and the girl with the hello kitty profile pic is the other. And I know it's cheap to steal a pic off of their facebook but THIS is one of those two girls...If this is her gyaru I don't want to see her lolita. Hello kitty girl is also uggo and I've never seen a pic of her in lolita.

[Anonymous No.8115456]

>>8115438
>gyaru

[Anonymous No.8115457]

>>8115438
Th...this is a joke. R...right anon-chan?

[Anonymous No.8115914]

>>8111904
realest shit i've read all day right here, thank you

[Anonymous No.8115932]

>>8115438
This person should not only not be giving advice to anyone, she needs to be flat out kicked out of the group unless she can prove she isn't as bad at lolita as this.

[Anonymous No.8115958]

>>8115932
Oh but she is that bad at lolita

[Anonymous No.8115973]

>>8115958
Then she needs to be told off by the mod. It just comes down to it being unfair to the new girls to get such shitty advice.

[Anonymous No.8116096]

>>8115409
I agree with this quite a bit. Tags shouldn't be self-chosen, you should have to automatically start with the little sister tag and apply to move up from there. There really need to be more mods besides Kanonique. She's really great and I know she does her best, but she's only one person. I feel like if there were two or three others, so much more could happen with that group.

[Anonymous No.8119505]

No excuse for those shoes.

[Anonymous No.8119552]

>>8112460
I want more pictures of her. Her her face looks so fucking weird.

[Anonymous No.8119560]

>>8112815
What is her instagram username? I want to see more or her freaky face.

[Anonymous No.8119562]

>>8108610
This picture just about describes my face when I saw this.Why does she do that?

[Anonymous No.8119564]

>>8119505
Hey, that's me. What shoes would yoiu suggest? I was trying to bring out the pink in the dress.

[Anonymous No.8119571]

>>8119564
I didn't post you, but I would recommend black or blue shoes.

[Anonymous No.8119578]

>>8119505
Agreed.

>>8119564
Those pinks don't match and are in different shades. You should have used blacks to match the JSK. I like that you have Meta Swan.

[Anonymous No.8119581]

>>8119571
Mm I'd love to try blue next time.
My bf suggested black. I didn't want to lose my feet with the black tights.
Thank you for the suggestion

[Anonymous No.8119585]

>>8119578
In person the pinks are closer to matching. If I got the same shade for all the pinks would it work? Thank you as well for the suggestion

[Anonymous No.8119586]

>>8119578
It's not even so much about the fact that the pinks are different for me. It's more about the fact that the pink in the print is very subtle and sparingly distributed, and then suddenly BAM there's a huge chunk of pink at the bottom of the coordinate and it's really jarring. Same goes for the blouse and wristcuffs too, I think it's too much pink for how little it's used in the actual print, though the pink rings can stay IMO.

[Anonymous No.8119608]

>>8119586
Ah ok. That makes sense
Then the tights with little pink hearts could stay?

[Anonymous No.8119611]

>>8119608
Lol I couldn't tell if they were hearts or not, but I'm sure they look cute in person so I'd say yes.

[Anonymous No.8119651]

>>8119585
No. But that might just be my personal opinion. I honestly don't think that there is enough pink (of the same shade) in the print to pull it out as an accent colour. Unless you went OTT with the pink, which I think would look bad anyway.

[Anonymous No.8119671]

Not only is this hideous, but she had to pull one of the "it's casual so no concrit". Bitch there aint nothing lolita about this. It's ugly as fuck, no petti, an you got a cardboard chocolate box on yo head.

[Anonymous No.8119677]

>>8119671
So, I was wondering about this. Why is it against the 'rules' to tell people their shit isn't lolita? That's an objective fact, not con-crit or opinion.

[Anonymous No.8119690]

>>8119677
Is it? Because I want nothing more than to tell her jeans and converse are not lolita.

[Anonymous No.8119702]

>>8119677
>That's an objective fact, not con-crit or opinion
Silly anon, lolita is anything your frilly little heart desires!
So in short, you'd be getting piled on by snowflakes and itas telling you what 'is' and 'isn't' lolita is just, like, your opinion, man.

[Anonymous No.8119713]

>>8119702
It's this shitty attitude that allows bullshit to run rampant. I feel like we need to take back lolita from underaged tumblr.

