[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   
File: 30 KB, 300x400, UGLY META.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086117 No.8086117 [Reply] [Original]

A thread committed to all the ugly brand dresses. Please try not to fight though.

>> No.8086147

ITT: Meta dresses

/thread

>> No.8086151

>>8086147
Hard mode, no Indie. Revengence mode, no Meta.

>> No.8086152

>>8086147
You beat me to it, anon.

>> No.8086165
File: 46 KB, 250x333, tipsminitophat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086165

Damn, I wanted to post Maxicimam, but there is some really cute stuff there now. I've always thought that Maxicimam was like that one girl who was forever stuck in her ita phase. She tries, but never gets it right.

Anyway, here's a cross post from wtf_burando. I'm surprised that people still post there.

>> No.8086217

>>8086117
I like pop swinger... in different cuts.

>> No.8086233
File: 42 KB, 240x320, 2536544988_66a99d2b16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086233

Frosting Disaster

>> No.8086243

>>8086217
Me too, anon...Me too ;_;

>> No.8086249

>>8086233
Frosting? It's a cute idea, but poor execution. Maybe with some accordion pleats so it both looks more like frosting and also is able to maintain more structure so it doesn't look like deflating, flaccid puffs.

>> No.8086252
File: 141 KB, 480x640, img60356405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086252

>>8086165
I dunno, some of the stuff on their Rakuten begs to differ...

>> No.8086274

>>8086249
It's not meant to look like frosting.

>> No.8086277

>>8086252
haha, classic Maxicimam

>> No.8086284
File: 109 KB, 480x640, B39HC311-w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086284

no thank you Baby

>> No.8086433
File: 44 KB, 232x313, baby why.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086433

>>8086284
Holy shit what even is that thing

>> No.8086495
File: 18 KB, 250x333, 60613_600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086495

This one makes me cringe every time.

>> No.8086504

>>8086233
I have a Baby dress with puff trim like this and they're like...crinkly like there's plastic in them or something. Very bizarre. It's like I have a dress trimmed with cat toys.

>> No.8086509
File: 38 KB, 333x250, 0002q1st.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086509

>>8086495
The skirt's even worse.

>> No.8086510
File: 20 KB, 236x314, 49ee4ef4a3331142f25a98879ad3dfdf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086510

>> No.8086511

>>8086495
It's honestly just the colorway that takes this from cute to shit for me. But I always hate black x pink. I'm sure someone could pull it off.

>> No.8086517

>>8086510
>implying this is bad
Stop anon, just stop

>> No.8086526

>>8086510
I can see how one wouldn't like this dress. It's really busy looking. But a girl in my comm has this dress, and it looks amazing when worn.

>> No.8086532
File: 18 KB, 240x320, 125744bw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086532

>> No.8086563

>>8086510
I think I remember seeing this in person. It was pretty lovely. Though, the stock pic doesn't really do it justice.

>> No.8086573

>>8086510
I adore this dress. Don't diss it.

>> No.8086583
File: 947 KB, 1200x1832, SCAN0219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086583

>>8086532
meh, that one is just old school. Not terrible.

now this is a classic!

>> No.8086610
File: 43 KB, 350x467, dn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086610

Does Dangerous Nude count?

>> No.8086617
File: 563 KB, 245x225, honeyno.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086617

>>8086583
tfw dress on bottom left used to be your ultimate dream dress... Except you wanted the black parts to be made of ruffled lace too...

>> No.8086672

>>8086532
Is that crushed velvet?

>> No.8086677

>>8086672
I think so?

>> No.8086685
File: 121 KB, 255x333, Screen Shot 2015-01-29 at 12.23.19 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086685

>>8086672
Here you go, Anon. It's definitely crushed velvet. Same Baby dress different colorway.

>> No.8086711
File: 41 KB, 500x667, 129942_original_original[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086711

>>8086151
>no Indie
I lose.

>> No.8086800

>>8086495
Actually really like this minus the topmost black bow. Skirt makes no sense on its own, however

>> No.8086804

>>8086510
Bastard child of the picnic blanket dress and Angel of Music

>> No.8086822
File: 416 KB, 500x667, idontknowwhatimdoing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8086822

>>8086711

>> No.8086922

>>8086711
But that's really cute tho ya cunt.

>> No.8086933

>>8086433
I like it... except for the strange sheer underskirt bit.

>> No.8086941

>>8086822
Is this the one that had a weirdly long torso? If so does anyone have the pic of the girl wearing the most fucked up one and it's like down to her knees?

>> No.8086976

>>8086147
You shut yout whore mouth.