[Anonymous No.8119720]

>>8119690
She didn't even wash her jeans? Ain't nothing kawaii about them cumstains

[Anonymous No.8119778]

>>8119671
It burns knowing that this fucking bitch thinks that's lolita.

[Anonymous No.8119810]

>>8119677
Screen cap it and challenge the mods by PM. It's against the rules to post non-lolita fashions, that coord is not Lolita so it doesn't belong in the group.

[Anonymous No.8119892]

>>8119505
I like that on the right would change the shoes though.

[Anonymous No.8120112]

>>8119552
>>8119560
I can't remember it sorry. I remember her name having 'chantilly' in it and I found it under the sweet lolita tag I think.

[Anonymous No.8120120]

>>8119671
This fucking kills me. It's so shitty and not lolita. As punk it's ok but gawd. And the retarded compliments, fuck, you blind?! Get out of lolita.

[Anonymous No.8120150]

>>8120120
I often think the compliments on posts in this group are very insincere and the girls posting them are just having a laugh.

[Anonymous No.8120161]

>>8119671
She just got told anyway.

[Anonymous No.8120179]

>>8120161
Not strongly enough.

[Anonymous No.8120182]

>>8119505
Is that a Forever 21 blouse? I think I have the same one but I haven't used it in any coords yet, I haven't been able to match it with anything yet.

[Anonymous No.8120489]

>>8119671
Must have been either deleted by her because "meanies" or by the mods for legit not being lolita.

[Anonymous No.8120506]

>>8112278
are you me? living the good life.

people need to stop being special snowflakes. fuck ya'll

[Anonymous No.8120553]

>>8108244

[Anonymous No.8120708]

>>8109944
Yeah, the happy medium is called communication. You explain your hobby like a normal person would.
Oh wait. All you bitches are psycho, I always forget.

[Anonymous No.8120711]

>>8112278
mind asking what you interviewed for? cause that's the kind of job I want

[Anonymous No.8120722]

>>8120711
You should probably also ask what she wore. Dressing like Fanny Rose isn't quite the same as this >>8108610 or this >>8112460.

[Anonymous No.8120723]

>>8119720
lol you think men cum on legs
shut up fat virgin

[Anonymous No.8120728]

>>8120722
oh, so like dressed down.
I'm sure they didn't paint their eyes and shit.

[same anon as 8120981 No.8120992]

>>8119671
I can't remember if this was posted on the Big Sisters forum or the Lolita Mentoring forum because the only the "special snowflakes '''''certified''''' lolita mentors~~~~~" can give advice on the Lolita Mentoring forum and not people who have actual sense.

[Anonymous No.8121078]

>>8120723
not who you replied to, but some men like to cum wherever the fuck they want. Leg guys like to cum on legs. Ass guys cum on asses. Foot guys cum on feet.
>shut up fat virgin
Moral of the story here is to not call people out as virgins when you're pretty sexually ignorant yourself.

[Anonymous No.8121100]

>>8120182
Yeah, I have that in mint. I usually wear it under a bolero to pop a little extra color. I find the sleeves are a little too short.

[Anonymous No.8121662]

>>8114436
>>8114715
>>8114729
How can you guys stand being in that group?

I joined and quit 6 hours later when someone asked "What is taobao?" and when someone told them to google it their comment was deleted and they were reminded to "be lovelies~" or whatever

That was about all I could take

[Anonymous No.8121669]

i dont wanna discriminate against brolitas but like... bro...

[Anonymous No.8121673]

>>8119677
>>8119690
People tried to do this before and they were threatened with bans lol

[Anonymous No.8121674]

>>8121669
This is actually an improvement. They usually wear pastel sweet with short sleeves.

[Anonymous No.8121676]

>>8121669
To be fair, if you blacked out the face the coord is rather nice, wig included. Dude is doing the best with what he/she has so props to them for putting in some effort. That's a lot more than I can say for some other people into lolita.

[Anonymous No.8121679]

>>8121669
his face is forever in my nightmares

its too bad that he started transitioning so late, he'll never pass for female

[Anonymous No.8121681]

>>8121674
oh the coord is pretty great it's just his face is gonna haunt my dreams

[Anonymous No.8121750]

>>8121078
Everyone on this board is stupid enough to reply to obvious bait, jesus christ, when are you guys gonna learn where you are on the internet. Go back to RedTumbit

[Anonymous No.8121766]

Regarding COF: has anyone purposely posted an ita coord to show how many insincere asspats they receive? Nothing terribad, just 'ita on purpose' to prove this point?

[Anonymous No.8121767]

>>8111714
this is so embarrassing

[Anonymous No.8121781]

>>8108415
There are a lot more informal private comms than people think. Its just not openly discussed for obvious reasons.

[Anonymous No.8121787]

>>8121669
So what would you do? If you don't invite them, that's discriminatory but if you do, then many others are uncomfortable with her presence. I'm not sure how I'd deal with it if she were in my community, honestly.

[Anonymous No.8121818]

>>8121781
yeah, it's called "having friends"

[Anonymous No.8121836]

>>8121818
Obviously that but something else too that goes beyond just friends circling together. I know of a couple of actual private comms where the members were hand-picked for being nicely dressed, well mannered and able to afford better outings more often than the public comms in these cities. We weren't all friends at the time and even now we don't all hang out together that much except for meets.

[Anonymous No.8121847]

>>8121669
Fuck you. I saw that coord in person and they looked incredible.

[Anonymous No.8121899]

>>8121847
aight

[Anonymous No.8121907]

>>8121669
Ok I've seen a lot of pics and read some stuff about this person and I will say this is the best they have ever done. Everything before this was creepy and just ew but it's finally a step in the right direction and we should encourage it I think. If weirdos are going to wear lolita clothes, then its best if they do it elegantly like this.

[Anonymous No.8121914]

>>8121847
diffanon but are you really that buttbothered that people find his face ugly

[Anonymous No.8121917]

How the fuck is it unfair that Lockshop wants actual customer to enter? Girl has some retard logic.

[Anonymous No.8121936]

>>8121669
This is honestly one of her best coords, quite frankly. I hope she moves more towards this than the really sweet stuff she usually wears.

[Anonymous No.8121944]

>>8121679
Why did they never get facial feminizing surgery if they are completely trans and living/working as a woman in all other aspects? I'm assuming they had trans surgery? I know it's probably rude to wonder, but no ruder than those being mean about it.

[Anonymous No.8121952]

>>8121669
It's mean but I normally just put my thumb over her face so it doesn't distract from the co-ord

[Anonymous No.8121970]

>>8121669
she wouldn't even be that ugly if it wasn't for that fucking chin

[Anonymous No.8121988]

>>8121917
People can be very entitled. I'd like to enter, but I became poorfag right before I was able to buy a LS wig or 2. It's hardly unfair she only wants people to model her wigs, especially if it'll be the product they'll be advertising.

[Anonymous No.8122088]

>>8121669
If he's going about wanting to be a woman, he should REALLY look into getting facial reconstruction surgery for MtFs.

[Anonymous No.8122676]

>>8120711
I interviewed for a programing position coding in C. They don't care at all what you look like, as long as you are a good programmer and know what you're talking about is important to them.

>>8120722
I wore Dream Sky in Sax. I'm mostly sweet, but I like gothic too.

[Anonymous No.8123532]

>Im black too and don't find that offensive, so I wasn't trying to be! But my bad! Im not trying to turn this post into an argument. And I also didn't come here for people to make fun of my writing.

Girl... you know you're not Black... and, stfu and sit down.

[Anonymous No.8123574]

>>8123532
All this coming from a dark-skinned girl who uses the palest foundations she can find

[Anonymous No.8123600]

>>8123532
>>8123574

#truth

She could for real be the GLW skin lightening spokesperson, tho.

[Anonymous No.8123614]

>>8123600
They should hire her as a model. She even whitewashes herself beforehand!

[Anonymous No.8123632]

>>8123532
Damn, can someone get caps?

[Anonymous No.8123634]

>>8123632
I gotchu anon, 1 sec.

[Anonymous No.8123654]

>>8123634
bless

[Anonymous No.8123655]

[Anonymous No.8123657]

[Anonymous No.8123659]

[Anonymous No.8123660]

This is when it got de

[Anonymous No.8123661]

The fact she liked her own post kills me.

[Anonymous No.8123664]

>>8123661
Also, sorry for not blocking out the name, but it's kind of needed for that cap.

[Anonymous No.8123665]

>>8123655
>>8123657
>>8123659
>>8123660
you're doing the lord's work anon

[Anonymous No.8123666]

>>8123661
>>8123664
Can anyone get caps of her freakout in the current post? I'm not at my PC and I really hope it gets saved for posterity.