>> No.8087017

>>8086822
I bought this off the model at PMX last year, so I was fortunate to know the torso didn't go down to my ass, but holy shit that's a terrible picture of it, it's really pretty in person. The legwear and shoes on this are ugly as fuck tho.

>> No.8087025

>>8087017
>thinks little prince is pretty
>thinks the shoes and tights, which are the only good thing in the pic are ugly

kay.

>> No.8087026

>>8087025
The shoes don't go with it at all matey.

>> No.8087029

>>8087026
the shoes nor the tights go with the fugly dress, but that's the dresses fault not the shoes. the shoes and tights go together well though.

>> No.8087042

>>8087026
Arrrgh, you've blasted me last timbers into the nigh imposs'ble darrrkness that is daaaaavy jones lockaaar.

>> No.8087254
File: 6 KB, 250x166, 1396596572021s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8087254

>>8086495
>>8086510
I like those.

>> No.8087326

>>8086151
For me, meta was removed from the brand category when they started to advertise raschel lace items.

>> No.8087393

>>8087017
Yeah from the shop stock image I thought it looked alright at first but then the model's image was just like "wait a minute what's going on here"

I agree the stockings in the set are ugly though. The colors look terrible and there's too many stars sprinkled all over them, paired with the dress there's too much shit going on.

>> No.8087659

>>8087326
BTSSB has raschel lace items.

>> No.8087663

>>8087326
This just makes you sound like someone who got into lolita yesterday and has memorized the handbook on LJ.

>> No.8087723

>>8087326
lol They've had those since 2003 fuck off.

>> No.8087725

>>8087326

There's a difference between Meta raschel and most raschels though. I have a Meta dress that the trim is raschel and it's soft and doesn't look shiny or cheap. I agree it's not the best looking lace to pick of all the laces out there, but raschel doesn't make something "not lolita."

>> No.8087731
File: 120 KB, 480x640, P11JS202-09-480x640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8087731

>> No.8087740
File: 226 KB, 421x573, lo7ki6u5j4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8087740

>> No.8087743
File: 70 KB, 480x640, 9o78op79p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8087743

>> No.8087757

>>8087743
Looks better in person.

>> No.8087791

>>8087743
I like this one, the middle tier just looks like it's iridescent and can't photograph well.

>> No.8087796

>>8086433
A cry for help

>> No.8087802

>>8086583
It looks so itchy

>> No.8087815

>>8087743
Believe me, it's a lot better in person. I have the black and the white ones; it's that pretty.

>>8087791
It's the jacquard's reflecting that's definitely throwing it off. It's much more muted in person if btssb used the same jacquard for all the colorways.

>> No.8087958

>>8087743
This dress is really pretty to me. I've never seen it before now, though. Anyone know the name of it?

>> No.8087978

>>8087326
okay ifwinterends

>> No.8088154

>>8086117
I love that damn dress, but then again, kitsch always gets me in the worst way.

>> No.8088168
File: 200 KB, 302x353, badmetabad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8088168

When you think Meta can't get much worse, they release this sparkly nightmare. I've had nice, pretty raschel on Meta dresses before, but this shit just looks shiny, itchy, and gross.

>> No.8088868

>>8087393
I actually like all the items separately. But together it just looks like a pile of starry shit. Putting the dress with solid colored tights, bolero, etc, really opens it up.

>> No.8090675

>>8086147
Well said, anon. Well said.

>> No.8090929
File: 375 KB, 679x1031, 262246-6312-2015-01-17436214.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8090929

>>8086822
Not as bad as this ugly mo-fo.

>> No.8090972

>>8090929
I think if the lines on the unicorns were just a tad darker or at least the surrounding area was a bit darker it'd be prettier since you could actually see the unicorn. I need her in my life

>> No.8091504

>>8086922
please love yourself

>> No.8091650

>>8086495
Honestly I think this is one of the most tame things posted itt.

>>8086284
>>8086510
These look like Baby's solution to having extra scraps of fabric lying around.

>>8086822
The legwear and shoes REALLY did not help selling this dress. I feel like there are cuter coordinates, somewhere.

>>8087743
This looks alright.

>>8090929
It's cute in a fairy kei sort of way.

>> No.8092024
File: 107 KB, 480x640, B38JS235-b1-480x640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8092024

>> No.8093221
File: 83 KB, 480x640, babywhy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8093221

These are so bad oh my god.

>> No.8093566
File: 1.84 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8093566

>>8087958
It's lady of the camellias. I own it in ivory
>tfw this is my wedding dress.