[Anonymous No.8123667]

>>8123660
* deleted

>>8123666
On it.

[Anonymous No.8123669]

>>8123666
I'll try capping them quickly.

[Anonymous No.8123674]

>>8123666
the power of trips compels you

>>8123667
you're a star, anon. hopefully you don't get caught in her block rampage.

[Anonymous No.8123691]

>>8123661
omg I knew I recognized this idiot

[Anonymous No.8123697]

[Anonymous No.8123701]

[Anonymous No.8123711]

[Anonymous No.8123715]

>>8123697
Loved all the white girls telling her she was racist in the original post...

[Anonymous No.8123716]

[Anonymous No.8123718]

>>8123659
>the term "coloured" can be offensive
When will these white sjw learn that the phrase "people of colour" is the exact same as saying "coloured people."

[Anonymous No.8123721]

>>8123697
Oh wow, thanks, anon. My program decided to crap out halfway through my caps so I'm glad you got them.

[Anonymous No.8123722]

>>8123718
But it's not though... nice bait try

[Anonymous No.8123723]

>>8123721

[Anonymous No.8123727]

>>8123722
A'ight, tell me how it's different. I'm legit curious, because I, and most other minorities I know, hate the term because it still lumps us all into a group of "coloured." Switching the words around doesn't make it any different.

[Anonymous No.8123732]

>>8123727
As a minority as well, the term "coloured people" has a historical context associated with it. Yes POC may not be "ideal" for you but it's on the same level as saying African American instead of Black. Saying "coloured people" is like saying "nigger" instead of Black. There's a huge difference.

[Anonymous No.8123734]

>>8123727
Colored person is hugely used as a Southern-US insult towards blacks, for one of many reasons, whereas person of color has been adopted and accepted by many minority groups and has been upheld in modern academic writing by those who would be considered PoC. Saying colored person ascribes a status to them as if it's a disease, person of color puts the person before the status.

[Anonymous No.8123738]

>>8123727
Also, American race relations holy fuck it's important to know the difference over here. White supremacists say colored person, I don't know how it is in other countries, but the historical context on it over here is huge.

[Anonymous No.8123741]

>>8123734
>>8123738

Thank you.

[Anonymous No.8123742]

>>8123723
That's perfect!

Also, will you be continuing? There's a bit more that was added.

[Anonymous No.8123745]

>>8123732
>>8123734
I too am curious. So what do we call white people?

[Anonymous No.8123747]

>>8123742
Just call me your drama news anchor.

>Bringing you live coverage of Rufflechat drama since a few minutes ago

[Anonymous No.8123752]

>>8123745
I personally will either use the term white or Caucasian when speaking about them en masse. Which is the equivalent of saying Black or African American.

[Anonymous No.8123755]

>>8123745
Whatever you want, really. Slurs against whites don't hold any power other than hurt feelings. Not saying you should run around calling everyone a cracker, but there isn't a context against whites. I call them whites, but in the US, most just call them people, whereas other groups have to be specified, i.e., all the damn news headlines.

[Anonymous No.8123756]

>>8123745
Statistically exotic?

[Anonymous No.8123761]

>>8123747
Holy shit that Michelle girl is a twat

[Anonymous No.8123762]

>>8123756
To be serious, though, I usually go with white or Caucasian.

[Anonymous No.8123766]

>>8121669
Sauce on the dress? It's lovely and I absolutely have to have it

[Anonymous No.8123767]

>>8123747
I believe I shall!

[Anonymous No.8123768]

>>8123752
Caucasian isn't even correct, really, since that refers to groups of people who have ancestry from the Caucasus mountains, aka, almost "middle eastern" but not quite (Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan). You know, those people who aren't even considered white anymore, but aren't demonized enough to be considered the umbrella term "Arabs".

[Anonymous No.8123773]

>>8123768
Neither is "African American" or "Hispanic" but they're an easy way to identify a larger group of people. No one is being specific here. And none of those terms have a negative and painful historical context. If I meet someone and they tell me how they would like for me to refer to them, I'll call them as such.

[Anonymous No.8123775]

>>8123768
Different anon, this is really interesting! Learn something new every day.

[Anonymous No.8123776]

>>8123766
Haenuli Angel of Music. I think 2nd reservation might still be open or it just ended. You can find it on the 2nd hand comms if it's the latter.

[Anonymous No.8123777]

>>8123752
All Caucasians are not white, though. And once you bring in Europe/Eurasia there are light-skinned ethnic minorities that might look White but historically and culturally have more in common with 'POC'... The whole idea of splitting up into white and non-white is clumsy and america-centric.

[Anonymous No.8123778]

>>8123755

If you keep calling them that, and that type of fucking attitude gets ingrained into society, it's going to have a fucking context pretty soon.

Jesus christ people do you even history.

[Anonymous No.8123779]

This thread. . .

[Anonymous No.8123781]

>>8123776
Second reservation ended sometime last week.
There were a few being sold secondhand though.

[Anonymous No.8123782]

>>8123778
White people are the majority, it's not hurting anyone.

From one cracker to another, fucking deal with it.

[Anonymous No.8123784]

>>8123779
Oh God, people who free advertise for brands via tattoo make the worst fucking life choices.

[Anonymous No.8123786]

>>8123782

LOL bitch I'm yellow.

I can't believe the attitude on this website. It's not okay to insult people, and certainly not based on their color. Encouraging a double standard will only enhance the inequality that you're trying to bridge.

[Anonymous No.8123791]

>>8123778
>implying tumblr insults are going to have an effect on real life
these white tears tho

[Anonymous No.8123793]

>>8123786

[Anonymous No.8123794]

>>8123786
Do you even know where you are right now? I think it's time to go home.

All together now, white people are a ruling majority. Hurt feelings don't promote systematic inequality, because that's all that that can do.

[Anonymous No.8123797]

>>8123793
holy shit yes

[Anonymous No.8123798]

Holy fuck that Michelle chick is still going. I thought she finally flounced.

[Anonymous No.8123802]

>>8123794

4chan, where all insults are equal, and I can say cracker with as much impunity as nigger or chink.

Do you know where you are?

[Anonymous No.8123806]

>>8123802
Those widdle white feelies throb so red right now
:((((

There is a problem here... You don't fucking get it. That's the problem. I have no solution for you.

[Anonymous No.8123812]

>>8123776
It's still open, I don't think they'll end it soon, did they announce a due date for this reservation?

>tfw I'm planning to buy a set
>tfw my pay-day isn't until thursday

FUCK

[Anonymous No.8123819]

>>8123812
scratch that. I just checked online, I'm so fucked. I've been wanting this dress since the 1st reservation...

[Anonymous No.8123823]

>>8123819
Hey anon jsyk when the first reservation ended I emailed Haenuli and she said that once they ship everything out and make sure everyone got the correct orders they put up extras for sale, so keep an eye out on their storenvy

Also, fair warning that if you have a long torso that the OP won't be flattering :( I had to sell mine for that reason. I looked super frumpy and stocky.

[Anonymous No.8123826]

>>8123660
I don't see how person of color is a better term either. It's literally just the words "colored person" rearranged.

[Anonymous No.8123831]

>>8123826
i'm confused too. is it like how you're not supposed to say "schizophrenic people" and instead say "people with schizophrenia"?

[Anonymous No.8123835]

>>8123826
Because there is actually a history behind the specific phrase "coloured people" or "coloured person"

[Anonymous No.8123840]

>>8123826
See:
>>8123732
>>8123734
>>8123738

Think disabled person vs. person with a disability. The big difference is that the terms have consciously been rearranged to demonstrate linguistically that the person has a characteristic and isn't to be initially defined by that characteristic. But, I'm not here to preach what's right, that's just the idea behind it.

[Anonymous No.8123843]

>>8123831
It puts the word 'person' first, instead of qualifying the 'type' of person first. Also prevents dehumanising shortenings like 'coloureds' and 'schizos'.

[Anonymous No.8123855]

>>8123843
And with colored person, in the U.S., there are a shit ton of preconceived notions built up by history surrounding the term that unconsciously make you have a prejudice about someone, based on how they are linguistically presented to you.

[Anonymous No.8123969]

>>8108244
Reminds me a fuckton of how Wicca works, are you a witch anon?

[Anonymous No.8124004]

>>8123969
Actually, I started reading up on Wicca, so that may be where I got the idea! I took an interest in it from a friend who practices Wicca since lately I've been feeling spiritually lost, and from the way she described it, it really appealed to me, particularly the emphasis on having a relationship with nature and the natural balance of the good and the bad in life, and also how it can be really different based on the covens or individuals practicing. At least from what I've read.

[Anonymous No.8124255]

>>8123855
I just don't personally don't get why grouping everyone that's not white into one group seems like a good idea? Surely that erases different identities, why should there be one term for one race and one general term for so many different races?

[Anonymous No.8124269]

>>8124255
white isn't a race

[Anonymous No.8124368]

>>8123823
Oh wow, well alright I'll definitely keep my eye on em. Ill try to place a preorder if the preorder statuses still show up when my job pays me.

[Anonymous No.8124530]

>>8108183
apparently it's 'in' right now...?

[Anonymous No.8124537]

>>8124530
It looks like shit, I hate it.

[Anonymous No.8124542]

>>8123840
great selection of posts anon. This really spells out why someone would be (rightly) offended by being called a coloured person

[Anonymous No.8124587]

>>8124537
yeah I'm not a fan. pretty sure she's in Canada though so maybe it's cold? idk

[Anonymous No.8124695]

Now the thread has devolved into tumblrinas quabbling about how you can't be racist against white people lol

herewego

[Anonymous No.8124736]

>>8123655
"colored people" is exactly the same as "people of color" holy shit it's the same phrase in reverse why do people get so fucking buttmad?

[Anonymous No.8124811]

>>8124736
See
>>8123732
>>8123734
>>8123738
>>8123855
>>8123840

[Anonymous No.8125218]

>>8123747
>>8123716
>>8123711
>>8123701
>>8123697
>>8123660
>>8123659
>>8123657
>>8123655

And to us non-americans we're all like

[Anonymous No.8125622]

The new nerdy lolita group is seriously cringy.

>mfw expected intelligent discussion from nerdy lolis and I get ms toddler loli, fat weebs and no gender tumblrinas.

Just want to chat with like minded people who can dress themselves and not spurge all over me because we have a common fandom or hobby

[Anonymous No.8125649]

>>8115438
FUCKING FAERIEDRAGONET brb need to drink some bleach

[Anonymous No.8125663]

>>8123793
I'm pretty sure they were all joking

[Anonymous No.8125699]

>>8125218
I never knew that this was such a big deal in the US.

[Anonymous No.8125743]

>>8123532
What the fuck is so wrong about a specific section dedicated to helping a certain ethnicity finding wigs?
By that logic, all ethnic wig shops should be shut down, or is that "not racist" just because they're typically black or hispanic owned?


But hey, if these people are going to be playing ethics police then I guess they won't be buying their discount kawaii shit that comes from China from ebay or taobao anymore. Cause, y'know, bad employee treatment + no consideration for the environment.
(Actually no, this won't happen, because as long as things are in demand and cheap ethics can be conveniently overlooked).

[Anonymous No.8125763]

>>8125622
>tfw you don't even try to join because you know the type of people that refer to themselves as 'nerdy lolitas' are just obnoxious

Seriously, I like table top gaming, video games, and devouring books/wikipages as much as the next 'nerd' person, but when you try to smash that together with fashion, it gets a bit messy.

Now knitting/crochet, that could be a nice group for lolita. Nice and focused. Could exchange free patterns, share edits and intarsia patterns.

[Anonymous No.8125778]

>>8125743
>they're typically black or hispanic owned?
It's funny, because they're really not. Most BBSS are actually owned by Koreans. It's a sore spot for black women that want to support black businesses.

[Anonymous No.8125779]

>>8125778

Probably because black people are so shitty at running businesses.

[Anonymous No.8125799]

>>8125778
Well, those RACIST asians stealing business from the black woman!

[Anonymous No.8125962]

>>8123716
>I think she may have some form of autism.
What the fuck is that kid smoking?

[Anonymous No.8125989]

>>8125778

It's probably more of a sore spot for the same reason during the LA riots black people decided to target Korean shopkeepers.

And they say minorities can't be racist.

[Anonymous No.8125996]

>>8119505
More like no excuse for those trashy tattoos.

[Anonymous No.8126017]

>>8125763
I would love a knitting/crochet group for lolita.

[Anonymous No.8126019]

>>8125962
kek its matthew scarborough expert autist

[Anonymous No.8126020]

Oh man, this just popped up and there's so much nitpick. Since she didn't mention she's ok with critism. I'd change so much. Switch the bag for a black one, the gold shoes make no sense she should switch for black ones. Switch to black blouse too. Possibly change the headbow for a velveteen black one. Not sure about the white opaque tights either. She wears a gold necklace with silver rings, no just NO. She doesn't suit her wig hairstyle at all.

[Anonymous No.8126023]

>>8123782
No. No we're not. We're the majority in white countries, but globally we are the smallest minority unless you count groups like Jews.

[Anonymous No.8126043]

>>8126023
Well, considering this entire discussion is (as always) about Murrika...

[Anonymous No.8126128]

On RC
>Does anybody have any silly fears of doing something accidentally at a meetup?

Kinda cringed at pic related. Wearing pretty much the girliest fashion but refuse to wear bloomers because ~muh genderfluidity~ okay.

[Anonymous No.8126167]

>>8126128
How is not wearing panties even comfortable?
Assuming they are genetically female, what about the discharge, boxers don't have lining like panties do.
That's really fucking gross.

[Anonymous No.8126170]

>>8126128
That logic doesn't even make sense

[Anonymous No.8126176]

>>8126170
it just don't

[Anonymous No.8126191]

>>8126128
>>8126176
Someone needs to tell this girl nobody gives a fuck. Also unless it's super windy, she's jumping around, or her comm is full of midgets I can't fathom a situation where anybody could see lingerie underneath a petticoat "accidentally."

[Anonymous No.8126195]

>>8126191
>>8126176
>>8126128
I wish I could tell her how even if 'genderfluidity' were a thing that clothing has nothing to do with it.

[Anonymous No.8126205]

>>8124530
>>8124537
There's this thing called winter, where sometimes you compromise aesthetics for this thing called warmth.

[Anonymous No.8126208]

>>8126205
No, you wear only thick tights, there's no reason to wear socks too. Also, you retard, if you even bothered to look at the OP pic, she's wearing paper thin tights and ankle socks, neither of which are suited for winter alone, nor together. So fuck off.

[Anonymous No.8126209]

>>8126205
Or you wear fleece lined tights.

I've seen people wear socks over tights when it's warm out.

[Anonymous No.8126211]

>>8125699
Look up "Jim Crow laws" and it will make more sense why it is.

[Anonymous No.8126215]

>>8126208
No, you fuck off. I'm just explaining why it is seen more often lately. It's not that it's "in" as >>8124530 posited. I'm not talking about OP pic specifically but in general. Nor did I say it looked good or was the only option. Do you need a nap.

[Anonymous No.8126230]

>>8126176
>>8126128
typical tumblr "gender roles are bullshit fuck gender roles except for clothes theyre a perfect indicator of gender" retardation

[Anonymous No.8126244]

>>8126128
Yes so much.

[Anonymous No.8126335]

Why won't they add me to CoF? ;_;

[Anonymous No.8126382]

>>8126335
Do you have any friends in it already? I can approve my friends normally.

[Anonymous No.8126446]

>>8126382
No. My facebook has no friends and I only use it for groups/promotions.

[Anonymous No.8126453]

>>8126446
That's probably why youre not getting accepted it looks sketchy

[Anonymous No.8126464]

>>8126453
I deleted my old, real facebook and I just want to read stuff from there on my newsfeed. :/
I can't just go adding friends.

[Anonymous No.8126471]

>>8126464
I mean... ok? but you asked why they wont add you to CoF, that is why.

[Anonymous No.8126483]

>>8126471
Yeah. Thanks for letting me know.

[Anonymous No.8126798]

>>8126483
Have someone here add you as a friend.

[Anonymous No.8126959]

>>8126798
If someone is willing, I can email them my profile and they could add me. We could be friends too, for real if they wanted.

[[e-mail] No.8127009]

>>8126959
yo i'll help you out

[Anonymous No.8127263]

>>8127009
Emailed. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.8127452]

I don't know what to think.

[Anonymous No.8128511]

>>8127452
why am i not surprised that the tumblrina has more likes

[Anonymous No.8128520]

>>8127452
>"genderfluid"
>ugly woman

every time

[Anonymous No.8129343]

>>8128520
I've met two people that identify as genderfluid that were also attractively androgynous, but they are definitely the exception. Overweight tumblrinas seem to be the norm, unfortunately.